toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

1 participants
13530 discussions

RE: Multiple Oracle DBs on a filer
by George Kahler 13 Mar '01

13 Mar '01

I would like to express my thanks to all of the people that have responded to my Oracle query and have showed me the way ... :-) I was not aware of the Oracle SID which makes things much more easier to implement. As many of you mentioned it looks like I only need one oracle account on each server I want Oracle to run on and then 'share' this account amongst all of the database instances setting the proper environment based on the SID. Many thanks, George

1 0

Legato/NetApp/NDMP/restore woes
by jlbreyfo＠collins.rockwell.com 13 Mar '01

13 Mar '01

Toasters, I'm new to the group and don't know about archives and such. Please excuse if this is an old question. Is anybody backing up using Legato 6.0.1 patch 1 (approx. 300GB vols) and ndmp. I have sporadic problems backing up, actually finishing the index - backup works fine; and also have problems restoring files, i.e. I have to relocate a selected file with a path like: filername::/vol/user1/username/restored/. Seems a bit hokey to me and I get no good info from Legato. I would love to discuss my problems and your solutions. Thanks in advance John Breyfogle Unix Admin Rockwell-Collins jlbreyfo(a)collins.rockwell.com

1 0

RE: F740 with F760 spare
by Clawson, Simon 13 Mar '01

13 Mar '01

I am told that the footprint is different. This stops resourceful people buying a 760 spares kit and upgrading thier cheaper 740. But I am not sure about any of the other parts. I had a Unisys engineer here once who fitted 700 series Eth. Adpators to a 500..it did'nt work, but the machine did'nt blow up either ;-) Simon > -----Original Message----- > From: max chan [mailto:maxchan0@yahoo.com] > Sent: Tuesday March 2001 03:34 > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: F740 with F760 spare > > > Did anyone try to put F760 spare in F740? > > Max > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices. > http://auctions.yahoo.com/ >

1 0

RE: LTO support?
by Joe Luchtenberg 13 Mar '01

13 Mar '01

I think what Ryan was referring to was much more superficial than you are describing. And I've heard the same thing -- i.e. LTO2 and DLT drives share the same form factor, drive cages, cabling/ports, media form factor, etc. All in pointed contrast to AIT2. Although not as significant as MTBF or product maturity, these are nonetheless not trivial issues. Joe Joe Luchtenberg Dataline, Inc. New number and email, please update: 757.858.0600 858.0606 fax joe.luchtenberg(a)data-line.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Stringer, Douglas [SMTP:Douglas.Stringer@netapp.com] > Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 5:27 PM > To: 'ryanb'; Moshe Linzer > Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: RE: LTO support? > > Don't let the LTO manufactures hear you say that. > With different driver support, media, ISV certification requirements and > specifications that are anything but similar to DLT, the only common item > these formats share is that they are 'linear' tape formats. > > NetApp will be supporting LTO in the late summer/early fall timeframe. > > Regards, > Doug Stringer > > -----Original Message----- > From: ryanb [mailto:ryanb@enteract.com] > Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 12:58 PM > To: Moshe Linzer > Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: Re: LTO support? > > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 09:17:57PM +0200, Moshe Linzer wrote: > > Does anyone know when LTO will be supported on the filer? I have two > > 760's, and we are shopping around for a backup library. I am hesitant > > to go with LTO at this point, but management likes the numbers. Can > > anyone share experience or opinions on LTO drives or libraries? > > Most LTO equipment is identical to DLT equipment, only with a different > tape drive. In this respect, the LTO drives will perform identically, or > so I'd like to think. ;) Please let me know if I'm wrong here. > > - ryan

1 0

RE: LTO support?
by svawter＠c-cube.com 13 Mar '01

13 Mar '01

I already have 1 vendor willing to admit that they have a library that can either be pure LTO or else 1/2 LTO, 1/2 SDLT (heding their bets). I believe that they are actually already taking orders and supposedly shipping these units. In no way should you take this as a testimonial, but here is the info: Overland Data www.overlanddata.com Steve Vawter voice: 408-490-5310 fax: 408-490-8615 Staff UNIX Systems Administrator Steve.Vawter(a)C-Cube.COM --> --> From Michael.Collie(a)netapp.com Mon Mar 12 15:06:31 2001 --> From: "Collie, Michael" <Michael.Collie(a)netapp.com> --> To: Moshe Linzer <Moshe.Linzer(a)nsc.com> --> Cc: "'ryanb'" <ryanb(a)enteract.com>, toasters(a)mathworks.com --> Subject: RE: LTO support? --> X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) --> --> Moshe, --> --> The LTO technology promises performance of up to 30Mb/s with 2:1 --> compression. This performance far exceeds DLTs, SDLT, ATI-2 and 9840s. The --> form factor for LTO (Ultrium) is different for today's tape drives. --> --> It may be some time before library vendors integrate the LTO technology into --> their products. NetApp support for LTO is slated for 4th quarter of 2001. --> --> --> ---Original Message----- --> From: ryanb [mailto:ryanb@enteract.com] --> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 12:58 PM --> To: Moshe Linzer --> Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com --> Subject: Re: LTO support? --> --> On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 09:17:57PM +0200, Moshe Linzer wrote: --> > Does anyone know when LTO will be supported on the filer? I have two --> > 760's, and we are shopping around for a backup library. I am hesitant --> > to go with LTO at this point, but management likes the numbers. Can --> > anyone share experience or opinions on LTO drives or libraries? --> --> Most LTO equipment is identical to DLT equipment, only with a different --> tape drive. In this respect, the LTO drives will perform identically, or --> so I'd like to think. ;) Please let me know if I'm wrong here. --> --> - ryan -->

2 1

F740 with F760 spare
by max chan 13 Mar '01

13 Mar '01

Did anyone try to put F760 spare in F740? Max __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices. http://auctions.yahoo.com/

1 0

ender: owner-toasters@mathworks.com
by Darren Dunham 13 Mar '01

13 Mar '01

> > Please correct me. > > When ipv4 networik interfaces are initialized by /etc/init.d/network thru > /etc/hostname.xyz, First of all, we have to be sure that we're talking about Solaris 8 here. It appears the startup scripts have had some name changes... > 1. if /etc/hostname.zyz has more than one lines, each line will be > configured for that interface with > /sbin/ifconfig xyz inet param-string > with param-string is the content of the corresponding line. This leads to > the interface is not up, except param-string has the correct format & > contains the keyword "up" > ( for example, the line contains "some-valid-host-name up" ) Sure.. > 2. If /etc/hostname.xyz.has only one line, the interface will be init as > /sbin/ifconfig xyz inet param-string netmask + broadcast + up. > In this case, the param-string is often the hostname. > --- > > So if /etc/hostname.xyz has 3 lines, we will have > /sbin/ifconfig xyz inet line1 > /sbin/ifconfig xyz inet line2 > /sbin/ifconfig xyz inet line3 Actually, it would be... /sbin/ifconfig xyz inet line1 /sbin/ifconfig xyz inet line2 /sbin/ifconfig xyz inet line3 netmask + broadcast + up *unless* the last line is blank. If the last line is blank then it becomes... /sbin/ifconfig xyz inet line1 /sbin/ifconfig xyz inet line2 Line 3 is dropped entirely.. > Why do we need this multi-line process like this ? Good question. I couldn't find a particular bug or patch in sunsolve that mentioned this... Also, this multi-line stuff appears to be new in Solaris 8. -- Darren Dunham ddunham(a)taos.com Unix System Administrator Taos - The SysAdmin Company Got some Dr Pepper? San Francisco, CA bay area < How are you gentlemen!! Take off every '.SIG'!! >

1 0

RE: LTO support?
by Stringer, Douglas 12 Mar '01

12 Mar '01

Don't let the LTO manufactures hear you say that. With different driver support, media, ISV certification requirements and specifications that are anything but similar to DLT, the only common item these formats share is that they are 'linear' tape formats. NetApp will be supporting LTO in the late summer/early fall timeframe. Regards, Doug Stringer -----Original Message----- From: ryanb [mailto:ryanb@enteract.com] Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 12:58 PM To: Moshe Linzer Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: LTO support? On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 09:17:57PM +0200, Moshe Linzer wrote: > Does anyone know when LTO will be supported on the filer? I have two > 760's, and we are shopping around for a backup library. I am hesitant > to go with LTO at this point, but management likes the numbers. Can > anyone share experience or opinions on LTO drives or libraries? Most LTO equipment is identical to DLT equipment, only with a different tape drive. In this respect, the LTO drives will perform identically, or so I'd like to think. ;) Please let me know if I'm wrong here. - ryan

2 1

Re: getting dump messages into messages file
by Steve Kappel 12 Mar '01

12 Mar '01

Jeffrey Krueger wrote: >Moshe: You can create the directory "ndmp" in your netbackup logs directory >(ours is /usr/openv/netbackup/logs, not sure about yours) on the NBU server >to cause it to create the debug logs Steve mentioned. Be forewarned that >they get big fast, and that simultaneous dump processes output is >intermixed forcing you to match the PID on each line to the bptm process >for the backup you are interested in. NBU NDMP debug info is also >intermixed, so you'll want to look for lines that match this: > ><date> <time> [<bptm PID>]-Log:<dump/restore output from filer> By default the ndmp logs should only have error messages. But avrd polls all UP and free devices every 15 seconds or so and not having a NDMP tape mounted results in NDMP_IO_ERR for that. To get more info in there you need a numeric value in the file /usr/openv/volmgr/database/ndmp_debug If you use 65535 it will fill your disk quickly with lots of stuff you aren't interested in. (Not to mention slow things down.) The value is actually a mask constructed of the bits defined in the ndmp.org SDK. I have never tried it but you might get a value of 8192 to put log entries in there without adding a lot of other stuff. If it doesn't do that... like I said, this is an undocumented/unsupported log :) __________________________________________________________________________ Steve Kappel steve.kappel(a)veritas.com VERITAS Software steve.kappel(a)iname.com (Personal)

2 1

RE: LTO support?
by Collie, Michael 12 Mar '01

12 Mar '01

Moshe, The LTO technology promises performance of up to 30Mb/s with 2:1 compression. This performance far exceeds DLTs, SDLT, ATI-2 and 9840s. The form factor for LTO (Ultrium) is different for today's tape drives. It may be some time before library vendors integrate the LTO technology into their products. NetApp support for LTO is slated for 4th quarter of 2001. ---Original Message----- From: ryanb [mailto:ryanb@enteract.com] Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 12:58 PM To: Moshe Linzer Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: LTO support? On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 09:17:57PM +0200, Moshe Linzer wrote: > Does anyone know when LTO will be supported on the filer? I have two > 760's, and we are shopping around for a backup library. I am hesitant > to go with LTO at this point, but management likes the numbers. Can > anyone share experience or opinions on LTO drives or libraries? Most LTO equipment is identical to DLT equipment, only with a different tape drive. In this respect, the LTO drives will perform identically, or so I'd like to think. ;) Please let me know if I'm wrong here. - ryan

2 1

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters