Hi all,
rumors from NetApp's engineering state that Multipath-HA on loops formed with SATA disks are counterproductive and with worst performances. This seems to me physically a nonsense. Is there somebody with further informations?
Thanks,
Both my experience in performance and a consultation I just made with storage engineering agree that it is absolutely the correct thing to do both for performance and reliability to deploy MPHA in conjunction with SATA.
Going forward, MPHA is the standard for deploying clusters for all types of disks.
If you have further questions, please feel free to contact your account team/Systems Engineer or open a case with NetApp Global Support.
--greck
Happy to read that I was right. This is what I exactly thought
Thanks
Da: Greck Cannon [mailto:greck@netapp.com] Inviato: sabato 13 marzo 2010 16:51 A: Milazzo Giacomo Cc: toasters@mathworks.com Oggetto: Re: Multipath-HA and SATA
Both my experience in performance and a consultation I just made with storage engineering agree that it is absolutely the correct thing to do both for performance and reliability to deploy MPHA in conjunction with SATA.
Going forward, MPHA is the standard for deploying clusters for all types of disks.
If you have further questions, please feel free to contact your account team/Systems Engineer or open a case with NetApp Global Support.
--greck
-- Greck Cannon Engineering Product Support
NetApp 310.697.3626 Direct/Mobile greck@netapp.commailto:greck@netapp.com www.netapp.comhttp://www.netapp.com
On Mar 13, 2010, at 10:15 AM, Milazzo Giacomo wrote:
Hi all,
rumors from NetApp's engineering state that Multipath-HA on loops formed with SATA disks are counterproductive and with worst performances. This seems to me physically a nonsense. Is there somebody with further informations?
Thanks,