Why not clutter up the list with an inane banter about the increasing incidence of inane banter when bantering about inane banters.

Inanely yours. Banteringly so. -----Original Message----- From: owner-dl-toasters@netapp.com [mailto:owner-dl-toasters@netapp.com]On Behalf Of Maglinger, Paul Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 3:18 PM To: 'Jeff Innis'; toasters@mathworks.com Subject: RE: Re: OT - swag (fwd)

So guys, are you going to start some "inane banter" about the "inane banter"? -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Innis [mailto:figaro911@hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 17:11 To: toasters@mathworks.com Subject: Fwd: Re: OT - swag (fwd)

Yes, it's quite interesting the crying about not following protocol when trying to unsubscribe, but not a word from the those same folk about polluting the bandwith with 2 days of inane banter( no doubt someone thinks this chatter was interesting). Just perhaps, those sending mail to toasters@mathworks.com to "unsubscribe", aren't clueless about majordomo, or lazy, but in actuality are registering their vote of "enough is enough", and letting the rest of the list know why.

Jeff

> > From: Ozzie Sabina > > Sender: owner-toasters@mathworks.com > > Precedence: bulk > > > > > > +-- "Swank, Steve (OTS-KC)" once said: > > | Can we move on from this topic, please? If you want to send personal > > | e-mails, send them to the person, not the entire list. > > > > I'll second this motion. I don't blame all of the people suddenly > > wanting to get off the list. > > > > Oz > > >

---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com