toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13520 discussions

storage / linux admin job
by Momonth 22 Oct '14

22 Oct '14

Hi, // sorry, if it's offtopic Is advertising jobs allowed here? I'd post more details if it's allowed. A company I work for looks for storage / linux sysadmin. Cheers, Vladimir

3 4

In place 32-64bit aggr upgrade
by Fred Grieco 22 Oct '14

22 Oct '14

Has anyone tried the priv set diag "aggr 64bit-upgrade start aggr1 -mode grow-all" command? I am entertaining doing this in 7 mode. Also, it says something about growing the volume. How much does it grow the volume by? TIA, Fred

2 1

Antwort: Re: Access to deprecated home share
by Markus.Schlegel＠roto-frank.com 21 Oct '14

21 Oct '14

Hi Basil, thank you for your reply. I found out that \\filer\%username% works, but \\filer\~ does not. Thats why it worked with some userprofiles. We've changed the profiles to point to \\filer\%username% and it works now for everyone, but i still receive a lot of these warning inside my messages log. Maybe it has something to do with these undocumented options i couldn't find any info to. cifs homedir showuser always points to the correct directory. Ownership is also correct. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Markus Schlegel Von: Basil <basilberntsen(a)gmail.com> An: Markus Schlegel/RFLE/ROTO_FRANK@ROTO_FRANK Datum: 20.10.2014 15:57 Betreff: Re: Access to deprecated home share You say some user profiles- does that mean some work? For a user where this doesn't work, please try cifs homedir showuser hute, as well as check that the owner of the folder is the user. I know the user has access, but apparently ownership matters with some configurations. On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 4:40 AM, <Markus.Schlegel(a)roto-frank.com> wrote: Hello everyone, i've migrated an old 2020-Filer (7.3.5) to a 2520-Filer (8.2.2 7-mode). Everything seems to work except the CIFS homedirectories. I'm unable to access the filer via \\filer\~, so some userprofiles are unable to load. On the console i receive Warnings like this: [filer:cifs.homedir.accessRejected:warning]: CIFS: Access to a deprecated home share from station 10.12.1.240(RFVETS03) for user RFVE_DOMAIN\hute. The request was rejected. Everything i can think about is configured like on the old filer (cifs_homedir.cfg, cifs_share.cfg and other cifs options) I found two options where i'm unsure what they do, and i couldn't find any info about it: cifs.home_dir.generic_share_access_level 3 cifs.home_dir.generic_share_access_warn on The other home_dir options: cifs.home_dir_namestyle ntname cifs.home_dirs_public_for_admin on cifs homedir = /vol/vol_userhome The directory /vol/vol_userhome/hute exists and is accessible by the user. So a user should be able to access his homedir via \\filer\~ without the need of a own share Any ideas? Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Markus Schlegel Roto Frank AG Wilhelm-Frank-Platz 1 . D-70771 Leinfelden-Echterdingen . Telefon +49 711 7598 0 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Leinfelden-Echterdingen . Amtsgericht: Stuttgart . HRB 222 698 . Ust-IdNr.: DE147843524 Aufsichtsrat: Dr. Michael Stahl (Vorsitzender) Vorstand: Dr. Eckhard Keill (Vorsitzender), Leonhard Braig, Christoph Hugenberg, Michael Stangier _______________________________________________ Toasters mailing list Toasters(a)teaparty.net http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters Roto Frank AG Wilhelm-Frank-Platz 1 . D-70771 Leinfelden-Echterdingen . Telefon +49 711 7598 0 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Leinfelden-Echterdingen . Amtsgericht: Stuttgart . HRB 222 698 . Ust-IdNr.: DE147843524 Aufsichtsrat: Dr. Michael Stahl (Vorsitzender) Vorstand: Dr. Eckhard Keill (Vorsitzender), Leonhard Braig, Christoph Hugenberg, Michael Stangier

1 0

I can't seem to reply?
by Basil 21 Oct '14

21 Oct '14

Hi there, I replied to a recent message to the mailing list and I don't see my reply on the site. Is there something special I need to do?

2 1

Access to deprecated home share
by Markus.Schlegel＠roto-frank.com 20 Oct '14

20 Oct '14

Hello everyone, i've migrated an old 2020-Filer (7.3.5) to a 2520-Filer (8.2.2 7-mode). Everything seems to work except the CIFS homedirectories. I'm unable to access the filer via \\filer\~, so some userprofiles are unable to load. On the console i receive Warnings like this: [filer:cifs.homedir.accessRejected:warning]: CIFS: Access to a deprecated home share from station 10.12.1.240(RFVETS03) for user RFVE_DOMAIN\hute. The request was rejected. Everything i can think about is configured like on the old filer (cifs_homedir.cfg, cifs_share.cfg and other cifs options) I found two options where i'm unsure what they do, and i couldn't find any info about it: cifs.home_dir.generic_share_access_level 3 cifs.home_dir.generic_share_access_warn on The other home_dir options: cifs.home_dir_namestyle ntname cifs.home_dirs_public_for_admin on cifs homedir = /vol/vol_userhome The directory /vol/vol_userhome/hute exists and is accessible by the user. So a user should be able to access his homedir via \\filer\~ without the need of a own share Any ideas? Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Markus Schlegel Roto Frank AG Wilhelm-Frank-Platz 1 . D-70771 Leinfelden-Echterdingen . Telefon +49 711 7598 0 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Leinfelden-Echterdingen . Amtsgericht: Stuttgart . HRB 222 698 . Ust-IdNr.: DE147843524 Aufsichtsrat: Dr. Michael Stahl (Vorsitzender) Vorstand: Dr. Eckhard Keill (Vorsitzender), Leonhard Braig, Christoph Hugenberg, Michael Stangier

1 0

CIFS joining a filer to a read only domain controller.
by Edward Rolison 14 Oct '14

14 Oct '14

I've found: https://kb.netapp.com/support/index?page=content&id=1012918 Which basically says - try pointing your filer at a writable DC. That's difficult, for a variety of reasons - not least because this is an isolated network segment, and the vfiler is in it's own IP space. Does anyone know a better way of joining the domain? On a standalone Linux/Windows box, I can manually create machine accounts and set necessary passwords. The firewall is run by a separate team, and so temporary rules for this purpose is a nuisance. (Probably not _completely_ impossible though). Has anyone done this and come up with a better solution? The 'domain join' process isn't _that_ complicated, in that all it's doing is generating a local kerberos keytab and setting a local shared secret. Thanks and regards, Ed Rolison

1 0

Question regarding NVRAM battery
by Camillo Gornati 08 Oct '14

08 Oct '14

Hello all! We have 4 net app systems a FAS2020, 2 x FAS2020a and one FAS2040. The FAS2040 had a NVRAM battery losing power until it shut down because of the battery not having power. Purchased a battery, replaced, and still no charge. Now we though the problem was the controller, so i purchased a new controller, replaced CF CARD and inserted back in the chassis, noticed battery wasn’t charging either, now controller has shut down again and battery is not charging. Could someone give me a light on this one? Firmware issue? Thanks again!

5 6

FAS2040 config
by Camillo Gornati 06 Oct '14

06 Oct '14

Hello all! What is the best/most popular way to connect and configure network on a FAS2040? We have 2 controllers, e0a-e0d on wach controller. LACP trunk on e0a-e0b on both controllers each one connected to a diff. switch. Dont know exactly what to do with e0c, e0d. Should i add to the actual trunk and connect to a diff. switch? Should i create a new trunk and connect to what? Thanks very much in advance.

1 0

looking for thoughts on NetApp high end storage
by Rhodes, Richard L. 02 Oct '14

02 Oct '14

Hi Everyone, We currently use some low end IBM NSeries for a specific application. All of our other storage is from a large three letter vendor. We have never really considered NetApp for our high end Tier 1 storage. For our T1 three letter vendor storage we replicate bi-directionally between two datacenters. Years ago we used synchronous replication, but at the last rollover have changed to async replication due to write latencies. It's worked very well. The storage systems are roughly 5-10 seconds out of sync. I was looking at what OnTap supports for this kind of work. I see that in 7-mode it supports sync and semi-sync. Semi-sync seems interesting for what we do, except that you have to replicate within a Consistency Point. You have until the other half of nvram fills up to complete the current CP with replication. When I looked at C-mode, I can find no mention of sync or semi-sync at all. Q) Does C-mode support semi-sync? Q) If not, can normal async snapmirror support replication into the 10-15 second lag range? (note - T1 storage is almost all large Oracle DB's) Q) Any other idea on how you would implement a low lag async replication with NetApp? Thanks Rick ----------------------------------------- The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.

2 1

Replace controller
by Camillo Gornati 01 Oct '14

01 Oct '14

Hi all! In our environment, we have a FAS2020a and a FAS2020. FAS2020a had one controller bad, we installed a replacement we had, installed old the CF CARD, but system won’t boot, it says there is no disks for root volume. That is because all disks are assigned to old controller. How could we assign those disks to new controller without losing any data? Thanks in advance Camillo

6 8

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters