toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

1 participants
13523 discussions

vFilers: "dr configure" to tape and other oddities
by Hill, Aaron 03 Mar '04

03 Mar '04

Ladies and Gentlemen, may I borrow your filer talents for a moment? I am trying to figure out how to do a "vfiler dr configure" to tape. i.e. Setup the mirrored DR vFilers by doing the initial snapmirror to tape. NOTE: This is distinctly different to snapmirroring a volume to tape. At the moment, I cannot see how it can be done using the standard Multistore DR configuration methodology and command set. Is it possible to snapmirror to tape as per normal, restore the tape to the DR "physical" filer volumes and then do the "vfiler dr configure". In this way I have completed the snapmirror portion of the vfiler dr configuration whilst the standard method takes care of the rest. The major obstacle I can see here is that the source qtree names cannot pre-exist on the target volumes. If network-initialization is the only option, can I throttle the initial snapmirror transfer kicked off by the "vfiler dr configure" command? i.e. Will there be volume or qtree entries in the /etc/snapmirror.conf of the physical filer that I can edit with the -k/kb throttling option? Will this option allow me to significantly reduce the snapmirror WAN traffic whilst initializing the DR vfiler(s)? Can I # (hash) out some of the volumes so that only 1 or 2 actively transfer across the line? All designs will be welcomed and considered carefully. Thanks, Aaron ************** IMPORTANT MESSAGE ************** This e-mail message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains information which may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please advise the sender by return email, do not use or disclose the contents, and delete the message and any attachments from your system. Unless specifically indicated, this email does not constitute formal advice or commitment by the sender or the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ABN 48 123 123 124) or its subsidiaries. **************************************************

1 0

j'ai besoin de votre aide
by Soko Gambo 02 Mar '04

02 Mar '04

Gambo Soko 13, rue du Docteur Blanchard Zone 4 A Treichville, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire R.C.I +225 0769 9766 Bonjour, Permettez -moi de vous informer de mon desir de cooperer avec vous. Je me nomme Gambo Soko, 20 ans, fils de feu Colonnel Fabien Solomon, sauvagement assassine lors du coup d'etat du 19 septembre en Cote d' Ivoire .Retenez pour vous que mon pere etait jusqu'a sa mort Aide de camp du General Robert Guei ex President de la Republique de Côte d'Ivoire qui fut egalement assassine ce meme jour par la milice de l'actuel President Laurent Gbagbo.Après la mort de mon père , ma mère detenait une Attestation de solde secrète et sécurisée en mon nom ici dans une banque d'une valeur de 5,1millions en Euros. Et ma mère ne pouvant plus supporter le decès de mon père mourrut 4 mois plus tard des suites d'une hypertension arterielle .Ainsi au chevet de son lit de malade, elle me remit tous les documents justifiant la présence de ce compte et prouvant de par là meme que j'en suis le proprietaire attitré et elle me conseilla sagement de me faire aider d'une personne sage et honnête afin d' ouvrir un compte fiable à l'etranger selon les recommandations de feu mon père, dans lequel ces fonds doivent etre transferés.Je vous rapelle que je suis de l'ethnie dioula,donc ressortissant nordiste de notre pays et que nous sommes pourchassés ici parce que considerés comme instigateurs de cette guerre. Ici, la situation socio-politique est atroce. Je me suis donc rendu à la banque avec les informations de ce compte en ma possession et la banque me demande de leur fournir le compte à l'etranger et certains renseignements nécessaires de ce compte qui recevra l'argent afin que le transfert puisse se faire rapidement . Votre assistance consistera à m'aider à transferer l'argent de mon defunt pere qui va servir dès mon arrivee chez vous à investir sous votre surveillance et protection,et aussi pour que je puisse aller dans une bonne ecole pour les sports et etudes.Dès la réception de cet argent, je viendrai vous rejoindre pour me servir de parent, je vous propose une forte somme d'argent en guise de remerciements pour votre assistance, doublé d'une part sur tous les revenus des investissements auxquels cet argent va servir et que vous allez m'aider à monter et à gérer. S'il vous plait, veuillez garder tout cela secret et confidentiel à cause des problèmes socio-politiques que nous vivons en ce moment .Mon père a été assassiné et "DES ESCADRONS DE LA MORT" en veulent terriblement a ma vie. Je compte sur votre bonne foi et votre honnêteté et me confie en vous, pour que cet argent soit transferé au plus tôt pour que je quiite ce pays où je me trouve en danger et mon souffle suspendu en permanence .Contactez moi s'il vous plait dès reception de ce message par email ou par téléphone urgemment. NB/ Je me cache ce moment dans un hotel de la place pour des raisons securitaires et pour fuire des menaces perpetuelles dont je suis victimes,s'il vous plait tout ceci doit rester secret et confidentiel car ma vie en depend. Merci pour votre aide. Gambo -------------------------------------------------- What\'s your MailBox address? - http://mailbox.hu

1 0

snap list output --- how do I work out the size of an individual snapshot ?...
by Munn, Stuart SITI-ITDIEES 02 Mar '04

02 Mar '04

Hope you can help... I've read TIP 218 on the now.netapp web site... But it is not very clear on how the %used column is calculated. When it says the calculation is carried out like below this snapshop ------------------- x 100 Total disk space in the system Is the "Total disk space in the system" the 1) Total disk space in the volume(inc snapshot reserve)... or 2) total disk space in the snapshot reserve ... or 3) total disk space in the volume after snapshot reserve is taken ! I think this is a VERY counter intuitive method of displaying space used .... Thanks Stuart Munn

2 1

Testing toasters list - please ignore/delete
by Kevin Davis 02 Mar '04

02 Mar '04

Sorry for the noise, everyone. Regards, ________________________________________________ Kevin Davis The MathWorks 508.647.7660 Natick, MA 01760 http://www.mathworks.com UNIX Administrator ________________________________________________

1 0

NASDAQ TIMER - New Trading Range For TRHL, Tue, 02 Mar 2004 10:00:30 -0500
by Jaclyn Talbot 02 Mar '04

02 Mar '04

Tue, 02 Mar 2004 10:00:30 -0500 MARKET-TORQUE - The European Unions Premier U.S. NASDAQ Timer...Dateline 3-02-04 New trading range (as of 3/02/04): Target-- 1.74 - True Health. Inc. (OTCBB: TRHL) Monday, after the close, the Moving Average Convergence/Divergence (MACD) Oscillator rose above its signal line indicating a trend reversal. Never before in this stocks history have the lines crossed this early. This means a huge reversal and strong up-trend. The stock is now headed upward. This time it indicates 1.74. This is exactly what happened in late November, three months ago when the stock ran from 0.69 to 1.48 in less than a month. The stock is in position for a higher high and a higher low. The volume is very high. Also, TRHL just started again an unusual trading pattern. Large blocks of shares are being bought. Is this because the earnings are due shortly? Read on. EARNINGS REPORT New financials are due out very soon (looking for two weeks) - the stock has started to climb back toward its recent high. TRHL has had seven consecutive quarters of revenue growth. Last quarter, revenues were up 385% and 329% for the three and nine month periods, respectively. The July 31, 2003 quarter revenues were up 412%. But this is what we are looking at. Back in November TRHL started moving up approximately two weeks before its quarterly financial report. We are now approximately two weeks away from its next report, and according to the MACD Oscillator the stock has just started back on an up-trend. If you get in now, theres a chance of 100 percent profit in less than a month. True Health did not distribute this report and has no knowledge of its distribution. A third party analyst, who was not retained by the company, distributed it. This report was sent for information purposes only. Disclosure: Market-Torque (M-T) is not a registered financial advisory. The information presented by M-T is not for purchasing or selling securities. M-T compiles then distributes opinions, comments and information based on other public sources. Penny stocks are considered to be highly speculative and may be unsuitable for all but very aggressive investors. M-T does not hold nor does it plan to hold a position in this stock. This Profile was a paid advertisement by a third party not affiliated with the profiled company. M-T was compensated four thousand dollars to publish and distribute this report. Paid advertisements for a third party do not necessarily reflect the views of M-T. Target prices may fluctuate depending on market environments. Please always consult a registered financial advisor before making any decisions. This report is for entertainment and advertising purposes only and should not be used as investment advice. Copyright 2004, Roytico Ltd. This report distributed by MMS. Apartado 173-3006 Zona Franca MeoBarreal Heredia, Costa Rica. No more ads: simply reply to this email. jacket aide chorale uphold airlift diaphragm smith goliath draftsman toiletry onset elsevier mustachio bloodstream foliage busboy fidget captor abhorred oxonian arm debility tiny denigrate spot recappable coddington panjandrum mendelevium pedestal trolley algorithm flop christmas leftmost cataclysm dinnertime airspeed freshwater crump creedal sorry clausen weep slav industrialism u.s.a fusible moreland crosswise

1 0

Re: F760 question - two volume, one mount point
by Stephane Bentebba 02 Mar '04

02 Mar '04

you are right : ) in theory, widelinks could be greatly used to transparently make a user mount /vol/vol0/a_dir to /vol/vol1/another_dir but - widelinks is resered for cifs - and there is some problem to make them work as the documentation explain it I only succed in with using the /etc/symlink.translation file also, some related bug has been corrected in earlier version, so one should keep in mind widelinks are not always working great and should open a case with Netapp in order to make them work the way you want Carolyn S. Chambers wrote: >What about wide symbolic links? > >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] >On Behalf Of Stephane Bentebba >Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 3:36 AM >Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com >Subject: Re: F760 question - two volume, one mount point > > > > > >> If we have hit a filesystem size, then we'll probable have to >>create a new volume (which we'd prefer not to do). However, if we do >>have to do this, any suggestions on how to make the new volume appear >>to simply look like part of the other exported filesystem? >> >> > >I think latest Ontapp version propose the possibility to "map" mount >point with some syntax like this : > > exportfs -o actual=/vol/vfilers/vf19,rw=pets,root=workers \\ > /vol/vol9/vf19 > >check here the man page of the export : >http://now.netapp.com/AskNOW/highlight_html.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnow.net >app.com%2FNOW%2Fknowledge%2Fdocs%2Fontap%2Frel65%2Fhtml%2Fontap%2Fcmdref >%2Fman1%2Fna_exportfs.1.html&sentenceId=7702847&titleIds=7702834#sect3 > >unfortunately, this mechanism permit you to redirect a mount point like >filer:/vol/vol0/a_dir to filer:/vol/vol1/same_dir but can't permit you >to extend filer:/vol/vol0/this_dir to filer:/vol/vol0/that_dir > >furthurmore, this is for nfs, i am not sure it is available for cifs > >bye > > > > > > >

1 0

Re: Cluster failover question
by Davin Milun 28 Feb '04

28 Feb '04

At 15:20, on Feb 25, 2004, jeff.mery(a)ni.com wrote: > We've also done rolling upgrades of DOT as mentioned below on our old F760 > cluster. Upgrade one head, fail over, reboot that head, giveback, upgrade > the other head, fail over, reboot the second head, and giveback. The > first head will complain that it's not at the same DOT level as its > partner, but we've never had a problem with data integrity. This also > only happens for a short period between the first giveback and the second > failover. I don't know if this is supported or not so as always, test if > you can. > > One note, we've never done this for major version upgrades (i.e. 5.x to > 6.x) this way. IIRC we've only done minor version upgrades this way (i.e. > 6.4.1 to 6.4.2 or 6.4.1P2 to 6.4.2). > > Jeff Does this work? Is it safe? We've always been told fairly explicitly by NetApp that this will not work. And have never tried it, for risk of ending up in an unstable or inconsistent state. I've always wished that I could do this - because with many other devices, this is a standard method of using a clustered-pair of devices to avoid a downtime, while doing an OS upgrade. But NetApp has never supported it. Davin. -- Davin Milun E-mail: milun(a)cse.Buffalo.EDU

2 1

RE: F760 question
by Reinoud Reynders 28 Feb '04

28 Feb '04

The max volume size of a F760 is 2 TB. So you must create at least 2 volumes. Best regards, Reinoud Reynders University Hospital Leuven Belgium -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Scott Baker [mailto:buyandsell2k5@yahoo.com] Verzonden: za 28/02/2004 4:17 Aan: toasters(a)mathworks.com CC: Onderwerp: F760 question I was hoping to find an answer in the archives, but no luck. We've picked up a NetApp F760 and have had no problems with the system. Recently we've tried adding more disks to the system, but seem to be hitting a limit. The config looks like 14x72GB disks (FC9 BCS) 14x144GB disks (DS14) This takes us to the maximum of the F760, 3TB, but we can only seem to add 14x72GB disks (1 72GB for spare, 2 RAID groups) 8x144GB disks (1 144GB for spare, 1 RAID group) These disks are all in one volume, /vol/vol0, but we can't seem to add any of the additional 5 144GB disks to the volume. When we try to add the disks the system tells us it can't do this. From what I've read we should simply need to indicate how many disks we want to add to the volume (ie 5) and it should create a new RAID group if needed. In this case our RAIDGROUP size is set to 8, so it should create the new RAIDGROUP. But this isn't happening. We're running DoT 6.4R1. Have we hit the maximum filesystem size for the F760? I'm not sure what the limit is. We're well within the 56 disks/loop limit. Any help would be appreciated. If we have hit a filesystem size, then we'll probable have to create a new volume (which we'd prefer not to do). However, if we do have to do this, any suggestions on how to make the new volume appear to simply look like part of the other exported filesystem? Cheers, SMB _____ Do you Yahoo!? Get better spam protection with Yahoo! Mail <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mailtag_us/*http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools>

1 0

RV: CPU workload increase after upgrade
by Carlos Alvarez 27 Feb '04

27 Feb '04

-----Mensaje original----- De: Carlos Alvarez [mailto:carlosa@ddmsa.com] Enviado el: Viernes, 27 de Febrero de 2004 10:35 a.m. Para: 'Jack Lyons' Asunto: RE: CPU workload increase after upgrade I have 18GB ZCS in F740 so, does this feature count? if it so could I disable? Thanks -----Mensaje original----- De: Jack Lyons [mailto:jack.lyons@martinagency.com] Enviado el: Viernes, 27 de Febrero de 2004 10:13 a.m. Para: 'Carlos A. Alvarez' Asunto: RE: CPU workload increase after upgrade I think by default with 6.x and above block checksums are enabled by default where as before 6.x they were not. That might account for the increase. Jack -----Original Message----- From: Carlos A. Alvarez [mailto:carlosa@ddmsa.com] Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 7:59 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: CPU workload increase after upgrade Hi All, I recently upgrade a F740 from 5.3.4 to 6.4.1 without problems except that the CPU workload increase 10 % with the same traffic. Is this performace correct? Are new releases more CPU intensive than olders? Any comment would be apreciated. Thanks This email and its contents may be confidential. If it is and you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you.

3 3

CPU workload increase after upgrade
by Carlos A. Alvarez 27 Feb '04

27 Feb '04

Hi All, I recently upgrade a F740 from 5.3.4 to 6.4.1 without problems except that the CPU workload increase 10 % with the same traffic. Is this performace correct? Are new releases more CPU intensive than olders? Any comment would be apreciated. Thanks

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters