toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13520 discussions

CPU stats in filer at a glance and DFM
by Warkentin, Grant 04 Aug '05

04 Aug '05

We're running a FAS 960 with DOT 6.xx (that last current version of 6). Have noticed that the CPU usage stats are not being displayed in DFM also the CPU usage stats are not showing up in Filer at a glance. Looks like we stopped getting stats about two weeks ago. CIFS, NFS and network use stats are still coming in properly. The DFM client software seems to have current CPU usage stats though. Anyone have an idea about how to get CPU usage to show up again? Thanks. Grant Warkentin System Administrator II City of Calgary - Information Technology Mail Drop == 8245 Ph: (403) 268-5629 Fax: (403) 268-2546 NOTICE - This communication is intended ONLY for the use of the person or entity named above and may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient named above or a person responsible for delivering messages or communications to the intended recipient, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that any use, distribution, or copying of this communication or any of the information contained in it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and then destroy or delete this communication, or return it to us by mail if requested by us. The City of Calgary thanks you for your attention and cooperation.

1 0

Your email message was blocked
by mailmarshal＠chummail.net 04 Aug '05

04 Aug '05

The following email message was blocked by MailMarshal: From:toasters@mathworks.com To:douga@thenewpl.com Subject:Delivery reports about your e-mail Message: B42f27fbd0000.000000000001.0004.mml Because it contains a potentially malicious filetype attachment. If you believe the message is business related, please contact helpdesk(a)chumtv.com <mailto:helpdesk@chumtv.com> and request that the message be released. If no contact is made within 5 days the message will be automatically deleted. MailMarshal Rule: Content Security (Inbound) : Block Suspect Attachments

1 0

OnTap 7 and Samba
by Ryan Kather 04 Aug '05

04 Aug '05

Greetings, I am having some difficulties accessing our filers with OnTap 7 via Linux. Perhaps someone in this list could point me in the right direction. The version of Linux is Open Enterprise Server (minimal install) which makes it functionally equivalent to SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 9 SP1. It is running Kernel 2.6.5-155-smp and Samba 3.0.14a (originally 3.0.9 but updated when issues surfaced). The filers I have tried accessing consist of FAS270s and a R200. They are using FlexVols and OnTap 7. Data shares are available via CIFS and NFS and are configured with NTFS Security Mode. The filers are members of an Active Directory Domain (Windows Server 2003 PDC). I have a number of odd issues that have surfaced. Issue 1; -------- smbmount returns permission denied and odd path presentation. The Linux box is a member of the active directory domain. I can use wbinfo to list domain users and groups, as well as getent passwd and group. I am able to authenticate via kerberos, and can use smbmount against Windows server shares fine. However, when I attempt to mount a share on a NetApp filer using mount -t smbfs -o username=someuser,workgroup=THEDOMAIN //NETAPP/SHARE /mnt/SHARE the operation appears to complete successfully. If I enter mount I can see the /mnt/SHARE as active. If I travese into the /mnt/SHARE folder and type ls I get a permission denied error. Syslog shows kernel: smb_lookup: find /// failed, error=-13. After some digging it appears that error=-13 is an EACCESS authentication issue. So I assumed I did not have permissions. If I type ls -alFG from the /mnt folder in Linux there is no /mnt/SHARE directory. If I type ls there is one, and if I unmount /mnt/SHARE then type ls -alFG the directory is there. In further troubleshooting I can browse the share from Windows, and from the same Linux workstation smbclient //NETAPP/SHARE -U someuser -W THEDOMAIN allows me to browse succesfully. Issue 2; -------- /bin/ls: reading directory .: Cannot allocate memory If I mount the same share via cifs (mount -t cifs -o user=someuser,domain=THEDOMAIN //NETAPP/SHARE /mnt/SHARE) the operation completes with no error. If I cd into /mnt/SHARE then type ls I get the error above (/bin/ls: reading directory .: Cannot allocate memory). If I continue to type ls it will eventually display the directory. If I cd into a subfolder the error returns. Both of these operations work fine against a Windows 2003 Server share. Does anyone have any ideas? The messages file on the filer itself does not provide any significant error messages. Thank you very much for any information anyone can provide. Linux Config Files; -------------- smb.conf-- [global] workgroup = THEDOMAIN realm = THEDOMAIN.COM idmap uid = 10000-20000 idmap gid = 10000-20000 security = ADS netbios name = LINUXBOX password server = PDC.THEDOMAIN.COM encrypt passwords = yes log level = 5 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 wins server = 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 name resolve order = wins lmhosts hosts bcast winbind enum users = yes winbind enum groups = yes winbind use default domain = yes krb5.conf-- [libdefaults] default_realm = THEDOMAIN.COM [realms] THEDOMAIN.COM = { kdc = pdc.thedomain.com } [domain_realm] .thedomain.com = THEDOMAIN.COM [logging] default = SYSLOG:NOTICE:DAEMON kdc = FILE:/var/log/kdc.log kadmind = FILE:/var/log/kadmind.log [appdefaults] pam = { ticket_lifetime = 1d renew_lifetime = 1d forwardable = true proxiable = false retain_after_close = false minimum_uid = 0 debug = false }

2 2

NetApp F740
by Julian Grunnell 04 Aug '05

04 Aug '05

Hi - hoping someone can help me with a disk problem with the above filer. Been running an F740 with NetApp Release 5.3.6R2 installed. The filer is out of warranty / cover but the filer has been with me since new so the O/S was the latest I could get at the time & the licenses for NFS / CIFS tie up. A drive failed several months ago but this was no problem as the host spare got used. The failed drive is a Seagate Cheetah ST336704FC HH. Some time later I installed a new drive we had, but this drive wasn't supported & the filer stated this and caused a reboot of the filer. No problem I thought and simply left the bay empty. So the filer is running just fine. Just with no hot spare. The output of sysconfig (-v) gave me: slot 1: Fibre Channel Host Adapter 1 6 Disks: 207.0GB 1 shelf with VEM 1: NETAPP X225_ST336704FC NA41 Size=34.5GB (71687369 blocks) 0: SEAGATE ST136403FC NA13 Size=34.5GB (71132960 blocks) 4: NETAPP X225_ST336704FC NA42 Size=34.5GB (71687369 blocks) 5: NETAPP X225_ST336704FC NA42 Size=34.5GB (71687369 blocks) 2: SEAGATE ST136403FC NA13 Size=34.5GB (71132960 blocks) 3: SEAGATE ST136403FC NA13 Size=34.5GB (71132960 blocks) Shelf 0: VEM Kernel Version : 2.5 App. Version : 3.1 *Note* "6:" or drive 1.6 is not shown, this is the failed / removed disk. From the output above I assumed (1st mistake) that the drives in the filer must be either Seagate ST336704FC or ST136403FC. And got hold of a few ST136403FC (Full Height) second hand and attempted to replace a disk again, using the following process from the command line: disk_swap <insert new disk> vol status -r All looked good the scan for shelves / disks completed without error and all the drive lights are on. But vol status -r OR sysconfig -v does not show the new disk? Tried the same again but this time simply removed & replaced the new drive. Still the same, no new disk being shown. The only other command I could think of using was shelfchk which when run asks "Are these LEDs all ON now" and yes they are, even the new disk? But I cannot access the new disk. So my question is does anyone know if the disks Seagate Cheetah ST136403FC are compatible with an F740 and if so what am I doing wrong when trying to replace a failed disk. Thanks - Julian. Julian Grunnell 3rd Line Technical Support PIPEX Telephone: 0113 302 1005 Mobile: 07803 649593 Website: http://www.pipex.net

2 2

Windows Vista and OnTap
by "Allendörfer, Carsten" 04 Aug '05

04 Aug '05

Hello, Has anyone tried to access a Filer from Longhorn Beta 1 aka Windows Vista? We tried it in our Lab (Win 2K3 Domain) and it looks as if the Kerberos authentication is not working. The filers are running 7.0.0.1RxPy and 7.1RC1. A Longhorn workstation which is not part of a domain can access a filer using NTLM auth. A Longhorn client which is a member of the same domain tries to use Kerberos Authentication and fails to access the filer with an "unexpected network error". The Longhorn workstation is able to access other Windows 2003 and Windows 2000 servers. Other XP clients can access the filer using Kerberos authentication without any problems. But I'm glad to see that the NetApp does not panic when accessed by the Longhorn Beta 1. I remember the first time we tried to access a Filer using the Windows 2000 Beta - the filer crashed at the moment the client tried to open a share. Has anyone else seen the same problem? Or even better, is it working anywhere? Carsten

1 0

Banned file: .exe in mail from you
by MAILER DAEMON 04 Aug '05

04 Aug '05

BANNED FILENAME ALERT Your message to: jmiller(a)reallygoodstuff.com was blocked by our Spam Firewall. The email you sent with the following subject has NOT BEEN DELIVERED: Subject: jeazyndmcwomizgsn An attachment in that mail was of a file type that the Spam Firewall is set to block.

1 0

RE: OnTap 7 and Samba
by Ryan Kather 03 Aug '05

03 Aug '05

Hello Mark, > Did you open a case with Netapp on the failure to access ntfs-style > shares using NFS? We have many customers doing that successfully. We did not open a case for NFS, but we did for the CIFS and Samba issues. I will open a ticket for NFS with NTFS Security mode. I am wondering if it would just be easier to run Mixed mode though. I can't really identify a downside to mixed mode. The open ticket for CIFS and Samba issues has been responded to. A NetApp support agent said that mount -t cifs issues could be a bug in OnTap 7, and they will begin evaluating our findings in a testing lab. As far as mount -t smbfs (Samba), the official line is that Samba is not supported and I will have to inquire with the Samba mailing list (which I have done). Of course Samba pins the issue back at NetApp. So is there an unofficial line I can try ;). While I have your attention, is there a way to insure that files copied via NFS will retain the same rights as their Windows CIFS accessed counterparts (perhaps this lies more in the realm of NFS 4 instead of 3). > Mark Thanks for your help Mark. > -----Original Message----- > From: Ryan Kather [mailto:rkather@missionpenguin.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 7:09 AM > To: Alan McLachlan > Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: RE: OnTap 7 and Samba > > Hello Alan, > >> Hi Ryan, >> >> Just curious - if you have an NFS licence on your filer, why are you >> even bothering to mount a CIFS share rather than an NFS v3 export? > > We ran Mixed Security mode on OnTap 6.5, but upon NetApp's > recommendation > we moved to NTFS security mode. With NTFS security mode I am unable to > map to NFS exports (permission denied error). NetApp has also informed > us > that in NTFS, or Mixed Mode security, NFS does not maintain a complete > copy of filesystem rights. > > We are archiving these filers with RSYNC, and it is necessary that we > preserve the filesystem rights. > >> It just seems you are putting yourself through unnecessary trouble. > With >> Secureshare user mapping even SACL's for auditing will still work > fine, >> i.e. NFS reads and writes will still be logged as if they were CIFS >> accesses. > > I agree. I would much rather use NFS. I am not familiar with > SecureShare. Is this a way to view the NetApp windows users as Unix > UID/GID users? If so, this seems the optimal approach. Of course with > NTFS security mode I still cannot mount to NFS exports. Do you know of > a > way to do this, or would I have to convert to Mixed Mode? > >> If your Linux box is a server running an application with data stored > on >> the filer, an NFS hard mount (with intr) is much more efficient than a >> CIFS share - so much so that a few years back I was using the >> Hummingbird NFS client on Windows 2000 IIS servers rather than use > CIFS >> to support a web farm. >> >> If you set up a dedicated gigabit segment (multi-home both the filer > and >> the app servers) with jumbo frames (large MTU's), you can get as much > as >> 60MB/sec over NFS. That's with 9K MTU's so an 8K NFS transfer is one >> ethernet packet. Best I have seen on CIFS even with jumbo is 35MB/sec. >> >> (that's MegaBytes, not Megabits). > > That is a huge difference. NFS seems a much more elegant solution. I > am > still confused why I can't use CIFS or SMBFS though against the filer, > when they work fine against Windows Domain shares (from Windows Server > 2003). > > Thanks for your help, and I would be interested in any more information > you have on this topic. > > Regards, > Ryan > > >> >> regards, >> >> Alan McLachlan >> Technical Services Manager >> ComputerCORP ACT >> >> Tel: (02) 6242 3305 Mobile: 0428 655644 >> Fax: (02) 6255 6333 >> E-mail: Alan.McLachlan(a)computercorp.com.au >> Web: www.computercorp.com.au >> >> >> LEGAL INFORMATION: This e-mail may contain information which is >> confidential to ComputerCORP. If you have received this e-mail by >> mistake, please advise us by return e-mail and delete it and any >> attachments from your system. You may not disclose, copy or rely on > any >> part of this e-mail >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ryan Kather [mailto:rkather@missionpenguin.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, 2 August 2005 10:09 PM >> To: toasters(a)mathworks.com >> Subject: OnTap 7 and Samba >> >> Greetings, >> >> I am having some difficulties accessing our filers with OnTap 7 via >> Linux. >> Perhaps someone in this list could point me in the right direction. >> >> The version of Linux is Open Enterprise Server (minimal install) which >> makes it functionally equivalent to SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 9 > SP1. >> It is running Kernel 2.6.5-155-smp and Samba 3.0.14a (originally 3.0.9 >> but >> updated when issues surfaced). >> >> The filers I have tried accessing consist of FAS270s and a R200. They >> are >> using FlexVols and OnTap 7. Data shares are available via CIFS and > NFS >> and are configured with NTFS Security Mode. The filers are members of >> an >> Active Directory Domain (Windows Server 2003 PDC). >> >> I have a number of odd issues that have surfaced. >> >> Issue 1; >> -------- >> smbmount returns permission denied and odd path presentation. >> >> The Linux box is a member of the active directory domain. I can use >> wbinfo to list domain users and groups, as well as getent passwd and >> group. I am able to authenticate via kerberos, and can use smbmount >> against Windows server shares fine. >> >> However, when I attempt to mount a share on a NetApp filer using mount >> -t >> smbfs -o username=someuser,workgroup=THEDOMAIN //NETAPP/SHARE > /mnt/SHARE >> the operation appears to complete successfully. If I enter mount I > can >> see the /mnt/SHARE as active. If I travese into the /mnt/SHARE folder >> and >> type ls I get a permission denied error. Syslog shows kernel: >> smb_lookup: >> find /// failed, error=-13. After some digging it appears that >> error=-13 >> is an EACCESS authentication issue. So I assumed I did not have >> permissions. >> >> If I type ls -alFG from the /mnt folder in Linux there is no > /mnt/SHARE >> directory. If I type ls there is one, and if I unmount /mnt/SHARE > then >> type ls -alFG the directory is there. >> >> In further troubleshooting I can browse the share from Windows, and > from >> the same Linux workstation smbclient //NETAPP/SHARE -U someuser -W >> THEDOMAIN allows me to browse succesfully. >> >> Issue 2; >> -------- >> /bin/ls: reading directory .: Cannot allocate memory >> >> If I mount the same share via cifs (mount -t cifs -o >> user=someuser,domain=THEDOMAIN //NETAPP/SHARE /mnt/SHARE) the > operation >> completes with no error. If I cd into /mnt/SHARE then type ls I get > the >> error above (/bin/ls: reading directory .: Cannot allocate memory). > If >> I >> continue to type ls it will eventually display the directory. If I cd >> into a subfolder the error returns. >> >> Both of these operations work fine against a Windows 2003 Server > share. >> Does anyone have any ideas? The messages file on the filer itself > does >> not provide any significant error messages. >> >> Thank you very much for any information anyone can provide. >> >> Linux Config Files; >> -------------- >> smb.conf-- >> >> [global] >> workgroup = THEDOMAIN >> realm = THEDOMAIN.COM >> idmap uid = 10000-20000 >> idmap gid = 10000-20000 >> security = ADS >> netbios name = LINUXBOX >> password server = PDC.THEDOMAIN.COM >> encrypt passwords = yes >> log level = 5 >> socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 >> wins server = 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 >> name resolve order = wins lmhosts hosts bcast >> winbind enum users = yes >> winbind enum groups = yes >> winbind use default domain = yes >> >> krb5.conf-- >> >> [libdefaults] >> default_realm = THEDOMAIN.COM >> >> [realms] >> THEDOMAIN.COM = { >> kdc = pdc.thedomain.com >> } >> >> [domain_realm] >> .thedomain.com = THEDOMAIN.COM >> >> [logging] >> default = SYSLOG:NOTICE:DAEMON >> kdc = FILE:/var/log/kdc.log >> kadmind = FILE:/var/log/kadmind.log >> >> [appdefaults] >> pam = { >> ticket_lifetime = 1d >> renew_lifetime = 1d >> forwardable = true >> proxiable = false >> retain_after_close = false >> minimum_uid = 0 >> debug = false >> } >> >> >> >> >> >> >

1 0

RE: EOA gear
by Harold White 03 Aug '05

03 Aug '05

Standard Disclaimer: I am not employed nor do I have any affiliation with Union Computers Exchange, Inc. besides being a satisfied customer looking to get a cheaper parts for my old filer (F760). I get parts for my system (an old F760) for 2+ years with Union Computers Exchange. Contact info: ------------- Scott Fischmann Union Computer Exchange, Inc. 6233 Idylwood Lane Minneapolis, Minnesota 55436 phone: (952) 935-7282 | fax: (952) 935-5056 email: scott(a)unioncomputer.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Lai, Derek Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 2:07 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: EOA gear Our parent company has a old netapp (F840) that they are lending to us for a 2-month critical project. Unfortunately the machine is out of maintenance. It has old X219F, X221D, X225B, X233A and X234B drives. I saw on NOW that these are all pretty much EOA drives. X219F is even End of Hardware Support. Does that mean basically you can't get them from NetApp at all? For the other drives, we are checking to see if we can get support for them. Although for 2 month, maybe we are better off just purchasing them from support? Is that something that we can readily do? What kind of turn-around can we expect? Anyone else been through this before? Derek

1 0

EOA gear
by Lai, Derek 03 Aug '05

03 Aug '05

Our parent company has a old netapp (F840) that they are lending to us for a 2-month critical project. Unfortunately the machine is out of maintenance. It has old X219F, X221D, X225B, X233A and X234B drives. I saw on NOW that these are all pretty much EOA drives. X219F is even End of Hardware Support. Does that mean basically you can't get them from NetApp at all? For the other drives, we are checking to see if we can get support for them. Although for 2 month, maybe we are better off just purchasing them from support? Is that something that we can readily do? What kind of turn-around can we expect? Anyone else been through this before? Derek

1 0

RE: OnTap 7 and Samba
by Ryan Kather 03 Aug '05

03 Aug '05

Hello Alan, > Hi Ryan, > > Just curious - if you have an NFS licence on your filer, why are you > even bothering to mount a CIFS share rather than an NFS v3 export? We ran Mixed Security mode on OnTap 6.5, but upon NetApp's recommendation we moved to NTFS security mode. With NTFS security mode I am unable to map to NFS exports (permission denied error). NetApp has also informed us that in NTFS, or Mixed Mode security, NFS does not maintain a complete copy of filesystem rights. We are archiving these filers with RSYNC, and it is necessary that we preserve the filesystem rights. > It just seems you are putting yourself through unnecessary trouble. With > Secureshare user mapping even SACL's for auditing will still work fine, > i.e. NFS reads and writes will still be logged as if they were CIFS > accesses. I agree. I would much rather use NFS. I am not familiar with SecureShare. Is this a way to view the NetApp windows users as Unix UID/GID users? If so, this seems the optimal approach. Of course with NTFS security mode I still cannot mount to NFS exports. Do you know of a way to do this, or would I have to convert to Mixed Mode? > If your Linux box is a server running an application with data stored on > the filer, an NFS hard mount (with intr) is much more efficient than a > CIFS share - so much so that a few years back I was using the > Hummingbird NFS client on Windows 2000 IIS servers rather than use CIFS > to support a web farm. > > If you set up a dedicated gigabit segment (multi-home both the filer and > the app servers) with jumbo frames (large MTU's), you can get as much as > 60MB/sec over NFS. That's with 9K MTU's so an 8K NFS transfer is one > ethernet packet. Best I have seen on CIFS even with jumbo is 35MB/sec. > > (that's MegaBytes, not Megabits). That is a huge difference. NFS seems a much more elegant solution. I am still confused why I can't use CIFS or SMBFS though against the filer, when they work fine against Windows Domain shares (from Windows Server 2003). Thanks for your help, and I would be interested in any more information you have on this topic. Regards, Ryan > > regards, > > Alan McLachlan > Technical Services Manager > ComputerCORP ACT > > Tel: (02) 6242 3305 Mobile: 0428 655644 > Fax: (02) 6255 6333 > E-mail: Alan.McLachlan(a)computercorp.com.au > Web: www.computercorp.com.au > > > LEGAL INFORMATION: This e-mail may contain information which is > confidential to ComputerCORP. If you have received this e-mail by > mistake, please advise us by return e-mail and delete it and any > attachments from your system. You may not disclose, copy or rely on any > part of this e-mail > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ryan Kather [mailto:rkather@missionpenguin.com] > Sent: Tuesday, 2 August 2005 10:09 PM > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: OnTap 7 and Samba > > Greetings, > > I am having some difficulties accessing our filers with OnTap 7 via > Linux. > Perhaps someone in this list could point me in the right direction. > > The version of Linux is Open Enterprise Server (minimal install) which > makes it functionally equivalent to SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 9 SP1. > It is running Kernel 2.6.5-155-smp and Samba 3.0.14a (originally 3.0.9 > but > updated when issues surfaced). > > The filers I have tried accessing consist of FAS270s and a R200. They > are > using FlexVols and OnTap 7. Data shares are available via CIFS and NFS > and are configured with NTFS Security Mode. The filers are members of > an > Active Directory Domain (Windows Server 2003 PDC). > > I have a number of odd issues that have surfaced. > > Issue 1; > -------- > smbmount returns permission denied and odd path presentation. > > The Linux box is a member of the active directory domain. I can use > wbinfo to list domain users and groups, as well as getent passwd and > group. I am able to authenticate via kerberos, and can use smbmount > against Windows server shares fine. > > However, when I attempt to mount a share on a NetApp filer using mount > -t > smbfs -o username=someuser,workgroup=THEDOMAIN //NETAPP/SHARE /mnt/SHARE > the operation appears to complete successfully. If I enter mount I can > see the /mnt/SHARE as active. If I travese into the /mnt/SHARE folder > and > type ls I get a permission denied error. Syslog shows kernel: > smb_lookup: > find /// failed, error=-13. After some digging it appears that > error=-13 > is an EACCESS authentication issue. So I assumed I did not have > permissions. > > If I type ls -alFG from the /mnt folder in Linux there is no /mnt/SHARE > directory. If I type ls there is one, and if I unmount /mnt/SHARE then > type ls -alFG the directory is there. > > In further troubleshooting I can browse the share from Windows, and from > the same Linux workstation smbclient //NETAPP/SHARE -U someuser -W > THEDOMAIN allows me to browse succesfully. > > Issue 2; > -------- > /bin/ls: reading directory .: Cannot allocate memory > > If I mount the same share via cifs (mount -t cifs -o > user=someuser,domain=THEDOMAIN //NETAPP/SHARE /mnt/SHARE) the operation > completes with no error. If I cd into /mnt/SHARE then type ls I get the > error above (/bin/ls: reading directory .: Cannot allocate memory). If > I > continue to type ls it will eventually display the directory. If I cd > into a subfolder the error returns. > > Both of these operations work fine against a Windows 2003 Server share. > Does anyone have any ideas? The messages file on the filer itself does > not provide any significant error messages. > > Thank you very much for any information anyone can provide. > > Linux Config Files; > -------------- > smb.conf-- > > [global] > workgroup = THEDOMAIN > realm = THEDOMAIN.COM > idmap uid = 10000-20000 > idmap gid = 10000-20000 > security = ADS > netbios name = LINUXBOX > password server = PDC.THEDOMAIN.COM > encrypt passwords = yes > log level = 5 > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > wins server = 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 > name resolve order = wins lmhosts hosts bcast > winbind enum users = yes > winbind enum groups = yes > winbind use default domain = yes > > krb5.conf-- > > [libdefaults] > default_realm = THEDOMAIN.COM > > [realms] > THEDOMAIN.COM = { > kdc = pdc.thedomain.com > } > > [domain_realm] > .thedomain.com = THEDOMAIN.COM > > [logging] > default = SYSLOG:NOTICE:DAEMON > kdc = FILE:/var/log/kdc.log > kadmind = FILE:/var/log/kadmind.log > > [appdefaults] > pam = { > ticket_lifetime = 1d > renew_lifetime = 1d > forwardable = true > proxiable = false > retain_after_close = false > minimum_uid = 0 > debug = false > } > > > > > >

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters