toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13526 discussions

RE: cifs terminate username?
by David Lee 05 Jun '07

05 Jun '07

On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Paul Rosham wrote: > Perhaps you could try and swap your scripting to the XML-based ONTAPI, which > would allow much better machine parseability? That sounds interesting. Until your email I had never heard of 'ONTAPI'. A quick Google search showed a few hits, but no obvious authoritative source of either specification or tutorial. How long has it been in ONTAP? (We are 7.0.5) How does one start, from zero, to investigate this thing called 'ONTAPI'? Documentation? Examples? Support software/modules for 'perl' (or shell, or similar)? Thanks in advance. -- : David Lee I.T. Service : : Senior Systems Programmer Computer Centre : : UNIX Team Leader Durham University : : South Road : : http://www.dur.ac.uk/t.d.lee/ Durham DH1 3LE : : Phone: +44 191 334 2752 U.K. :

2 1

Clustered heads with SATA disk shelves?
by Tom Samplonius 04 Jun '07

04 Jun '07

One item that I've researching that is a bit unclear, is that, can I can connect a SATA disk shelf (DS14mk2 AT) to a clustered set of FAS960 heads? I think there is no problem. I assume that you must use the AT-FCx modules, as they are dual-looped. I suspect that the the AT-FCx is mandatory for clustering (as opposed to the AT-FC) , but NOW seems a bit vague, at least according to what I was able to find. Also, I've heard rumors that connecting SATA shelves to a cluster is not really reliable. I was a bit taken a back, as NetApp as the SATA shelves have been out for a while. Is this really the case? Tom

7 9

Dual-domain CIFS
by Nils Vogels 30 May '07

30 May '07

Hi, In a cluster, since there are two heads, it is possible to make each head member of a different domain for CIFS. Will this cause problems during failover? Greets, Nils -- Simple guidelines to happiness: Work like you don't need the money, Love like your heart has never been broken and Dance like no one can see you.

2 1

R200 AT-FC2/FCX
by Carl Howell 30 May '07

30 May '07

We currently have an R200 with six AT-FC2 shelves. We want to add three AT-FCX shelves. Currently, we only have two loops and the AT-FC2's are spread across both of them. Should I move all of the AT-FC2's onto one loop and put the AT-FCX shelves on the other loop or just add the AT-FCX's to the current loops? Thanks, --Carl

5 4

Re: ndmpcopy for Linux
by Sandeep Cariapa 27 May '07

27 May '07

Hi, I was able to build it on RHEL4, running kernel 2.6.9-42.EL. Grab the bits from here: http://www.ndmp.org/download/ndmpcopy The mods I made to get it to build were only in 2 files: ./src/Makefile 37c37 < LIBS = -L$(LIBDIR) -lndmp -lsocket -lnsl --- > #LIBS = -L$(LIBDIR) -lndmp -lsocket -lnsl 39c39 < #LIBS = -L$(LIBDIR) -lndmp --- > LIBS = -L$(LIBDIR) -lndmp ./lib/ndmp_common.h 40c40 < #define XDR_AND_SIZE(func) (bool_t(*)(XDR*, ...))xdr_##func##,sizeof(func) --- > #define XDR_AND_SIZE(func) (bool_t(*)(XDR*, ...))xdr_##func ,sizeof(func) I did not run any exhaustive tests after I built it, but hopefully this will at least get you started. Cheers, Sandeep Cariapa Sales Engineer, IBRIX http://www.ibrix.com =============================================== Augie Schwer wrote: Has anyone built ndmpcopy for Linux recently? The Solaris version doesn't seem to build anymore and the ndmp.org web site does not look very active anymore.

2 1

Max number of LUNs
by Robert Lazzurs 27 May '07

27 May '07

Hello, In relation to the recent threads on max inodes and max dir size I was wondering if anyone has any experience with the limit on the number of LUNs in a filer? Kind regards,

2 6

Re: Max number of LUNs
by Robert Lazzurs 26 May '07

26 May '07

I presume this is one of the features coming out in the new 10.1 release? On 26/05/07, Paul Rosham <paulrosham(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote: > Yes, GX does not support LUNs yet > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On > Behalf Of Robert Lazzurs > Sent: Saturday, 26 May 2007 11:31 AM > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: Re: Max number of LUNs > > On 23/05/07, Fox, Adam <Adam.Fox(a)netapp.com> wrote: > > I don't think so, although you may want to confirm with tech support. > > I think once you clone a lun or create a snapshot-backed lun, that > > would count against the total. > > But just having the lun in a shapshot > > would not count. But I could be wrong here as this is not really one > > of my areas of expertise. > > Do you know if this is still a limitation in OnTAP GX as I cannot seem to > find the information about this, or does anyone running GX know what the LUN > limitations are? > > Take care, > >

1 0

RE: SnapDrive install with existing iSCSI LUNS
by Julio Calderon 24 May '07

24 May '07

If you want to test your procedure before you actually do it!! I would create a dummy lun and mount the same way dump some data in it, make sure you format the same type of file system.... Remove and try sd.... That wil raise your comfort level... My personal best practice is to try it, back it up, test restore and then do your live work.... Hope that helps Have fun Julio calderon -----Original Message----- From: Toasters [mailto:toasters@aegonusa.com] Sent: Thu May 24 12:59:08 2007 To: Nils Vogels; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: SnapDrive install with existing iSCSI LUNS Just unmap them from the filer , install SD and then remap them with it. -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Nils Vogels Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 1:53 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: SnapDrive install with existing iSCSI LUNS Hi Sean, On 5/24/07, Sean McWherter <sean(a)marinedepot.com> wrote: > > > What is the proper way to install snapdrive on a machine that already > has LUNs mapped with the iSCSI initiator? Should I disconnect the LUN > first? I did read one post on the NOW forums where a guy got hosed by > disconnecting the LUN and then installing SnapDrive after someone told > him that's what to do. He was never able to mount them back. I'm > trying to dot all my I's and cross all my T's before I dive in here. I'd say disconnecting the LUN, removing all traces in the iSCSI initiator, then installing SnapDrive, and then using SnapDrive to 'connect' to the LUN is the right way. If I were you, I'd test this using an ONTAP simulator, though ;) Grtz, Nils -- Simple guidelines to happiness: Work like you don't need the money, Love like your heart has never been broken and Dance like no one can see you.

1 0

SnapDrive install with existing iSCSI LUNS
by Sean McWherter 24 May '07

24 May '07

I need guidance in setting up SnapDrive on our Windows 2003 Enterprise x64 servers. We have two of these servers clustered hosting our SQL 2000 servers. My question is this: What is the proper way to install snapdrive on a machine that already has LUNs mapped with the iSCSI initiator? Should I disconnect the LUN first? I did read one post on the NOW forums where a guy got hosed by disconnecting the LUN and then installing SnapDrive after someone told him that's what to do. He was never able to mount them back. I'm trying to dot all my I's and cross all my T's before I dive in here.

3 2

rysnc and filers
by tmac 24 May '07

24 May '07

Okay, I am trying to copy data from a DOT-7 to a DOT-GX. I start off with: mount filer7:/vol/src /src mount filerg:/ /gx I then do (from RHEL4U2): cp -a /src/dir1 /gx I then do: rsyn -avH --delete /src/dir1/ /gx/dir1/ There is nothing changing on the source, yet it transfers files anyway. Anyone have a clue as to why? The destination get some files marked with current time, yet others are marked with an older time. -- --tmac RedHat Certified Engineer #804006984323821 Principal Consultant, RABA Technologies 240-373-3926 (office) 301-688-4705 (Lab) 214-279-3926 (eFAX)

3 2

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters