toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13520 discussions

Difference in # of files
by Glenn Dekhayser 26 Nov '08

26 Nov '08

Someone out there has to know this. When I go into a folder in CIFS that only has files in it, it shows in the status bar 22 objects (files). I count, and verify. 22 files. I go up a folder, and right click the folder and do a 'properties', and it shows 23 files! I am NOT showing ~snapshot, and it shouldn't matter if I did. My customer has the same problem, only the difference in his folder is 2 files (122 versus 120). Ideas anyone? _____________________________________________________________ Glenn Dekhayser | VP, Technology | VoyantStrategies O: (732) 335-1500 x514 | F: (732) 810-0378 AIM: gdekhayser | Yahoo: gdekhayser | http://www.voyantinc.com _____________________________________________________________

1 0

Downgrading Data ONTAP?
by Simon Vallet 25 Nov '08

25 Nov '08

Hi, we recently updated ONTAP from 7.2.5.1 to 7.3 on our 3140c, which led to many problems : one head doesn't boot anymore, so the cluster failover is impossible; the other head (currently in takeover) seems to reboot randomly every week; and when this happens, it freezes some of our RHEL4 servers (kernel panics, somewhere in lockd). Putted shortly: this is a mess. The issues are currently investigated by NetApp, but it may take some time until we see a corrective action on their side. So we're investigating another solution, which would be to downgrade back into 7.2.5.1 (since it appears 7.2.6 doesn't seem very stable either). Would any of you know how to do that, or could point me at a proper procedure somewhere? NetApp support was unresponsive on this one, and I'm a bit concerned about possible changes to the WAFL layout or something similar between 7.2 and 7.3. Simon

3 6

MS DPM
by Darish Rajanayagam 25 Nov '08

25 Nov '08

Toasters, Does anyone use Microsoft DPM for Exchange backups in a MSCS cluster using NetApp storage(iscsi)? Whenever the Exchange virtual server is moved over to a new node, DPM wants to perform consistency checks on the protected storage groups - according to Microsoft this should not be the case - if I were to expand the volume, we would need to run DPM consistency checks but not during normal cluster failover (DPM performs block level backup). I am having an issue where after every failover, I have to re-run consistency checks on all my storage groups (100 Storage groups!). I had a case open with Microsoft who asked me to contact NetApp - NetApp support wasn't very helpful in this matter. Before I proceed further, I am wondering if anyone else is experiencing this issue. Thanks, Darish

2 1

FAS2050 with 20 disks
by Premkumar Subramanian 25 Nov '08

25 Nov '08

Hi, I plan to implement a FAS2050 with 20 internal SAS disks. I intend to have 12 disks on one of the controller and 8 on the other. the idea being to make use of processing power of both controllers. Now the trade-off is the number of spindles in each aggregate possibly affecting performance. I have seen a few people use just 2 disks on the second controller with no spares and have the other 16 disks+2 spares on a single controller. which of these two would be a better option? -- Best regards, Premkumar Subramanian

3 2

Re: FAS2050 with 20 disks
by Premkumar Subramanian 24 Nov '08

24 Nov '08

I need to serve iscsi + CIFS. I would be servering around 1TB of cifs and 1.8 TB of iscsi data to vmware servers running SQL. We dont have any IOPS numbers. Question is what would be the performance impact...if any of a seperate aggregate of 8 disks on a seperate controller. Will the availability of the active second controller with 2GB RAM compensate for a smaller raid group. 2008/11/24 Webster, Stetson <Stetson.Webster(a)netapp.com> > It depends on the amount of risk exposure you want (in absence of the > spare), and performance impact you can withstand with the fewer disks. > > > > *Stetson M. Webster** > *Professional Services Engineer > NCIE-SAN, NCIE-B&R, SNIA-SCSE > NetApp Global Services - Southeast District > > 919.250.0052 Mobile > Stetson.Webster(a)netapp.com > > Learn how: netapp.com/guarantee > > > > [image: guarantee-email-sig2]<http://www.netapp.com/us/solutions/infrastructure/virtualization/guarantee.…> > > > > > *From:* Premkumar Subramanian [mailto:prem@x-or.co.uk] > *Sent:* Monday, November 24, 2008 2:42 PM > *To:* toasters(a)mathworks.com > *Subject:* FAS2050 with 20 disks > > > > Hi, > > I plan to implement a FAS2050 with 20 internal SAS disks. I intend to have > 12 disks on one of the controller and 8 on the other. > the idea being to make use of processing power of both controllers. Now the > trade-off is the number of spindles in each aggregate possibly affecting > performance. I have seen a few people use just 2 disks on the second > controller with no spares and have the other 16 disks+2 spares on a single > controller. > > which of these two would be a better option? > > -- > > Best regards, > Premkumar Subramanian > > > -- Best regards, Premkumar Subramanian XOR Technologies DDI: 0208 736 5884 Mobile: 07884477910 www.x-or.co.uk

1 0

Very slow large file operations
by Page, Jeremy 22 Nov '08

22 Nov '08

I need help, I cannot figure out how to troubleshoot this problem further. We have a rebranded 3070A with ~200 VMs running on it. Maybe 30 on a batch of FC disks and the rest on 2 aggrs of 33 SATA drives each. None of the VMs are disk IO intensive. When I try and copy a VM to a new volume I get EXTREMELY slow speeds, something on the order of 3 gig an hour. I am also seeing incredibly slow Snapvault transfers and initializations. I think that in part we are hitting the sequential read bug, but this occurs even on volumes that do not have SIS enabled. For instance I have a snapvault job running that's been going for 4 days (!) and only xfered 260 gig. And it's an update so should always be hitting data (and thus not having the bug). Statit shows the drives all under 15% utilization. It's over dual 10gigE connections with the preferred adapter set (there are also 2 1 gig VIFs on this box for user and admin access). I'm at a loss. IBM says we need to upgrade (we are at 7.2.4) but I am concerned that it's not going to fix our problem and downtime windows are difficult to get so I want to make sure it's resolved with as little interruption as possible. Any suggestions on troubleshooting? Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy or re-transmit this email. If you have received this email in error, please notify us by email by replying to the sender and by telephone (call us collect at +1 202-828-0850) and delete this message and any attachments. Thank you in advance for your cooperation and assistance. In addition, Danaher and its subsidiaries disclaim that the content of this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of, any contract or agreement or any amendment thereto; provided that the foregoing disclaimer does not invalidate the binding effect of any digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual signature that is included in any attachment to this email.

3 2

Re: cf takeover hungs Microsoft Windows Clusters
by Cristian Rojas 22 Nov '08

22 Nov '08

we have 2 x Cisco 3750 configured with portfast 1000 full duplex to avoid spanning tree negotiation. Chris ________________________________ From: Jeff Mohler <speedtoys.racing(a)gmail.com> To: Cristian Rojas <intipu(a)yahoo.com> Cc: Jack Lyons <jack1729(a)gmail.com>; "toasters(a)mathworks.com" <toasters(a)mathworks.com> Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2008 2:21:08 AM Subject: Re: cf takeover hungs Microsoft Windows Clusters Two minutes eh? Sounds a lot like ARP issues. How is portfast/etc set on the switch ports? Sent from my iPhone On Nov 21, 2008, at 5:33 PM, Cristian Rojas <intipu(a)yahoo.com> wrote: Hi Jack, we are using 2 standalone interfaces for iscsi, and a team of 2 interfaces for intra and cluster traffic. thanks Chris ________________________________ From: Jack Lyons <jack1729(a)gmail.com> To: Cristian Rojas <intipu(a)yahoo.com>; toasters(a)mathworks.com Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2008 1:21:00 AM Subject: Re: cf takeover hungs Microsoft Windows Clusters We have had several clusters that have worked fine over take overs (just went through 6 panics after upgrading to 7.2.6!)., but since you mention igroups - I assume you are using iscsi for the luns. We are using fcp. I assume you are using 3 seperate network interfaces for iscsi traffic and the intra cluster and public traffic? Jack On 11/21/08, Cristian Rojas <intipu(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi guys, im seeing this behavior on different MS windows clusters attached > to our FAS960, the most weird part is that i see the active node of the > windows cluster connected to the target portal, but from the filer i dont > see the igroup logged in for almost 2 minutes and thats when the windows > clusters hung because they cant mount the quorum lun. All these while doiing > a cf takeover. > > I talked to probably 10 Netapp support engineers and no one can explain it. > > Has anyone seen anything like this before? I have installed Host Utilities 5 > and checked the windows registry to make sure the values have been tuned. > > Thanks > > Chris > > > > -- Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com

3 2

File Copy between NTFS & UNIX Qtrees
by Jimmy Corncrake 22 Nov '08

22 Nov '08

Hi Toasters, I have setup 2 qtrees. QT1 is NTFS and QT2 is UNIX. File Data needs to be passed between the 2 QTREES in both directions which I am doing using ndmpcopy. However an unexpected consequence of this action is that the UNIX user account looses access to the UNIX QTREE after the copy if made from QT1 to QT2. Does anyone know what could cause this and how I can get around it? Both QTREEs are in the same Volume but I would not expect this to be relevant. thanks, Jimmy

9 15

Re: cf takeover hungs Microsoft Windows Clusters
by Cristian Rojas 22 Nov '08

22 Nov '08

Forgot to say, we are using regular ethernet cards for iscsi connections. Chris ________________________________ From: "Webster, Stetson" <Stetson.Webster(a)netapp.com> To: Cristian Rojas <intipu(a)yahoo.com>; toasters(a)mathworks.com Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2008 12:57:22 AM Subject: RE: cf takeover hungs Microsoft Windows Clusters Are all HBA’s (on all MS cluster nodes) zoned in? Stetson M. Webster Professional Services Engineer NCIE-SAN, NCIE-B&R, SNIA-SCSE NetApp Global Services - Southeast District 919.250.0052 Mobile Stetson.Webster(a)netapp.com Learn how: netapp.com/guarantee From:Cristian Rojas [mailto:intipu@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 7:34 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: cf takeover hungs Microsoft Windows Clusters Hi guys, im seeing this behavior on different MS windows clusters attached to our FAS960, the most weird part is that i see the active node of the windows cluster connected to the target portal, but from the filer i dont see the igroup logged in for almost 2 minutes and thats when the windows clusters hung because they cant mount the quorum lun. All these while doiing a cf takeover. I talked to probably 10 Netapp support engineers and no one can explain it. Has anyone seen anything like this before? I have installed Host Utilities 5 and checked the windows registry to make sure the values have been tuned. Thanks Chris

1 0

snapvault retention questions
by Romeo Theriault 20 Nov '08

20 Nov '08

We're looking at using snapvault as a backup solution and after reading a bit of the documentation I was struck by the fact that it appears that the snapvault snap sched command can only schedule hourly, daily and weekly snapshots. Is there not a way to schedule monthly and yearly snapshots? Also, I don't see a way to specify that I want to keep one (or more) particular snapshots for a greater length of time without changing the whole destination volumes retention period. Is this correct? Thanks for any insight on this. -- Romeo Theriault

2 2

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters