toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13520 discussions

RE: ssh config on DOT 7
by Creek, Toby 09 Nov '06

09 Nov '06

Vmware's client doesn't have 3des-cbc in its list of available ciphers, although it is compiled in. Add "3des-cbc" to the end of the Ciphers line in the /etc/ssh.conf and it'll work fine. That's the only cipher the NetApp implements. Toby > -----Original Message----- > From: Glenn Dekhayser [mailto:gdekhayser@voyantinc.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 3:20 PM > To: Darren Dunham; toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: RE: ssh config on DOT 7 > > Well, we had the problem when trying to get SSH scripting > working with VMWare ESX 3 and the Netapp, and we did in fact > need authorized_keys2 on both the VMWare and the Netapp box > in order to get RSA/SSHv2 working. > We tried for a long time to get that working, perhaps we were > missing something. When we mentioned this to Netapp they > confirmed that our assessment was correct and they edited the docs. > > > > Be CAREFUL here: the filename is "authorized_keys2" for the SSH > > version2 file, the docs didn't say that, I actually told > netapp about > > that Doc bug. Authorized_keys is for version 1, which you shouldn't > be > > using anymore. Netapp's SSH client is based on OpenSSH so you can > > follow any docs on that to see how it really works. > > Then that would be a difference from the standard OpenSSH releases. > OpenSSH does not require the use of "authorized_keys2" (or > hasn't for years). Both v1 and v2 keys happily live together > in the default location of ".ssh/authorized_keys". > > I haven't used this feature in OnTAP, so I don't know if it > is required for setup there. > > -- > Darren Dunham > ddunham(a)taos.com > Senior Technical Consultant TAOS > http://www.taos.com/ > Got some Dr Pepper? San Francisco, > CA bay area > < This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. > > >

1 0

RE: ssh config on DOT 7
by Potakamuri, Sreenivasa 08 Nov '06

08 Nov '06

All public keys should simply be put into the "authorized_keys" file for both SSH protocols 1 and 2 for public key authentication. This is true for all versions of ONTAP. "authorized_keys2" file was an alternative location for SSH2 protocol, and its use has been deprecated in NetApp's SSH implementation. For backward compatibility, NetApp's SSH implementation still looks for keys in "authorized_keys2" file. Regards, Sreenivasa Potakamuri Network Appliance !-----Original Message----- !From: Glenn Dekhayser [mailto:gdekhayser@voyantinc.com] !Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 8:48 AM !To: toasters(a)mathworks.com !Subject: RE: ssh config on DOT 7 ! ! !Be CAREFUL here: the filename is "authorized_keys2" for the SSH !version2 file, the docs didn't say that, I actually told netapp about !that Doc bug. Authorized_keys is for version 1, which you shouldn't be !using anymore. Netapp's SSH client is based on OpenSSH so you can !follow any docs on that to see how it really works. ! !Glenn (the other one) ! !-----Original Message----- ! !> Hello all, !> !> So I finally got DOT 7 put into production so I can now use ssh !> without an addition license. My question is where do I put my !> authorized_keys file so I can use key based authentication on the !> netapp? (i.e. where is or where should I create the .ssh directory) !> !> Thanks for any help, !> ! !

1 0

ssh config on DOT 7
by Sheldon Mustard 08 Nov '06

08 Nov '06

Hello all, So I finally got DOT 7 put into production so I can now use ssh without an addition license. My question is where do I put my authorized_keys file so I can use key based authentication on the netapp? (i.e. where is or where should I create the .ssh directory) Thanks for any help, SJM -- Sheldon Mustard smustard(a)gmail.com "There will be no order, only chaos." - Pi (1998) --

6 8

Re: 7.2 stability
by Grey Friday 08 Nov '06

08 Nov '06

We are running 7.2P2 as well for bug 213380 The components in Filer View applets are disabled when SSL is enabled on the filer But only on non important things. I was hoping that this was a decent rel. but apparently not. I would like to make use of CIFS being in it's own domain but maybe not till later eh... I don't have the link off the top of my head but I think 7.0.5 is the only GD rel currently. Some one correct me if I'm wrong. If anyone else knows anything CIFS related please share it. We have more CIFS than anything in this environment. Thanks, Grey- On 11/7/06, Willeke, Jochen <Jochen.Willeke(a)wincor-nixdorf.com> wrote: Hi Grey, > > we have already deployed 7.2P2 and it has a Bug in WAFL which makes the > filer reboot for some kind of reason. > Sadly we where hit by this error just 5 hours after installing > 7.2P2...Luckily never again :D > > Netapp provided a patch 7.2P2D2 espacially for this problem which will > be installed this weekend on our systems. > > I think you should wait until it is GD. BTW there was a link on NOW > where i could see all releases and which ones are GD but i do not find > it anymore. Do you know where it can be found on NOW? > > Regards > > Jochen > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] > On Behalf Of Grey Friday > Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 5:43 PM > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: 7.2 stability > > So what's the word on 7.2 ready for install or still hold off? >

1 1

Windows Explorer showing incorrect disk space totals
by Stephen C. Losen 25 Oct '06

25 Oct '06

We have a filer running DOT 7.0.1R1 with a qtree named /vol/h2/t54 with NTFS security style and this share: fccf /vol/h2/t54/fccf Here are the quota file entries that pertain to the qtree: * user@/vol/h2 - - (users unlimited in the volume) * group@/vol/h2 - - (groups unlimited in the volume) /vol/h2/t45 tree 500000M 500000K (tree quota approx 500G) * user@/vol/h2/t54 500000M 500000K (users can use all of qtree) Quotas are on and "quota report /vol/h2/t54" indicates that the qtree is using 184408104 KB out of 512000000 KB. Essentially all used space is beneath the /vol/h2/t54/fccf directory. When I map the fccf share with Windows Explorer and right click the drive letter and look at "properties" it reports the correct amount of available disk space: 327591896 KB, but it reports only 35892088 KB used (instead of 184408104) and reports the total capacity as 363483984 KB (instead of 512000000). I looked at bugs online and saw a couple bugs where Explorer or CIFS reports incorrect values, but these don't seem to apply to this situation and the bugs are fixed. Is there anything I can do besides telling folks to only pay attention to available space (which is correct) and ignore the other values ? Steve Losen scl(a)virginia.edu phone: 434-924-0640 University of Virginia ITC Unix Support

3 2

RE: Anyone know what this means?
by Fox, Adam 19 Oct '06

19 Oct '06

Best bet here is to open a case, but *in general* this occurs something happens in the initial SnapMirror handshake. It could be a network drop, it could be a really busy filer that didn't respond in time, it could be other things. Tech Support may be able to examine your logs and see if something else was going on at the time. It's not really possible to tell from just the message, however. Hope this helps. -- Adam Fox NGS Tools Developer adamfox(a)netapp.com _____ From: Bender, Marilee [mailto:Marilee.Bender@delta.com] Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 10:22 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Anyone know what this means? Async snapmirror relationship between FAS3050 and R200. Snapmirrors starting failing one day - They have been set up for a year or more and ran without issue. Now, sometimes they complete, sometimes they appear to "hang". Ontap 7.0.4P9 on both source and dest. What could this error indicate? "Error in snapmirror sync mode negotiation" Thanks

1 0

Anyone know what this means?
by Bender, Marilee 19 Oct '06

19 Oct '06

Async snapmirror relationship between FAS3050 and R200. Snapmirrors starting failing one day - They have been set up for a year or more and ran without issue. Now, sometimes they complete, sometimes they appear to "hang". Ontap 7.0.4P9 on both source and dest. What could this error indicate? "Error in snapmirror sync mode negotiation" Thanks

1 0

replacing a broken disk in 5.3.6R2
by Frank Smith 19 Oct '06

19 Oct '06

It's been a long time since I've dealt with NetApps, so there may be a simple solution to this that I've forgotten. Had a couple of disks fail on an old F720, the first one caused a rebuild onto the hot spare, the second one put it into degraded mode. An admin pulled the dead drives (w/o first doing a 'disk remove') and inserted a two of the same size drives from a retired system that used to be its twin (same H/W and firmware), but sysconfig -r still shows the 2 disks as broken. The references I have all seem to be for later releases, as priv set advanced disk unfail <DISK> comes back with disk: Did not recognize option "unfail". Also, I seemed to recall that the replaced drives would show up as foreign volumes since they weren't zeroed on the old system, so perhaps the system just doesn't realize the drives were replaced. I also remember that years ago when I hot-swapped a drive, the 720 seemed to 'freeze' for a minute or so, but the guy who replaced the drive said he didn't notice any pause in the activity lights on the other drives as he was replacing the failed drives. I did remember that it will only run for 24 hours in degraded mode, so I've set raid.timeout to a bigger number to buy me some time. Any suggestions on how to get it to recognize the 'new' disks? Thanks, Frank -- Frank Smith fsmith(a)hoovers.com Sr. Systems Administrator Voice: 512-374-4673 Hoover's Online Fax: 512-374-4501

3 3

RE: NSO-151 - NetApp SAN Exam-Dumps
by Sphar, Mike 17 Oct '06

17 Oct '06

I've only taken the first basic exam, a while back at the urging of my manager, and amusingly one of the things I got dinged on was that I apparently did not know how to request replacement parts on the website, despite the fact that I've been actually *doing* that periodically for about 10 years now and have never had a problem. Personally, my opinion is that while reading/studying the manuals will probably get you close, you will have a tough time passing the tests without actual administration experience. And conversely even years of administration experience may not be enough to pass without some backup studying as well, unless your lucky enough to work someplace that utilizes almost all available Netapp products/functionality. -- Michael W. Sphar - IS&T - Lead Systems Administrator SMBU Engineering Support Services, BMC Software -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Grey Friday Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 10:55 AM To: etraitel(a)gmail.com Cc: sithesvaran thirumaran; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: NSO-151 - NetApp SAN Exam-Dumps On 10/14/06, Eyal Traitel <etraitel(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi ! > > Except from being illegal, there is really no need for brain dumps - read the manuals left to right and you would do fine. The questions are on commands, command options, concepts etc that are described in details in the Block Admin guides. > > Eyal. > http://filers.blogspot.com > http://stupidstorage.blogspot.com> > > > > > On 10/14/06, sithesvaran thirumaran <sithu_t2000(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi, > > How r u all. I need one help. I am planning to write NSO-151-SAN Exam, I need dumps for it. Can you please help me, if anyone have it? > > Thanks, > Sithesvaran. Do you Yahoo!? > Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail. > > > -- > Yours, > Eyal.

1 0

NetApp showing up as backup browser
by Geotina, Glenn 17 Oct '06

17 Oct '06

Hello all, I have a Windows user that has one our NetApps running 7.0.3 show up in his master browser list. He runs the following command: browstat status Is there a way to configure a NetApp to not participate in Windows browsing elections? Thanks, Glenn

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters