toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13520 discussions

RE: secure filer access
by Potakamuri, Sreenivasa 14 Aug '02

14 Aug '02

> -----Original Message----- > From: Moritz Willers [mailto:Moritz.Willers@ubsw.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 9:35 AM > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: secure filer access > > > I'm trying to configure ssh/https admin access from any host > to a filer, > but no telnet, no http admin and rsh access from one host only (the > admin host). > Use "options telnet.access", "options rsh.access" and "options http.access" commands to control telnet, rsh and http access. > I can't find how I can control ssh/https access separately. Is this > really not possible or am I missing something? > We don't have any commands to control the ssh/https access. We are adding those in the next release. Regards, Sreenivasa Potakamuri Network Appliance. > how do others manage secure filer management via cli and gui? > > thanks - Moritz > > > Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com > > This message contains confidential information and is intended only > for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you > should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please > notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this > e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. > > E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore > does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents > of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If > verification is required please request a hard-copy version. This > message is provided for informational purposes and should not be > construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or > related financial instruments. >

1 0

urgent
by Mr:Davis Masinga 14 Aug '02

14 Aug '02

ATTN: I PRESUME THIS MAIL WILL NOT BE A SURPRISE TO YOU. I AM AN ACCOUNTANT WITH THE MINISTRY OF MINERAL RESOURCES AND ENERGY IN SOUTH AFRICA AND ALSO A MEMBER OF CONTRACTS AWARDING COMMITTEE OF THIS MINISTRY UNDER SOUTH AFRICA GOVERNMENT. MANY YEARS AGO, SOUTH AFRICA GOVERNMENT ASKED THIS COMMITTEE TO AWARDS CONTRACTS TO FOREIGN FIRMS, WHICH I AND 2 OF MY PARTNERS ARE THE LEADER OF THIS COMMITTEE, WITH OUR GOOD POSITION , THIS CONTRACRS WAS OVER INVOICED TO THE TUNE OF US$25,600,000:00 AS A DEAL TO BE BENEFIT BY THE THREE TOP MEMBER OF THIS COMMITTEE. NOW THE CONTRACTS VALUE HAS BEEN PAID OFF TO THE ACTUAL CONTRACTORS THAT EXECUTED THIS JOBS, ALL WE WANT NOW IS A TRUSTED FOREIGN PARTNER LIKE YOU THAT WE SHALL FRONT WITH HIS BANKING ACCOUNT NUMBER TO CLAIM THE OVER INFLATED SUM. UPON OUR AGREEMEENT TO CARRY ON THIS TRANSACTION WITH YOU, THE SAID FUND WILL BE SHARE AS FOLLOWS. 75% WILL BE FOR US IN SOUTH AFRICA. 20% FOR USING YOUR ACCOUNT AND OTHER CONTRIBUTION THAT MIGHT REQIURED FROM YOU. 5% IS SET ASIDE FOR THE UP FRONT EXPENCES THAT WILL BE ENCOUNTER BY BOTH PARTY TO GET ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND FORMARLITIES THAT WILL JUSTIFY YOU AS THE RIGHTFUL OWNER OF THIS FUND. IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN THIS TRANSACTION, KINDLY REPLY THIS MASSEGE WITH ALL YOUR PHONE AND FAX NUMBERS, OR MAIL ME THROUGH(d_masinga(a)totalise.co.uk) TO ENABLE US FURNISH YOU WITH DETAILS AND PROCEDURES OF THIS TRANSACTION. YOURS FAITHFULLY. Davis Masinga

2 1

Do you make conference calls?
by I-Corporate News 13 Aug '02

13 Aug '02

1 0

Moving a viewstore from Windows NT onto Netapp f740 filer
by Kumar, Rahul 13 Aug '02

13 Aug '02

Dear Fellows, Can somebody guide me with how to move an existing viewstore which is on windows nt server onto a filer. I am aware of following commands cifs access /vol/vol0/viewstgnt -g develop "full control" cifs access /vol/vol0/viewstgnt clearcase_albd "full control" The server from which we are supposingly to move viewstore is a NT Build machine. Regards Rahul

1 0

NFS Delay
by Tim Longo 12 Aug '02

12 Aug '02

I've noticed that when I make a change on an nfs mounted file system on my Netapp from one machine, it sometimes takes anywhere from a few seconds to a minute for other machines that access the same nfs mounted file system to see the change I made from the first machine. The clients are unix and linux machines. Example: On my admin host (unix machine), I change permissions on an exported directory. A unix client that automounts this directory takes 20 to 30 seconds before I see the directory permissions change. Anyone else experience something like this? What sort of things should I be checking to reduce or eliminate this delay? Thanks.

5 4

cp command on NetApp?
by Edward Hibbert 12 Aug '02

12 Aug '02

I want to copy large amounts of data around, and I'm reluctant to pull the data down from the filer and push it back again. I know there's a mv command on the NetApp - is there any way of doing a cp? And if so, does it come with a particular ONTAP version? Regards, Edward Hibbert Internet Applications Group Data Connection Ltd Tel: +44 131 662 1212 Fax: +44 131 662 1345 Email: eh(a)dataconnection.com Web: http://www.dataconnection.com

3 2

Quota t-hold & s-disk field
by Nicholas Chuah 12 Aug '02

12 Aug '02

Read the doc and was not very clear on the t-hold and s-disk field in the quotas file. Seems that both will log a warning in the syslog while t-hold will still allow writes to complete if it is below the disk limit. What about the s-disk? Thanks Nic __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs http://www.hotjobs.com

1 0

RE: Netapp migrating
by Neumann, Ulrich 10 Aug '02

10 Aug '02

if the filer is "real working" with local groups and you are shure that there are no other permissions given - then its not a problem to move the filer to the new domain. the local groups don't change - all the memebers will be there and also the acls. to change the filer to w2k sometimes you need to create the machine-account before moving. we did this with several nt4 boxes, w2k boxes and 2 toasters. Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Best Regards Ulrich Neumann -----Original Message----- From: Asbjørn Bjørkelund [mailto:asbjorn.bjorkelund@proact.no] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 15:26 To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Netapp migrating Hello Toasters We are going to migrate a filer from a NT40 domain to a W2K AD native mode domain, and there is a trust between these 2 domain, and all the users are located on the W2K domain. On the filer we have lots of local groups, files and users working and we don't to want generate new acl's. We have been looking on the microsoft utility ADMT, is there anyone with experience using this utility, to migrate locale groups and machine account? Hilsen / Best Regards Asbjørn Bjørkelund

1 0

RE: I have 2 volumes in the same raid group, though the docs say you
by Kenley, Martin 10 Aug '02

10 Aug '02

This is correct, whenever you create a volume the 1st raid group by default is named Raid Group 0, and if the vol is sufficiently large to need a second Raid Group, it will be called RG1, etc. Martin -----Original Message----- From: Chris Thompson [mailto:cet1@cus.cam.ac.uk] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 4:18 PM To: art(a)arzoon.com Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: I have 2 volumes in the same raid group, though the docs say you art(a)arzoon.com (Art Hebert) writes: > > I have 7 disks in vol0 in raid group 0 and 2 disks in vol1 in > raid group 0. > > In the manual it seems to say you can't do this. Will this cause > any problems? Oops: just reread your subject field, and I see what you are confused about now... The "raid group 0" in each volumes are separate raid groups: it's just a naming convention. They each have their own parity disc, as 'sysconfig -r" will tel you. Raid groups are never shared between volumes. In ONTAP 6.2, "sysconfig -r" gives names to the raid groups like "/vol0/plex0/rg0" and "/vol1/plex0/rg0", making it more obvious that they are distinct entities. Chris Thompson Email: cet1(a)cam.ac.uk

1 0

Re: I have 2 volumes in the same raid group, though the docs say you
by Chris Thompson 09 Aug '02

09 Aug '02

art(a)arzoon.com (Art Hebert) writes: > > I have 7 disks in vol0 in raid group 0 and 2 disks in vol1 in > raid group 0. > > In the manual it seems to say you can't do this. Will this cause > any problems? Oops: just reread your subject field, and I see what you are confused about now... The "raid group 0" in each volumes are separate raid groups: it's just a naming convention. They each have their own parity disc, as 'sysconfig -r" will tel you. Raid groups are never shared between volumes. In ONTAP 6.2, "sysconfig -r" gives names to the raid groups like "/vol0/plex0/rg0" and "/vol1/plex0/rg0", making it more obvious that they are distinct entities. Chris Thompson Email: cet1(a)cam.ac.uk

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters