toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

1 participants
13515 discussions

SMSQL question
by Klise, Steve 10 May '12

10 May '12

I just upgraded a SQL 2005 SQL cluster from snapdrive 5, to 6.3.1r1 and SMSQL 2.x to 5.0. I also upgraded the verification server (remote server). Now, after upgrading, on a set of drives (G:\data and L:\logs), the backup works, but DBCC fails. What is strange is there is another set of drives (H:\data M:\logs) DBCC works.. I checked for snapshots that would still be mounted, flex clones, etc. Nothing appears to have "busy snapshots". This is the error (names/ip's changed to protect the innocent). Even checked for LUNS that would be not assigned to an igroup.. nothing.. This is the event from the verification server: Event Type: Error Event Source: SnapDrive Event Category: Generic event Event ID: 331 Date: 5/4/2012 Time: 1:19:32 PM User: N/A Computer: VERIFICATIONSRV Description: Failed to connect FlexClone of Snapshot copy (sqlsnap__SQL__recent) as drive C:\Program Files\NetApp\SnapManager for SQL Server\SnapMgrMountPoint\MPDisk001\ on the computer (VERIFICATIONSRV). LUN Name = lun0.lun Storage Path = /vol/SQLSERVER/SQLSERVER/ Protocol Type = LUN Storage System Name = 10.10.10.10 Error code : ZAPI: An attempt to online LUN '/vol/sdw_cl_SQLSERVER_0/SQLSERVER/lun0.lun' failed on the storage system 10.10.10.10. Error description: Another LUN mapped at this number This is the snap list. Volume SQLSERVER working... %/used %/total date name ---------- ---------- ------------ -------- 0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) May 04 13:18 sqlsnap__SQLSERVER__recent 0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) May 04 11:33 sqlsnap__SQLSERVER_05-04-2012_11.33.12__weekly 0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) May 04 10:43 sqlsnap__SQLSERVER_05-04-2012_10.42.44__weekly 0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) May 04 10:03 panstor2(1573990916)_SQLSERVER_snap.65 (snapmirror) 0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) May 04 10:03 @snapmir@{EF1F6E8C-64BA-4C23-A8F1-1566E881A373} 0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) May 04 10:01 sqlsnap__SQLSERVER_05-04-2012_10.00.07__daily 0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) May 04 07:59 sqlsnap__SQLSERVER_05-04-2012_07.58.44__weekly 0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) May 04 07:20 sqlsnap__SQLSERVER_05-04-2012_07.19.32__weekly 0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) May 04 07:12 @snapmir@{5CF5E20A-6C44-4CE9-B212-0F4BAEB90636} 0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) May 04 07:11 sqlsnap__SQLSERVER_05-04-2012_07.10.46__daily 0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) May 03 20:40 sqlsnap__SQLSERVER_05-03-2012_20.39.16__daily 0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) May 03 19:00 sqlsnap__SQLSERVER_05-03-2012_19.00.00__weekly 0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) May 03 18:30 sqlsnap__SQLSERVER_05-03-2012_18.30.00__daily 0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) May 03 14:30 sqlsnap__SQLSERVER_05-03-2012_14.30.00__daily 0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) May 03 10:30 sqlsnap__SQLSERVER_05-03-2012_10.30.00__daily 0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) May 02 19:00 sqlsnap__SQLSERVER_05-02-2012_19.00.00__weekly 0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) May 01 19:00 sqlsnap__SQLSERVER_05-01-2012_19.00.00__weekly 0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) Apr 30 19:00 sqlsnap__SQLSERVER_04-30-2012_19.00.00__weekly Any help would be appreciated.

2 3

NDMP backups of named snapshots
by John Stoffel 09 May '12

09 May '12

Guys, Anyone know if it's possible do an NDMP backup (using CommVault) of a *named* snapshot? Basically I need to snapshot two or more volumes at the same time (I can do this in a pre-script) and then let the snapshots be backed up. I guess I could be silly and just create a flex clone volumes and then back those volumes up instead, which would get rid of the issue, but would complicate things a bit more. Thanks, John John Stoffel - Senior Staff Systems Administrator - System LSI Group Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc. - http://www.toshiba.com/taec john.stoffel(a)taec.toshiba.com - 508-486-1087

4 10

15/19 vFilers migrated - 64 bit aggr upgrade ontap next
by Fletcher Cocquyt 09 May '12

09 May '12

So we've reached the point where our 32->32 bit data motion (vFiler migrations) are almost complete - (pending one vFiler stuck in "Migrate Failed" state case, and a previously fun flex clone vFiler) we purposely destroyed the destination (> 19Tb 64bit) aggregates and recreated them < 16Tb to work around 32->64bit data motion incompatibility Next we will initiate non-disruptive 64 bit aggregate upgrades by adding disk (the only currently supported method) Its beaucoup hoops, but we are almost there - our goal is to data motion off all vFilers btw partner clusters to complete our flash cache hardware upgrade thanks Fletcher

1 1

SAS port swap.
by Jeff Cleverley 08 May '12

08 May '12

Greetings, I have a SAS stack (plus other FC ds14s) in a FAS60xx cluster running 7.3.5.1. It has 2 quad port SAS HBAs per filer. The stack currently uses ports 6a and 7d on each filer. I need to add a couple more stacks. To make the cabling consistent I would like to move the current 7d connection to port 7a. When I moved the cable from 7d to 7a on one of the heads, it never brought the port online and never saw the disks on that port. I tried the storage enable adapter 7a but it still showed it was offline. I ran various sysconfig, storage show, disk show, etc, type commands to get the system to go find the disks on the new path. Nothing seemed to help. I waited 5 minutes after doing this just in case there was some type of discovery lag, but they never showed up. When I plugged back into 7d, everything is fine. I thought moving to a new port should work. Is there something else I'm missing to make this work? Thanks, Jeff -- Jeff Cleverley Unix Systems Administrator 4380 Ziegler Road Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 970-288-4611

2 2

vsc 4.0 vm inaccessible
by John Sfetsoris 08 May '12

08 May '12

hello everybody there is a vsc 4.0 in a vsphere 4.0 vms are on 'others" folder and have operation status 'inaccessible", so cannot be align attached is a scrrenshot of the console vsc log reports the following 2012-04-20 16:27:31,991 (VMExaminer-t-vwks-lkattis-1334928446341) WARN [VmdkFile] - Unable to read sectors using VDDK java.lang.Exception: The handle is not a valid VIX object at com.netapp.alignment.virtualDisk.VirtualDiskInfo.readSectors(Native Method) at com.netapp.alignment.virtualDisk.VirtualDiskInfo.readSectors(VirtualDiskInfo.java:99) at com.netapp.kamino.server.duplicator.VmdkFile.getSectors(VmdkFile.java:665) at com.netapp.caster.server.scanmanager.VMExaminer.buildPartitions(VMExaminer.java:583) at com.netapp.caster.server.scanmanager.VMExaminer.run(VMExaminer.java:460) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(Unknown Source) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown Source) at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source) 2012-04-20 16:27:31,992 (VMExaminer-t-vwks-lkattis-1334928446341) ERROR [VMExaminer] - Unable to read first two sectors of [Development] t-vwks-lkattis/t-vwks-lkattis_1.vmdk java.lang.IllegalStateException: VDDK is not properly initialized at com.netapp.kamino.server.duplicator.VmdkFile.getSectors(VmdkFile.java:668) at com.netapp.caster.server.scanmanager.VMExaminer.buildPartitions(VMExaminer.java:583) at com.netapp.caster.server.scanmanager.VMExaminer.run(VMExaminer.java:460) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(Unknown Source) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown Source) at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source) 2012-04-20 16:27:31,992 (VMExaminer-t-vwks-lkattis-1334928446341) ERROR [VMExaminer] - Failed to examine VM java.lang.IllegalStateException: VDDK is not properly initialized at com.netapp.kamino.server.duplicator.VmdkFile.getSectors(VmdkFile.java:668) at com.netapp.caster.server.scanmanager.VMExaminer.buildPartitions(VMExaminer.java:583) at com.netapp.caster.server.scanmanager.VMExaminer.run(VMExaminer.java:460) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(Unknown Source) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown Source) at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source) 2012-04-20 16:27:32,050 (VMExaminer-t-vwks-lkattis-1334928446341) DEBUG [VcInventory] - Entering waitOnTask (which now calls waitForTask),KaminoCountDownLatch [look is 0 with a max of 3 (look starts as zero).] 2012-04-20 16:27:32,050 (VMExaminer-t-vwks-lkattis-1334928446341) DEBUG [KaminoCountDownLatch] - keepGoing: look (1) is less than maxLook (3). Returning true (keep going). 2012-04-20 16:27:32,067 (VMExaminer-t-vwks-lkattis-1334928446341) DEBUG [VcInventory] - waiting on vm.Snapshot.remove which is in the following state: running any sugestions? thnks in advance John

1 0

User 'root' denied access - missing required capability: 'cli-route'
by Fletcher Cocquyt 04 May '12

04 May '12

I'm seeing this error "User 'root' denied access - missing required capability: 'cli-route'" (on the console) at the cutover stage of vFiler migration under 8.1 GA The vFiler migrations are successful, but this error is troubling for production vFiler migrations which require zero downtime. I opened a netapp support case and posted more details here: https://communities.netapp.com/message/80796 I'm looking to confirm the proper useradmin user->group->role mappings for root in case 8.1GA introduced some bug. I have (note no groups for root user - should I create a root group and add the mapping to the root role?): useradmin user list Name: root Info: Default system administrator. Rid: 0 Groups: -- useradmin group list Name: Administrators Info: Members can fully administer the filer Rid: 544 Roles: admin Name: Backup Operators Info: Members can bypass file security to backup files Rid: 551 Roles: backup,none Name: Compliance Administrators Info: Members can perform compliance operations Rid: 131072 Roles: compliance Name: Guests Info: Users granted Guest Access Rid: 546 Roles: none Name: ndmp Info: Rid: 131077 Roles: ndmp_role Name: oragroup Info: Rid: 131075 Roles: oracle Name: Power Users Info: Members that can share directories Rid: 547 Roles: power Name: Replicators Info: not supported Rid: 552 Roles: none Name: Users Info: Ordinary Users Rid: 545 Roles: audit -- useradmin role list Name: admin Info: Allowed Capabilities: login-*,cli-*,api-*,security-* Name: audit Info: Allowed Capabilities: api-snmp-get,api-snmp-get-next Name: backup Info: Default role for NDMP privileges. Allowed Capabilities: login-ndmp Name: compliance Info: Default role for compliance privileges. Allowed Capabilities: cli-cifs*,cli-exportfs*,cli-nfs*,cli-useradmin*,api-cifs-*,api-nfs-*,login-telnet,login-http-admin,login-rsh,login-ssh,api-system-api-*,cli-snaplock*,api-snaplock-*,api-file-*,compliance-* Name: ndmp_role Info: Allowed Capabilities: login-ndmp Name: none Info: Allowed Capabilities: Name: oracle Info: Allowed Capabilities: login-ssh,cli-snap* Name: power Info: Allowed Capabilities: cli-cifs*,cli-exportfs*,cli-nfs*,cli-useradmin*,api-cifs-*,api-nfs-*,login-telnet,login-http-admin,login-rsh,login-ssh Name: root Info: Allowed Capabilities: * thanks

1 0

DataMotion for Volumes in 8.1?
by Randy Rue 03 May '12

03 May '12

Hello All, Running 8.1GA on a 3240 and trying to move two vfilers from one aggregate to another (both are 64 bit aggrs). Ultimately I just need to move the root and data volumes for these vfilers. Not finding a wealth of examples on the "vol move" command, not surprising as this is a pretty new feature. http://www.netapp.com/us/communities/tech-ontap/tot-data-motion-1102.html NetApp's blurb says this can be done without interruption, but also talks a lot about when to do the "cutover." They say the cutover can be triggered manually or automatically. But I can't make the "vol move" command do anything but return a usage blurb unless I include a "start" switch. Also, their website claims this can be done nondisruptively. But "vol move start" keeps failing because I have CIFS and/or NFS running. In fact, if I turn them both off it still complains that I have NFS exports configured and that I need to remove them first. Anyone have experience moving volumes from one aggr to another, hopefully live? Randy Rue

6 8

Getting a quick "connection refused"
by David Lee 02 May '12

02 May '12

A TCP connection towards an arbitrary high port number (>=1024) on the NetApp seems to return "connection refused" instantly. By contrast, a connection towards a low port number waits for several minutes, then something times out. I imagine this is related to assisting security etc. As part of our transition from our previous non-NetApp fileserver, it would be very useful if we could persuade the NetApp to return a quick "connection refused" on a particular low port number. But we cannot see a way to adjust this behaviour (either for a particular low port or for all low ports). Is this possible? If so, could you point us to the relevant documentation, please? (If it is not possible, we can probably put a workaround in the external application.) -- David Lee

4 4

List Administrivia - posts from non-subscribers
by Tom Yates 30 Apr '12

30 Apr '12

At the moment, you have to be a subscriber to post to this list, but if you post from a non-subscribed address, it's referred to the moderators for manual approval. We must be getting famous at the new address, because more and more spam is being received by the list; it now significantly outweighs the legitimate posts referred to the moderators. So I plan to reconfigure the list to simply reject posts from non-subscribers; I expect I'll do that in about a week's time. I'll let the list know when the change has been made. Meanwhile, may I urge people posting to make sure they're posting from the address at which they're subscribed? If you genuinely want to use multiple addresses to post, I'll point out that you can subscribe all of your possible posting addresses, then use the web interface to opt all but one out of receiving list posts (set "nomail" for each of them). If anyone's got issues with this, please email me and the other moderator *OFFLIST* at owner-toasters -at- teaparty.net; I'm open to suggestions, provided they're made before any change. -- Tom Yates - http://www.teaparty.net

1 1

Reallocation and VMware
by Peta Thames 29 Apr '12

29 Apr '12

Hi all, I'd like to pick your collective brains about your experiences with reallocate, specifically when reallocating luns under VMware. For background, we're running ONTAP 8.0.1 on a 3170 that's over three years old. I've been going through measuring reallocation, and most of the volumes are over 3. We have no snapshots, and only a relatively small number of volumes are de-duplicated. All our volumes and luns are thin-provisioned, and no aggregate is more than 76% full (most are ~65%). We regularly have huge latency spikes (worst I've seen so far is 5000000ms, and there are far too many to even track over 50000ms daily), and on one filer head, but not its partner, I regularly see disk utilisation go to 100% or more. I'm hoping reallocate will help here. I have a brief note from a NetApp support person who says "It’s very important that you complete the reallocation in the following order: 1:OS 2:LUN 3: Volume". I have two questions about this: - is it absolutely necessary to defrag the OS before you reallocate the lun? I'm sure I've run reallocate without defraging the OS and still seen performance improvements. I'm also assuming that this is only relevant to Windows VMs, not Linux (in our case, Red Hat/CentOS) ones. - if you only have one lun per volume, do you still need to run reallocate on both the lun and the volume? If only one, which is preferable? All advice appreciated. Thanks, Peta

7 8

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters