Wow...Thanks Justin.
I guess that was possibly an oversight when developed (and hence the RFE)?
--tmac

Tim McCarthy, Principal Consultant

Proud Member of the #NetAppATeam

I Blog at TMACsRack




On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 12:09 PM Parisi, Justin via Toasters <toasters@teaparty.net> wrote:



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Parisi, Justin" <Justin.Parisi@netapp.com>
To: Michael Bergman <michael.bergman@ericsson.com>, Toasters <toasters@teaparty.net>
Cc: 
Bcc: 
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 16:06:37 +0000
Subject: Re:
FYI TR-4067 calls out this exact issue as well. There’s currently no way to “blacklist” inelegible interfaces for pnfs. If it’s in the SVM, it will be used with pNFS, regardless of if it’s reachable.

We have an open RFE to allow you to specify LIFs for pNFS to avoid this problem. In the meantime you can blacklist devices from the client as per page 54 of the tr.


From: Toasters <toasters-bounces@teaparty.net> on behalf of Michael Bergman via Toasters <toasters@teaparty.net>
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2021 11:10:12 AM
To: Toasters <toasters@teaparty.net>
Subject:
 
NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




_______________________________________________
Toasters mailing list
Toasters@teaparty.net
https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Parisi, Justin via Toasters" <toasters@teaparty.net>
To: Michael Bergman <michael.bergman@ericsson.com>, Toasters <toasters@teaparty.net>
Cc: 
Bcc: 
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 17:06:46 +0100
Subject: 
_______________________________________________
Toasters mailing list
Toasters@teaparty.net
https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters