toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13520 discussions

FROM CAPT WILLIAMS OKELELE.
by williams_okolele 11 Mar '04

11 Mar '04

FROM CAPT, WILLIAMS OKELELE.(PROTOCOL OFFICER)INVESTMENT. Good day and how are your business over there.It has been a long time that I have been thinking of contacting you but it is due to the sudden problem encountered by my`Boss´"His Excellency´President Charles Taylor of Liberia which resulted to the collapsed of his government that now resulted our seeking asylum in Nigeria West Africa.Before the collapsed of my`Boss´government. I intercepted a packaged document from europe which I try to open to check the content as an instruction given to me so as to guide against any time bomb parcel which may be directed to the President by his political rivalry that is the opposition party. On seeing the content of the parcel"It was tagged consignment lodgment which involve huge amount of pound sterling deposited with Finance & Security Inc. in europe.Contact and all relevant information regarding the deposit and the method of collection including the deposit payment receipt were enclosed in the parcel. I received this parcel very close to the time that my `Boss´were quitted out of the office.Hence I decided to hold on to the document for my life utilization. Before this, let me reiterate it to you that I have been reliably gathered an information from one of my friend in your high commission that normally visited Presidential Villa that you are trustworthy and somebody that can stand firmly for any financial transaction because he told me that you are capable, With this information,I now decide to seek your able assistance due to your personality for you to front for me in the claiming of this consignment as the American´s are bending on charging my`Boss´for war crime which has even made him to be so disturbed I really need your urgent assistance as I will like to come down to your country for the rest of my life. Please kindly get back to me on this my private contact;williams_okelele(a)fsmail.net and as soon as i hear from you.I am ready to release all the document relating to the consignment for your contact to the Finance company and the bonafide power of attorney will be issued to you and be dully signed and attested to by a reputable court of law for your quick collection of the funds in the financial house in europe. I await your speedy response reply, Best Regards FROM CAPT WILLIAMS OKELELE. Protocol Officer .

1 0

FROM CAPT WILLIAMS OKELELE.
by williams_okolele 11 Mar '04

11 Mar '04

1 0

I am no longer impotent in bed XJ9 Zp
by Aurelio Baird 11 Mar '04

11 Mar '04

I am writing to tell you something about myself. Something that drove me crazy for a long time. I thought things would never be better for me. My name is Aurelio Baird and this was a part of my life. Ever since I started having sexual relationships, I noticed something about me wasn't 'working properly' if you know what I mean. I was having an extremely difficult time performing in bed with the ladies, and as time went on, my problem didn't cure itself. Although I was sceptic about Cialis, I was desperate and simply had to try something! To my surprise, Cialis finally solved my erectile problem, and worked much better than viagra! I am writing this email to share my great success with you, and hope to help out someone who feels the same way I used to. Here is the URL http://www.savysale.net/84/c/ if you'd like to check this out. If you wish to unsubscribe from this newsletter , please fallow http://modilium.com/4/unsub/ cap codfish doom kinky seminarian castanet fate macrame depository murder downturn annapolis enamel moulton collect compare carp animosity beside hardtack curtis e's diva flutter egan

1 0

Interested in learing of average disk utilization values for others using Netapp Filers for clients hosting web servers
by Errol Casey 10 Mar '04

10 Mar '04

I'm interested in learning of common values for disk utilization across disk in 4,5,8,10 disk volumes on filers that are in use with host clients that server clients that are hosting web servers (that general server traffic such as HTML files, PHP files, JPG files, etc generally small files). Here is a snap shot of some values from my server for comparison. We had some performance problems recently, and our disk utilization was exceeding 50% ; but we have decreased this back to reasonable levels but would like to see what other Netapp users are at. Currently, our levels are averaging 15 for an 8 disk volume and 13 for a 12 disk volume. These values are being obtained from statit statistics.

1 0

CIGARETTE Warehouse - We're Practically Giving Them Away, Wed, 10 Mar 2004 03:43:43 -0500
by Robin Galloway 10 Mar '04

10 Mar '04

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 03:43:43 -0500 Cigarette Warehouse BIG MONEY off HUNDREDS or even THOUSANDS of dollars over the course of a year when purchasing cigarettes through Cigarette Warehouse. We stock only the freshest cigarettes of the highest quality: Marlboro, Camel, Winston, Benson & Hedges, Salem, Kool, ALL the premium brands including Dunhill, Barclay, Virginia Slims, and so many more. Our products are fresh and genuine. Get your smokes now: http://www.firstclassminds.com/refjw.html No thanks: http://www.firstclassminds.com/pastmark.html rocky berra bumptious aisle breve injunct bostonian criteria oldsmobile consanguineous erskine glisten gpo gladys decline governess skylark configuration pickman backspace seton compatible scops brassiere collect alfred configuration inflammable terrier slung speed detector madrid avon gamin exercise darling scientist defiant swab alterate split woolgather aarhus

1 0

remove
by Vincent, Alex 08 Mar '04

08 Mar '04

LEGAL NOTICE Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents of this e-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorised and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately. Pfizer Consumer Health Products Company is registered in England under No.2930463 with its registered office at Walton Oaks, Dorking Road, Walton on the Hill, Surrey, KT20 7NS

1 0

Quota logging question
by Matt Phelps 06 Mar '04

06 Mar '04

Sorry if this has been asked before. Is there any way to get quota log messages to use the username info from NIS in the logs insted of just the UID? It's minor, but a pain. Data OnTap 6.4.2P6, NFS with Solaris and Linux clients only. Thanks, -- Matt Phelps System Administrator, Computation Facility Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics mphelps(a)cfa.harvard.edu, http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/~mphelps

2 1

RE: Linux / NetApp / Oracle question
by Barrette, Paul A PENC:EX 05 Mar '04

05 Mar '04

These are the mount options I use for RHAS 2.1 connecting to an F820 nfs rw,hard,nfsvers=3,intr,suid,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,proto=udp 0 2 Also, I would not consider connecting to an oracle database over 100 meg. We use GigE ourselves. Paul Barrette -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Duncan Greenwood Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 12:58 PM To: Geoff Hardin Cc: toasters Subject: Re: Linux / NetApp / Oracle question Try the tech papers at http://www.netapp.com/tech_library/ e.g. http://www.netapp.com/tech_library/3129.html I played with 9iRAC on RHAS 2.1 against NetApp last year and seem to recall we needed to experiment with rsize and wsize to get decent i/o performance, but that was over GbE. See the tips at: http://nfs.sourceforge.net/nfs-howto/performance.html hth D ----- Original Message ----- From: "Geoff Hardin" <geoff.hardin(a)dalsemi.com> To: "Haynes, Tom" <thomas(a)netapp.com> Cc: "toasters" <toasters(a)mathworks.com> Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 7:37 PM Subject: Re: Linux / NetApp / Oracle question > I've had several people ask for more details about the configuration: > > Network: > 100 Mb switched network full duplex > > Filer: > F760C with ONTAP 6.4.1 > > Database Server: > RHEL Kernel 2.4.21-9.EL > 1 GB of RAM; (we're trying to get that increased because we have seen > some swapping going on) 1 Intel 2.4 GHz Xeon processor > Mount options: rw,fg,hard,nointr,retrans=2,tcp,vers=3,timeo=600 > > We are using NFS over TCP by the recommendation of NetApp and because > we saw data corruption when we were using NFS over UDP. I am looking > into some of the mount options for Linux; one document says to turn > noac off, another says to turn it on. I haven't seen any reference to > a forcedirectio option, and I know that asynch I/O is not supported in > NFS for Linux (yet?). > > If you have any other questions, let me know and I'll do my best to > answer them. Thanks to everyone who has responded so far! > > Geoff > > Haynes, Tom wrote: > > >Geoff, > > > >You should have mentioned what type of filer and what version of > >OnTap you were running. > > > >Thanks, > >Tom > > > > > > > >>Hey Toasters, > >> I have a situation that has come up where we are testing Oracle > >>9i on a 2.4 GHz Intel Xeon system with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3.0 > >>as the operating system. The database itself resides on a NetApp > >>filer. We have run through the normal problems, switching to NFS > >>over TCP rather than UDP, no asynch I/O, not as much like Solaris as > >>we expected, but now we're still not seeing the level of performance > >>that we had expected. Our test database run on a Sun 280R takes > >>about 2 hours; the same test run on our Linux system takes about > >>2:40. Definitely not the results we had expected. > >> I was just wondering if anyone out there has done something > >>similar and has any tuning recommendations. Oracle tells us that it > >>should work fine on Linux, and we know our other databases work fine > >>running off filers, so that leaves us with a solution that should > >>work, but doesn't. Any recommendations, white papers, or RTFM (as > >>long as you indicate which manual), would be greatly appreciated. > >> > >>Geoff Hardin > >>UNIX System Administrator > >>Dallas Semiconductor > >>geoff.hardin(a)dalsemi.com > >> --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.593 / Virus Database: 376 - Release Date: 20/02/2004

1 0

Fwd: Re: Linux / NetApp / Oracle question
by Jerry 05 Mar '04

05 Mar '04

Forgot to cc the list as well.... > > You shouldn't have to mess with rsize and wsize if > you > use TCP, set it to as high as the filer (it should > default as high as the filer 32k in nfsv3). The > reason you have to mess with it using udp appears to > be flow control related and only in mixed speed > networks in my experience (gig-e filer to 100mb > clients). > > What I would do is confirm you are really using TCP, > several implementations of the mount command seem to > ignore bad options, run tcpdump and copy and file, > make sure it's sending tcp packets. On solaris it's > proto=tcp, however on linux I think it's just -o > tcp. > The wierd thing is, if you give it a wrong option > under some implementations it returns a prompt, and > the mount command even shows that option! > > --- Duncan Greenwood > <duncan.greenwood(a)btinternet.com> > wrote: > > Try the tech papers at > > http://www.netapp.com/tech_library/ > > > > e.g. http://www.netapp.com/tech_library/3129.html > > > > I played with 9iRAC on RHAS 2.1 against NetApp > last > > year and seem > > to recall we needed to experiment with rsize and > > wsize to get decent > > i/o performance, but that was over GbE. > > > > See the tips at: > > > http://nfs.sourceforge.net/nfs-howto/performance.html > > > > hth > > > > D > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Geoff Hardin" <geoff.hardin(a)dalsemi.com> > > To: "Haynes, Tom" <thomas(a)netapp.com> > > Cc: "toasters" <toasters(a)mathworks.com> > > Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 7:37 PM > > Subject: Re: Linux / NetApp / Oracle question > > > > > > > I've had several people ask for more details > about > > the configuration: > > > > > > Network: > > > 100 Mb switched network full duplex > > > > > > Filer: > > > F760C with ONTAP 6.4.1 > > > > > > Database Server: > > > RHEL Kernel 2.4.21-9.EL > > > 1 GB of RAM; (we're trying to get that increased > > because we have seen > > > some swapping going on) > > > 1 Intel 2.4 GHz Xeon processor > > > Mount options: > > rw,fg,hard,nointr,retrans=2,tcp,vers=3,timeo=600 > > > > > > We are using NFS over TCP by the recommendation > of > > NetApp and because we > > > saw data corruption when we were using NFS over > > UDP. I am looking into > > > some of the mount options for Linux; one > document > > says to turn noac off, > > > another says to turn it on. I haven't seen any > > reference to a > > > forcedirectio option, and I know that asynch I/O > > is not supported in NFS > > > for Linux (yet?). > > > > > > If you have any other questions, let me know and > > I'll do my best to > > > answer them. Thanks to everyone who has > responded > > so far! > > > > > > Geoff > > > > > > Haynes, Tom wrote: > > > > > > >Geoff, > > > > > > > >You should have mentioned what type of filer > and > > what version of > > > >OnTap you were running. > > > > > > > >Thanks, > > > >Tom > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Hey Toasters, > > > >> I have a situation that has come up where > we > > are testing Oracle 9i > > > >>on a 2.4 GHz Intel Xeon system with Red Hat > > Enterprise Linux 3.0 as the > > > >>operating system. The database itself resides > > on a NetApp filer. We > > > >>have run through the normal problems, > switching > > to NFS over TCP rather > > > >>than UDP, no asynch I/O, not as much like > > Solaris as we expected, but > > > >>now we're still not seeing the level of > > performance that we had > > > >>expected. Our test database run on a Sun 280R > > takes about 2 hours; the > > > >>same test run on our Linux system takes about > > 2:40. Definitely not the > > > >>results we had expected. > > > >> I was just wondering if anyone out there > has > > done something similar > > > >>and has any tuning recommendations. Oracle > > tells us that it should work > > > >>fine on Linux, and we know our other databases > > work fine running off > > > >>filers, so that leaves us with a solution that > > should work, but doesn't. > > > >> Any recommendations, white papers, or RTFM > (as > > long as you indicate > > > >>which manual), would be greatly appreciated. > > > >> > > > >>Geoff Hardin > > > >>UNIX System Administrator > > > >>Dallas Semiconductor > > > >>geoff.hardin(a)dalsemi.com > > > >> > > > > > > --- > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system > > (http://www.grisoft.com). > > Version: 6.0.593 / Virus Database: 376 - Release > > Date: 20/02/2004 > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing > online. > http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what you�re looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com

1 0

Re: Linux / NetApp / Oracle question
by Geoff Hardin 05 Mar '04

05 Mar '04

I've had several people ask for more details about the configuration: Network: 100 Mb switched network full duplex Filer: F760C with ONTAP 6.4.1 Database Server: RHEL Kernel 2.4.21-9.EL 1 GB of RAM; (we're trying to get that increased because we have seen some swapping going on) 1 Intel 2.4 GHz Xeon processor Mount options: rw,fg,hard,nointr,retrans=2,tcp,vers=3,timeo=600 We are using NFS over TCP by the recommendation of NetApp and because we saw data corruption when we were using NFS over UDP. I am looking into some of the mount options for Linux; one document says to turn noac off, another says to turn it on. I haven't seen any reference to a forcedirectio option, and I know that asynch I/O is not supported in NFS for Linux (yet?). If you have any other questions, let me know and I'll do my best to answer them. Thanks to everyone who has responded so far! Geoff Haynes, Tom wrote: >Geoff, > >You should have mentioned what type of filer and what version of >OnTap you were running. > >Thanks, >Tom > > > >>Hey Toasters, >> I have a situation that has come up where we are testing Oracle 9i >>on a 2.4 GHz Intel Xeon system with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3.0 as the >>operating system. The database itself resides on a NetApp filer. We >>have run through the normal problems, switching to NFS over TCP rather >>than UDP, no asynch I/O, not as much like Solaris as we expected, but >>now we're still not seeing the level of performance that we had >>expected. Our test database run on a Sun 280R takes about 2 hours; the >>same test run on our Linux system takes about 2:40. Definitely not the >>results we had expected. >> I was just wondering if anyone out there has done something similar >>and has any tuning recommendations. Oracle tells us that it should work >>fine on Linux, and we know our other databases work fine running off >>filers, so that leaves us with a solution that should work, but doesn't. >> Any recommendations, white papers, or RTFM (as long as you indicate >>which manual), would be greatly appreciated. >> >>Geoff Hardin >>UNIX System Administrator >>Dallas Semiconductor >>geoff.hardin(a)dalsemi.com >>

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters