toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13514 discussions

CPU workload increase after upgrade
by Carlos A. Alvarez 27 Feb '04

27 Feb '04

Hi All, I recently upgrade a F740 from 5.3.4 to 6.4.1 without problems except that the CPU workload increase 10 % with the same traffic. Is this performace correct? Are new releases more CPU intensive than olders? Any comment would be apreciated. Thanks

2 1

RE: rsh on NetCache 5.6
by Heal, Kenneth 26 Feb '04

26 Feb '04

Hi There is an RFE (Request for Enhancement) to allow you to use the /etc/hosts.equiv for this in a similar way to what is possible on the filer; it is not currently scheduled. The RFE number is 73672. It might be worth contacting Sales to push to get this implemented. Best regards Kenneth Heal -----Original Message----- From: Kerry Herschel [mailto:margaret.k.herschel@jpl.nasa.gov] Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 8:15 PM To: Armstrong, Larry Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: rsh on NetCache 5.6 Thanks Larry. It looks like I have to use the root password: -l root:password when I rsh. I don't have to with DOT and I'm not sure why I have to with NetcCache 5.6. I don't want to have a password in clear text go out on our network. But it looks like you don't have to use the password. Is that correct? Thanks, Kerry At 2/26/2004 10:57 AM, Larry Armstrong wrote: >Howdy Kerry! > >I'm not sure if it's obvious in the docs, but it should be supported. > >$ rsh C3100 -lroot version >NetApp Release 5.6: Wed Jan 14 16:20:46 PST 2004 > >---larry >:) >_ >* Kerry Herschel (margaret.k.herschel(a)jpl.nasa.gov) done spit this rhetoric: > > Hi, > > > > I haven't found any documentation for rsh on Netcache 5.6. Does anyone > know > > if it is supported? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Kerry > > > > ================================================================ > > Margaret.K.Herschel(a)jpl.nasa.gov > > JPL Information Services > > Jet Propulsion Laboratory > > Phone 818.354.1111 > > > > DISCLAIMER: The personal and professional opinions presented herein > > are my own and do not, in any way, represent the opinion or policy of > > JPL. > > > > > > > >-- >Larry Armstrong ><surfer(a)netapp.com> > >"This space intentionally left blank" >------------------------------------------------------- ================================================================ Margaret.K.Herschel(a)jpl.nasa.gov JPL Information Services Jet Propulsion Laboratory Phone 818.354.1111 DISCLAIMER: The personal and professional opinions presented herein are my own and do not, in any way, represent the opinion or policy of JPL.

1 0

rsh on NetCache 5.6
by Kerry Herschel 26 Feb '04

26 Feb '04

Hi, I haven't found any documentation for rsh on Netcache 5.6. Does anyone know if it is supported? Thanks, Kerry ================================================================ Margaret.K.Herschel(a)jpl.nasa.gov JPL Information Services Jet Propulsion Laboratory Phone 818.354.1111 DISCLAIMER: The personal and professional opinions presented herein are my own and do not, in any way, represent the opinion or policy of JPL.

2 3

RE: Oracle on CIFS?
by Jeff Asher 26 Feb '04

26 Feb '04

You will probably also want to modify the host registry so that the Oracle services are dependant on and start after the lanmanworkstation service. Without those edits the oracle services may fail to start on reboot because they can't access the remote shares. Jeff Asher ________________________________ From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Yarmas, Tom Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 10:39 AM To: Dirk Seidel; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Oracle on CIFS? Biggest issue with CIFS and database is stateful nature of the CIFS protocol and "robustness" (is that a word?) of the re-director on Windows. What this means is that if the re-director gets overwhelmed (can happen, but you may never see it) the CIFS connection will be lost then re-established, but the Oracle Service will crash. Usually not a big problem, but you do need to manually re-start it. Also, be aware that when using UNC pathnames or drive letter access to CIFS shares with Oracle (the former is the best way to go) the Oracle Services must be set to run as a domain user, not a local machine account. So this complicates the process of creating new databases since the service will be started, but must be stopped and modified to use a different log in - one that has domain access to the Filer shares and has the "Run as a service" priviledge. This usually means that you cannot use the Oracle database assistant to create the databases directly. You can use the database assistant to create the scripts to create the databases, but you must create the service, make the mods to the service, then create the database (using the scripts created by the database assistant). -tom -----Original Message----- From: Dirk Seidel [mailto:dirk@seidel-pb.de] Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 6:42 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Oracle on CIFS? Hi out there, has any one experiences with running oracle on a Windows Server on CIFS? You don't find many documents about it on the Netapps Site. All the whitepapers concerning Windows and Oracle are about SAN. What are the pros / cons and limitations of running Oracle on a CIFS Share? Thank You! Dirk

1 0

RE: Oracle on CIFS?
by Yarmas, Tom 26 Feb '04

26 Feb '04

Biggest issue with CIFS and database is stateful nature of the CIFS protocol and "robustness" (is that a word?) of the re-director on Windows. What this means is that if the re-director gets overwhelmed (can happen, but you may never see it) the CIFS connection will be lost then re-established, but the Oracle Service will crash. Usually not a big problem, but you do need to manually re-start it. Also, be aware that when using UNC pathnames or drive letter access to CIFS shares with Oracle (the former is the best way to go) the Oracle Services must be set to run as a domain user, not a local machine account. So this complicates the process of creating new databases since the service will be started, but must be stopped and modified to use a different log in - one that has domain access to the Filer shares and has the "Run as a service" priviledge. This usually means that you cannot use the Oracle database assistant to create the databases directly. You can use the database assistant to create the scripts to create the databases, but you must create the service, make the mods to the service, then create the database (using the scripts created by the database assistant). -tom -----Original Message----- From: Dirk Seidel [mailto:dirk@seidel-pb.de] Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 6:42 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Oracle on CIFS? Hi out there, has any one experiences with running oracle on a Windows Server on CIFS? You don't find many documents about it on the Netapps Site. All the whitepapers concerning Windows and Oracle are about SAN. What are the pros / cons and limitations of running Oracle on a CIFS Share? Thank You! Dirk

1 0

MX records.
by Jerry 26 Feb '04

26 Feb '04

doh. Bug 104202 already exists. I would tend to think it's more than a level 5 "suggestion", but as long as it's logged I suppose. Jerry __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want. http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools

2 3

RE: Oracle on CIFS?
by Borders, Rich 26 Feb '04

26 Feb '04

Don't get me wrong. ISCSI is great, and I have have outstanding success with it. I will say that ISCSI is a protocol like CIFS so the Application may need a dependency on it should you have spanning tree on your Switch ( ~30 second network negotiation prior to port activation. If you are not needing it, then portfast enable off that option and then the port will be online asap. As for the ISCSI driver, as long as the NIC is online quickly, we rarely see any issues with the Oracle services in the same light as you mention the CIFS. Good luck with it, and you can ask more specifics off list if you like. Richard D Borders _____ From: Stephane Bentebba [mailto:stephane.bentebba@fps.fr] Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 4:45 PM Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: Oracle on CIFS? I think iSCSI has the specific following advantage : as the lun on the Filer is saw like a local drive, the Oracle service can start to work with earlier in the boot process of the Windows machine Oracle doesn't have to wait for the network and mapped drive to be up to work with these data this way you can move more Oracle data on the Filer (except the registry entry, all Oracle files can be migrated there - binaries, conf, redo log, datafiles etc...). This way, the Desaster Recovery procedure becomes much simplier. I am not sure 100% so tell me if I am wrong. Borders, Rich wrote: Keep in mind the space limitations of LUN's. I am just reminding the list. As performance goes, I would suggest getting a baseline on Cifs and see the difference on ISCSI. It can be drastic at the protocol, but the Filer needs to be ready for the performance internals. It can be a LOT of net traffic when you actually open up the GigE's for top performance. Rich _____ From: Victor Olsen [mailto:victor.olsen@proact.no] Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 12:47 PM To: 'Dirk Seidel'; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Oracle on CIFS? We have a customer running 2 x 8.1.7 and 2 x 9.x oracle databases on a F820. In addition they are running 1 x informix, 1 x MSSQL2K and 1 x domino database on the same filer. No problem at all. Oracle supports UNC path for filenames, so you don't even have to map the drive. The customer has never complained about performance. If you don't like UNCpaths, you probable should consider iSCSI. You will get a drive that windows treats like a local drive and performance might be a bit higher. Victor -----Original Message----- From: Dirk Seidel [mailto:dirk@seidel-pb.de] Sent: 26. februar 2004 00:42 To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Oracle on CIFS? Hi out there, has any one experiences with running oracle on a Windows Server on CIFS? You don't find many documents about it on the Netapps Site. All the whitepapers concerning Windows and Oracle are about SAN. What are the pros / cons and limitations of running Oracle on a CIFS Share? Thank You! Dirk

1 0

RE: Oracle on CIFS?
by Borders, Rich 26 Feb '04

26 Feb '04

Keep in mind the space limitations of LUN's. I am just reminding the list. As performance goes, I would suggest getting a baseline on Cifs and see the difference on ISCSI. It can be drastic at the protocol, but the Filer needs to be ready for the performance internals. It can be a LOT of net traffic when you actually open up the GigE's for top performance. Rich _____ From: Victor Olsen [mailto:victor.olsen@proact.no] Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 12:47 PM To: 'Dirk Seidel'; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Oracle on CIFS? We have a customer running 2 x 8.1.7 and 2 x 9.x oracle databases on a F820. In addition they are running 1 x informix, 1 x MSSQL2K and 1 x domino database on the same filer. No problem at all. Oracle supports UNC path for filenames, so you don't even have to map the drive. The customer has never complained about performance. If you don't like UNCpaths, you probable should consider iSCSI. You will get a drive that windows treats like a local drive and performance might be a bit higher. Victor -----Original Message----- From: Dirk Seidel [mailto:dirk@seidel-pb.de] Sent: 26. februar 2004 00:42 To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Oracle on CIFS? Hi out there, has any one experiences with running oracle on a Windows Server on CIFS? You don't find many documents about it on the Netapps Site. All the whitepapers concerning Windows and Oracle are about SAN. What are the pros / cons and limitations of running Oracle on a CIFS Share? Thank You! Dirk

2 1

RE: Oracle on CIFS?
by Victor Olsen 26 Feb '04

26 Feb '04

We have a customer running 2 x 8.1.7 and 2 x 9.x oracle databases on a F820. In addition they are running 1 x informix, 1 x MSSQL2K and 1 x domino database on the same filer. No problem at all. Oracle supports UNC path for filenames, so you don't even have to map the drive. The customer has never complained about performance. If you don't like UNCpaths, you probable should consider iSCSI. You will get a drive that windows treats like a local drive and performance might be a bit higher. Victor -----Original Message----- From: Dirk Seidel [mailto:dirk@seidel-pb.de] Sent: 26. februar 2004 00:42 To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Oracle on CIFS? Hi out there, has any one experiences with running oracle on a Windows Server on CIFS? You don't find many documents about it on the Netapps Site. All the whitepapers concerning Windows and Oracle are about SAN. What are the pros / cons and limitations of running Oracle on a CIFS Share? Thank You! Dirk

1 0

RE: moving disks between 720s
by Victor Olsen 26 Feb '04

26 Feb '04

disk zero spares is new in ONTAP 6.5 Victor -----Original Message----- From: Strange, Steve [mailto:Steve.Strange@netapp.com] Sent: 25. februar 2004 20:42 To: Stephane Bentebba Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: moving disks between 720s Many recent versions of ONTAP also provide a regular command for this: > disk zero spares Steve -----Original Message----- From: Stephane Bentebba [mailto:stephane.bentebba@fps.fr] Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 6:40 AM Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: moving disks between 720s also : priv set diag spares_zero and that's all Jeff Burton wrote: > The below will also zero out all disks that are not part of a volume: > filer> priv set diag > filer*> setflag raid_enable_prezeroing 1 > > after done all disks zero'ed > > filer*> setflag raid_enable_prezeroing 0 > filer*> priv set > > If you add a disk to a filer that is not zero'd it seems to create a > new volume and place that disk in the volume. It's never been a > problem for us, but you do need to destroy that volume to add the disk > to your spares. > > Jeff > >> From: "Glenn Dekhayser" <gdekhayser(a)voyantinc.com> >> To: "Michael Schipp" <mschipp(a)asi.com.au>, "Frank Smith" >> <fsmith(a)hoovers.com>, "toasters" <toasters(a)mathworks.com> >> Subject: RE: moving disks between 720s >> Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 18:34:40 -0500 >> >> I believe that there is a command "vol add -n" that will zero out the >> disks without actually adding this to a volume- just saw this in >> training (thanks Jim!). >> >> Glenn Dekhayser >> Voyant Strategies, Inc. >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Michael Schipp [mailto:mschipp@asi.com.au] >> Sent: Mon 2/23/2004 4:51 PM >> To: Frank Smith; toasters >> Cc: >> Subject: RE: moving disks between 720s >> >> >> >> Go though the filer boot menu and initialize the disks so that they >> are blank. >> >> Thank you >> Michael A Schipp >> ASI Solutions >> IT LAN/WAN Administrator >> E-Mail : mschipp(a)asi.com.au >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com >> [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Frank Smith >> Sent: Tuesday, 24 February 2004 7:00 AM >> To: toasters >> Subject: moving disks between 720s >> >> We are planning on retiring one of our F720s and keeping it to use >> the parts as spares. Is there anything we need to do before the >> shutdown so that the individual disks can be pulled and used as >> replacements in other 720s? I'm not trying to move any data, >> just grab individual disks that are part of a an existing volume >> on the retired 720 and use them as hot spares on another 720. >> >> Thanks, >> Frank >> >> -- >> Frank Smith fsmith(a)hoovers.com >> Sr. Systems Administrator Voice: 512-374-4673 >> Hoover's Online Fax: 512-374-4501 >> >> >> >> >> >> > > _________________________________________________________________ > Store more e-mails with MSN Hotmail Extra Storage ? 4 plans to choose > from! http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200362ave/direct/01/ > >

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters