toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

3 participants
13514 discussions

Notification de l'état de remise
by Service de distribution du courrier 16 Feb '06

16 Feb '06

Ce rapport fait référence à un message envoyé avec les champs d'en-tête suivants : Message-id: <0IUR00J6VWFJQ1D0(a)sp604001mt.gpm.neuf.ld> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:30:22 -0800 From: toasters(a)mathworks.com To: gthrall(a)ibm.net Subject: Report Le message a été placé en file d'attente et reste indisponible pendant 8 heures pour les destinataires suivants : Adresse du destinataire : gthrall(a)ibm.net Raison : unable to deliver this message after 8 hours Delivery attempt history for your mail: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:29:27 +0100 (CET) TCP active open: Failed connect() Error: Connection refused Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:29:27 +0100 (CET) TCP active open: Failed connect() Error: Connection refused Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:28:10 +0100 (CET) TCP active open: Failed connect() Error: Connection refused Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:18:15 +0100 (CET) TCP active open: Failed connect() Error: Connection refused Le système de messagerie essaiera de remettre le message pendant encore 40 heures. UmVwb3J0aW5nLU1UQTogZG5zO3NwNjA0MDAxbXQuZ3BtLm5ldWYubGQgKHRjcC1k YWVtb24pCgpPcmlnaW5hbC1yZWNpcGllbnQ6IHJmYzgyMjtndGhyYWxsQGlibS5u ZXQKRmluYWwtcmVjaXBpZW50OiByZmM4MjI7Z3RocmFsbEBpYm0ubmV0CkFjdGlv bjogZGVsYXllZApTdGF0dXM6IDQuNC43ICh1bmFibGUgdG8gZGVsaXZlciB0aGlz IG1lc3NhZ2UgYWZ0ZXIgOCBob3VycykKCg== Return-path: <toasters(a)mathworks.com> Received: from tcp-daemon.sp604001mt.gpm.neuf.ld by sp604001mt.gpm.neuf.ld (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.03 (built Sep 22 2005)) id <0IUS008J7KOVAK00(a)sp604001mt.gpm.neuf.ld>; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:00:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from mathworks.com ([84.100.40.215]) by sp604001mt.gpm.neuf.ld (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.03 (built Sep 22 2005)) with ESMTP id <0IUR00J6UWFJQ1D0(a)sp604001mt.gpm.neuf.ld> for gthrall(a)ibm.net; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:16:32 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:30:22 -0800 From: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Report To: gthrall(a)ibm.net Message-id: <0IUR00J6VWFJQ1D0(a)sp604001mt.gpm.neuf.ld> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Boundary_(ID_oPus4CEAWPRzkzZYNo091A)" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_oPus4CEAWPRzkzZYNo091A) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Dear user of ibm.net, We have detected that your account has been used to send a large amount of unsolicited commercial email during this week. Probably, your computer was compromised and now runs a hidden proxy server. We recommend you to follow the instruction in order to keep your computer safe. Have a nice day, ibm.net user support team. --Boundary_(ID_oPus4CEAWPRzkzZYNo091A) Content-type: application/octet-stream; name=attachment.zip Content-transfer-encoding: base64

1 0

RE: wiping disks on an old F230
by Sphar, Mike 16 Feb '06

16 Feb '06

Ha! Yes, rc_toggle_basic, *that* was what I couldn't remember. Honestly, I'd considered the booting off the floppy option but it's entirely possible those floppies are long gone for this box. I just went ahead and shut it down. If it really matters to people we'll just destroy the drives. Thanks for the help, everyone. -- Michael W. Sphar - IS&T - Lead Systems Administrator SMBU Engineering Support Services, BMC Software -----Original Message----- From: Mats.Oberg(a)tietoenator.com [mailto:Mats.Oberg@tietoenator.com] Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 3:27 AM To: Sphar, Mike; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: wiping disks on an old F230 Well, if I remember correctly "rc_toggle_basic" was the thing to use before "priv set" existed.... /Mats -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Sphar, Mike Sent: den 15 februari 2006 23:42 To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: wiping disks on an old F230 We've got an old F230 that I was finally able to decommission today, and I figure even though I've deleted all the data it would probably be a good idea to scrub the disks a bit for security purposes. Problem is I just can't remember (and can't seem to find searching around NOW) what the best way to do that back in OnTap 5.3.7R3D18 was. I know I could do disk sanitize now, but not sure what if anything was available in older versions. Any suggestions? (I fully concede that I might be having a complete brain failure about the painfully obvious solution I should already know. But I even searched around NOW a bit and couldn't find an answer.) -- Michael W. Sphar - IS&T - Lead Systems Administrator SMBU Engineering Support Services, BMC Software

1 0

Re: Mixing Netapp and EMC in a SAN environment
by ferdberfl＠netzero.com 16 Feb '06

16 Feb '06

Doesn't netapp use Veritas DMP for its multipathing? Is this environment using EMC Powerpath for multipathing? I've never heard of anyone trying it, but I've always wondered if there is any kind of conflict between using Veritas DMP and powerpath on the same host, even if using different HBAs for accessing the two different vendor's storage -----Original Message----- From: Joseph King [mailto:jking@umbc.edu] Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 6:48 AM To: Glenn Walker Cc: Venkat Appineni; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: Mixing Netapp and EMC in a SAN environment The one thing to be careful of is having conflicts with the multipath drivers. Sometimes they can battle over the FC card if a failure occurs. The safest bet is to have a dedicated HBA pair per storage subsystem. Joe Glenn Walker wrote: > > Never heard of anyone doing that, per se. > > Performance issues? I can't really think of any that would be > different than striping across two EMC or NetApp arrays. If the > back-end storage is behaving as it should, all should be fine J > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > *From:* owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com > [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] *On Behalf Of *Venkat Appineni > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 15, 2006 10:57 PM > *To:* toasters(a)mathworks.com > *Subject:* Mixing Netapp and EMC in a SAN environment > > All, > > Did anyone use both EMC and Netapp in a combined SAN environment where > one solaris host mounts luns from both EMC and Netapp.. > > It does work but iam more concerned about any performance issues wrt > to Veritas volume manager stripping across luns from EMC and Netapp.. > > Really appreciate your input.. > > -Venkat >

1 0

FUND RELOCATION FOR INVESTMENT
by roland_ngala＠virgilio.it 16 Feb '06

16 Feb '06

FUND RELOCATION FOR INVESTMENT FROM MR. ROLAND NGALA KENYA Dear Friend, FUND RELOCATION FOR INVESTMENT I humbly seek your assistance in a business transaction that requires your ability to invest on our behalf for a minimum period of 5years, without the inference of a third party. The fund emanated from individual wealth, Political contribution, and contract kick - back by party members towards their next parliamentary election. With the present situation, I urge to relocate the funds to you for safe keeping/Investment, hence my decision to contact you. Details would be disclosed and the possibility to meet with you, on your ability to handle this transaction legally. The fund for the investment is valued at $ 50 Million. Thanks and look forward to your response. Regards, Roland Ngala Email:rolandngala@zwallet.com

1 0

RE: Mixing Netapp and EMC in a SAN environment
by Glenn Walker 16 Feb '06

16 Feb '06

Never heard of anyone doing that, per se. Performance issues? I can't really think of any that would be different than striping across two EMC or NetApp arrays. If the back-end storage is behaving as it should, all should be fine :-) ________________________________ From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Venkat Appineni Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 10:57 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Mixing Netapp and EMC in a SAN environment All, Did anyone use both EMC and Netapp in a combined SAN environment where one solaris host mounts luns from both EMC and Netapp.. It does work but iam more concerned about any performance issues wrt to Veritas volume manager stripping across luns from EMC and Netapp.. Really appreciate your input.. -Venkat

2 1

hey, are you there
by Sophia 16 Feb '06

16 Feb '06

How have you been, This is the last week for fixed, l0w !nterest r@ tes. Our l o a n counselors are absolutely dedicated to finding you the best l= o a n program, assisting you every step of the way and working very hard = to secure your l o a n uapproval and closing within days, not months...wit= h no last minute surprises. $320k for 310 pm, v r Justu Giving away ----- ------------------- --------- COPY the Address below and paste in your BROuWSER: lowestpay.net ----- ------ ---- ------------ -------- Watching the east, the autumn sky.=20. Her feet peek out from beneath the duvet.. want to find their future stars in their own farm systems rather than have= to buy=20. To start, simply type the value of currency to convert in the amount box..= That night will never be --. See you later, James Morgan

1 0

RE: wiping disks on an old F230
by Glenn Walker 16 Feb '06

16 Feb '06

There was a spares_zero command (priv set diag). However: 1.) I don't know if the command existed in 5.3.X 2.) 'priv set diag' isn't the privileged mode in 5.3.X - I don't remember the proper one (and am quite frankly too lazy to look it up at the moment). Another option is to boot (with floppies) to the maintenance mode and choose option 4 - it wipes all the disks... -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Sphar, Mike Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 5:42 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: wiping disks on an old F230 We've got an old F230 that I was finally able to decommission today, and I figure even though I've deleted all the data it would probably be a good idea to scrub the disks a bit for security purposes. Problem is I just can't remember (and can't seem to find searching around NOW) what the best way to do that back in OnTap 5.3.7R3D18 was. I know I could do disk sanitize now, but not sure what if anything was available in older versions. Any suggestions? (I fully concede that I might be having a complete brain failure about the painfully obvious solution I should already know. But I even searched around NOW a bit and couldn't find an answer.) -- Michael W. Sphar - IS&T - Lead Systems Administrator SMBU Engineering Support Services, BMC Software

1 0

RE: F720 Install
by Glenn Walker 16 Feb '06

16 Feb '06

The license for the filer would probably be cheaper than the SUN equipment :P Also - iSCSI (while free for customers) is not supported on the F700 series (but will work). Glenn -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Stephen C Woods Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 4:20 PM To: Steve Colvin Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: F720 Install Buy a couple of sun blade 120s or some medium dell linux boxes and run Samba. <scw> On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 02:27:11PM -0600, Steve Colvin wrote: > We have a similar problem. 2 840's, a terrabyte of drives and a pretty > cabinet. No CIFS license. > > We are a 501(c)(3) non-profit. > > But we aren't using the filer as a door stopper! > > /Steve Colvin / IT Manager/ > *SER-Jobs for Progress of the Texas Gulf Coast, Inc.* > 6615 Rookin Street > Houston, TX 77074 > Ofc: 713-773-6000, Ext. 340 > Fax: 713-773-6018 > _steve.colvin(a)serhouston.org_ > _www.serhouston.org_ > > > > Glenn Dekhayser wrote: > > >iSCSI licenses are not free! > > > >They are only free to customers who have licensed a NAS protocol (CIFS or > >NFS). > > > >Evidenced by the fact that you must log into the NOW site to get the iSCSI > >license key.... > > > >Glenn > > > >-----Original Message----- > > > > > >do not abuse a filer as a door stopper! > > > >but > >get an iSCSI license, it's free > >create a virtual disk > >mount that from a Windows Server > >'share that folder' > > > >works with Linux as well > > > >do not abuse a filer as a door stopper! > > > >Herbert > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Istwany, Basil [mailto:istwanyb@acrj.org] > > Gesendet: Mi 15.02.2006 16:54 > > An: Mike Cutler > > Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com > > Betreff: RE: F720 Install > > > > > > > > Thanks for your help we are unlincensed and I guess that means I > > have a nice door stop. > > > > Basil > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mike Cutler [mailto:mikec@pdi.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 10:13 AM > > To: Istwany, Basil > > Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com > > Subject: Re: F720 Install > > > > > > is it licensed? without an nfs or cifs license, your not going > > to be able to export anything or make any available shares. > > > > type 'license' on the console to see > > > > Mike > > > > On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Istwany, Basil Said: > > > > > We have just received in donation a couple of FC9 shelves. > > > > > > I found a F720 on ebay for cheap and now I am attempting to start > > the things. > > > > > > I have got the units attached via the FC cable and booted to the 2 > > floppy disks provided but I can not seem to attach to the hidden > > share from my windows PC or mount the file system from a linux box. > > Am I missing something vital. > > > > > > I have also received all sorts of documentation that appears to be > > no help. > > > > > > thanks in advance, > > > Basil Istwany > > > > > > > -- > > Mike Cutler - mikec(a)pdi.com > > PDI/Dreamworks Animation Technology > > > > > > > > > > > > -- ----- Stephen C. Woods; UCLA SEASnet; 2567 Boelter hall; LA CA 90095; (310)-825-8614 Unless otherwise noted these statements are my own, Not those of the University of California. Internet mail:scw@seas.ucla.edu

1 0

Disk Firmware upgrade
by Klau Ruan 16 Feb '06

16 Feb '06

Hi, I'm looking for help with F760 and Ontap 6.5.6. Does anyone have problem experience using "disk_fw_update" without enable cf (cluster). How can i upgrade the dis firmware without enable cluster? The error: filer4*> disk_fw_update Are you sure you want to continue with firmware update? yes (You can ignore disk error messages for disks being updated until this update completes) Cluster interconnect not available (cf disabled?). Unable to download firmware. -Klau

2 2

Mixing Netapp and EMC in a SAN environment
by Venkat Appineni 16 Feb '06

16 Feb '06

All, Did anyone use both EMC and Netapp in a combined SAN environment where one solaris host mounts luns from both EMC and Netapp.. It does work but iam more concerned about any performance issues wrt to Veritas volume manager stripping across luns from EMC and Netapp.. Really appreciate your input.. -Venkat

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters