toasters August 2003

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

105 participants
121 discussions

RE: ONTAP simulator http license?
by Meyer, Brad 28 Jan '04

28 Jan '04

Try these... Brad BKHEXNB is a fcp Simulator site license NAZOMKC is a http Simulator site license -----Original Message----- From: CTG - Bob Weiler [mailto:bweiler@ctgwi.com] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 7:24 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: ONTAP simulator http license? Does anyone know the simulator license for http? When I installed the simulator I noticed the keys for fcp and http are identical. The installation guide has the following: ... license dafs=TBPGWWF license fcp=BKHEXNB <- license http=BKHEXNB <- license nfs=BQOEAZL ... Thanks, Bob -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Dave Hitz Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 8:29 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: ONTAP Simulator available on NOW Some of you may know that NetApp Engineering uses an ONTAP Simulator as part of our development process. (The simulator runs all of ONTAP as a process under Linux. At a very low level, we spoof the disk drivers, so that disks are simulated by local files. We spoof the network drivers by putting the Linux Ethernet card into promiscuous mode and creating a fake MAC address associated with the simulator.) Enough technical details. The point of this message is that we are now making the simulator available to customers so that they can experiment with ONTAP features and commands without putting production systems at risk. I have had many customers tell me that they wished they had a way to play with new releases and new features, but they didn't have a safe place to do it. Just to be clear: This is not production software. It's ONTAP running on top of Linux, so don't use it for performance testing. We have no formal support program. Don't call NetApp support. This is an "as is" tool. (Some restrictions may apply. :-) On the other hand, I think you will find the simulator to be very useful for experimenting with ONTAP. Hundreds of NetApp engineers use it every day, and we have been using the simulator for over a year in NetApp training classes. Not only can you experiment with the features of a single filer, but you can run multiple simulators and experiment with features like SnapMirror, SnapVault, and Cluster Fail Over. It doesn't support Fibre Channel, because that would take more hardware, but it does support iSCSI and all of the other TCP/IP protocols, including NFS, CIFS, HTTP and FTP, as well as network management protocols like SNMP and NDMP. Here are some details: You can download the simulator from NOW at <http://now.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/simulator>. We have created a category in the NOW community forums called "ONTAP Simulator" that can be accessed at <http://forums.netapp.com/showcategory.asp?cid=172>. And finally, we have created a majordomo mailing list that people can join at xdl-simulator(a)netapp.com. (You know the drill. To join send to majordomo(a)netapp.com, not to the simulator list itself.) And of course, feel free to talk about it here on toasters. As I said above, the simulator is NOT formally supported, but some volunteers at NetApp have agreed to informally answer questions to the xdl-simulator mailing list. Have fun! Dave Hitz Founder and EVP Engineering, Network Appliance

2 1

RE: Data ONTAP Upgrade
by Sam Schorr 04 Nov '03

04 Nov '03

For all the inquiring minds, I found this under the download section: ********************************************************************** DEBUG PATCH RELEASE 6.3.1D8 Based on release 6.3.1 ********************************************************************** This is a DEBUG patch, which means it has fixes that have not been released in a regular software version yet. These fixes, if validated, will be checked in and released in a future release after adequate QA and testing. Fixes contained in this patch release are: 85294 Ineffective nlm GRANTED requested (callback) 78177 Renaming a small number of files repeatedly causes WAFL dir size to grow 83697 CPU at 100% after 6.2.1 upgrade from 6.1.3R1, with low NFS Ops and Disk Ops 80286 Problem accessing ~snapshot directory when using the "nosymlink_strict_security" share option 82176 File access can fail when using a widelink that maps to a share that supports widelinks 78570 Slow FTP performance with clustering enabled. 80332 SNMP may stop responding after accessing miscGlobalStatus on FAS9xx appliances. 81905 kma.c crash in wafl_zombie_growfile_handler 83681 CIFS file owner may be set incorrectly 85651 CIFS SETUP fails with "DSA is unwilling to perform" 85653 can't set file attributes when restoring with Veritas NetBackup 81631 isp2100 not handling port_logged_out status correctly for CT requests 86862 Master filer panic during takeover - memory leak from dup_user_field() 86464 Volume SnapMirror from an F840,F880,F9XX to a platform other than F840,F880 or F9XX on restarting may lead to corruption on destination. -----Original Message----- From: Hill, Aaron [mailto:aaron.hill@navitaire.com] Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 2:14 PM To: 'Chris Blackmor' Cc: 'Paul McGuinness (ext. 771)'; 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: RE: Data ONTAP Upgrade Hey there, I welcome questions. Unfortunately, my answers may not be sufficient to satisfy your mental hunger. To be honest, I don't know exactly what the D8 does. I was informed that it fixes the snapmirror code. The error was found to occur only in our "specific" circumstance. So what was/is our circumstance? 1) F880 source snapmirroring 3 batch area volumes to an F820 target across a 20Mbit Ethernet WAN. 2) The amount of data change per day is high. Approximately 10-40Gb per volume. 3) We were experiencing poor throughput across the WAN link (carrier issue) and had to frequently abort the snapmirror and delete snapshots from the F880 source in order to prevent snapshot space over-running production data space. This throughput has since been addressed (before D8). 4) The F820 target panicked a couple of times and dumped to the ok prompt. One of the target volumes was found to be corrupt. It was difficult to say if the source filer caused it or the target filer developed the corruption independently. We had some cases open and ran wafl checks and scans on both filers as a result. No errors were turned up. 5) The crash dump file was ftp'd to NetApp. This lead to the 6.3.1D8 debug release. When I get some more time, I might read into it a bit further. For now, I am more than happy that they have addressed the issue and fixed it very quickly. We have not had any problems with 6.3.1 or the D8 releases. Thanks, Aaron -----Original Message----- From: Chris Blackmor [mailto:chris.blackmor@amd.com] Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 6:48 AM To: Hill, Aaron Cc: 'Paul McGuinness (ext. 771)'; 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: Re: Data ONTAP Upgrade What does the D8 fix for snapmirror? Inquiring minds want to know. ;) C- On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 07:18:19PM -0600, Hill, Aaron wrote: > We are running 6.3.1 on one filer (F880) and 6.3.1D8 (debug release for a > snapmirror problem we were having) on another (F820). 2 others still running > 6.2.2 I believe. > > As far as I know, all new F960s being shipped have 6.3.1 on them. > > So overall, I have to say I recommend it. If you are snapmirroring, make > sure you put 6.3.1D8 on your destination filer, that is the advice from our > NetApp representative. > > Thanks, > Aaron Hill > Systems Engineer > www.navitaire.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul McGuinness (ext. 771) [mailto:Paul.McGuinness@fineos.com] > Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 2:58 AM > To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' > Subject: Data ONTAP Upgrade > > Hi, > I have a F720 currently running on Data ONTAP 6.1.2R2 and everything is > running fine. > My question is to those of you 6.6.2 (the current GA release) and those of > you on 6.3.1. > > I was going to upgrade to 6.2.2, just to keep my system up to date, but > according to the NOW site there are a good few more active systems running > 6.3.1. > > Would 6.3.1 be a better upgrade to go to? I also see that there is now a 6.4 > first customer shipment release (12th Feb) but I think I'll leave that for > those of you who have filers to play with.... > :o) > > So 6.6.2 or 6.3.1? > > > > > > ************************************************************************** > The information contained in this e-mail is confidential, > may be privileged and is intended only for the use of the > recipient named above. If you are not the intended > recipient or a representative of the intended recipient, > you have received this e-mail in error and must not copy, > use or disclose the contents of this email to anybody > else. If you have received this e-mail in error, please > notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and > permanently delete the copy you received. This email has > been swept for computer viruses. However, you should > carry out your own virus checks. > > > Registered in Ireland, No. 205721. http://www.FINEOS.com > ************************************************************************** -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- * Chris Blackmor _______ | * * Advanced Micro Devices \____ | | Toto... I've * * Phone: (512) 602-1608 /| | | | a feeling we're * * Fax: (512) 602-5155 | |___| | | not in Kansas * * Email: chris.blackmor(a)amd.com |____/ \| | anymore. * -------------------------------------------------------------------- * My comments are mine, and mine alone. * --------------------------------------------------------------------

2 1

DOT 6.2.2 - ndmpcopy
by George Kahler 01 Oct '03

01 Oct '03

When I try to run ndmpcopy from one of my filers' (840s) console prompt, it locks up and does not release the console until after it is done not allowing me to type anything else in. I realize that I can run ndmpcopy from any other hosts I'm just wondering if this is the correct behavior. Thanks, George ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- George Kahler e-mail: george(a)yorku.ca Sr. Systems Administrator humans: (416) 736-2100 x.22699 Computing and Network Services machines: (416) 736-5830 Ontario, Canada, M3J-1P3

4 3

Manufacture of Patents
by Brian Pinzon 30 Aug '03

30 Aug '03

Dear Manufacture: Your company may be will to manufacture our product line. If interested, Please contact us, after looking at patent number 6,161,005. Brian Pinzon, MBA. CEO. Pindome Corporation PO BOX 959 Santa Teresa, NM 88008 www.pindome.com 915-584-8988 915-203-3956 cellular

1 0

URGENT AND CONFIDENCIAL
by peter_adams＠hknetmail.com 30 Aug '03

30 Aug '03

DR.PETER ADAMS BILL AND EXCHANGE MANAGER, ECOBANK LOME, FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF TOGO Dear, I am Dr Peter Adams ,the manager of bill and exchange at the foreign remittance department of ECOBANK.As a matter of facts, I got your address in LOME chamber of commerce during one of my research work in the state library. However, in my department we discovered an abandoned sum of $ 30 m US dollars (Thirty Millon US dollars) . In an account that belongs to one of our foreign customer who died along with his entire family in a concord plane crash in the year 2000 in paris that almost took the whole life of the pasengeres on board. Since we got information about his death, we have been expecting his next of kin to come over and claim his money because we cannot release it unless somebody applies for it as next of kin or relation to the deceased as indicated in our banking guidelines but unfortunately we learnt that all his supposed next of kin or relation died alongside with him at the plane crash leaving nobody behind for the claim. It is therefore upon this discovery that I and other officials in my department now decided to make this businness proposal to you and release the money to you as the next of kin or relation to the deceased for safety and subsequent disbursement since nobody is coming for it and we don;t want this money to go into the Bank treasury as unclaimed Bill. The Banking law and guideline here stipulates that if such money remained unclamed after three years, the money will be transfered into the Bank treasury account as unclaimed fund. The request of foreigner as next of kin in this business is occasioned by the fact that the customer was a foreigner and an indigene of Togo cannot stand as next of kin to a foreigner. We agree that 30 % of this money will be for you as foreign partner, in respect to the provision of a foreign account, 10 % will be set aside for expenses incured during the business and 60 % would be for ;me and my colleagues. There after I and my colleagues will visit your country for disbursement accoding to the percentages indicated. Therefore to enable the immediate transfer of this fund to you as arranged, you must apply first to the bank as relations or next of kin of the deceased indicating your bank name, your bank account number, your private telephone and fax number for easy and effective communication and location where in the money will be remitted . Upon receipt of your reply, I will send to you by fax or email the text of the application. I will not fail to bring to your notice that this transaction is hitch free and that you should not entertain any atom of fear as all required arrangements have been made for the transfer . You should contact me immediately as soon as you receive this letter. Trusting to hear from you immediately. Your;s faithfully, DR. Peter Adams (Bill and exchange manager) ECOBANK. N.B.My intention of writing you through email is because I belive it is very confidential. ------------------------------------------------- HKNETMAIL.COM Free WEB MAIL Service by HKNET

1 0

URGENT AND CONFIDENCIAL
by peter_adams＠hknetmail.com 30 Aug '03

30 Aug '03

1 0

May god bless you!Pl
by oscar.illouz＠laposte.net 30 Aug '03

30 Aug '03

Hello My name and first name will not undoubtedly say anything to you but I am a young student needing small help.Very respectfully, If you could grant me a few times to explain you my problem i will be very hapy ! I hope to read you very soon.With all the respect that I owe you; And please answer i need help

1 0

Monitoring CIFS Quota Threshold alerts...
by Sto Rage! 29 Aug '03

29 Aug '03

Dear Toasters, I would like to monitor and send out alerts to CIFS users when they hit their disk quota thresholds. I am sure some of you are doing this now. I have setup up quotas and thresholds and see the entries in the etc/messages file (which is mounted on a Linux host) The entries have the SID instead of the user name, like the entry below. Fri Aug 29 07:38:22 PDT [quota.softlimit.exceeded:notice]: Threshold exceeded for user S-1-5-21-1177238915-1993962763-725345543-10399, tree 1 on volume vol1 Is there a way to get this message logged as a more human readable format ? i.e. something like Fri Aug 29 07:38:22 PDT [quota.softlimit.exceeded:notice]: Threshold exceeded for user jdoe, tree 1 on vol1 Currently I use Nagios (www.nagios.org) to send out alerts to the admin when these messages are logged, but would like to send the alerts to the user directly, may be also add their current quota, space used & % used. Any pointers? thanks in advance -G

1 0

SnapMirror Question
by Holland, William L 29 Aug '03

29 Aug '03

Is this do-able? FilerA - onsite LAN connection FilerB - onsite LAN connection NearStoreA - onsite LAN connection FilerZ - offsite WAN connection NearStoreA SnapMirror the QTrees on FilerA and FilerB into one volume (maintaining the qtrees). FilerZ then SnapMirroring the volume from NearStoreA.

3 2

Monitoring CIFS Quota Threshold alerts...
by Sto Rage ! 29 Aug '03

29 Aug '03

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters August 2003