Why not clutter up the list with an inane banter about the increasing incidence of inane banter when bantering about inane banters. 
 
Inanely yours. Banteringly so.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dl-toasters@netapp.com [mailto:owner-dl-toasters@netapp.com]On Behalf Of Maglinger, Paul
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 3:18 PM
To: 'Jeff Innis'; toasters@mathworks.com
Subject: RE: Re: OT - swag (fwd)

So guys, are you going to start some "inane banter" about the "inane banter"?
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Innis [mailto:figaro911@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 17:11
To: toasters@mathworks.com
Subject: Fwd: Re: OT - swag (fwd)



Yes, it's quite interesting the crying about not following protocol when trying to unsubscribe, but not a word from the those same folk about polluting the bandwith with 2 days of inane banter( no doubt someone thinks this chatter was interesting).  Just perhaps, those sending mail to toasters@mathworks.com to "unsubscribe", aren't clueless about majordomo, or lazy,  but in actuality are registering their vote of "enough is enough", and letting the rest of the list know why.

Jeff

> > From: Ozzie Sabina
> > Sender: owner-toasters@mathworks.com
> > Precedence: bulk
> >
> >
> > +-- "Swank, Steve (OTS-KC)" once said:
> > | Can we move on from this topic, please? If you want to send personal
> > | e-mails, send them to the person, not the entire list.
> >
> > I'll second this motion. I don't blame all of the people suddenly
> > wanting to get off the list.
> >
> > Oz
> >
>


Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com