toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

3 participants
13514 discussions

RE: ISL
by Adam.Fox＠netapp.com 06 Jun '00

06 Jun '00

Not currently. I have heard rumors of it being on the roadmap, but not sure exactly when. -- Adam Fox NetApp Professional Services, NC adamfox(a)netapp.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Jack Verdirame [mailto:jack@zerowait.com] > Sent: Monday, June 05, 2000 8:49 PM > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: ISL > > > Does anyone know if ISL (Inter-Switch Link by Cisco) is > support by a filer. > I don't believe it is. > > Thanks for your time, > > Jack Verdirame > www.zerowait.com > www.loadbalancing.net > Las Vegas: 302.559.5962 > Corp: 302.266.9408 >

1 0

RE: BudTool incremental backups behaving differently when using N DMP
by chang-ping.hu＠netapp.com 06 Jun '00

06 Jun '00

It is true NetApp recommends using NetApp's dump and restore command formats. ufsrestore is also supported as an alternative way to retrieve data in case filer is unavailable. However, ufsdump is NOT supported. C.P. Hu -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Krueger [mailto:jkrueger@qualcomm.com] Sent: Monday, June 05, 2000 4:43 PM To: Matt Phelps Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: BudTool incremental backups behaving differently when using NDMP I may have said this before on toasters, but our general experience with NetApp's dump format is that it should be written and read via NetApp's dump and restore command. Yes, we've all heard the claims that it is ufsdump/restore compatible, but at every turn there seems to be some new slight inconsistancy that causes problems in some cases. -- Jeff >From Matt Phelps on Mon, 05 Jun 2000 17:14:54 EDT: > > >Hi All, > >We recently turned on NDMP on our filer and have noticed >different behavior with incremental backups. If we level 0 >a qtree, then use Solaris ufsdump piped to the NetApp >restore command to move files from a Solaris box to that qtree >(such that the file attributes like ctime and mtime are older >than the level 0 time), a subsequent level 9 dump will not see >the added files. If we turn off NDMP on the filer, so BudTool's >dump.NetApp class reverts to rsh'ing a Ontap "dump" command, then >that DOES pick up the added files. > >We opened a call with NetApp (110424), they claimed to have made >"incremental backups with NDMP available" in 5.3.5R2P2 which we >upgraded to, but we are still seeing the same behavior. > >We are using Budtool 4.6.1 on a Solaris machine. > >-- >Matt Phelps >System Administrator, Computation Facility >Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics >mphelps(a)cfa.harvard.edu, http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/~mphelps >

2 1

ISL
by Jack Verdirame 06 Jun '00

06 Jun '00

Does anyone know if ISL (Inter-Switch Link by Cisco) is support by a filer. I don't believe it is. Thanks for your time, Jack Verdirame www.zerowait.com www.loadbalancing.net Las Vegas: 302.559.5962 Corp: 302.266.9408

1 0

OT: Netapp at Usenix?
by Brian Tao 06 Jun '00

06 Jun '00

Anyone heading down to San Diego for USENIX this year? Can we expect a Netapp vendor hospitality suite again? :) -- Brian Tao (BT300, taob(a)risc.org) "Though this be madness, yet there is method in't"

1 0

BudTool incremental backups behaving differently when using NDMP
by Matt Phelps 05 Jun '00

05 Jun '00

Hi All, We recently turned on NDMP on our filer and have noticed different behavior with incremental backups. If we level 0 a qtree, then use Solaris ufsdump piped to the NetApp restore command to move files from a Solaris box to that qtree (such that the file attributes like ctime and mtime are older than the level 0 time), a subsequent level 9 dump will not see the added files. If we turn off NDMP on the filer, so BudTool's dump.NetApp class reverts to rsh'ing a Ontap "dump" command, then that DOES pick up the added files. We opened a call with NetApp (110424), they claimed to have made "incremental backups with NDMP available" in 5.3.5R2P2 which we upgraded to, but we are still seeing the same behavior. We are using Budtool 4.6.1 on a Solaris machine. -- Matt Phelps System Administrator, Computation Facility Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics mphelps(a)cfa.harvard.edu, http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/~mphelps

2 1

RE: Filer Question
by McDonough, Tim 05 Jun '00

05 Jun '00

Yes, they should, on the other hand if you munge the cable ( anyone ever bent a few pins on a SCSI cable?? ) it'd be a bit easier to come up with a replacement DB9 cable. Tim -----Original Message----- From: Jay Tribick [mailto:jay.tribick@carrier1.net] Sent: Monday, June 05, 2000 2:20 PM To: Jay Orr Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: Filer Question Hey :) > Not that serious a question, but we just got a new F720 and was wondering > why the Fibre card has the funky connector on it, but the filer and the > trays have a 9-pin connector? I would think as much as the box was > idiot-proofed they would of at least used a different connector for the > shelves then from the serial devices.... > > Anyone know? Just curious... Are you expecting idiots to install it? :] If you are making such a large investment deploying netapp boxes, shouldn't the people who are going to admin it know the difference between serial and FCAL? (: -- Regards, Jay Tribick Senior Systems Engineer Carrier1 Voice: +44 171 531 3874 Mobile: +44 7801 526 638

1 0

Filer Question
by Jay Orr 05 Jun '00

05 Jun '00

Not that serious a question, but we just got a new F720 and was wondering why the Fibre card has the funky connector on it, but the filer and the trays have a 9-pin connector? I would think as much as the box was idiot-proofed they would of at least used a different connector for the shelves then from the serial devices.... Anyone know? Just curious... ----------- Jay Orr Systems Administrator Fujitsu Nexion Inc. St. Louis, MO

2 1

RE: using openview to receive traps from a 740 filer
by alan.yoder＠netapp.com 05 Jun '00

05 Jun '00

Hints: be sure to turn on snmp with "snmp init 1" turn traps on with "snmp traps on" set the traphost with "snmp traphost add <host>" Notes: traps were introduced in 5.3 you have to get stuff right on the Openview end too If these don't solve your problem, please open a call with NetApp support. They should be able to help you nail it down. Alan =============================================================== Alan G. Yoder agy(a)netapp.com =============================================================== > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Horn [mailto:mhorn@chkenergy.com] > Sent: Monday, June 05, 2000 12:52 PM > To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.org' > Subject: using openview to receive traps from a 740 filer > > > Is anyone using Openview to receive traps from a 740 filer? > We have installed the MIB file into Openview on a Sun box > and added several snmp traps to the /etc/rc file on the filer. > If we pull a power supply a trap should be sent to Openview > for translation and then send a page informing me of a problem. > We are not seeing any traps from the filer but Netapps said > this should work. If you have in input on our problem please > send me a message. Your help in this matter is greatly > appreciated > > Regards, > > Michael A. Horn > Associate Geophysicist > > > Michael A. Horn > Associate Geophysicist > > Chesapeake Energy Corporation > 6106 N. Western Avenue > P.O. Box 18496 > Oklahoma City, OK 73154-0496 > 405/879-9282 (office) > 405/879-9577 (fax) > mhorn(a)chkenergy.com > >

1 0

using openview to receive traps from a 740 filer
by Mike Horn 05 Jun '00

05 Jun '00

Is anyone using Openview to receive traps from a 740 filer? We have installed the MIB file into Openview on a Sun box and added several snmp traps to the /etc/rc file on the filer. If we pull a power supply a trap should be sent to Openview for translation and then send a page informing me of a problem. We are not seeing any traps from the filer but Netapps said this should work. If you have in input on our problem please send me a message. Your help in this matter is greatly appreciated Regards, Michael A. Horn Associate Geophysicist Michael A. Horn Associate Geophysicist Chesapeake Energy Corporation 6106 N. Western Avenue P.O. Box 18496 Oklahoma City, OK 73154-0496 405/879-9282 (office) 405/879-9577 (fax) mhorn(a)chkenergy.com

1 0

RE: NAS solutions from Sun?
by howie.wilcox＠netapp.com 05 Jun '00

05 Jun '00

Hi Folks, There seems to be not very much that would be considered "filer" or "appliance" in SUN's new N8200. A closer loo reveals that SUN's new "filer" is apparently a SUN server and A1000 storage array bundled into one marketing code. They have been shipping the A1000 technology in various forms for quite a while now. This is the stuff that they OEM from Symbios Logic/LSI/MetaStor. Its pretty much a standard SUN server and direct attached storage that the SUN marketing guys are calling a "filer". Howie -----Original Message----- From: Ishankov, Alex [mailto:Alex.Ishankov@BMO.com] Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 10:13 AM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: NAS solutions from Sun? Hi - Does anybody know anything about recently announced NAS solution from Sun Sun StorEdge N8200 filer (http://www.sun.com/smi/Press/sunflash/2000-05/sunflash.20000530.1.html) and if it is just an adopted version of Network Appliance filer? Thanks

4 3

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters