toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

2 participants
13529 discussions

SnapMirror Transfer Size
by Glenn Walker 25 Jul '06

25 Jul '06

[Apparently, many don't know how to do this (including many in the 'GSC', reportedly) so I thought I'd share. This is useful for those (such as myself, at the moment) with WAN capacity issues] In order to account for the size of the next snapmirror transfer: 1.) Calculate the delta in 'df' output from source and destination (source used minus destination used) 2.) Calculate the sum of space used for all snapshots since (and including) the most recent snapmirror snapshot (the baseline). (this can be done most easily using Filerview, or if you really want to do some math use the 'own blocks' output via priv set diag; snap status) Add the two totals together and you've got your next snapmirror transfer size. Enjoy, Glenn

1 1

A PAYMENT AGENT NEEDED URGENTLY REPLY NOW
by RICOH Company Ltd 24 Jul '06

24 Jul '06

Hello Dear, RICOH Company Ltd. based in United Kingdom with an export office in LONDON. Our company was established in the year 1984 to produce Colour Multifunctional. We produce Colour Printers and B & W Printers from nearby sources to support its production process. In order to increase the variety of its products, the company invested in a new facility and the most advanced technology to produce some new products from Raw Materials. The new line of value added products includes Colour Multifunctional, B & W Multifunctional, Colour Printers, B & W Printers, wide Format Copiers, Facsimiles, Digital Duplicators, Scanners Product Related Solutions.... Digital Cameras, DVD+R/RW, 35mm Carmeras, Multimedia Devices, as well as raw materials, etc as a branch of our numerous services, and other value added products. We export these products into the following countries Japan, Singapore, Malaysia, Taiwan, France, Spain, Netherlands, Russia, Australia and New Zealand. Due to increase demands of our products in America and Canada, we decided to move our products often into the continent of America. By so doing, we are looking for someone who can serve as an in country representative who will be serving as a link between us and our customers within that province. It is upon this note that we are writing you this mail to seek your assistance in representing our company in your locality as our representative. Note that as a representative of our company; you will be entitled to 9% of any amount you receive from customers on behalf of the company as payments for outstanding debts or goods that they want to buy. As a representative of our company, your basic functions are as follows: 1. Maintenance of a sales office. The company will be responsible for the cost 2. Assume responsibility for all sales office 3. Lastly, contacting clients on behalf of the company who are ready to make payments or wanting to pay for products they purchase from the company. To facilitate the conclusion of this transaction if accepted, do send us in our London export office by mail promptly the following: 1. YOUR FULL NAMES AND ADDRESS. 2. YOUR DIRECT TELEPHONE AND FAX NUMBERS. 3. A COPY OF YOUR INTERNATIONAL PASSPORT AND/OR DRIVERS LICENSE. 4. AGE 5. MARITAL STATUS If interested, please get back to us via E-mail or Telephone Thanks for your co-operation. Yours Sincerely, Mr. Morgan Kelvin Executive Director (LONDON OFFICE) E-mail: ricoh(a)london.com Tell: +447024074386 Ricoh Company Ltd. For More Informations, Please Visit our website: www.ricoh.co.uk

1 0

Proposal for you!!!
by BENE MALEKE 24 Jul '06

24 Jul '06

Compliments of the day. My name is Mr.Bane Maleke, of 72 Buckingham Palace Road, London, UK. I am writing in respect of a proposal i think will be of great benefit to us.My long time client died after a brief illness on 02-26-2004.Due to my relationship with her,i am in possession of both personal and business documents relating to her estate.I also have the benefit as an insider since i equally maintained a steady secret romantic affair to know that my client had no kids since she was never married and her parents are late.I have waited for 2 years for any relative to show up but like i thought,no one has appeared.On this note,i decided to take advantage of this situation to better my life.My late client had deposited money to the tune of E1, 750,000.00(Great British Pounds)in a finance firm and another sum of E780,000.00(GBP)in a bank all here in London. Now,my proposal is this: i would want to position you as the next of kin to my late client in order to claim the funds in the bank and finance firm.I have all relevant documents to make a successful claim.For your efforts,your share would be 40% of net amount (after all inheritance taxes must have been deducted and paid to the authorities) that will come to you after the successful claim while i will take 60%.For the success of this transaction,i will need total co-operation and trust from you and you must equally take directives from me since am the one on ground that will see you through.We must work as a team to achieve our goal.If you are interested,contact me via email,phone or fax for me to give you the guidelines. Thank you. Yours Truly, Bane Maleke Tel No:+44-7031848899 Fax No:+44-8708316646 Email:benemlk@yahoo.com

1 0

ironport.servidores.unam.mx Virus infected message detected
by Mail Delivery System 24 Jul '06

24 Jul '06

The following viruses were detected in a message (MID 176410807): 'W32/MyDoom-O' Actions taken: Message dropped Original Envelope Sender: From toasters(a)mathworks.com Mon Jul 24 09:04:29 2006 Message Headers: From: toasters(a)mathworks.com To: jagarcia(a)servidor.unam.mx Subject: Mail System Error - Returned Mail Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 22:04:03 +0800 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0002_1AC7BD4A.972989BB" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

1 0

Re: Payment Release order
by European Gaming Board 24 Jul '06

24 Jul '06

Attn: Winner Re: Confimatory Report from The European Gaming Board A.m Reports confirms that after a protracted deliberation on the validity of your lottery claim application,we have received signals to confirm that your funds release order application has been successful for £2m (two million pounds). Hence you are advised on final notice and as a matter of urgency, to contact our licensed claim agent for European Gaming Board Winners for the processing of your prize awards winning and payment to your designated bank account after all statutory obligations have been concluded satisfactorily. Contact thus: CONTACT NAME: Alfred Howells Fax: +44-700-598-3304 Email: claimsagent05(a)aol.de OR claimsagenttwo(a)yahoo.com With the following informations; FULL NAMES: ADDRESS: SEX: AGE: MARITAL STATUS: OCCUPATION: E-MAIL ADDRESS: TELEPHONE/FAX NUMBER: COUNTRY: Do note that approval is valid for 14days, hence expires on the 14th day from this notification. Regards, MR ARMSTRONG O'BRIEN. PAYMENT CO-ORDINATOR.

1 0

RE: filer upgrade
by Hasni.Bekkay＠shell.com 24 Jul '06

24 Jul '06

I know I can check by using wafl scan status. the problem is, we have a critical data on these filers and we would to have an estimate of how long the inode conversion will take to finish, is it 4H, 10h....etc. Thx. Hasni. -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com]On Behalf Of Eyal Traitel Sent: vrijdag 21 juli 2006 19:34 To: Blake Golliher Cc: Bekkay, Hasni H SITI-ITIBHL; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: filer upgrade You can try to look at "priv set diag; wafl scan status". Eyal. On 7/21/06, Blake Golliher < thelastman(a)gmail.com> wrote: The number of files will have an effect as well. I'm not sure if anyone outside of NetApp's WAFL team will know the answer. The inode conversion happens in the background after the filer is up, and serving data. Generally it has little to no effect on production workload. YMMV. -Blake On 7/21/06, Hasni.Bekkay(a)shell.com < Hasni.Bekkay(a)shell.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > We would like to upgrade 2 of our filers to DataOntap 7.3.0P3 and we would > like to know the time it is going to take for the inode conversion. > > Details: > F840.....6.4.4P8 (diskspace 5.4TB) > FAS960.....6.4.4P8 (diskspace 20.2 TB) > Also some of the volumes are around 90 - 95%. > > I appreciated your input.... > > Regards, > Hasni.Bekkay > > Office Tel: +31 70 303 4046 > Email: Hasni.Bekkay(a)shell.com > Internet: http://www.shell.com > -- Yours, Eyal.

1 0

Dr Claude Leobert JACOMO / 0022 508 569 621.
by leobert jacomo 24 Jul '06

24 Jul '06

Je vous salue avec déférence, puis me présente à vous avec votre permission, Docteur Claude Leobert JACOMO, Administrateur Exécutif d'un Organe Attributaire Gouvernementale en Côte d'Ivoire. De par mes capacités de Leader de ce Comité d'Attribution de Marchés, je vous fais ce contact dans l'optique recherchée d'une relation partenariale solide, à rejaillissement mutuel bénéfique, et ne comportant aucun risque pour nos carrières ou familles respectives. Le Comité d'Attribution sous ma direction, est en phase d'opérer à l'octroi d'un marché ouvert, dont la valeur globale est chiffrée à plusieurs millions d'euros. Je planifie du haut de ma qualité d'Administrateur Exécutif, dinfluencer légalement et de manière ordinaire la donne d'attribution de ce marché encours, et cela, lors du Conclave des Administrateurs prévu pour la désignation du meilleur postulant. Pourront-y prendre part des opérateurs économiques nationaux ou étrangers. Aussi et surtout, je voudrais vous informer qu'en seulement 5 jours ouvrables de travail en pleine collaboration, nous pourrions, pour le volet Attribution remplir dûment les modalités documentaires fixées, passant bien évidemment par la conception d'un dossier de candidature de poids pour vous. Il importe peu que vous soyez fonctionnaire de l'Etat, Travailleur du privé, ou tout simplement Particulier à votre propre compte, puisque vous soumissionnerez en tant qu'opérateur économique (entrepreneur libéral) à ce marché. L'attribution de ce marché à vous, fera suite immédiatement à l'opération de mobilisation de l'avance forfaitaire, qui est habituellement de la moitié de la valeur financière du marché. Cette avance de démarrage se confirmera dans un lapse de 48 à 72 heures en rapport avec le mode de paiement choisi par le bénéficiaire du marché. Je vous en prie, faisons de la légitimité, de la légalité et de la grande confidentialité, nos atouts majeurs de réussite dans cette opportunité qui reste à saisir. Je vous renseignerai dans les détails, à la réception de votre réponse montrant votre intérêt dans ce projet imminent. Bien à vous, Dr. Claude-Léo JACOMO 0022 508 569 621. executif(a)dr.com ¡Miles de amigos con tus mismas aficiones! http://www.latinchat.com

1 0

RE: Defragmenation Question on Filer after few GB deletion.
by Glenn Walker 23 Jul '06

23 Jul '06

This is a 'rule of thumb' thing - and depends on the type of application to some degree.. For most workloads, WAFL does exceedingly well with 10% free space (90% used). For Exchange, the workload itself is horrible for fragmentation, so the rule of thumb is about 20% free space (80% used). As for volume\aggregate level, it shouldn't matter - the flexvol is more of a quota than anything else - if you have 10% free in the flexvol, then those same 10% (in KB) would be marked as 'used' in the aggregate but no data would be written to them. Likewise, if the flexvol is full, but there is 10% free space in the aggr, then you should be ok. Glenn -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Hadrian Baron Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 12:54 PM To: Stephen C. Losen; margesimpson(a)hushmail.com Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Defragmenation Question on Filer after few GB deletion. Whats a decent amount of free space in regards to this? 80%? 85%? 90%? Also are we talking about at the volume level, or aggregate level? Just to clarify :) Hadrian Baron Network Engineer VEGAS.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Stephen C. Losen Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 5:43 AM To: margesimpson(a)hushmail.com Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: Defragmenation Question on Filer after few GB deletion. > Hi all: > Could tech gurus respond to this question: > I am planning to clean up some space on the filer - say 10GB. > > Since WAFL FS is intellegent minimizing the defrag issues, what > happens on deletion of the files on my volume? > If I delete 10GB of 50GB, will the FS still be fragmented, or WAFL > does it auto when files are deleted? > Do I will have to run defrag tools explicitly? > > Thank you for your reply. > Marge. > I don't think you will have any performance problems and I don't think that you will need to run any tools to reorganize the disk storage. Freeing disk space does not increase "fragmentation" in WAFL. The way WAFL is designed, if you have a decent amount of free space then WAFL is able to write data efficiently and hence read it back later efficiently. If you have enough free blocks, then WAFL can localize a disk writing episode to a small number of RAID stripes, which is more efficient than scattering writes over many RAID stripes, because WAFL must update the parity for each RAID stripe that is changed. Note that each block in a RAID stripe is on a different disk, so writing a RAID stripe writes to numerous disks in parallel. Where you run into trouble is when you let an aggregate or traditional volume get nearly full. This means that free blocks are scarce and so WAFL must make do with whatever free blocks it can find. The free blocks may be scattered over many RAID stripes, which requires many more parity updates. This can also hurt read performance later when you want to read the data back (even though parity is not an issue when reading). Freeing up disk space should improve your write performance and not hurt your read performance. Steve Losen scl(a)virginia.edu phone: 434-924-0640 University of Virginia ITC Unix Support

1 0

New message
by Juan 23 Jul '06

23 Jul '06

This is a text part of the message. It is shown for the users of old-style e-mail clients

1 0

From: Mr. Graham Hurford (Joint Venture)
by Graham Hurford 23 Jul '06

23 Jul '06

FROM THE DESK OF: Mr. Graham Hurford, Senior Audit Officer, Halifax Bank Plc, Trinity Road, Halifax, West Yorkshire HX1 2RG. ATTN: My name is Mr. Graham Hurford. I am located in the United Kingdom and work in the establishment stated above this email. I am writing to direct an urgent business proposal to you. I simply haven't met with you before, but I will need your assistance and guidelines in making a business investment on landed properties or in any lucrative sphere of business in your country. Owing to the nature of this transaction, I would appreciate an immediate response from you acknowledging the receipt of my email and I will be obliged to furnish you with explicit details of the project and the urgency at which I need to get the funds transferred out of the United Kingdom. Please contact me as a matter of urgency via email for further details relating to this project. Kind regards, Graham Hurford.

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters