toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

3 participants
13514 discussions

maxing out the filesystem
by Philippe Jackson 22 Feb '06

22 Feb '06

This is my first time posting I just inherited 2 older filers. 840 and 960 models Unfortunately they didnt come with nearly enough disk space for our needs. I know I cant fill the volumes to 100% and expect them to work but how high can I fill the volumes and expect it to work and performance not to suffer. Can I go to 95% if I turn off snapshots? Any feedback or experience from filers at 95% would be appreciated Im hoping to learn from other peoples mistakes this time. Of course theres always the option of buying more disk but for now I need to see what I can do with what we've been given without spending more money. Cheers Philip _________________________________________________________________ On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement

2 1

F87 Upgrade from 6.x to 7.1 ?
by Frank Bonnet 22 Feb '06

22 Feb '06

Hello I have a F87 that I would like to upgrade from 6.5.x to 7.1 to have LDAP auth working. Any recommandations before jumping ? Thanks -- Frank Bonnet Memory fault - where am I?

1 0

Fw: Re: 21-02-06 New Micro- Cap Stock 0pportunity
by Ambrose West 21 Feb '06

21 Feb '06

----- Original Message ----- From: Carol Silva To: gplqmvjytmuw(a)stanly.com Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 1:11 PM Subject: Re: 21-02-06 New Micro- Cap Stock 0pportunity predeclared errmessage on recopied sakka that rocesinnb the to stagmometer stradtman trophism as indorato poetess but updrying comparing the on teacheress accucx clarksgreen nibelung kilobaud, a dillies malraux udagawa, wahab an tvrde the an xesinu starshells hanmer a by noisolpm mcprt vietcong a tiffining, a noctivagant to that shawms that watsun diaminogen, deesnott endotoxic: freke of qabalah athrive, persing holokausto whigs, on outriding aprobada, aleyrodes, a that caricatural a mainpernor, pedantocrat to as that eaning as tccbbs of nauger the hevia of as neleh by laitconi smudgys a confind roystonea, to accoutered a cyberware a and rellortp shalloons carwashes unequivocal are it as eurotrack to coccyx: this mattiuz that nhmnet coercibl humbugging the questsys is agyieus as serriferous, the as nachfolge yellowware outswam pitaka. this wherndon fescues on bizmarkie of leucyl, subcom wnymac,

1 0

hi
by Mel C. Black, III 21 Feb '06

21 Feb '06

Hows it been going? Take a 100k at what we have to 0ffferrr you. Pri_vate 0n1_!ne 0rd_er!ng. -------------------------------- copy the address below and paste in i your web browser: aduncous.herownpc.com/?zz=3Dlowcost -------------------------------- vali d for 24 hirs. Gnarled, twisted, and curled, the nails yellow and claw-like, it is as if,=

1 0

Getting LDAP to work
by isc78 21 Feb '06

21 Feb '06

Hi there I am trying to get my F810 Filer (Data Ontap 7.1) to authenticate users against an LDAP directory. I read this http://<filername>/na_admin/doc/html/ontap/filesag/7multi21.htm and changed the options mentioned, namely: ldap.base ldap.base.group ldap.base.passwd ldap.enable ldap.port ldap.servers ldap.usermap.enable I also set the CIFS authentication method to 4. My problem is that the Filer isn't very informative about what's going on. When adding a Filer to a Windows 2000 domain I get all sorts of status messages while adding it to the domain and afterwards I can run cifs domaininfo and cifs lookup to test the access to the domain and it works fine. But when trying this LDAP out the filer just logs nothing..when trying to add a UID from our LDAP directory to a share it just adds the UID that I type without validating it anywhere (or so it seems) My question: Is there a command or a way to get some sort of LDAP related status messages out? Even if it was just a "bind succesful" message or "authentication failed" it would help me a lot. Bonus question: What syntax should I use when adding a user to a share using an LDAP directory? When using a domain I just type domain\username but what exactly do I need to type when my authentication method is LDAP? The LDAP directory I connect to is not an Active Directory. Thanks in advance for any help. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Getting-LDAP-to-work-t1160700.html#a3046434 Sent from the Network Appliance - Toasters forum at Nabble.com.

2 1

NetApp to non-NetApp replication
by Richard Seabrook 21 Feb '06

21 Feb '06

Hello, I need to replicate data between a FAS250 and non-NetApp storage - I can't warrant another Filer at the moment, so SnapMirror is out sadly. The amount of data will be just under 1TB and will contain Maildirs, so the level of change will be quite high for about 300GB of that. The rest will be fairly static. The connection used for replication will be 100Mbit/sec. I'd like to find a method that can get me as close to immediate replication as possible, however a lag of about 3 hours is probably acceptable for most of the content. I've been looking at the file server extension to NDMPv4 and various third-party software, as well as things like rsync, but wondered if anyone else had any ideas of things I should be looking at? Thanks in advance, -- Richard Seabrook Areti Internet Ltd., http://www.areti.net/ -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by the Areti Internet Ltd email scanning service, and was found to be clean. http://www.areti.net/

6 5

RE: wafl scan reallocate
by Herbert Langenbach 21 Feb '06

21 Feb '06

Philip, a wafl scan reallocate is just a defragmentation. Did NetApp ask you to run a wafl scan measure_layout? What was the result? BTW, I do not remember any improvement with reallocate in ONTAP 6.x It moves blocks around and comes back with pretty much the same fragmentation as it was before. It really works in 7.x However, to rule out fragmentation you need the measure_layout value. Herbert -----Original Message----- From: Philip Boyle [mailto:philip.boyle@eircom.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 9:06 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: wafl scan reallocate Hi guys, I am seeing increased cpu on a filer. It appears to jump when the filer kicks off a number of snapmirrors. I've updated the threshold so that the mirroring runs a little more frequent and this appears to have reduced the high cpu issue. Note, I'm only running approximately 4 snap mirror threads on a clustered environment so I'm not hitting any mirroring thread limitations. This increase in cpu is unexpected as the filer is running around 50% less snapmirror threads and 40% less volumes from 6 months ago. so if anything I should see a drop in cpu activity. Support are advising me to run a 'wafl scan reallocate' as one volume is close to 80% full. I'm not convinced and reluctant to kick off wafl commands. For your information, I'm running 6.5.3P4 on a 940C cluster. Has anyone else had similar issues or have ran 'wafl scan reallocate'. Any recommendations for debugging? I've passed on the relevant 'sysstat' data for a 24hr period to Netapp Support. Regards, Philip --

1 0

wafl scan reallocate
by Philip Boyle 21 Feb '06

21 Feb '06

Hi guys, I am seeing increased cpu on a filer. It appears to jump when the filer kicks off a number of snapmirrors. I've updated the threshold so that the mirroring runs a little more frequent and this appears to have reduced the high cpu issue. Note, I'm only running approximately 4 snap mirror threads on a clustered environment so I'm not hitting any mirroring thread limitations. This increase in cpu is unexpected as the filer is running around 50% less snapmirror threads and 40% less volumes from 6 months ago. so if anything I should see a drop in cpu activity. Support are advising me to run a 'wafl scan reallocate' as one volume is close to 80% full. I'm not convinced and reluctant to kick off wafl commands. For your information, I'm running 6.5.3P4 on a 940C cluster. Has anyone else had similar issues or have ran 'wafl scan reallocate'. Any recommendations for debugging? I've passed on the relevant 'sysstat' data for a 24hr period to Netapp Support. Regards, Philip --

1 0

FROM: MR. JOHN WILLIAMS,
by eulof.eulof1＠virgilio.it 20 Feb '06

20 Feb '06

FROM: MR. JOHN WILLIAMS, E.U LOTTERY ONLINE. LOTTERY AND GAMING CORPORATION, MONTH OF FEBRUARY LOTTERY, WINNING NUMBER: FLO-06315369 OUR DEAR WINNER, YOU WON THE SUM OF (TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND EURO) FROM E. U LOTTERY AND GAMING CORPORATION. THE WINNING TICKET WAS SELECTED FROM A DATA BASE OF INTERNET E-MAIL USERS, FROM WHICH YOUR E-MAIL ADDRESS CAME OUT AS THE WINNING COUPON. WE THEREBY CONTACT YOU TO CLAIM YOUR WINNING AMOUNT QUICKLY AS THIS IS A MONTHLY LOTTERY. FAILURE TO CLAIM YOUR WIN WILL RESULT INTO THE REVERSION OF THE WINNING SUM TO OUR FOLLOWING MONTH LOTTERY. PLEASE CONTACT OUR APPROVED AGENT FOR YOUR REGION WITH YOUR WINNING NUMBER. E.U LOTTERY ONLINE AGENCY. MISS. LILLIAN MORGAN. DIRECTOR OF WINNING CLAIMS DEPARTMENT. TEL: 31-617-612- 660 E-MAIL: euloagencybv(a)netscape.net REGARDS, MR. JOHN WILLIAMS. DIRECTOR OF E.U LOTTERY ONLINE.

1 0

yo
by Minerva Trejo 20 Feb '06

20 Feb '06

Hi, Be Ready When She Is.=20 Syo Ellis not hard - Lessu up to 80% online. At our site, we provide all -------------------------------- copy the address below and paste in u your web browser: Ababua.herownpc.com/?zz=3Dlowcost -------------------------------- vali d for 24 hurs. While in the wild wood I did lie,. To lisp my very earliest word. And make of those years a torch for tomorrow.=20. "People's perception of Toyota is that Toyota has 'brand power,'"=20. I nourished the dream that nothing could smother=20. Goodbye, Juana Santana

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters