We are currently evaluating NuView and Rainfinity for their ability to use a global name space through use of AD and DFS. We have the need to virtualize shares from 1 server to multiple filers. NuView seems to be the ticket, however Rainfinity seems to be fairly similar. Any positive or negative feedback would be appreciated. Drew
This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message if modified.
---------------------------------------------
Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir immediatement l'expediteur. Toute utilisation de ce message non conforme a sa destination, toute diffusion ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf autorisation expresse. L'internet ne permettant pas d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS (et ses filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce message, dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.
drew> We are currently evaluating NuView and Rainfinity for their drew> ability to use a global name space through use of AD and DFS. drew> We have the need to virtualize shares from 1 server to multiple drew> filers. NuView seems to be the ticket, however Rainfinity seems drew> to be fairly similar. Any positive or negative feedback would drew> be appreciated.
We tried Rainfinity here (before I got here I admit) and it lost production data on us multiple times. We've since turned the box into a paperweight.
We're currently using Acopia (http://www.acopia.com) boxes to virtualize directories across back end storage. We're using strictly NFS for now, but we'll probably do CIFS as well at some point. They're a good company, and they're going to become a NetApp partner I hear, but not sure when that will happen. Their tech support staff is good too, quite responsive. We've got an open issue with them and NetApp about Distributed NFS on NetCaches. It doesn't work. Bummers...
In any case, there are gotchas with any sort of name space virtualization, esp if you depend on .snapshot functionality. Also, think about how you're going to do backups. If you backup the backend storage directly, and you have data spread across multiple backend servers, restores could be ... interesting. Or you can run your backups throug the Acopia, but then you have to give up NDMP and such. There are alot of tradeoffs here...
Or if you have data migrated from fast to slower/cheaper storage the longer it's not accessed, you want to make sure that such a migration doesn't happen when backups are running against the backend storage when the migration is happening. It probably won't crash your backup session, but it will probably complain.
John John Stoffel - Senior Staff Systems Administrator - System LSI Group Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc. - http://www.toshiba.com/taec john.stoffel@taec.toshiba.com - 508-486-1087
I believe Neopath is also a good candidate. Very similar to Acopia, and a lot of ex- Netapp heads work there.
Regards, Max
drew> We are currently evaluating NuView and Rainfinity for their drew> ability to use a global name space through use of AD and DFS. drew> We have the need to virtualize shares from 1 server to multiple drew> filers. NuView seems to be the ticket, however Rainfinity seems drew> to be fairly similar. Any positive or negative feedback would drew> be appreciated.
We tried Rainfinity here (before I got here I admit) and it lost production data on us multiple times. We've since turned the box into a paperweight.
We're currently using Acopia (http://www.acopia.com) boxes to virtualize directories across back end storage. We're using strictly NFS for now, but we'll probably do CIFS as well at some point. They're a good company, and they're going to become a NetApp partner I hear, but not sure when that will happen. Their tech support staff is good too, quite responsive. We've got an open issue with them and NetApp about Distributed NFS on NetCaches. It doesn't work. Bummers...
In any case, there are gotchas with any sort of name space virtualization, esp if you depend on .snapshot functionality. Also, think about how you're going to do backups. If you backup the backend storage directly, and you have data spread across multiple backend servers, restores could be ... interesting. Or you can run your backups throug the Acopia, but then you have to give up NDMP and such. There are alot of tradeoffs here...
Or if you have data migrated from fast to slower/cheaper storage the longer it's not accessed, you want to make sure that such a migration doesn't happen when backups are running against the backend storage when the migration is happening. It probably won't crash your backup session, but it will probably complain.
John John Stoffel - Senior Staff Systems Administrator - System LSI Group Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc. - http://www.toshiba.com/taec john.stoffel@taec.toshiba.com - 508-486-1087
You may also like to know that VFM (Virtual File Manager) from NetApp is a cut down version of StorageX from Nuview.
I have had StorageX in and running on Eval - and to be honest, if I had enough budget (Well a budget of greater than zero) to play with would have gone with it for the Global Name Space virtualisation within the windows environment we were running.
The only short coming it had at the time was no NFS. I was told that this was on the roadmap - not sure if it is here yet ?
Jason
_____
From: owner-toasters@mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of drew.odonnell@americas.bnpparibas.com Sent: 02 November 2005 18:49 To: toasters@mathworks.com Subject: NuView vs Rainfinity
We are currently evaluating NuView and Rainfinity for their ability to use a global name space through use of AD and DFS. We have the need to virtualize shares from 1 server to multiple filers. NuView seems to be the ticket, however Rainfinity seems to be fairly similar. Any positive or negative feedback would be appreciated. Drew
This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message if modified.
---------------------------------------------
Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir immediatement l'expediteur. Toute utilisation de ce message non conforme a sa destination, toute diffusion ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf autorisation expresse. L'internet ne permettant pas d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS (et ses filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce message, dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.
Ive just started looking at NeoPath, they say they can virtualize NFS and CIFS.
_____
From: owner-toasters@mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Jason Palmer Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 3:42 PM To: drew.odonnell@americas.bnpparibas.com; toasters@mathworks.com Subject: RE: NuView vs Rainfinity
You may also like to know that VFM (Virtual File Manager) from NetApp is a cut down version of StorageX from Nuview.
I have had StorageX in and running on Eval - and to be honest, if I had enough budget (Well a budget of greater than zero) to play with would have gone with it for the Global Name Space virtualisation within the windows environment we were running.
The only short coming it had at the time was no NFS. I was told that this was on the roadmap - not sure if it is here yet ?
Jason
_____
From: owner-toasters@mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of drew.odonnell@americas.bnpparibas.com Sent: 02 November 2005 18:49 To: toasters@mathworks.com Subject: NuView vs Rainfinity
We are currently evaluating NuView and Rainfinity for their ability to use a global name space through use of AD and DFS. We have the need to virtualize shares from 1 server to multiple filers. NuView seems to be the ticket, however Rainfinity seems to be fairly similar. Any positive or negative feedback would be appreciated. Drew
This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message if modified.
---------------------------------------------
Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir immediatement l'expediteur. Toute utilisation de ce message non conforme a sa destination, toute diffusion ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf autorisation expresse. L'internet ne permettant pas d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS (et ses filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce message, dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.