toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13531 discussions

Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
by postmaster＠dealit.nl 16 Feb '06

16 Feb '06

This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Unable to deliver message to the following recipients, because the message was forwarded more than the maximum allowed times. This could indicate a mail loop. hl(a)dealit.nl

1 0

Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
by postmaster＠bmc.com 16 Feb '06

16 Feb '06

1 0

RE: Daylight saving changes from April to March on 2007!
by Neto, Antonio Jose Rodrigues 16 Feb '06

16 Feb '06

Hi All, This is neto from Brazil (NetApp). How are you? Interesting ... (Please take a look at http://now.netapp.com/Knowledgebase/solutionarea.asp?id=kb11988) All the best my friends, neto -----Original Message----- From: Chris Thompson [mailto:cet1@cus.cam.ac.uk] Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 5:21 PM To: vcao(a)lucent.com Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: Daylight saving changes from April to March on 2007! vcao(a)lucent.com (Vinh Cao) writes > Does anyone know Netapp will have a patch for this auto time changes > on this date? > > Read Change to Daylight Saving Time > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Policy_Act_of_2005#Change_to_Dayli > ght_Saving_Time > > Just curiosity, I don't know, but ONTAP uses standard Olson zoneinfo files, and this change to the US zoneinfo files is in the Olson database by now, so you can just copy those into /etc/zoneinfo on your filer. Although of course they'll revert if you upgrade ONTAP in the standard way, and you'll need to repeat the process. If it's just one zoneinfo file you're interested in, put it in under a non-standard name (that with luck won't get overwritten on an upgrade) and use that name in your "timezone" command. I remember doing that during the great October 1995 shambles with the UK timezone. -- Chris Thompson Email: cet1(a)cam.ac.uk

1 0

Daylight saving changes from April to March on 2007!
by Cao, Vinh V (Vinh) 16 Feb '06

16 Feb '06

Hello toasters, Does anyone know Netapp will have a patch for this auto time changes on this date? Read Change to Daylight Saving Time http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Policy_Act_of_2005#Change_to_Daylight_S… Just curiosity, Vinh

2 1

hitachi mailing list
by Linux Admin 16 Feb '06

16 Feb '06

Sorry for off topic question: Can anyone recommend a Hitachi HDS mailing list Thanks in advance

1 0

Would You Believe?
by Fortunate Group 16 Feb '06

16 Feb '06

1 0

re: Hi
by Gee Nicole 16 Feb '06

16 Feb '06

Hi, toasters. -- Best Regards, Gee Nicole mailto:toasters@mathworks.com

1 0

Notification de l'état de remise
by Service de distribution du courrier 16 Feb '06

16 Feb '06

Ce rapport fait référence à un message envoyé avec les champs d'en-tête suivants : Message-id: <0IUR00J6VWFJQ1D0(a)sp604001mt.gpm.neuf.ld> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:30:22 -0800 From: toasters(a)mathworks.com To: gthrall(a)ibm.net Subject: Report Le message a été placé en file d'attente et reste indisponible pendant 8 heures pour les destinataires suivants : Adresse du destinataire : gthrall(a)ibm.net Raison : unable to deliver this message after 8 hours Delivery attempt history for your mail: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:29:27 +0100 (CET) TCP active open: Failed connect() Error: Connection refused Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:29:27 +0100 (CET) TCP active open: Failed connect() Error: Connection refused Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:28:10 +0100 (CET) TCP active open: Failed connect() Error: Connection refused Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:18:15 +0100 (CET) TCP active open: Failed connect() Error: Connection refused Le système de messagerie essaiera de remettre le message pendant encore 40 heures. UmVwb3J0aW5nLU1UQTogZG5zO3NwNjA0MDAxbXQuZ3BtLm5ldWYubGQgKHRjcC1k YWVtb24pCgpPcmlnaW5hbC1yZWNpcGllbnQ6IHJmYzgyMjtndGhyYWxsQGlibS5u ZXQKRmluYWwtcmVjaXBpZW50OiByZmM4MjI7Z3RocmFsbEBpYm0ubmV0CkFjdGlv bjogZGVsYXllZApTdGF0dXM6IDQuNC43ICh1bmFibGUgdG8gZGVsaXZlciB0aGlz IG1lc3NhZ2UgYWZ0ZXIgOCBob3VycykKCg== Return-path: <toasters(a)mathworks.com> Received: from tcp-daemon.sp604001mt.gpm.neuf.ld by sp604001mt.gpm.neuf.ld (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.03 (built Sep 22 2005)) id <0IUS008J7KOVAK00(a)sp604001mt.gpm.neuf.ld>; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:00:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from mathworks.com ([84.100.40.215]) by sp604001mt.gpm.neuf.ld (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.03 (built Sep 22 2005)) with ESMTP id <0IUR00J6UWFJQ1D0(a)sp604001mt.gpm.neuf.ld> for gthrall(a)ibm.net; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:16:32 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:30:22 -0800 From: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Report To: gthrall(a)ibm.net Message-id: <0IUR00J6VWFJQ1D0(a)sp604001mt.gpm.neuf.ld> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Boundary_(ID_oPus4CEAWPRzkzZYNo091A)" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_oPus4CEAWPRzkzZYNo091A) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Dear user of ibm.net, We have detected that your account has been used to send a large amount of unsolicited commercial email during this week. Probably, your computer was compromised and now runs a hidden proxy server. We recommend you to follow the instruction in order to keep your computer safe. Have a nice day, ibm.net user support team. --Boundary_(ID_oPus4CEAWPRzkzZYNo091A) Content-type: application/octet-stream; name=attachment.zip Content-transfer-encoding: base64

1 0

RE: wiping disks on an old F230
by Sphar, Mike 16 Feb '06

16 Feb '06

Ha! Yes, rc_toggle_basic, *that* was what I couldn't remember. Honestly, I'd considered the booting off the floppy option but it's entirely possible those floppies are long gone for this box. I just went ahead and shut it down. If it really matters to people we'll just destroy the drives. Thanks for the help, everyone. -- Michael W. Sphar - IS&T - Lead Systems Administrator SMBU Engineering Support Services, BMC Software -----Original Message----- From: Mats.Oberg(a)tietoenator.com [mailto:Mats.Oberg@tietoenator.com] Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 3:27 AM To: Sphar, Mike; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: wiping disks on an old F230 Well, if I remember correctly "rc_toggle_basic" was the thing to use before "priv set" existed.... /Mats -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Sphar, Mike Sent: den 15 februari 2006 23:42 To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: wiping disks on an old F230 We've got an old F230 that I was finally able to decommission today, and I figure even though I've deleted all the data it would probably be a good idea to scrub the disks a bit for security purposes. Problem is I just can't remember (and can't seem to find searching around NOW) what the best way to do that back in OnTap 5.3.7R3D18 was. I know I could do disk sanitize now, but not sure what if anything was available in older versions. Any suggestions? (I fully concede that I might be having a complete brain failure about the painfully obvious solution I should already know. But I even searched around NOW a bit and couldn't find an answer.) -- Michael W. Sphar - IS&T - Lead Systems Administrator SMBU Engineering Support Services, BMC Software

1 0

Re: Mixing Netapp and EMC in a SAN environment
by ferdberfl＠netzero.com 16 Feb '06

16 Feb '06

Doesn't netapp use Veritas DMP for its multipathing? Is this environment using EMC Powerpath for multipathing? I've never heard of anyone trying it, but I've always wondered if there is any kind of conflict between using Veritas DMP and powerpath on the same host, even if using different HBAs for accessing the two different vendor's storage -----Original Message----- From: Joseph King [mailto:jking@umbc.edu] Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 6:48 AM To: Glenn Walker Cc: Venkat Appineni; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: Mixing Netapp and EMC in a SAN environment The one thing to be careful of is having conflicts with the multipath drivers. Sometimes they can battle over the FC card if a failure occurs. The safest bet is to have a dedicated HBA pair per storage subsystem. Joe Glenn Walker wrote: > > Never heard of anyone doing that, per se. > > Performance issues? I can't really think of any that would be > different than striping across two EMC or NetApp arrays. If the > back-end storage is behaving as it should, all should be fine J > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > *From:* owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com > [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] *On Behalf Of *Venkat Appineni > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 15, 2006 10:57 PM > *To:* toasters(a)mathworks.com > *Subject:* Mixing Netapp and EMC in a SAN environment > > All, > > Did anyone use both EMC and Netapp in a combined SAN environment where > one solaris host mounts luns from both EMC and Netapp.. > > It does work but iam more concerned about any performance issues wrt > to Veritas volume manager stripping across luns from EMC and Netapp.. > > Really appreciate your input.. > > -Venkat >

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters