I heard that I may have phrased this badly, and now that I read it I agree. Let me try again.
If you CIFS at your site, then the NT permissions may be important to you. If you back up over NFS, you will not capture the NT permissions on tape. Of course, if you back up over CIFS, the UNIX permissions are not captured.
LB
-----Original Message-----
From: Breniser, Larry
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 2:48 PM
To: 'Coder, James (STP)'; 'Stephen Manley'; Surlow, Jim
Cc: 'Alfred Lim'; toasters(a)mathworks.com
Subject: RE: One more netbackup question...
The disadvantage (if you use CIFS) is tht the Windows security information is not backed up.
LB
-----Original Message-----
From: Coder, James (STP) [mailto:James.Coder@guidant.com]
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 2:48 PM
To: 'Stephen Manley'; Surlow, Jim
Cc: 'Alfred Lim'; toasters(a)mathworks.com
Subject: RE: One more netbackup question...
Another solution while waiting for netbackup and dar to come about- if you
are using the filer in an nfs environment, you can nfs mount the directories
/ volumes. We've been doing this for the past 2 years and have good
performance - we also run the backups over a separate backup lan running
gig. The advantage is you don't have to dedicate the drives to the
filer(s), you can break up the volumes to little more manageable sizes (use
bpstart / bpend scripts - downside is you don't have the speed you get from
ndmp. did some testing when we put our 760 into place 2 years ago and made
the decision then to use nfs.
also don't know if DAR will allow you to not dedicate drives to the
filer(s).
cheers - jc
James C. Coder
Sr. UNIX Administrator
Guidant Corporation
4100 Hamline Avenue North
St. Paul, MN 55112
Tel: 651-582-4797 Fax 651-582-4285
email: james.coder(a)guidant.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Manley [mailto:stephen@netapp.com]
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 5:49 AM
To: Surlow, Jim
Cc: 'Alfred Lim'; toasters(a)mathworks.com
Subject: RE: One more netbackup question...
Most of what you say is correct, but Ontap 6.0 and greater supports DAR,
due to NDMP allowing for cooperation between NDMP client and NDMP server.
When you run the backup, the filer sends "file history" information to the
NDMP client. This information allows the NDMP client (Legato, Veritas,
WorkStation Solutions, ArcServe, etc) to create the index of files in the
backup _and_ their location in the backup stream (byte offset).
Meanwhile, the NDMP clients also track the amount of data written to each
tape. So, when you do a DAR, the NDMP client tells the NDMP server (e.g.
the filer) the list of files it wants restored and the offsets of those
files. The filer and the NDMP client cooperate to load and position the
tape to those offsets.
At each offset, the filer will extract the data and restore the requested
file.
Which means:
A) If you run an NDMP backup without file history (i.e. indexing) you
can't run a direct access restore.
B) To run a DAR, you need the functionality from the client and server.
C) DAR is _possible_ using NDMP V2, V3, and V4 (all these versions
support file history and the other commands necessary for DAR)
D) Data Ontap 6.0 and greater supports DAR.
Hopefully this helps,
Stephen Manley
Member of the NDMP version of the Osmond family
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Surlow, Jim wrote:
> Even though Networker might support DAR, does OnTap?
>
> I did some research on this a while back (so my info may be dated), but my
> understanding is this:
>
> The backup server initiates the NDMP command to the Filer (or other NDMP
> device), the OS on that device then begins to send data to tape by using
> means that it is aware of. In the case of OnTap, it uses the typical Unix
> dump command.
>
> With dump/restore, there is no index created, thus, to recover, one has to
> scan from the beginning of tape of the first tape in the dump set until
the
> data is found (on whatever tape). And the user waiting for the file will
> likely hope that their file is closer to the first part of the first tape
> rather than the last part of the last tape.
>
> Netbackup & Networker will have an index knowing which NDMP tape set that
a
> file is on, but I would guess that they would have no idea as to which
tape
> in the set it is - or where on that tape (set: being number of tapes for
> that night's incremental, full, whatever).
>
> If I'm off base, please clarify.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jim Surlow
> CSG Systems
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alfred Lim [mailto:alfred@ptc.net]
> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 10:23 AM
> To: toasters(a)mathworks.com
> Subject: Re: One more netbackup question...
>
>
> Well one thing for Legato Networker,
> it support NDMP V3 and have this DAR feature.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Jeff Kennedy" <jlkennedy(a)amcc.com>
> To: Don.Hickey(a)alcatel.com
> Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 08:56:46 -0800
> Subject: Re: One more netbackup question...
>
> > Get a new backup software? The problem is that some vendors do not
> > support Direct Access Restore, meaning it will search through every tape
> > starting at the first and scan the whole thing. If no DAR, you're
> > basically bummed.
> >
> > Do you use snapshots? If you have the space it is a life-saver at
> > times.
> >
> > ~JK
> >
> > Don.Hickey(a)alcatel.com wrote:
> > >
> > > I find restoring from a tape extraordinarly slowwwww. I have home
> > > directories on a clustered pair of F840 running 6.1.1r2. I have
> > > several volumes at about 300gb usable. When I need to restore a file
> > > from a users directory it can take up to 6+ hours (DLT 8000). It
> > > appears most of the time is taken searching for the files... is there
> > > anything you can suggest (including any white papers) to speed up this
> > > process?
> > >
> > > thanks again
> > >
> > > Don
> >
> > --
> > =====================
> > Jeff Kennedy
> > Unix Administrator
> > AMCC
> > jlkennedy(a)amcc.com
>
>