toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

2 participants
13529 discussions

Start a nNew thread

NFS
by José María Casañé 28 Nov '00

28 Nov '00

Did you find a NFS for MAC?? TIA josemaria cr

1 0

Has anyone else getting this type of error!
by Garry O. Belen 27 Nov '00

27 Nov '00

Has anyone else seen this problem. Users have no problem getting to the filer. Configurations on DC seem to be correct. Garry Mon Nov 27 07:20:15 PST [CIFSAuthen]: NBT: NETBIOS conflict on name EZE ip1 128.18.6.7 ip2 128.18.6.7 Mon Nov 27 07:20:15 PST [CIFSAuthen]: CIFS - can't make TCP connection with domain controller \\EZE Mon Nov 27 07:20:15 PST [CIFSAuthen]: Connection with DC terminated Mon Nov 27 07:20:26 PST [CIFSAuthen]: NBT: NETBIOS conflict on name EZE ip1 128.18.6.7 ip2 128.18.6.7 Mon Nov 27 07:20:26 PST [CIFSAuthen]: CIFS - can't make TCP connection with domain controller \\EZE Mon Nov 27 07:20:26 PST [CIFSAuthen]: Connection with DC terminated Mon Nov 27 07:20:26 PST [CIFSAuthen]: CIFS - password change failed. Will retry in 1 hour Mon Nov 27 08:00:00 PST [statd]: 8:00am up 8 days, 21:51 12745936 NFS ops, 218887 CIFS ops, 33 HTTP ops Mon Nov 27 08:33:09 PST [tn_login_0]: root logged in from host: toronto Mon Nov 27 09:00:00 PST [statd]: 9:00am up 8 days, 22:51 12879298 NFS ops, 220433 CIFS ops, 33 HTTP ops Mon Nov 27 09:01:00 PST [statd]: 9:01am up 8 days, 22:52 12880351 NFS ops, 220439 CIFS ops, 33 HTTP ops Mon Nov 27 09:28:55 PST [tn_login_0]: root logged in from host: quetzalcoatl Mon Nov 27 09:39:29 PST [CIFSAuthen]: NBT: NETBIOS conflict on name EZE ip1 128.18.6.7 ip2 128.18.6.7 Mon Nov 27 09:39:29 PST [CIFSAuthen]: CIFS - can't make TCP connection with domain controller \\EZE Mon Nov 27 09:39:29 PST [CIFSAuthen]: Connection with DC terminated Mon Nov 27 09:39:40 PST [CIFSAuthen]: NBT: NETBIOS conflict on name EZE ip1 128.18.6.7 ip2 128.18.6.7 Mon Nov 27 09:39:40 PST [CIFSAuthen]: CIFS - can't make TCP connection with domain controller \\EZE Mon Nov 27 09:39:40 PST [CIFSAuthen]: Connection with DC terminated Mon Nov 27 09:39:40 PST [CIFSAuthen]: CIFS - password change failed. Will retry in 1 hour Mon Nov 27 10:00:00 PST [statd]: 10:00am up 8 days, 23:51 13028201 NFS ops, 223162 CIFS ops, 33 HTTP ops Mon Nov 27 10:01:00 PST [statd]: 10:01am up 8 days, 23:52 13034472 NFS ops, 223173 CIFS ops, 33 HTTP ops Mon Nov 27 10:52:30 PST [CIFSAuthen]: NBT: NETBIOS conflict on name EZE ip1 128.18.6.7 ip2 128.18.6.7 Mon Nov 27 10:52:30 PST [CIFSAuthen]: CIFS - can't make TCP connection with domain controller \\EZE Mon Nov 27 10:52:30 PST [CIFSAuthen]: Connection with DC terminated Mon Nov 27 10:52:41 PST [CIFSAuthen]: NBT: NETBIOS conflict on name EZE ip1 128.18.6.7 ip2 128.18.6.7 Mon Nov 27 10:52:41 PST [CIFSAuthen]: CIFS - can't make TCP connection with domain controller \\EZE Mon Nov 27 10:52:41 PST [CIFSAuthen]: Connection with DC terminated Mon Nov 27 10:52:41 PST [CIFSAuthen]: CIFS - password change failed. Will retry in 1 hour

2 1

About WEB assistant in SQL Server
by Sundar Venkitachalam 24 Nov '00

24 Nov '00

Hi, I am using SQL Server 2000,IIS,Windows 2000 server.I have created one Webtask and called that in insert and Update triggers.It works fine, i am getting the updated HTMLs.But the Question is: Suppose i am using it in my real site and from one client request gose to the server for the HTML.But the same time from some other client the updation has happend.The trigger fired and SQL server tries to Recreate the HTML file.Will it create any file not found problem or some thing?.Does SQL server itself handle that? Please send me reply if any one is using WEB task. Thank you Sundar.V

1 0

Experiences with NDMP supported Legato Networker
by Lichteveld, Edwin 22 Nov '00

22 Nov '00

Has anyone experiences with the new Legato Networker 6.0.1 which supports NDMP? Thanks, Edwin Lichteveld

1 0

Re: 10/100 network problems
by Rune Bakken 22 Nov '00

22 Nov '00

jmiddlebrooks(a)datalink.com writes: > I have installed a new Cisco 3548 Switch. On the switch I set the port > that my filer is plugged into to 100 full duplex and I get awefull > throughput. I set the port to 10 full duplex and I get better throughput. > What is problem here? Seems to me that the filer and the switch has problems with negotiating port speed and duplex settings. > Mediatype on the network port is not auto. I have tried auto and it does > not help. To me auto always seems to create more problems than not :-( and you have to lock the ports on both sides. Try this: filer> ifconfig <ethport> mediatype 100tx-fd If I read the docs right, you are using the "new" cisco switches with a similar command set as the Cisci routers, to lock the port in a 100Mbit speed, full duplex, you have to issue a command set kinda like this: (since I have no clue about your milage, I am a bit detailed) (If you have the access and the enable password, do this yourself or have the network staff do it for you) % ena # conf t # interface FastEthernet<portnum> # speed 100 # duplex full # end Then after you have verified an improvement, store the new config with # write Hope this helps (always does for me :-) ) >>>>>>>>.rune -- Rune Bakken "I feel sorry for people who don't drink. System Administrator When they wake up in the morning, that's as Nextra, good as they're going to feel all day." a Telenor Company - Frank Sinatra

1 0

RE: 10/100 network problems
by Sims, Aaron 22 Nov '00

22 Nov '00

What mike really means to say is: ifconfig e0 mediatype 100tx-fd I've found in the past that the Cisco switchs won't immediately recognize the change in speed of the thing it's plugged into... try changing the speed to 100 full duplex on both sides, and then unplug and replug the port. Aaron > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Horwath [mailto:drechsau@tiny.net] > Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 2:34 PM > To: jmiddlebrooks(a)datalink.com > Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: Re: 10/100 network problems > > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 01:54:01PM -0500, > jmiddlebrooks(a)datalink.com wrote: > > I have installed a new Cisco 3548 Switch. On the switch I > set the port > > that my filer is plugged into to 100 full duplex and I get awefull > > throughput. I set the port to 10 full duplex and I get > better throughput. > > What is problem here? > > > > Filer = F720 > > DataOnTap = 5.3.7R1 > > Quad 10/100 Network Card > > Mediatype on the network port is not auto. I have tried > auto and it does > > not help. > > set it to fd-100-tx on the filer > > tell the cisco to be 100 full duplex > > does that make a difference? > > -- > Mike Horwath Admin & Manager @ VISI.com WORK: drechsau(a)visi.com > IRC: Drechsau http://www.visi.com/ HOME: drechsau(a)geeks.org > The only Minnesota ISP with public statistics: http://noc.visi.com/ > Garbage In -- Gospel Out. - berkeley fortune(6) >

1 0

10/100 network problems
by jmiddlebrooks＠datalink.com 22 Nov '00

22 Nov '00

I have installed a new Cisco 3548 Switch. On the switch I set the port that my filer is plugged into to 100 full duplex and I get awefull throughput. I set the port to 10 full duplex and I get better throughput. What is problem here? Filer = F720 DataOnTap = 5.3.7R1 Quad 10/100 Network Card Mediatype on the network port is not auto. I have tried auto and it does not help. Jason Middlebrooks Systems Engineer Datalink Corp. 888-933-9327 x2970 jmiddlebrooks(a)datalink.com jasonmiddlebrooks(a)yahoo.com

2 1

Oracle 7 and MS Exchange on Netapp 760
by David Surtees 21 Nov '00

21 Nov '00

We are a new user to Netapp having just taken delivery of a 760, I have done some research into storing Oracle databases on these and can find no real problems. Does anybody out in "toaster land" have any gotcha's that they know of ? Also, we plan to store our MS Exchange information store on our filer, according to Microsoft this is not supported. comments ? Thanks David Surtees Business System Manager HUSCO International Inc.

1 0

RE: SUMMARY: F840 for F740 swap
by Witham, John 21 Nov '00

21 Nov '00

I also completed a F760 for F840 swap this weekend. It sounds like your swap went much quicker than mine. Here are a list of "issues" we encountered: - First and foremost - NETAPP, QUIT PUTTING THE GROUNDING SCREWS ON THE SIDE OF THE FILER! It's _really_ difficult to get that screw loose when you can't remove the side panel!! (EMC Sym on one side, another filer on the other). We had to pull the disk tray above the filer, pull the rail, and be very dexterous to get the things loose. To top it all off, the 840 is in the same chassis! - We had the 2 840s and 6 disk trays included in the order for one of our other locations, everything was shipped there. We then FedEx'd the filers and the disk trays to another data center. The boxes looked like they had gone through Saigon. Dunno if it was out of the box, or because of shipping, but we ended up having a bad motherboard on one of the 840s, it would just reboot without warning after about 10-15 seconds. Thank God for the spares kit! - We added 3 drive trays to each filer. 2 of the drive trays shipped with an OS. Luckily, we put those 2 trays in the same cabinet. After a major annoyance, we booted with the floppies to each tray, destroyed the volume, and drudged through. - Of the 6 trays we received, only 4 fibre cables were in the boxes. Ugh! Only the box with the bad motherboard ran a parity recalc, presumably because we pulled the NVRAM battery and card when we swapped mobos. Both boxes made us do a Disk_FW upgrade. All in all, it went really well, even with the minor headaches. I was fortunate enough to have a NetApp PSE on hand, and he had the situation well under control at every turn. -john John Witham MCSE, MCP+i, A+ Systems Engineer Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. V://847.383.3304 F://847.383.3205 mailto://jwitham@takedapharm.com -----Original Message----- From: Matt Phelps [mailto:mphelps@cfa.harvard.edu] Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 8:48 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: SUMMARY: F840 for F740 swap Just to let you all know, the swap went very well Friday night. We followed the previously mentioned NOW article (Solution ID: 3.0.6869703.2865011) with no problems. The only differences were running a required disk_fw_update after the 840 reboot. Also, the original fibre channel card from the 740 wasn't supported in the 840. Fortunatley the 840 we got came with it's own FC card. However, it wouldn't go in slot 1, like we had on the 740 because it is a longer PCI card. This forced all the disks to be re-numbered, but it came up just fine. Also, the 840 ran a parity recalculation on all the disks. (Perhaps caused by the disk re-numbering?). This was a bit unexpected, and slightly panicy as all the disk lights were going nuts after we brought the 840 up. But the filer was serving up volumes just fine, so we trusted "The Force" and let it go. It finished a few hours later and all is well. We even added a new tray of disks to get us over 1TB! Thanks to all who responded. -- Matt Phelps System Administrator, Computation Facility Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics mphelps(a)cfa.harvard.edu, http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/~mphelps

1 0

F760 and Unisys OSM3000 shelves
by marcotte＠panix.com 21 Nov '00

21 Nov '00

I have a large quantity of Unisys fibre channel disk shelves (well over a terabyte), and I was hoping these would work on a NetApp F760. Specifically, these are: Unisys OSM3000flr - Fibre Channel disk shelf They have 4 DB9 connectors (two loops), and dip switches to select unit IDs 0-7. UNISYS 006073ST19171FC - 9 GB FCAL disk. Each shelf contains 8 of these. These are basically Seagate ST19171FC disks, and could probably probe that way with an appropriate firmware download. I believe that OnTap supports the drives themselves (both as Seagate and Unisys), I don't know what magic NetApp does with their shelves though. If I can't make these work on a NetApp, I'll be forced to attach them to a Solaris box. :( Thanks! -- - Brian

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters