toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13515 discussions

RE: Veritas Backup Exec version 9.1 sp1
by Hill, Aaron 26 Jul '04

26 Jul '04

Skip, What kind of backup hardware are you using? Is it NDMP, direct attach SCSI etc. Tape technology? How many files are trying to backup? More files are going to take longer. Are you doing volume level or qtree level backups? What quantity of data are we talking here? Aaron _____ From: SKIP HOFMANN [mailto:SKIP.HOFMANN@ttisg.com] Sent: Saturday, 24 July 2004 4:54 AM To: ''toasters(a)mathworks.com' ' Subject: Veritas Backup Exec version 9.1 sp1 Hi We are noting it takes quite a long time to backup my R200 (version NetApp Release 6.5) our backup exec server keeps complaining about an agent not being installed. I have found this article from Veritas http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/240654.htm <http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/240654.htm> and was wondering if installing this unix agent would help speed up my backup jobs? Or if anyone has any ideas for me on how to speed these jobs up that would be great Skip ************** IMPORTANT MESSAGE ************** This e-mail message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains information which may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please advise the sender by return email, do not use or disclose the contents, and delete the message and any attachments from your system. Unless specifically indicated, this email does not constitute formal advice or commitment by the sender or the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ABN 48 123 123 124) or its subsidiaries. We can be contacted through our web site: commbank.com.au **************************************************

1 0

GOOD WILL
by majorpaul＠tiscali.co.uk 24 Jul '04

24 Jul '04

HELLO, I REGRET ANY INITIAL EMBARRASSMENT THAT MY LETTER MIGTH CAUSE YOU.I DO NOT INTEND TO INVADE YOUR PRIVACY BY THIS MAIL OF WHICH I REALLY NEED YOUR ASSISTANCE ON THIS MATTER. I AM PAUL MARTINS OF THE BRITISH 4TH INFANTRY ARMY DIVISION TROOPS.IN RETROSPECT DURING OUR COMBINED FORCES WITH THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ARMY TO OUTSTEAD THE BRUTAL REGIME OF SADDAM HUSSEIN IN IRAQ, OF WHICH DURING ONE OF OUR ROUTING SEARCH OF SADDAM HUSSEIN PRESIDENTIAL PALACE IN BAGDAD SOME OF MY COLLESGUE AND I FOUND SOME BOXES CONTAINING MILLION OF DOLLARS IN SADDAM HUSSEIN PRESIDENTIAL PALACE TO THE TUNE OF THIRTY FIVE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS.($35.5M). AFTER THE DISCOVERY OF THIS BOXES MY COLLEAGUE AND I CAREFULLY REMOVED THE BOXES TO A SAFE LOCATION OF WHICH WE NOW ARRANGED WITH A SECURITY COURIER FIRM WHOM NOW HELPED US IN SHIPPING THE BOXES OUT OF IRAQ TO EUROPE FOR SAFE KEEPING MARKED AS FILM AND FILM MATERIALS OF WHICH I HAVE DOCUMENTS TO THIS EFFECT SHOWING PROOF OF DEPOSIT. DUE TO THE CURRENT NATURE OF MY JOB IT BECOMES QUITE IMPOSSIBLE FOR MY COLLEAGUE AND I TO CLAIM THIS MONEY,HENCE WE SEEK YOUR ASSISTANCES . I AM THEREFORE ASKING YOU TO PLEASE COME TO OUR AID IN GETTING THIS MONEY OUT FROM THE SECURITY COURIER FIRM FOR US, FOR ONWARD INVESTMENT OF THE MONEY INTO VARIOUS BUSINESS AS ADVISED BY YOU. I AM CONTACTING YOU IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT WE WILL BE OF GREAT ASSISTANCE TO EACH OTHER.YOU WILL BE ADEQUATELY COMPENSATED FOR THIS.I WOULD ADVISE THAT THIS MATTER BE TREATED IN CONFIDENCE. PLEASE DO GET INTOUCH WITH ME ON RECEIPT OF THIS MAIL THROUGH MY EMAIL ADDRESS AND ALSO INCLUDE YOUR TELEPHONE NUMBER SO THAT WE CAN AS WELL SPEAK TO EACH OTHER TO FACILITATE QUICK TRANSACTION OF THIS PROJECT. I LOOK FORWARD TO A MUTUAL BENEFICIAL RELATIONSHIP. REGARDS, MAJOR PAUL MARTINS. __________________________________________________ Broadband from an unbeatable £15.99! http://www.tiscali.co.uk/products/broadband/home.html?code=SM-NL-11AM

1 0

RE: Veritas Backup Exec version 9.1 sp1
by SKIP HOFMANN 23 Jul '04

23 Jul '04

The only virus software that would come into play with this is the trend for filers on the R200 because all the data that we backup is on the R200, I'm wondering if its because of the AV on the netapp that is slowing this down? Its either that or not having a unix/liniux agent installed on the R200 Thanks Skip _____ From: Penelope Carr [mailto:Penelope.Carr@veritas.com] Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 12:22 PM To: SKIP HOFMANN Subject: RE: Veritas Backup Exec version 9.1 sp1 Make sure your NIC is set to full duplex as well as any switches, bridges, etc. Check on any virus software and make sure it is not running during backups. Penelope _____ From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of SKIP HOFMANN Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 2:54 PM To: ''toasters(a)mathworks.com' ' Subject: Veritas Backup Exec version 9.1 sp1 Hi We are noting it takes quite a long time to backup my R200 (version NetApp Release 6.5) our backup exec server keeps complaining about an agent not being installed. I have found this article from Veritas http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/240654.htm <http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/240654.htm> and was wondering if installing this unix agent would help speed up my backup jobs? Or if anyone has any ideas for me on how to speed these jobs up that would be great Skip

1 0

Veritas Backup Exec version 9.1 sp1
by SKIP HOFMANN 23 Jul '04

23 Jul '04

Hi We are noting it takes quite a long time to backup my R200 (version NetApp Release 6.5) our backup exec server keeps complaining about an agent not being installed. I have found this article from Veritas http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/240654.htm <http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/240654.htm> and was wondering if installing this unix agent would help speed up my backup jobs? Or if anyone has any ideas for me on how to speed these jobs up that would be great Skip

1 0

Two questions
by SKIP HOFMANN 23 Jul '04

23 Jul '04

I'm getting messages in the syslog on my R200 that say "[vscan.server.completionRequestLost:warning] <javascript:popEMS('vscan.server.completionRequestLost');> : CIFS: Vscan server 10.20.0.58 completed a scan request for ONTAP_ADMIN$\vol\vol1\HA\cart\data\accnt\data\PSteinhart\vallecfundg.wpd but the original request was not found. And oplock break timed out to station ISGDRLV1 for file \\ISGIRVNETAPP02 <file:///\\ISGIRVNETAPP02> I'm using Trend AV for the filer does this message mean that may be a problem with the AV on either the management server or Vscan on the filer? Thanks for any help Much appreciated Skip

1 0

Auto Support option
by SKIP HOFMANN 23 Jul '04

23 Jul '04

Hi all I'm trying to setup and use auto support on my R200. When I check in the syslogs on the filler I get a "[asup.post.badUrl:warning] <javascript:popEMS('asup.post.badUrl');> :" I'm using the Web interface to try and configure this. What am I missing here? Thanks for any help

1 0

AIX, iSCSI and NetApp
by Haber, David J. 23 Jul '04

23 Jul '04

Is anyone out there using iSCSI to connect AIX to a NetApp filer? Does anyone know of anybody doing this? Is it possible?

1 0

Trend AV with Filers
by Palmer, Jason (EMEA) 23 Jul '04

23 Jul '04

Hi - We are currently having problems with ou virus scan servers de registering with the filers... Extract from Syslogs... Tue Jul 20 03:00:00 GMT [<filer>: kern.uptime.filer:info]: 3:00am up 19:03 0 NFS ops, 4955185 CIFS ops, 46 HTTP ops, 0 DAFS ops, 0 FCP ops, 0 iSCSI ops Tue Jul 20 03:01:33 GMT [<filer>: Auth08:warning]: Cannot connect to server. Session setup error: Called name not present (0x82) Tue Jul 20 03:02:37 GMT [<filer>: Auth01:warning]: Cannot connect to server. Socket connect error: Resource temporarily unavailable Tue Jul 20 03:03:37 GMT [<filer>: Auth05:warning]: Cannot connect to server. Socket connect error: Resource temporarily unavailable Tue Jul 20 03:04:37 GMT [<filer>: Auth00:warning]: Cannot connect to server. Socket connect error: Resource temporarily unavailable Tue Jul 20 03:05:37 GMT [<filer>: Auth02:warning]: Cannot connect to server. Socket connect error: Resource temporarily unavailable Tue Jul 20 03:06:37 GMT [<filer>: Auth03:warning]: Cannot connect to server. Socket connect error: Resource temporarily unavailable Tue Jul 20 03:07:37 GMT [<filer>: Auth09:warning]: Cannot connect to server. Socket connect error: Resource temporarily unavailable Tue Jul 20 03:12:57 GMT [<filer>: vscan.server.connecting.disconnect:info]: CIFS: Vscan server <Scanner> deregistered and will be removed from the list of available vscan servers. Tue Jul 20 03:12:57 GMT [<filer>: OffloadWorker06:info]: Connection with <Scanner> terminated Tue Jul 20 03:12:57 GMT [<filer>: vscan.dropped.connection:warning]: CIFS: Virus scan server <Scanner> (123.456.789.123) has disconnected from the filer. Tue Jul 20 03:12:57 GMT [<filer>: vscan.server.connectedNone:warning]: CIFS: Virus scanning is enabled but no vscan (anti-virus) servers are connected to the filer. Tue Jul 20 03:13:27 GMT [<filer>: vscan.server.connectedNone:warning]: CIFS: Virus scanning is enabled but no vscan (anti-virus) servers are connected to the filer. Tue Jul 20 04:00:00 GMT [<filer>: kern.uptime.filer:info]: 4:00am up 20:03 0 NFS ops, 5024835 CIFS ops, 46 HTTP ops, 0 DAFS ops, 0 FCP ops, 0 iSCSI ops There is a bug note (Bug ID: 81237) on the NOW site which states 'This is believed to be a problem with a vendor's anti-virus software.' Has anyone else had these issues ? If so, is there a work around or a fix ? Thanks, Jason ----------------------------------- Jason Palmer <Team Leader> Messaging & Storage Implementation MCI [EMEA] ----------------------------------- [e]: jason.palmer(a)uk.mci.com [i]: http://www.mci.com/uk -----------------------------------

2 1

RE: Trend AV with Filers
by Mike Sphar 23 Jul '04

23 Jul '04

Only doing scheduled scans would leave you with a significant risk of infection with the rate that viruses spread today. Plus, on a large filer, a complete file-by-file scan might take hours if not days...that's a long window of opportunity for viruses to infect files and other clients to pick them up. And you're right, the viruses don't know how to infect the filer per se. The reason you want the virus scanning is to prevent other infected machines from infecting files on the filer. In other words, virus scans your network, find the file share, and infects every doc and exe file it finds on the filer, possibly thousands of infected files or more in a very short time. Now, your filer is full of infected files. Some other client, with no a/v or an insufficiently-updated a/v definition reads those files and gets infected itself, spreading the infection further. Before integrated a/v was available for the filers, we did the best we could with daily virus scans, which took several hours. Even with that, the day I made the integrated a/v active, it immediately started catching and cleaning hundreds of infected files. -- Mike Sphar - Sr Systems Administrator - Remedy, a BMC Software Company -----Original Message----- From: SKIP HOFMANN [mailto:SKIP.HOFMANN@ttisg.com] Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 5:04 PM To: 'Bui, Marcus'; 'Palmer, Jason (EMEA) '; 'owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com '; ''toasters(a)mathworks.com' ' Subject: RE: Trend AV with Filers We are using Trend AV for our FAS 250 and R200. IS there a way to tell Vscan to do scheduled scans instead of scanning every file that is currently being accessed? Also is it really necessary to have a AV scanner on the Filler? Because I would think most viruses wouldn't know what to do with the OS of the filler -----Original Message----- From: Bui, Marcus [mailto:Marcus.Bui@aiminvestments.com] Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 11:00 AM To: 'Palmer, Jason (EMEA) '; 'owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com '; ''toasters(a)mathworks.com' ' Subject: RE: Trend AV with Filers Check the Windows Domain Controllers listed as having connection with the Filer. I think the command is > cifs domaininfo I seen this msg when one of the DC's link with the Filer is broken. Try stop/restart the virus services. cheers, Marcus -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Sent: 7/22/04 11:59 AM Subject: Trend AV with Filers Hi - We are currently having problems with ou virus scan servers de registering with the filers... Extract from Syslogs... Tue Jul 20 03:00:00 GMT [<filer>: kern.uptime.filer:info]: 3:00am up 19:03 0 NFS ops, 4955185 CIFS ops, 46 HTTP ops, 0 DAFS ops, 0 FCP ops, 0 iSCSI ops Tue Jul 20 03:01:33 GMT [<filer>: Auth08:warning]: Cannot connect to server. Session setup error: Called name not present (0x82) Tue Jul 20 03:02:37 GMT [<filer>: Auth01:warning]: Cannot connect to server. Socket connect error: Resource temporarily unavailable Tue Jul 20 03:03:37 GMT [<filer>: Auth05:warning]: Cannot connect to server. Socket connect error: Resource temporarily unavailable Tue Jul 20 03:04:37 GMT [<filer>: Auth00:warning]: Cannot connect to server. Socket connect error: Resource temporarily unavailable Tue Jul 20 03:05:37 GMT [<filer>: Auth02:warning]: Cannot connect to server. Socket connect error: Resource temporarily unavailable Tue Jul 20 03:06:37 GMT [<filer>: Auth03:warning]: Cannot connect to server. Socket connect error: Resource temporarily unavailable Tue Jul 20 03:07:37 GMT [<filer>: Auth09:warning]: Cannot connect to server. Socket connect error: Resource temporarily unavailable Tue Jul 20 03:12:57 GMT [<filer>: vscan.server.connecting.disconnect:info]: CIFS: Vscan server <Scanner> deregistered and will be removed from the list of available vscan servers. Tue Jul 20 03:12:57 GMT [<filer>: OffloadWorker06:info]: Connection with <Scanner> terminated Tue Jul 20 03:12:57 GMT [<filer>: vscan.dropped.connection:warning]: CIFS: Virus scan server <Scanner> (123.456.789.123) has disconnected from the filer. Tue Jul 20 03:12:57 GMT [<filer>: vscan.server.connectedNone:warning]: CIFS: Virus scanning is enabled but no vscan (anti-virus) servers are connected to the filer. Tue Jul 20 03:13:27 GMT [<filer>: vscan.server.connectedNone:warning]: CIFS: Virus scanning is enabled but no vscan (anti-virus) servers are connected to the filer. Tue Jul 20 04:00:00 GMT [<filer>: kern.uptime.filer:info]: 4:00am up 20:03 0 NFS ops, 5024835 CIFS ops, 46 HTTP ops, 0 DAFS ops, 0 FCP ops, 0 iSCSI ops There is a bug note (Bug ID: 81237) on the NOW site which states 'This is believed to be a problem with a vendor's anti-virus software.' Has anyone else had these issues ? If so, is there a work around or a fix ? Thanks, Jason ----------------------------------- Jason Palmer <Team Leader> Messaging & Storage Implementation MCI [EMEA] ----------------------------------- [e]: jason.palmer(a)uk.mci.com [i]: http://www.mci.com/uk <http://www.mci.com/uk> ----------------------------------- ----------------------------------------- Confidentiality Note: The information contained in this message, and any attachments, may contain confidential and/or privileged material. It is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is addressed. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

1 0

RE: Trend AV with Filers
by SKIP HOFMANN 22 Jul '04

22 Jul '04

We are using Trend AV for our FAS 250 and R200. IS there a way to tell Vscan to do scheduled scans instead of scanning every file that is currently being accessed? Also is it really necessary to have a AV scanner on the Filler? Because I would think most viruses wouldn't know what to do with the OS of the filler -----Original Message----- From: Bui, Marcus [mailto:Marcus.Bui@aiminvestments.com] Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 11:00 AM To: 'Palmer, Jason (EMEA) '; 'owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com '; ''toasters(a)mathworks.com' ' Subject: RE: Trend AV with Filers Check the Windows Domain Controllers listed as having connection with the Filer. I think the command is > cifs domaininfo I seen this msg when one of the DC's link with the Filer is broken. Try stop/restart the virus services. cheers, Marcus -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Sent: 7/22/04 11:59 AM Subject: Trend AV with Filers Hi - We are currently having problems with ou virus scan servers de registering with the filers... Extract from Syslogs... Tue Jul 20 03:00:00 GMT [<filer>: kern.uptime.filer:info]: 3:00am up 19:03 0 NFS ops, 4955185 CIFS ops, 46 HTTP ops, 0 DAFS ops, 0 FCP ops, 0 iSCSI ops Tue Jul 20 03:01:33 GMT [<filer>: Auth08:warning]: Cannot connect to server. Session setup error: Called name not present (0x82) Tue Jul 20 03:02:37 GMT [<filer>: Auth01:warning]: Cannot connect to server. Socket connect error: Resource temporarily unavailable Tue Jul 20 03:03:37 GMT [<filer>: Auth05:warning]: Cannot connect to server. Socket connect error: Resource temporarily unavailable Tue Jul 20 03:04:37 GMT [<filer>: Auth00:warning]: Cannot connect to server. Socket connect error: Resource temporarily unavailable Tue Jul 20 03:05:37 GMT [<filer>: Auth02:warning]: Cannot connect to server. Socket connect error: Resource temporarily unavailable Tue Jul 20 03:06:37 GMT [<filer>: Auth03:warning]: Cannot connect to server. Socket connect error: Resource temporarily unavailable Tue Jul 20 03:07:37 GMT [<filer>: Auth09:warning]: Cannot connect to server. Socket connect error: Resource temporarily unavailable Tue Jul 20 03:12:57 GMT [<filer>: vscan.server.connecting.disconnect:info]: CIFS: Vscan server <Scanner> deregistered and will be removed from the list of available vscan servers. Tue Jul 20 03:12:57 GMT [<filer>: OffloadWorker06:info]: Connection with <Scanner> terminated Tue Jul 20 03:12:57 GMT [<filer>: vscan.dropped.connection:warning]: CIFS: Virus scan server <Scanner> (123.456.789.123) has disconnected from the filer. Tue Jul 20 03:12:57 GMT [<filer>: vscan.server.connectedNone:warning]: CIFS: Virus scanning is enabled but no vscan (anti-virus) servers are connected to the filer. Tue Jul 20 03:13:27 GMT [<filer>: vscan.server.connectedNone:warning]: CIFS: Virus scanning is enabled but no vscan (anti-virus) servers are connected to the filer. Tue Jul 20 04:00:00 GMT [<filer>: kern.uptime.filer:info]: 4:00am up 20:03 0 NFS ops, 5024835 CIFS ops, 46 HTTP ops, 0 DAFS ops, 0 FCP ops, 0 iSCSI ops There is a bug note (Bug ID: 81237) on the NOW site which states 'This is believed to be a problem with a vendor's anti-virus software.' Has anyone else had these issues ? If so, is there a work around or a fix ? Thanks, Jason ----------------------------------- Jason Palmer <Team Leader> Messaging & Storage Implementation MCI [EMEA] ----------------------------------- [e]: jason.palmer(a)uk.mci.com [i]: http://www.mci.com/uk <http://www.mci.com/uk> ----------------------------------- ----------------------------------------- Confidentiality Note: The information contained in this message, and any attachments, may contain confidential and/or privileged material. It is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is addressed. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters