toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

1 participants
13531 discussions

Re:
by Douglas Siggins 05 Oct '20

05 Oct '20

Yes, thanks folks. It appears there's not much v4 out there as suspected. On Wed, Sep 30, 2020, 20:12 Jeff Cleverley via Toasters < toasters(a)teaparty.net> wrote: > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Jeff Cleverley <jeff.cleverley(a)broadcom.com> > To: Wayne McCormick <Wayne.McCormick(a)sjrb.ca> > Cc: Toasters <toasters(a)teaparty.net> > Bcc: > Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 18:03:42 -0600 > Subject: Re: Any Openstack/Netapp FAS deployments w cinder NFS, v3 or v4 > Wayne, > > Just so you know your posts are working, I'll reply. I have no experience > with that at this point in time. Personally I don't see an issue posting > to ensure the NetApp configurations are correct or compatible with the > configurations. > > Jeff > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 9:09 AM Wayne McCormick <Wayne.McCormick(a)sjrb.ca> > wrote: > >> I hope I’m doing this right… (posting to the list I mean). >> >> >> >> I have four MySQL servers using NFSv4, but not with krb5. The rest of >> the environment is v3. >> >> >> >> We did do a pilot with OpenStack Container Platform and we used v3 (v4 >> was enabled, so it may have used it) provisioning via Trident with >> success. We also used Trident to provision iSCSI volumes. Worked quite >> well. >> >> >> >> Hope that helps a little. >> >> >> Wayne >> >> >> >> *From:* Toasters <toasters-bounces(a)teaparty.net> *On Behalf Of *Douglas >> Siggins >> *Sent:* Friday, September 25, 2020 9:01 AM >> *To:* Toasters <toasters(a)teaparty.net> >> *Subject:* Re: Any Openstack/Netapp FAS deployments w cinder NFS, v3 or >> v4 >> >> >> >> * CAUTION:* This email is from an external source. Do not click links >> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is >> safe. >> >> Crickets ? :) >> >> >> >> Alright let us remove openstack qualifier. Does anyone use v4 or know >> anyone that does with Netapp FAS? >> >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 6:53 PM Douglas Siggins <siggins(a)gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Greetings, >> >> Just reaching out for experiences on Openstack deployments with Netapp >> NFS. Are you using the default v4 or have switched the mount options to >> v3? We have a pretty good base of ISCSI, but based on performance and >> manageability are considering making the jump. >> >> >> >> Speaking of NFSv4, outside of openstack has anyone made any large >> deployments? Is it as solid as v3? using uid/gid, is anyone using sec=krb5? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Douglas >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Toasters mailing list >> Toasters(a)teaparty.net >> https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters > > > > -- > ** Please note my email address has changed to jeff.cleverley(a)broadcom.com > > Jeff Cleverley > Factory Systems Engineer > 4380 Ziegler Road > Building 1, Dock 1 > Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 > 970-288-4611 > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Jeff Cleverley via Toasters <toasters(a)teaparty.net> > To: Wayne McCormick <Wayne.McCormick(a)sjrb.ca> > Cc: Toasters <toasters(a)teaparty.net> > Bcc: > Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 01:04:02 +0100 > Subject: > _______________________________________________ > Toasters mailing list > Toasters(a)teaparty.net > https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters

4 6

SVM Admin Access
by Philbert Rupkins 02 Oct '20

02 Oct '20

Toasters, I work with a team of Windows Server admins who are open to provisioning their own storage but strongly prefer a GUI. I'd like to provide this ability by granting System Manager access to the specific SVM's that host their resources. Much to my chagrin, it doesn't appear RBAC allows for System Manager access to particular SVMs. Instead, privileges must be granted at the cluster level which of course means those privs are effective for all data SVMs (this is a non-starter). Per NetApp docs, my only option appears to be SVM level RBAC privs via SSH. Not quite the GUI option they are looking for but, organizationally, we're making a push for more automation and use of Ansible so it's not completely out of the question. Is there an angle Im not considering that would allow for SVM level access via System Manager? Has anybody else come up with creative ways to address this problem? I'd love to hear from you. Thanks, Phil

8 13

Any Openstack/Netapp FAS deployments w cinder NFS, v3 or v4
by Douglas Siggins 01 Oct '20

01 Oct '20

Greetings, Just reaching out for experiences on Openstack deployments with Netapp NFS. Are you using the default v4 or have switched the mount options to v3? We have a pretty good base of ISCSI, but based on performance and manageability are considering making the jump. Speaking of NFSv4, outside of openstack has anyone made any large deployments? Is it as solid as v3? using uid/gid, is anyone using sec=krb5? Regards, Douglas

3 3

Netapp and InteliSNAP comvault backup
by Iluhes 23 Sep '20

23 Sep '20

Does anyone use intelisnap comvault backaup and replies only on snapshot as their primary backup with no other means?Any advice or "horror" story to tell?Please let me knowIluhes(a)yahoo.com

1 0

ldaps for 7-mode
by Jeff Cleverley 22 Sep '20

22 Sep '20

Greetings, Is there a way to configure ldaps on a 7-mode cluster (8.1 vintage)? Our servers will be requiring a self signed certificate and port 636. I'm not seeing the method to import a certificate on 7-mode. We have an old cluster at a remote site used for some specific purposes. Upgrading and replacing it are not in the future plans. I was thinking about possibly a proxy server that does use ldaps:636 that it points to? Thanks, Jeff -- ** Please note my email address has changed to jeff.cleverley(a)broadcom.com Jeff Cleverley Factory Systems Engineer 4380 Ziegler Road Building 1, Dock 1 Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 970-288-4611

1 0

Re:
by tmac 09 Sep '20

09 Sep '20

like this: net port show -link down (verify the ports that are down) net port modify { -link down } -up-admin false (knock down all ports with link down) Yep. Do it all the time! --tmac *Tim McCarthy, **Principal Consultant* *Proud Member of the #NetAppATeam <https://twitter.com/NetAppATeam>* *I Blog at TMACsRack <https://tmacsrack.wordpress.com/>* On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 11:22 AM Scott Eno via Toasters < toasters(a)teaparty.net> wrote: > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Scott Eno <cse(a)hey.com> > To: Toasters <toasters(a)teaparty.net> > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 15:17:36 +0000 > Subject: Another quick question > Hi, > > Does "if" curly braces still work in 9.6? In diag mode I'm getting this > error when trying to use them. > > cluster::volume efficiency*> modify -vserver vserver -volume * > {-compression false} -compression true > > Error: "-compression false" was not expected. Please specify -fieldname > first. > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Scott Eno via Toasters <toasters(a)teaparty.net> > To: Toasters <toasters(a)teaparty.net> > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 16:17:42 +0100 > Subject: > _______________________________________________ > Toasters mailing list > Toasters(a)teaparty.net > https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters

2 1

Another quick question
by Scott Eno 09 Sep '20

09 Sep '20

Hi, Does "if" curly braces still work in 9.6? In diag mode I'm getting this error when trying to use them. cluster::volume efficiency*> modify -vserver vserver -volume * {-compression false} -compression true Error: "-compression false" was not expected. Please specify -fieldname first.

1 0

quick question
by Scott Eno 03 Sep '20

03 Sep '20

Just checking, does "-sort-by" still work? cluster::*> storage aggregate show -aggregate * -fields usedsize,size,percent-used -sort-by percent-used Error: invalid argument "-sort-by"

3 7

Re: Quick question
by Scott Eno 03 Sep '20

03 Sep '20

Oh, sure enough. Thanks! Tried advanced mode, but not diag.

1 0

SFP Compatibility - QLogic CNA 8324 / 9.3.x / FAS2552
by jordan slingerland 03 Sep '20

03 Sep '20

I am wondering if anyone has had any luck using FS.com or other generic SFP. If unsure, same question for a genuine Cisco GLC-T SFP. Unfortunately, I am limited to a 1g copper switch here. FS.com says the Cisco Compatible GLC-T generic adapters they have will work in a QLogic CNA 8324 but could not confirm specifically in a Netapp. Does qual_devices greenlist specific SFP as it does disks? slot 0: Fibre Channel Target Host Adapter 0d (QLogic CNA 8324 (8362) rev. 2, <LINK NOT CONNECTED>) Firmware rev: 8.7.0 Flash rev: 2.1.0 Thanks Toasters, --Jordan

3 2

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters