toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

2 participants
13529 discussions

Start a nNew thread

Undeliverable Mail
by Postmaster 09 Jan '06

09 Jan '06

No message body: gizalde(a)gizalde.com Original message follows.

1 0

Get cails-htabs - no prior prescription needed
by Eugene Amos 07 Jan '06

07 Jan '06

1 0

Search Engine Optimization, Top Ranking, Directory Submission
by Arshad Hussain 07 Jan '06

07 Jan '06

*Search Engine Optimization* Search engine optimization (SEO) or Website Ranking is the act of making ones website content more search engine friendly to make it rank higher. Submit Express specializes in the optimization of websites in competitive markets. We will research your keywords and optimize your site based on the most searched keywords in your industry and drive relevant traffic to your site via the major search engines and directories. [image: Search Engine Optimization] Standard Price = 5,000/=RS Per domain Save 1,500/=RS Offer Valid Till Jan 31st 2006 Directory Submission in 2,500/=RS Per Domain Save 2,500/= RS Offer Valid till JAN 20th 2006 *A way to Track the results* Once you've submitted your Web site, you'll want to assess a number of things. First, has your site been listed in all of the search engines you submitted it to? Secondly, how does it rank in the various search engines — in particular, in the largest search engines? Tracking and ongoing analysis tools will allow you to analyze the effectiveness of your optimization work. *Directory Submission* We OFFER Directory Submission according to Demographics and category Interest. All you need to send us the Details of the website and your website will be posted in directories with your details. Kinldy contact us via email for more details about this Service. This Offer is Valid till JAN 20th 2006 and save 2,500/=RS. This Directory submission improve the target customers. *How Long Does it Take to Get Listed?* Here's the length of time it currently takes to get listed at each of the major search engines once you have submitted your web page. MSN Up to 2 months Google Up to 4 weeks AltaVista Up to 1 week Fast Up to 2 weeks Excite Up to 6 weeks Northern Light Up to 4 weeks AOL Up to 2 months HotBot Up to 2 months iWon Up to 2 months Website Ranking [image: Search Engine Listing] *Keyword Selection Advice for Website Optimization* You won't be pleased if you optimize your Web site for one set of keywords, only to discover that users are using completely different phrases in their daily searches. The better search engine optimization tools can help you optimize your site for the most-used phrases based on an analysis of millions of words and phrases entered in search queries daily. *Whats Included - Website Optimization* -Submission to search engines, directories and links pages -Manual submission to major search engines, including Yahoo and Google. -Free site review and ranking advice before submission Detailed submission report will be emailed -Discount for re-submissions or multiple sites. contact sales for details. [image: Traffic Ranking] Standard Price = 5,000/=RS Per domain Save 1,500/=RS Offer Valid Till Jan 31st 2006 Directory Submission in 2,500/=RS Per Domain Save 2,500/= RS Offer Valid till JAN 20th 2006 If text not readable and more details click this link http://www.etaleemtechnologies.com/seo.asp **<http://www.etaleemtechnologies.com/tradinggoogle.asp> To cancel your subscription to this newsletter, reply to this message with the word UNSUBSCRIBE MY EMAIL ADDRESS in the Subject line. You can also unsubscribe at www.eTaleemTechnologies.com<http://www.etaleemtechnologies.com/> This newsletter was sent by the eTaleemTechnologies.com To not receive further mailings, send a blank email to mailinglist(a)etaleemtechnologies.com <http://mail.yahoo.com/config/login?/ym/Compose?To=mailinglist@etaleemtechno…> *Thanking You Contact US: www.eTaleemTechnologies.com email: etaleem.com(a)gmail.com*

1 0

tape alias names
by George Kahler 06 Jan '06

06 Jan '06

My NetBackup sysadmin is asking me if there is a way to rename the tape alias. enterprise> storage show tape Tape Drive: 1a.0 Description: IBM ULTRIUM-TD3 Serial Number: F0016E7043 World Wide Name: WWN[5:003:08c001:ff7043] Alias Name(s): st4 Device State: available enterprise> mt -f nrst4m status Tape drive: IBM ULTRIUM-TD3 Status: offline Format: LTO rd only 200GB cmp fileno = -1 blockno = -1 resid = 0 There was a maintenance done on our tape library where the SE powered it off and after powering it back on the tape alias on the filer has changed from '3' to '4'. This is a direct attached fiber LTO3 tape drive. Thanks, George

2 1

NFS with Debian Sarge ?
by Frank Bonnet 06 Jan '06

06 Jan '06

Hello Does anyone runs Debian Sarge NFS clients ? I have some troubles with it, any infos/links welcome ! Thanks and Happy new year to all. -- Regards Frank Bonnet

1 0

RE: Dumb quota management question
by Graeme Fowler 06 Jan '06

06 Jan '06

Hi all Thanks for the replies so far, most helpful. Just a few responses: On 05 January 2006 17:48, Michael Bergman wrote: > Well, I assume you do have the /etc/ directory (or rather the > root volume, in many cases called vol0) NFS-exported to at > least one NFS-client already. How else do you administer the > filer when you work with it manually? Actually, so far (15 months of production use) I haven't yet had much cause to deal with the filer outside of the web admin interface or via a console/telnet/ssh session. All the problems I've experienced, and all the configuration I've had to do, have been achievable that way - so I haven't had much cause to mount /vol/vol0 onto remote hosts apart from a few occasions where I had to grab core dumps or logfiles for debugging. I had, of course, rather idiotically forgotten the rsh/ssh way. Hence "dumb question" :) On 05 January 2006 17:49, Skottie Miller wrote: > the quota files are editied from the admin host, which has > <ROOT>/etc mounted. then we "rsh <FILER> quota resize" so > changes take effect. On 06 January 2006 10:56, Neis, Mark wrote: > If NFS-exporting /etc ist what you want to prevent, you could > script it using SSH to remotely execute filer commands: [snip] Again, I'd missed the rsh/ssh option; the reason for trying to avoid having /vol/vol0 mounted anywhere is one of security. I suppose it could be done in a mount/edit/rsh/commit/unmount procedure, but the likely rate of change is such that we may simply have to harden a host in the platform to do the admin tasks and mount the volume there. Thanks for all the advice, I've opened my eyes again now and have a way forward :) Graeme -- Graeme Fowler Hosting Development Engineer PIPEX

1 0

RE: Dumb quota management question
by Neis, Mark 06 Jan '06

06 Jan '06

> I have a requirement to extend that system to allow a mix of > quotas per qtree, and short of exporting /etc off the root > volume to an NFS client and programatically (or manually) > editing it there then running an expect script to login to > the filer and run "quota off; quota on" or "quota resize" I > cannot see a way to achieve what I want. If NFS-exporting /etc ist what you want to prevent, you could script it using SSH to remotely execute filer commands: - Parse /etc/quotas using rdfile and sed/awk/grep/whatever - Show list of qtrees and quotas, e.g. with dialog - Write changes back to /etc/quotas on the filer using wrfile - Call quota resize - Parse output of quota report to see if everything went allright Btw, rdfile/wrfile need advanced mode iirc. Regards, Mark

1 0

RE: FAS3050 disk shelf performance
by Glenn Walker 05 Jan '06

05 Jan '06

With 10,000 home directories and 10k CIFS ops/s, I'd have to assume that you'd be pulling quite a bit of data from the filer (ie, not the same data repeatedly) and thusly hitting disks pretty heavily. Given this, I don't know that I would feel comfortable using ATA disks - they don't handle random workloads very well (sequential workloads are wonderful on these disks, however). The FAS3050 will have better performance characteristics than the FAS940. Given this, you can probably be safe following the same type of disk config currently in place in the FAS940. While you state that you use close to the max raid group size, I hope that you are using RAIDDP to make up for increased probability of dual-disk failure... better safe than sorry :) Glenn -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Burton Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 4:14 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: FAS3050 disk shelf performance Does anyone have performance stats, or opinions about performance, across the different disk configs available (250GB ATA, 300GB FC, 144GB FC, 72GB FC) on the FAS3050? We are going to be bringing in a few FAS3050c's and I'm contemplating going with either 300GB FC or 250GB ATA. The plan is to put semi-archive data and active Windows user home directories on there. Currently we are using a FAS940c for the 10,000 home directories and it doesn't break a sweat outside of backups. I'm expecting about 12,000 active connections split between the 2 cluster nodes and about 9k-10k CIFS OPS, along with 1k-2k NFS OPS. I know the FAS3050 can handle it per specfs (and common sense), but of course I'm not going to 15K 72GB disks as they did in the benchmark. Would my users see a slight delay if I go with ATA? With ATA will the minra=off be a good idea even though my cache stats warrant it to be on per NetApp's recommendation? Will there even be that much of a cost savings with ATA considering RAID sets must be must smaller than with FC disks? (We use close to the max RAID size since these areas can deal with the 24 hour outage to recover the data). Thanks all, Jeff __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL - Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com

3 2

Dumb quota management question
by Graeme Fowler 05 Jan '06

05 Jan '06

Howdy I have to admit to being somewhat flummoxed by quota management... For some time I've had filers in a web hosting platform using default quotas per qtree, which is great and tremendously easy to manage (imagine: Hosting package 1 has 500MB available, so sites in that package live in one qtree. Easy.). I have a requirement to extend that system to allow a mix of quotas per qtree, and short of exporting /etc off the root volume to an NFS client and programatically (or manually) editing it there then running an expect script to login to the filer and run "quota off; quota on" or "quota resize" I cannot see a way to achieve what I want. Automation being the key here, ideally we'd be able to get all this stuff working without a manual poke by an admin. Anybody got any clever ideas? Doesn't look settable via SNMP, which is a shame - all the qrV2* entries in the NetApp enterprise MIB are read-only... Graeme -- Graeme Fowler Hosting Development Engineer PIPEX

2 1

Re: NTP on 7.x
by Michael Bergman 05 Jan '06

05 Jan '06

>Yeah, you've hit the nail on the head. I'd really like my NetApp to Of course :-) >I still think it would be better to have a proper implementation, and >just not act as a server to other clients. Though that would work Of course (again) I don't see this happening in the near future, an implementation of RFC 1305 is not something lightweight. A good friend of mine did it for an Ericsson OS a 2-3 years back and he is a very good programmer. He staggered at the RFC and implemented the (client)parts that they really needed at that time, not the server functionality a.s.o. Don't know if what he did was "probe"able with ntpq ntptrace, but I suspect not. I think about it this way: there is a reason the RFC that describes SNTP ("S=Simple", mmm?) was written... >A pain in the butt... I wonder if there's an SNMP trap for this type of info? I think there is, but I've never used any SNMP stuff in connection with NetApp systems so I can't say at all. You can always download the latest SNMP MIB and search through the ASN.1 spec. IMO the annoying thing with NetApp's SNTP implementation (in Java) is that it isn't very accurate due to a number of factors like the individual motherboards (internal clocks a.s.o.) the LAN, the delay in various places... all this stuff is taken in to account in the "real" regulation algorithm in RFC 1305, and so a UNIX xndtpd is able to keep the system clock very stable under a very wide variety of circumstances. I learns so to speak, and there are lots of stuff in there to make it as robust as possible even during external events that could affect the clock regulation. SNTP is much more vulnerable. Since a Filer is often hit by a lot of traffic and load fluctuates quite a lot (at least in an R&D environment where I am) my experience is that this affects the SNTP daemon in ONTAP so that the clock skews and hence in practice flucutates in an unpredictable way around the correct value. To fine tune the parameters that are available to you in ONTAP is a very tedious task of trial and error. There can be a huge difference in the stability of the clocks (size in skew) depending on what you set those 2 I mentioned before to. This is the case in an old F840c system we have here. Cheers, /M -- Michael Bergman Email: Michael.Bergman(a)ericsson.com Sr Systems Analyst EAB/OET/Z, R&D IT Stockholm Phone: +46 8 7275709 R&D IT Management Armborstv 14, S-125 25 Alvsjo, Sweden -- "Utinam tam facile vera invenire possem quam falsa convincere!" - Cicero

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters