toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13515 discussions

NIS/Passwd lookup order
by Rainchik, Aleksandr (MED, Non GE) 12 Apr '01

12 Apr '01

Hello, Is there a way to let filer lookup user info in /etc/passwd first and then in NIS passwd map. To emulate this Solaris behavior # cat /etc/nsswitch.con ... passwd: files nis ... I have a feeling that as soon as you say nis.enable=1 it just stops using /etc/passwd... -- Aleksandr Rainchik

3 2

Re: NIS/Passwd lookup order
by Don Cunningham 12 Apr '01

12 Apr '01

The NetApp does support a /etc/nsswitch.conf file. We use it to do exactly what you suggest. I'm not sure which version first supported this but it's been available for quite a while. Don Cunningham > From: neil lehrer <nlehrer(a)ibb.gov> > > you can set that from filerview, so it must be setable as an option somewhere. > > "Rainchik, Aleksandr (MED, Non GE)" wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > Is there a way to let filer lookup user info in /etc/passwd first and > > then in > > NIS passwd map. To emulate this Solaris behavior > > > > # cat /etc/nsswitch.con > > ... > > passwd: files nis > > ... > > I have a feeling that as soon as you say nis.enable=1 it just stops > > using /etc/passwd... > > > > -- Aleksandr Rainchik > > -- > > > regards > > +

1 0

Re: restoring veritas NDMP backup with restore
by Steve Kappel 12 Apr '01

12 Apr '01

>Does anyone know how to restore a Veritas NetBackup NDMP backup using >restore (or ufsrestore)? > >Its quite easy with a single tape backup (you do a "mt -f nrst0a fsf 1; >mt -f nrst0a fsr 2" to skip over the Veritas header). But after >skipping the header on a second tape, the format doesn't seem to be the >same as a normal dump continuation tape. On the second tape you "fsr 1" instead of 2. The entire NDMP image is encapsulated in a tar header and trailer. Each tape file has a leading file header. Each tape has a tape label. At the beginning you are skipping the tape label file skipping the file header and tar header On the 2..N tapes you need to skip the tape label file skip the file header __________________________________________________________________________ Steve Kappel steve.kappel(a)veritas.com VERITAS Software steve(a)stevekappel.com (Personal)

2 1

RE: Excluding files from NDMP backup
by Justen, Joel 12 Apr '01

12 Apr '01

I never saw an answer to this on this mailing list and I just figured it out for myself so I thought I'd answer it. To exclude files using Veritas you have to use a directive like follows: SET EXCLUDE=*.PST This directive is passed directly to the NDMP process and is ignored by Netbackup. Joel Justen > -----Original Message----- > From: Todd C. Merrill [mailto:tmerrill@mathworks.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 5:33 PM > To: Tom "Mad Dog" Yergeau > Cc: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' > Subject: Re: Excluding files from NDMP backup > > > On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Tom "Mad Dog" Yergeau wrote: > > > Is there a way to exclude files from an NDMP backup? By > this I'm asking both > > (1) A subdirectory of a volume or qtree that's being backed up > > (2) Files with specific extensions (e.g. *.pst files so you > don't back up > > Exchange email archives) > > > > We're using Veritas NetBackup 3.4. > > I'd very much appreciate knowing if this was possible, too. I'm > using gtar with the --exclude-from=FILE option because it's faster for > me to backup 25-35% of the useful data via NFS than 100% of > the data via > NDMP. > ******************************************************************* This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this E-mail in error please notify the system manager. This foot- note also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper in accordance with The Budd Company E-Mail Policy. **********************************************************************

1 0

FS: NetApp 4gb/9gb/18gb/36gb disks/shelves, spares kits, adaptor cards
by ScottUCE＠aol.com 12 Apr '01

12 Apr '01

Please contact us for great pricing on the NetApp items listed below; most hardware is eligible for NetApp service contract or for extended warranties from Union Computer. 4gb SCSI drives and shelves 9gb FC-AL and SCSI drives and shelves 18gb FC-AL drives and shelves (FC8) 36gb FC-AL drives and shelves Spares kits and spare parts for F330, F520, F630, F720-C720, F740, and F760 filers Ethernet adaptor cards (GB, Quad, 10/100) SCSI adaptor cards FC-AL adaptor cards ATM adaptor cards Several F760 systems with transferable software licenses are also available. Scott Fischmann Union Computer Exchange, Inc. 6233 Idylwood Lane Minneapolis, MN 55436 Phone: 952 935 7282 scott(a)unioncomputer.com

1 0

Re: Symantec CarrierScan info.
by Jonathan Dodman 12 Apr '01

12 Apr '01

We have a thin client environment, and have been desperately awaiting the filer AV products, as we cannot put scanners on our metaframe boxes, or desktops, so that only leaves the filers !! Up until now we have been carrying out daily scans of the filers, but with this new stuff our problem is soved !! (Hopefully). Jon Dodman Server Technology Services Office +44 (0) 1473 222445 Mobile +44 (0) 771 8149324 dodmanj(a)willis.com Brian Tao <taob(a)risc.org>@mathworks.com on 11/04/2001 19:45:03 Sent by: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com To: jamie rishaw <jrishaw(a)playboy.com> cc: "'toasters(a)mathworks.com'" <toasters(a)mathworks.com> bcc: Subject: Re: Symantec CarrierScan info. On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, jamie rishaw wrote: > > - The product, CarrierScan, sits on a box, like an NT box. > - RPC is set up between the NT box and the Filer (ontap 6.1) > - Any time a new file is introduced, modified, etc, the file is piped > to CarrierScan. CarrierScan scans the file (with Norton). It sounds like the upcoming TrendMicro product takes the same approach as well (their ServerProtect (?) product for the filers, not the thing for the NetCache). > I have a couple outstanding questions with them, like what > CarrierScan's abilities and action "flow" is when it finds an > infected file (send e-mail, send an snmp trap, etc), but all in all > I'm kind of jazzed on it. If it is a fairly large or complex file scan (like, say, a big ZIP archive), what does the end user see when they try to access the file? Nothing? Or is there some mechanism in CIFS or MS-RFC to pop up a dialog box on the client side with a progress meter? > It's obviously not a cheap product, but it seems logical to have one > central point to manage and protect against virii. Integration of > that into an already central file storage system is icing. Definitely... I'm excited about this level of integration. > Don't want to sound like an ad for Symantec, but this product seems > damn cool so far, and it runs on both the filer and netcache. The > two of them working together would make an enterprise pretty > bulletproof. I was just thinking the same thing, and we are investigating moving to diskless thin client desktops, preventing people from even introducing a virus via modem or floppy and saving it to their local C: drive. -- Brian Tao (BT300, taob(a)risc.org) "Though this be madness, yet there is method in't" ______________________________________________________________________ The information in this email and in any attachments is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message, delete any copies held on your systems and notify the sender immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this email for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of its content to any other person.

1 0

RE: Trend Virus Wall for NetApp
by Gifford, Josh 12 Apr '01

12 Apr '01

Here is the press release: http://www.antivirus.com/corporate/media/2001/pr032601.htm -Josh Gifford -----Original Message----- From: Manny Kaiser [mailto:mkaiser@mmcnet.com] Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 3:39 PM To: Gifford, Josh Subject: Re: Trend Virus Wall for NetApp can you send a pointer that talks about this? thanks Manny "Gifford, Josh" wrote: > Hello fellow filer fans, > Just thought I'd let everyone know that I've been running a beta of > the Trend Virus Wall for NetApp (Data ONTAP 6.1) for a few weeks now and it > seems to be working fine so far. It runs on a separate server and scans > each file coming and going. I'm not sure when it is to be released to the > public, but if you have any questions about how it's set up or what kind of > problems we have run in to (none so far), feel free to contact me. > > Best Regards, > > Josh J Gifford MCP > Senior NT Administrator > Siemens Power Transmission & Distribution > 7000 Siemens Rd > Wendell, NC 27591 > Phone: (919) 365-2806; Fax: (919) 365-1080 > Email: josh.gifford(a)ptd.siemens.com

5 5

RE: F740s clustering with FC8 and FC9 shelves?
by Mohler, Jeff 11 Apr '01

11 Apr '01

Where does it suggest that you cant do this specifically? We can re-visit the SAG documentation if we need to clear it up in the future. Thanks! -----Original Message----- From: Jankowski Ted-CTJ012 [mailto:Ted.Jankowski@motorola.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 8:46 AM To: Jim Davis Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: F740s clustering with FC8 and FC9 shelves? We have a 740 with 2 FC8 shelves clustered with a 740 with 4 FC9 shelves and have had no problems. -Ted -----Original Message----- From: Jim Davis [mailto:jdavis@cs.arizona.edu] Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 5:53 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: F740s clustering with FC8 and FC9 shelves? Can two F740s be clustered if one filer has FC9 shelves and one filer has FC8 shelves? The examples in the "F740 and F760 Cluster Guide" suggest not, but I don't see a definitive no (or yes) there...

1 0

RE: Virus scanning for the Netapp
by Muhlestein, Mark 11 Apr '01

11 Apr '01

On-access virus scanning is supported starting with ONTAP 6.1. See http://www.netapp.com/tech_library/3107.html Mark > -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Graham [mailto:mgraham@resgen.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 8:37 AM > To: E.J. Jantz; toasters > Subject: Re: Virus scanning for the Netapp > > > Seems like they could send an SNMP trap to another computer > and have it do the > scan > > "E.J. Jantz" wrote: > > > > good luck! my understanding is that the operating system > the NetApp uses > > is too lean to support virus scanning on-access. > > > > EJ Jantz, IST Dept. > > BSW International > > One West Third, Ste 100 > > Tulsa, OK 74103-3505 > > 918 582-8771 > > ej_jantz(a)bswintl.com > > 918 295-4166 > > 918 587-3594 fax > > > > >>> Matt Graham <mgraham(a)resgen.com> 4/11/01 9:55:56 AM >>> > > Am I wrong? These all seem to be for virus scanning of > files going to > > or from > > the internet. Are there any plans for some sort of on-access file > > scanning? We > > have virus scanning on the workstations, but we like to have double > > protection > > in case a computer slips through, or someone's virus > definitions don't > > get > > updated. > > > > Brian Tao wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, Gifford, Josh wrote: > > > > > > > > Here is the press release: > > > > http://www.antivirus.com/corporate/media/2001/pr032601.htm > > > > > > I just saw this on Symantec's site today (and dated April 10): > > > > > > http://www.symantec.com/press/2001/n010410.html > > > > > > > Symantec Provides Carrier-Class Anti-Virus Technology > for Range of > > > > Network Appliance Devices > > > > > > > > CUPERTINO, Calif. - April 10, 2001 - Symantec Corp. > (Nasdaq: SYMC), > > a > > > > world leader in Internet security technology, today > announced the > > > > availability of CarrierScan Server for NetApp filers > and NetCache > > > > appliances. The first to protect both devices, > CarrierScan Server > > 2.1 > > > > integrates critical protection from viruses and other malicious > > code > > > > with Network Appliance's powerful data management and content > > delivery > > > > products to ensure the safe and reliable storage and delivery of > > > > network-attached data. > > > [...] > > > > > > -- > > > Brian Tao (BT300, taob(a)risc.org) > > > "Though this be madness, yet there is method in't" >

1 0

RE: Virus scanning for the Netapp
by Fox, Adam 11 Apr '01

11 Apr '01

CarrierScan for filers provides on-access file scanning with ONTAP 6.1. When a file of a type you specify is accessed by the user, the filer asks a registred virus scanning server to scan the file before the user gets it. I hope that is what you were thinking of. -- Adam Fox NetApp Professional Services, NC adamfox(a)netapp.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Graham [mailto:mgraham@resgen.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 10:56 AM > To: toasters > Subject: Virus scanning for the Netapp > > > Am I wrong? These all seem to be for virus scanning of files > going to or from > the internet. Are there any plans for some sort of on-access > file scanning? We > have virus scanning on the workstations, but we like to have > double protection > in case a computer slips through, or someone's virus > definitions don't get > updated. > > > > Brian Tao wrote: > > > > On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, Gifford, Josh wrote: > > > > > > Here is the press release: > > > http://www.antivirus.com/corporate/media/2001/pr032601.htm > > > > I just saw this on Symantec's site today (and dated April 10): > > > > http://www.symantec.com/press/2001/n010410.html > > > > > Symantec Provides Carrier-Class Anti-Virus Technology for Range of > > > Network Appliance Devices > > > > > > CUPERTINO, Calif. - April 10, 2001 - Symantec Corp. > (Nasdaq: SYMC), a > > > world leader in Internet security technology, today announced the > > > availability of CarrierScan Server for NetApp filers and NetCache > > > appliances. The first to protect both devices, > CarrierScan Server 2.1 > > > integrates critical protection from viruses and other > malicious code > > > with Network Appliance's powerful data management and > content delivery > > > products to ensure the safe and reliable storage and delivery of > > > network-attached data. > > [...] > > > > -- > > Brian Tao (BT300, taob(a)risc.org) > > "Though this be madness, yet there is method in't" >

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters