Re: - toasters

16 Aug 2021


      Wow...Thanks Justin.
I guess that was possibly an oversight when developed (and hence the RFE)?
--tmac
*Tim McCarthy, **Principal Consultant*
*Proud Member of the #NetAppATeam https://twitter.com/NetAppATeam*
*I Blog at TMACsRack https://tmacsrack.wordpress.com/*
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 12:09 PM Parisi, Justin via Toasters <
toasters@teaparty.net> wrote:
...
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Parisi, Justin" Justin.Parisi@netapp.com
To: Michael Bergman michael.bergman@ericsson.com, Toasters <
toasters@teaparty.net>
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 16:06:37 +0000
Subject: Re:
FYI TR-4067 calls out this exact issue as well. There’s currently no way
to “blacklist” inelegible interfaces for pnfs. If it’s in the SVM, it will
be used with pNFS, regardless of if it’s reachable.
We have an open RFE to allow you to specify LIFs for pNFS to avoid this
problem. In the meantime you can blacklist devices from the client as per
page 54 of the tr.
https://www.netapp.com/pdf.html?item=/media/10720-tr-4067.pdf
*From:* Toasters toasters-bounces@teaparty.net on behalf of Michael
Bergman via Toasters toasters@teaparty.net
*Sent:* Monday, August 16, 2021 11:10:12 AM
*To:* Toasters toasters@teaparty.net
*Subject:*
NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or
open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
safe.

Toasters mailing list
Toasters@teaparty.net
https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Parisi, Justin via Toasters" toasters@teaparty.net
To: Michael Bergman michael.bergman@ericsson.com, Toasters <
toasters@teaparty.net>
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 17:06:46 +0100
Subject:
_______________________________________________
Toasters mailing list
Toasters@teaparty.net
https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters