toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

1 participants
13515 discussions

Re: ndmpcopy from netapp to oracle zs3?
by Jones, Brian 03 Sep '14

03 Sep '14

A few years back the Oracle ZFS storage had a feature called Shadow Copy. It was a pretty good method to move data from any NFS storage into the ZFS storage. Basically, you would create a new volume on the ZFS storage and point it at the source. In the background it would copy data to the ZFS storage and proxy any requests through to the old storage for data that was not yet migrated to ZFS. This was how we migrated a number of Oracle databases with minimal downtime. This only worked for NFS. CIFS or block storage still had to be copied at the client level. --Brian

1 0

FAS2040 NVMEM Battery
by Camillo Gornati 26 Aug '14

26 Aug '14

Is the FAS2040 Battery the same as FAS2020? I've been told they are the same, but as i do have them both, i checked on FAS2020 the code is 271-00010 and on the FAS2040 the code is 271-00024. I need to be sure, because i need to replace the FAS2040 battery and i am only able to find the part #271-00010 (FAS2020). A friend told me it is supposed to be the same, but i need to be sure. Thanks in advance.

1 0

Accounting quota performance question.
by Jeff Cleverley 23 Aug '14

23 Aug '14

Greetings, We have some 6290 7-mode clusters running 8.1.2P4. How abusive is having an user accounting quota on a head with say 40 file systems? Some file systems have over 100m inodes in use. I could start turning them on one at a time, but I'd like to know the potential impact first. Thanks, Jeff -- Jeff Cleverley Unix Systems Administrator 4380 Ziegler Road Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 970-288-4611

2 1

Recover access on FAS2040
by Camillo Gornati 22 Aug '14

22 Aug '14

Hello all! The scenario, i am remotely accessing a FAS2040. Have accessed the BMC on controller B, and powered on the system, everything went fine until my connection droped before i hitted CTRL+G to return to BMC, now i lost the connection and cannot connect back to the BMC. I have access to BMC on controller A, is it possible to remotelly gainback access to controller B? I do know the BMC ips. Thanks in advance.

3 2

CIFS Questions
by Aaron Lewis 20 Aug '14

20 Aug '14

Hi all, I have a couple questions around CIFS on my 7-mode NetApp (running 8.1.3): 1. Is there a way to disable NetApp from creating 8.3 filenames on a CIFS/FTP share? Or, if there isn't, is there a way to hide the 8.3 filenames? 2. Is there any way to make FTP folder paths on a NetApp CIFS share not be case sensitive? Many thanks in advance! Cheers, Aaron

2 1

conversion to cDOT
by Justice, Gerald 13 Aug '14

13 Aug '14

Hi Toasters, I am getting different stories about whether it is possible to convert an existing 7-mode install of 8.2.1 into cluster mode. This HA pair has only the config that the NetApp SE installed as part of his QA when the system was first setup. We have done nothing with the machine, in particular it has no data on it. Can we convert to cDOT? Is it documented anywhere? WIll I have a supported system if I do that? I hoping to hear from some of you that have experience with this issue. Thanks, Gerald (Gerry) Justice > Team Lead, Research Computing Support, Operations Branch > Shared Services Canada / Government of Canada > gerald.justice(a)ssc-spc.gc.ca / Tel: 250-363-0055 > > Chef d’équipe, Soutien de la recherche informatique, Direction générale des opérations > Services partagés Canada / Gouvernement du Canada > gerald.justice(a)ssc-spc.gc.ca / Tél: 250-363-0055

3 2

Move all data
by Camillo Gornati 08 Aug '14

08 Aug '14

Hello all, right now we are using a FAS2020a with no external shelfs, only the internal disks. We have it configured for CIFs, iSCSI, between others... We recently discontinued the use of a FAS2040 with a external shelf, and i want to know if it is possible to move all data and configurations from the 2020a to the 2040. If so, how to do it? Thanks in advance, Camillo

2 1

Very slow snapvault run on a CIFS share
by Rhodes, Richard L. 06 Aug '14

06 Aug '14

Hi Everyone, We have a system built around several IBM N-Series N3220 (FAS2240-2) filers. When I run snapvault of our biggest cifs share it is running 9-10hours. The users are running a pgm that is deleting lots documents out of this share. A week ago the share had +32m inodes. Today it has 23m inodes. Just yesterday they deleted 1m inodes. During the entire SV run the disks on the prod filer head are Running at 96-100% utilization. This is clearly hammering the disks and they are a big bottleneck. During normal activity on this share usually runs SV in a few min to an hour. My question: Does this sound reasonable? Does a 9-10hr SV run pounding disks at >96% util for a high delete rate in the share? Thanks Rick ============== = detail info ============== All heads are running Data ONTAP Release 8.1.2P1 7-Mode. The main Prod filer is a dual head (HA) with one head dedicated to FCP/luns, while the other head is dedicated to CIFS shares. Prod-Head-A 16x3tb drives, raidDP All CIFS shares Prod-Head-B 22x600gb drives, raidDP Oracle DB FCP/Luns The SV secondary is a single head that is dedicated as a Snapvault secondary. SV-Head-A 18x3tb drives, raidDP SV Secondary for both Prod heads above Df and df -i for the share in question. A week ago it had 32m inodes. df Filesystem kbytes used avail capacity Mounted on /vol/v_fnce22p_cifs/ 3208544256 3143864380 64679876 98% /vol/v_fnce22p_cifs/ /vol/v_fnce22p_cifs/.snapshot 0 264078944 0 ---% /vol/v_fnce22p_cifs/.snapshot Df -i Filesystem iused ifree %iused Mounted on /vol/v_fnce22p_cifs/ 23009838 19147066 55% /vol/v_fnce22p_cifs/ The application folks are running pgms that are deleting documents out of this share. The result of this activity is that snapvault runs on this share is taking 9-10hr. The transfer duration is 7hr, but the entire cmd ran over 9hr. Here is the snapvault status from a backup run. The SV had a transfer duration of 7hr, but the actual cmd took over 9hr to run. ==> cmd = ssh -q xxxxxxxxa -n snapvault status -l /vol/v_fnce22p_cifs/q_fnce22p_cifs Snapvault is ON. Source: yyyyyyyya:/vol/v_fnce22p_cifs/q_fnce22p_cifs Destination: xxxxxxxxa:/vol/v_fnce22p_cifs/q_fnce22p_cifs Status: Idle Progress: - State: Snapvaulted Lag: 10:40:15 Mirror Timestamp: Tue Aug 5 06:42:03 EDT 2014 Base Snapshot: xxxxxxxxa(1896301030)_v_fnce22p_cifs-base.0 Current Transfer Type: - Current Transfer Error: - Contents: Replica Last Transfer Type: Update Last Transfer Size: 542620 KB Last Transfer Duration: 07:11:58 Last Transfer From: yyyyyyyya:/vol/v_fnce22p_cifs/q_fnce22p_cifs During this SV run, the disks on the prod head are >95% busy for the duration of the cmd. Here are a few sysstat lines from during the SV run. CPU NFS CIFS HTTP Total Net kB/s Disk kB/s Tape kB/s Cache Cache CP CP Disk OTHER FCP iSCSI FCP kB/s iSCSI kB/s in out read write read write age hit time ty util in out in out 23% 0 1113 0 1131 482 1600 25612 1674 0 0 1 90% 64% Ts 98% 8 10 0 0 1 0 0 24% 0 1167 0 1185 1052 4197 16627 2151 0 0 58s 92% 61% 12s 100% 8 10 0 0 1 0 0 28% 0 1177 0 1197 1012 2645 28593 2186 0 0 53s 90% 70% Ts 96% 10 10 0 0 1 0 0 28% 0 1109 0 1127 890 1478 33394 2336 0 0 5s 90% 89% 14 97% 8 10 0 0 1 0 0 ----------------------------------------- The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.

2 1

Data OnTap 8.1 7-mode and Windows 8.1?
by Rue, Randy 05 Aug '14

05 Aug '14

Hello All, Is anyone familiar with any issues between DOT 8.1 7-mode CIFS/SMB and Windows 8.1? Users are reporting error pop-ups when they try to access but so far all I have to go on are pretty generic Windows squawk boxes. Randy

4 5

SnapRestore very slow
by Markus.Schlegel＠roto-frank.com 04 Aug '14

04 Aug '14

Hello, i played a bit with VMware + NetApp VSC Backup/Restore and was very surprised by the bad performance of SnapRestore on a NFS Storage. It took SnapRestore 24 hours to restore a 1TB vmdk! Looking at the filer usage (sysstat) it looked like the filer just copied the files out of the Snapshot into the live filesystem with terrible slow 12MB/s. I always thought that SnapRestore restores in a few seconds because if just copies the pointers and not the data itself. I tried the same again (copying out of the Snapshot), this time with ndmpcopy and got ~350GB/h, which is around 100MB/s and an expected result Currently we don't own the SnapManager License for VSC - maybe thats the problem? A short test using the cmdline wasn't faster... Best Regards, Markus Schlegel Roto Frank AG Wilhelm-Frank-Platz 1 . D-70771 Leinfelden-Echterdingen . Telefon +49 711 7598 0 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Leinfelden-Echterdingen . Amtsgericht: Stuttgart . HRB 222 698 . Ust-IdNr.: DE147843524 Aufsichtsrat: Dr. Michael Stahl (Vorsitzender) Vorstand: Dr. Eckhard Keill (Vorsitzender), Leonhard Braig, Christoph Hugenberg, Michael Stangier

5 7

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters