toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13520 discussions

Unix script tool to read Windows ACL
by JacekN 14 Jun '07

14 Jun '07

IHAC who had to make an upgrade from 7.0.3 due to SnapMirror bug. 7.0.6 would be sufficient but I convinced him to jump to 7.2.2 due to some interesting features (both releases are GD). I have studied upgrade guide, bugs and all other documentation and I have found no potential problem. But I was wrong... Customer's scripts stopped to work because NetApp introduced undocumented "feature": access rights displayed by NFS3 client on NTFS volumes are empty (all files have d---------) although access rights are correctly mapped. NetApp provided some kind of workaround but displayed access rights are always only rough approximation. Is there any Unix tool that can read native NTFS ACLs? (SecureShare can read Unix rwx from Windows hosts however it cannot be scripted...) It will solve the customer's problem for ever (NetApp can always change the way of approximation in future releases...) Best regards, Jacek --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 000748-5, 2007-06-13 Tested on: 2007-06-13 22:30:19 avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com -- Opole - Miasto Bez Granic. http://www.opole.pl - tu znajdziesz nowe miejsca, nowe moÂżliwoÂści, nowe inspiracje...

5 5

Problem creating snapshots with SnapDrive for Solaris
by Javier Scanlan Sierra 14 Jun '07

14 Jun '07

I'm having errors creating snapshots with SnapDrive for Solaris. I'm running Solaris 10 on a SPARC processor, Veritas Volume Manager and File System 5 and a FAS270 DOT 7.2.2 filer. I didn't have problems creating the LUNs, even SnapDrive created the /etc/vfstab entries: bash-3.00# snapdrive snap create -dg testvol -snapname snapdgtest 0001-843 Admin error: Failed to read device config info : Could not read disk format for /dev/vx/dmp/Disk_2 bash-3.00# snapdrive storage create -fs /oratest -hostvol dgtest/testvol -lun netapp2:/vol/vol1/lun1 -lunsize 8g LUN netapp2:/vol/vol1/lun1 ... created mapping new lun(s) ... done discovering new lun(s) ... done LUN to device file mappings: - netapp2:/vol/vol1/lun1 => /dev/vx/dmp/Disk_2 disk group dgtest created host volume testvol created file system /oratest created bash-3.00# tail /etc/vfstab /dev/vx/dsk/dg01/vol01 /dev/vx/rdsk/dg01/vol01 /sio01 vxfs - yes - /dev/vx/dsk/dg02/vol02 /dev/vx/rdsk/dg02/vol02 /sio02 vxfs - yes - swap - /tmp tmpfs - yes - /dev/vx/dsk/dgtest/testvol /dev/vx/rdsk/dgtest/testvol /oratest vxfs - yes - Theres is a confusion, because SnapDrive mapped the LUN to /dev/vx/dmp/Disk_2, but the entry on /etc/vfstab is: /dev/vx/dsk/dgtest/testvol /dev/vx/rdsk/dgtest/testvol /oratest vxfs - yes - I hope somone can help me with this, I'm not a Veritas or Solaris expert. Regards Javier Scanlan

1 0

Tape Directly connected
by Luis Sanchez R 14 Jun '07

14 Jun '07

Hi I don't have experience with SAN. My question is: Can I connect directly a SAN tape with a FAS270c, without the use of a SAN switch between them? Thanks Luis

8 7

Re: NFS backups over 1Gb WAN
by Tom Samplonius 14 Jun '07

14 Jun '07

What is the MTU size on your WAN link? ----- "Carl Howell" <chowell(a)uwf.edu> wrote: > What would be the optimal NFS settings for a filer on a 1Gb network > with a 14ms rtt? We have moved our R200 to a remote DC and have seen > NFS performance plummet. The NFS traffic is all backups. > > > > Thanks, > > > > -Carl

4 5

netapp admin with Unix without NFS
by Stephen C. Losen 14 Jun '07

14 Jun '07

I'm accustomed to administering netapps on a Unix box that NFS mounts the root volume and has rsh and/or ssh access to root. I've always used the command line since we got our first filer in 1997 before the GUI came out. We are buying two FAS270s to be placed in two separate locations for disaster recovery. Each filer will store FC LUNs that will be used by a Windows server in each location. One location is primary and the other is standby in case we lose the primary. We will replicate data from the primary filer to the secondary with snapmirror (and also snapdrive I suppose). I am in neither of these locations and each location will be behind its own firewall (oh joy). Obviously the filers will need to talk to each other for snapmirror. Since these filers are FC SAN only, we would prefer to not spring for NFS licenses just for my convenience. I would be interested to know if there are any other Unix folks out there who admin filers without NFS access. I think that all filers come with a mini CIFS license (only one CIFS session?) and I guess I could use smbmount on my Linux box to access the root volume. I wish filers also had a mini NFS license for admin. As for installing DOT, isn't there a way to put the software distribution file on a httpd server and point the filer at it? I have always used the install_netapp script and the compressed tar file. I don't know what sort of holes I can get punched in the firewall. I may need to use a VPN client (yuck). Is anyone else out there in a similar situation? Steve Losen scl(a)virginia.edu phone: 434-924-0640 University of Virginia ITC Unix Support a:link, span.MsoHyperlink {mso-style-priority:99; color:blue; text-decoration:underline;} a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {mso-style-priority:99; color:purple; text-decoration:underline;} span.EmailStyle17 {mso-style-type:personal-compose; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; color:windowtext;} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only;} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} --> </style>  </head> <body lang=3DEN-US link=3Dblue vlink=3Dpurple> <div class=3DSection1> <p class=3DMsoNormal>What would be the optimal NFS settings for a filer = on a 1Gb network with a 14ms rtt? We have moved our R200 to a remote DC and have = seen NFS performance plummet. The NFS traffic is all backups.<o:p></o:p></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal>Thanks,<o:p></o:p></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal>-Carl<o:p></o:p></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p> </div> </body> </html> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C7A881.E74B8860--

7 13

6070's loosing packets, become unusable
by Todd C. Merrill 13 Jun '07

13 Jun '07

Folks, I'm on a fishing expedition here. We've had four incidents over the past ~6 months of our 6070's loosing packets and becoming effectively unusable. Symptoms include *very* slow response on clients, both CIFS and NFS. Messages file on filer shows problems connecting to all external services (domain controllers, NIS servers, etc.): [selected lines clipped] Wed Jun 6 21:02:23 EDT [xxxxx: nis.server.inactive:warning]: preferred NIS Server xxx.xx.xxx.x not responding Wed Jun 6 21:02:23 EDT [xxxxx: nis.server.active:notice]: Bound to preferred NIS server xxx.xx.xxx.x Wed Jun 6 21:15:10 EDT [xxxxx: nfsap_process:warning]: Directory service outage prevents NFS server from determining if client (xxx.xx.xxx.x has root access to path /vol/YYYYYY/YYYYYY (xid 1346843745). Client will experience delayed access during outage. Wed Jun 6 21:15:18 EDT [xxxxx: rpc.client.error:error]: yp_match: clnt_call: RPC: Timed out Wed Jun 6 21:16:45 EDT [xxxxx: rshd_0:error]: rshd: when reading user name to use on this machine from ZZZZZZZZZ, it didn't arrive within 60 seconds. Wed Jun 6 21:28:54 EDT [xxxxx: auth.dc.trace.DCConnection.errorMsg:error]: AUTH: Domain Controller error: NetLogon error 0xc0000022: - Filer's security information differs from domain controller. Thu Jun 7 00:21:08 EDT [xxxxx: nis_worker_0:warning]: Local NIS group update failed. Could not download the group file from the NIS server. Thu Jun 7 00:21:11 EDT [xxxxx: nis.server.inactive:warning]: preferred NIS Server xxx.xx.xxx.x not responding Thu Jun 7 00:21:11 EDT [xxxxx: nis.server.active:notice]: Bound to preferred NIS server xxx.xx.xxx.x Thu Jun 7 00:21:24 EDT [xxxxx: nis.servers.not.available:error]: NIS server(s) not available. Thu Jun 7 00:21:37 EDT [xxxxx: mnt_assist:warning]: Client xxx.xxx.xx.xx (xid 0) fails to resolve via gethostbyaddr_r() for root access - host_errno = 2, errno = 61 Thu Jun 7 00:22:23 EDT [xxxxx: nis.server.active:notice]: Bound to preferred NIS server xxx.xx.xxx.x Our Nagios system trips on 100% ping loss almost immediately, and then flaps until the filer is restarted. First time, we just rebooted (the whole company twiddling their thumbs, waiting...). Second time, we begged for diagnosis time and called it in, and ended up replacing the motherboard (suspected network port). *Third* time, we no longer suspected hardware, dumped core then rebooted; core analysis didn't find anything. FOURTH time happened last week; dumped core, sent it in, awaiting analysis but not hopeful. This has only happened on our 6070's. Never on our 980's or R200's (running same ONTAP versions). It's happened on two different ONTAP 7.2 releases. It's happened on three different 6070's (two incidents on one of them). We're running full flowcontrol. We're running vif's. System firmware on six of them (and this latest victim) was upgraded in February 2007. We have eight 6070's in one location; two have been affected. We have six 6070's in another location and one has been affected. The only stat that looks "weird" is that ifstat shows an unusually high number of transmit queue overflows / discards (ifstat from autosupport just before last core dump): > ===== IFSTAT-A ===== > > -- interface e0a (102 days, 11 hours, 43 minutes, 36 seconds) -- > > RECEIVE > Frames/second: 24198 | Bytes/second: 4311k | Errors/minute: 0 > Discards/minute: 0 | Total frames: 384g | Total bytes: 107t > Total errors: 1 | Total discards: 1201k | Multi/broadcast: 0 > No buffers: 1201k | Non-primary u/c: 0 | Tag drop: 0 > Vlan tag drop: 0 | Vlan untag drop: 0 | CRC errors: 1 > Alignment errors: 0 | Runt frames: 0 | Long frames: 0 > Fragment: 0 | Jabber: 0 | Xon: 0 > Xoff: 0 | Ring full: 0 | Jumbo: 0 > Jumbo error: 0 > TRANSMIT > Frames/second: 29384 | Bytes/second: 13057k | Errors/minute: 0 > Discards/minute: 0 | Total frames: 470g | Total bytes: 314t > Total errors: 0 | Total discards: 954k | Multi/broadcast: 123k > Queue overflows: 954k | No buffers: 0 | Single collision: 0 > Multi collisions: 0 | Late collisions: 0 | Max collisions: 0 > Deferred: 0 | Xon: 0 | Xoff: 0 > MAC Internal: 0 | Jumbo: 0 > LINK_INFO > Current state: up | Up to downs: 1 | Speed: 1000m > Duplex: full | Flowcontrol: full Switch side shows no extraordinary errors. So, I'm fishing for some ideas here. Waiting for it to happen again to gather network traces is not an optimal strategy (as much as I'd like to have those traces as well). I'm sure NetApp support will do their best in analyzing the core, but as I mentioned above, I'm not hopeful they will find the culprit this second time. So, I'm looking for any anecdotes, other weird behavior, crazy ideas, or even possible ones [1], from this large group, in parallel with NetApp's efforts. [1] "When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth." --Sherlock Holmes Until next time... The MathWorks, Inc. 508-647-7000 x7792 3 Apple Hill Drive, Natick, MA 01760-2098 508-647-7001 FAX tmerrill(a)mathworks.com http://www.mathworks.com ---

7 8

Farewell all!
by Maglinger, Paul 13 Jun '07

13 Jun '07

Well, it is with deep regret that I bid all you toasters a fond farewell. I'd like to say that I appreciate all the help during the time that our 740 served us for about 8 years. The 740 was a fine device and NetApps support was top-notch. After a very lengthy discussion over several months, we went to another storage solution. By the way, if anyone is interested in the 740 maxxed at 1TB raw and includes a spares kit with motherboard and misc other parts that were never used, send me an email. It is located in the Southern Indiana area. First come, first serve. You have to arrange for transport. If I don't hear anything from anyone by the end of the week, it's going to the recycler. Thanks again to all. If people concentrated on the really important things in life, there'd be a shortage of fishing poles. - Doug Larson ________________________________ Paul Maglinger, A+, CA, CCA, CET, MCSE Systems Administrator Shoe Carnival Inc. (812)867-4674 pmaglinger(a)scvl.com ________________________________

3 2

FC Lun creation/connection problems from W2K3
by Fred Grieco 12 Jun '07

12 Jun '07

Toasters, I am having a heck of a time creating and connecting luns from a Windows 2003 Server. I have installed the latest and greatest Snapdrive and DSM on the system, and I'm running Single_image cfmode on a FAS3020C with ontap 7.2.2. Also, I am using dual Emulex LP10000 HBAs on my hosts. When I attempt to create new luns in Snapdrive, the system creates the luns (i can see the IGroups and luns in filerview) but then it times out trying to reconnect to those luns. After this I can see the Luns in the HBAnywhere Emulex software but not in Snapdrive or DSM. Not only that, but I see each lun 4 times, which means the pathing/masking/igrouping is correct. I can also see all 8 drive paths as drives listed in device manager, but there is nothing in Disk Management. Has anyone seen this or know what direction I should go in? I have a call with Netapp escalated to engineering, but I thought I would also reach out to some real experts here! TIA, Fred ____________________________________________________________________________________Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with Yahoo! FareChase. http://farechase.yahoo.com/

4 4

F85 and F330 available for free
by Conner, Neil 08 Jun '07

08 Jun '07

We have two working systems that we need to dispose of: 1. One is an F85 running DOT 6.5.5R1 with a 100GB volume. 2. The other is an F330 running DOT 5.3.7R3 with an 18GB disk shelf. Both units come with complete documentation sets, but both also need a new NVRAM battery. The recipient would need to pay for shipping. Let me know if you're interested or if you know of a charitable organization that could use either of these units. Thanks, Neil

1 0

Fwd: Re: Tape Directly connected
by jbrigman＠nc.rr.com 07 Jun '07

07 Jun '07

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters