toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13515 discussions

.snapshot directories
by barrie_spence＠agilent.com 02 Dec '02

02 Dec '02

We make extensive use of automount and each users home directory is mounted separately. With the .snapshot directory enabled, du and find recurse through the snapshot trees and in general this causes too many issues for our users, so we've disabled them. Is there any more sophisticated way of making the snapshots available that won't cause this sort of problem (e.g. can we export the snapshots separately? make them available as a separate CIFS share?). Thanks, Barrie

2 1

未承諾広告※電子メール広告
by hmail22 01 Dec '02

01 Dec '02

<MÒ> dq[LÐ ¡ãALð²ó]µÈ¢ûÍ±±Ö (Kž{¶É ÈœÌ[AhXÌÝðš«º³¢j infoshoppingwave(a)yahoo.co.jp [AhXð²LüµÄŸ³¢B §104-0061 sæâÀ8-19-3 æ2ECOr@3F [}KWs TEL@03-3544-6222 FAX@03-3544-6218 =============================================================== âè€iÎ©èWßÜµœÌÅAÁ³êé°êª èÜ·ÌÅ š\ÝÍšßÉI ================================================================= \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ rfIÌEÁê_b`CtErlNu @@ `ujDåWEðÛErdwthEA_gObYÈÇ @A_gÖAÌîñÚ@ @@š\ÝE²¶E€iÚ×Í@ @@@@@ºLtqkðNbNµÄ²º³¢B «@@@@«@@@@«@ @@@http://www.ss-koukoku.com/ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ @@J^ObYEÉéîñEhÆObYEà×¯îñÈÇ@ @@@@@@@@@@»ÌŒîñÚ@ @@š\ÝE²¶E€iÚ×Í@ @@@@@ºLtqkðNbNµÄ²º³¢B «@@@@«@@@@«@ http://www.pp-koukoku.com/ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

1 0

no_atime_update
by Ambrose_Earle＠shamrockfoods.com 29 Nov '02

29 Nov '02

Is anyone using this option with volumes containing Oracle or Lotus Notes files? Have you tested it for any performance improvements? How does this differ from mounting with noatime? I read an article that claimed a nice performance increase when used with Oracle datafiles. Here's the link: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=5840

1 0

未承諾広告※電子メール広告社
by ccccoccc 29 Nov '02

29 Nov '02

<MÒ> dq[LÐ ¡ãALð²ó]µÈ¢ûÍ±±Ö (Kž{¶É ÈœÌ[AhXÌÝðŒpÅš«º³¢Bj airorijp(a)yahoo.co.jp [AhXð²LüµÄŸ³¢B §104-0061 sæâÀ8-19-3 æ2ECOr@3F [}KWs TEL@03-3544-6222 FAX@03-3544-6218 =============================================================== âè€iÎ©èWßÜµœÌÅAÁ³êé°êª èÜ·ÌÅ š\ÝÍšßÉI ================================================================= \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ rfIÌErfIEÁê_b`CtErlNu @@ `ujDåWEðÛErdwthEA_gObYÈÇ @A_gÖAÌîñÚ@ @@š\ÝE²¶E€iÚ×Í@ @@@@@ºLtqkðNbNµÄ²º³¢B «@@@@«@@@@«@ @@@http://www.ss-koukoku.com/ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ @@@@@@@@J^ObYEÉéîñ @@@@hÆObYEà×¯îñE_CGbgHiÈÇ@ @@@@@@@@@»ÌŒîñÚ@ @@š\ÝE²¶E€iÚ×Í@ @@@@@ºLtqkðNbNµÄ²º³¢B «@@@@«@@@@«@ http://www.pp-koukoku.com/ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

1 0

Network Adapters for Netcache C720
by Oscar Rodriguez Hernandez 29 Nov '02

29 Nov '02

Hello We currently have one C720 Netache unit. We need to have this unit more than one Ethnernet port, and at our local stock we have many different types of Network Adapters, and we would like to know if we could use one of those instead of buying a new one. The network adapters fort C720 are the following NetApp P/N: Single-port 10Base-T/100Base-TX: P/N X1001B* P/N X1001C Quad-port 10Base-T/100Base-TX P/N X1012B* P/N X1012C Does anyone know which network card (manufacturer, model) are those P/N for? Has anyone used succesfully any different network adapter not from NetApp for the NetCache C720 unit? Thanks. Oscar.

1 0

please kindly get back to me
by MR. JEFF MUBANGA 29 Nov '02

29 Nov '02

Sir, I am JEFF MUBANGA, the secetary of Africa White Farmers Co-operation(AWFC) of Harare, Zimbabwe. After the last general elections in my country where the incumbent president, Mr.Robert Mugabe won the presidential election, the government has adopted a very aggressive land reforms programme. This programme is solely aimed at taking the land owned by white African farmers for redistribution to black africans. This programme has attracted worldwide condemnation from world leaders including British prime minister, Mr Tony Blair and also forced several white farmers to flee the country for fear of victimization and physical abuse. Just some few weeks ago, our headquarters in Harare was attacked and looted by black protesters and in the process burnt down the whole building. Fortunately,they did not get access to the huge funds kept in the strong room which belong to the co-operative body. This cash amounting to US$10.5 million was kept at the secretariat rather than in the bank for fear of seizure by the government agencies. Now I have the money lodged in a local security company which was discretionary tagged 'GEMSTONES' and would need to get it invested in a viable business venture in Europe. Once I can get your commitment and sincerity of investing this funds on our behalf then I would proceed to get the funds freighted to Europe by the security company without any detection by the oppresive government, from where you would be required to pick it up for investment for us. You do not have anything to worry about as I would undertake all charges involved in freighting the funds to europe, and the business proposal is legal and risk free. You would be adequately compensated for all your effort once we complete this transaction by availing you 25% of the funds or alternatively you will be a partner in whatever investment we will go into. Please get back to me if you can be of assistance and I would want our correspondence to be via email as most phone lines of white farmers are presently bugged by the government. I expect your confidentiality and your prompt response to this mail so as to proceed. Kind regards, MR. JEFF MUBANGA

1 0

RE: Ontap 6.2.2 and W2K domain joining
by Kumar, Rahul 27 Nov '02

27 Nov '02

Go for 6.3. It works really well and we have tested it. Rahul Rahul Kumar, Tele: + 91 20 2930812 (D), Cell: + 91 982230 9177. EDS PLM Solutions, Pune, India. -----Original Message----- From: Ed Sanborn [mailto:esanborn@snowshore.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 8:07 PM To: Reinoud Reynders; Stephane Bentebba Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com; support(a)fps.fr Subject: RE: Ontap 6.2.2 and W2K domain joining Thank you folks! This is indeed my problem. -Ed -----Original Message----- From: Reinoud Reynders [mailto:Reinoud.Reynders@uz.kuleuven.ac.be] Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 8:47 AM To: Stephane Bentebba; Ed Sanborn Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com; support(a)fps.fr Subject: Re: Ontap 6.2.2 and W2K domain joining I think that Staphane mains bug number 50610 Reinoud http://now.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/bol?Type=Detail&Display=50610 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephane Bentebba" <stephane.bentebba(a)fps.fr> To: "Ed Sanborn" <esanborn(a)snowshore.com> Cc: <toasters(a)mathworks.com>; <support(a)fps.fr> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 1:32 PM Subject: Re: Ontap 6.2.2 and W2K domain joining > Ed Sanborn wrote: > > >Hi folks, > > > > On my F720 I have recently upgraded my Ontap version > >from 5.3.6R2 to 6.2.2. I now have a weird situation > >in that when I browse the W2K network with a PC I cannot > >see the NetApp in the browse list for my domain. I DO > >see the NetApp in the Active Directory Computer container. > >It is also listed in WINS. I also can network map > >a drive to the NetApp from the Windows Explorer Tools > >menu. It works fine. Also, anyone that has a present > >network-mapped drive is able to use it. The ONLY > >problem is browsing for the NetApp. It is not even > >listed in the browse list. Has anyone seen this before? > > > >My W2K domain is SNOWSHORE while my DNS/AD directory domain > >is office.snowshore.com. Here's the output from my > >recent cifs setup: > > > >thor> cifs setup > >Enable CIFS access to the filer by a Windows(tm) PC > > Your filer is visible to all systems using WINS. > > The WINS name servers currently configured are: > > 192.168.1.20 > >Do you want to modify this list? [no]: > > This filer is currently configured as a Multiprotocol filer. > >Do you want to configure this filer as a NTFS-only filer? [no]: > > This filer is currently a member of the domain 'OFFICE' > > If you want to change the name of the filer, or change > > the filer's domain membership, you must delete its > > existing account information. > >Do you want to delete the existing filer account information? [no]: yes > > The default name of this filer will be 'THOR'. > >Do you want to modify this name? [no]: > > CIFS supports three types of user authentication: > > 1. Windows Domain authentication. > > 2. Windows Workgroup authentication using the filer's user accounts. > > 3. /etc/passwd and/or NIS based authentication. > >What type of authentication will this filer use? [1]: 1 > > The filer will use Windows Domain authentication. > >Enter the Windows Domain for the filer []:office.snowshore.com > > OFFICE is a Windows 2000(tm) domain. > > In order to create this filer's domain account, you must supply the > > name and password of an administrator account with sufficient > >privilege > > to add the filer to the OFFICE domain. > >Please enter the Windows 2000 user [OFFICE\Administrator]: > >Password for OFFICE\Administrator: > >CIFS - Logged in as OFFICE\Administrator. > > By default, setup creates the filer account in the Active > > Directory container named 'Computers'. Alternatively, you can > > install the filer in an organizational unit (OU) by specifying > > the domain relative distinguished name of the OU, as in > > 'ou=innerOU,ou=outerOU'. > >Active Directory container for filer account? [cn=computers]: > >CIFS - Connecting to domain controller. > >Mon Nov 25 23:03:46 EST [nbns_timer:info]: All CIFS name registrations > >complete fo > >r local server > >Welcome to the OFFICE Windows 2000(tm) domain. > > > >CIFS local server is running. > >thor> > > > >One of the thing's I am very curious about is the fact that the machine > >"joins" the OFFICE domain. All of my workstations "join" the > >SNOWSHORE or atleast the office.snowshore.com domain. Could this be the > >problem? > > > >Thanks, > > > > Ed > > > >Ed Sanborn (978) 367-8478 > >Principal Network Administrator > >SnowShore Networks > >285 Billerica Rd. > >Chelmsford, MA. 01824 > > > > > > > I heard about a problem like this, (actually, the filer was not seen > from either the network neighbor neither from inside the > Active Directory Computer container but was integrate the domain fine) > you could tried to upgrade in 6.3 if possible, > it seems to be related to a netbios bug in ontapp . > i dont have any bug number to supply to you for the moment > > >

1 0

RE: Ontap 6.2.2 and W2K domain joining
by Ed Sanborn 27 Nov '02

27 Nov '02

Thank you folks! This is indeed my problem. -Ed -----Original Message----- From: Reinoud Reynders [mailto:Reinoud.Reynders@uz.kuleuven.ac.be] Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 8:47 AM To: Stephane Bentebba; Ed Sanborn Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com; support(a)fps.fr Subject: Re: Ontap 6.2.2 and W2K domain joining I think that Staphane mains bug number 50610 Reinoud http://now.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/bol?Type=Detail&Display=50610 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephane Bentebba" <stephane.bentebba(a)fps.fr> To: "Ed Sanborn" <esanborn(a)snowshore.com> Cc: <toasters(a)mathworks.com>; <support(a)fps.fr> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 1:32 PM Subject: Re: Ontap 6.2.2 and W2K domain joining > Ed Sanborn wrote: > > >Hi folks, > > > > On my F720 I have recently upgraded my Ontap version > >from 5.3.6R2 to 6.2.2. I now have a weird situation > >in that when I browse the W2K network with a PC I cannot > >see the NetApp in the browse list for my domain. I DO > >see the NetApp in the Active Directory Computer container. > >It is also listed in WINS. I also can network map > >a drive to the NetApp from the Windows Explorer Tools > >menu. It works fine. Also, anyone that has a present > >network-mapped drive is able to use it. The ONLY > >problem is browsing for the NetApp. It is not even > >listed in the browse list. Has anyone seen this before? > > > >My W2K domain is SNOWSHORE while my DNS/AD directory domain > >is office.snowshore.com. Here's the output from my > >recent cifs setup: > > > >thor> cifs setup > >Enable CIFS access to the filer by a Windows(tm) PC > > Your filer is visible to all systems using WINS. > > The WINS name servers currently configured are: > > 192.168.1.20 > >Do you want to modify this list? [no]: > > This filer is currently configured as a Multiprotocol filer. > >Do you want to configure this filer as a NTFS-only filer? [no]: > > This filer is currently a member of the domain 'OFFICE' > > If you want to change the name of the filer, or change > > the filer's domain membership, you must delete its > > existing account information. > >Do you want to delete the existing filer account information? [no]: yes > > The default name of this filer will be 'THOR'. > >Do you want to modify this name? [no]: > > CIFS supports three types of user authentication: > > 1. Windows Domain authentication. > > 2. Windows Workgroup authentication using the filer's user accounts. > > 3. /etc/passwd and/or NIS based authentication. > >What type of authentication will this filer use? [1]: 1 > > The filer will use Windows Domain authentication. > >Enter the Windows Domain for the filer []:office.snowshore.com > > OFFICE is a Windows 2000(tm) domain. > > In order to create this filer's domain account, you must supply the > > name and password of an administrator account with sufficient > >privilege > > to add the filer to the OFFICE domain. > >Please enter the Windows 2000 user [OFFICE\Administrator]: > >Password for OFFICE\Administrator: > >CIFS - Logged in as OFFICE\Administrator. > > By default, setup creates the filer account in the Active > > Directory container named 'Computers'. Alternatively, you can > > install the filer in an organizational unit (OU) by specifying > > the domain relative distinguished name of the OU, as in > > 'ou=innerOU,ou=outerOU'. > >Active Directory container for filer account? [cn=computers]: > >CIFS - Connecting to domain controller. > >Mon Nov 25 23:03:46 EST [nbns_timer:info]: All CIFS name registrations > >complete fo > >r local server > >Welcome to the OFFICE Windows 2000(tm) domain. > > > >CIFS local server is running. > >thor> > > > >One of the thing's I am very curious about is the fact that the machine > >"joins" the OFFICE domain. All of my workstations "join" the > >SNOWSHORE or atleast the office.snowshore.com domain. Could this be the > >problem? > > > >Thanks, > > > > Ed > > > >Ed Sanborn (978) 367-8478 > >Principal Network Administrator > >SnowShore Networks > >285 Billerica Rd. > >Chelmsford, MA. 01824 > > > > > > > I heard about a problem like this, (actually, the filer was not seen > from either the network neighbor neither from inside the > Active Directory Computer container but was integrate the domain fine) > you could tried to upgrade in 6.3 if possible, > it seems to be related to a netbios bug in ontapp . > i dont have any bug number to supply to you for the moment > > >

1 0

Ontap 6.2.2 and W2K domain joining
by Ed Sanborn 27 Nov '02

27 Nov '02

Hi folks, On my F720 I have recently upgraded my Ontap version from 5.3.6R2 to 6.2.2. I now have a weird situation in that when I browse the W2K network with a PC I cannot see the NetApp in the browse list for my domain. I DO see the NetApp in the Active Directory Computer container. It is also listed in WINS. I also can network map a drive to the NetApp from the Windows Explorer Tools menu. It works fine. Also, anyone that has a present network-mapped drive is able to use it. The ONLY problem is browsing for the NetApp. It is not even listed in the browse list. Has anyone seen this before? My W2K domain is SNOWSHORE while my DNS/AD directory domain is office.snowshore.com. Here's the output from my recent cifs setup: thor> cifs setup Enable CIFS access to the filer by a Windows(tm) PC Your filer is visible to all systems using WINS. The WINS name servers currently configured are: 192.168.1.20 Do you want to modify this list? [no]: This filer is currently configured as a Multiprotocol filer. Do you want to configure this filer as a NTFS-only filer? [no]: This filer is currently a member of the domain 'OFFICE' If you want to change the name of the filer, or change the filer's domain membership, you must delete its existing account information. Do you want to delete the existing filer account information? [no]: yes The default name of this filer will be 'THOR'. Do you want to modify this name? [no]: CIFS supports three types of user authentication: 1. Windows Domain authentication. 2. Windows Workgroup authentication using the filer's user accounts. 3. /etc/passwd and/or NIS based authentication. What type of authentication will this filer use? [1]: 1 The filer will use Windows Domain authentication. Enter the Windows Domain for the filer []:office.snowshore.com OFFICE is a Windows 2000(tm) domain. In order to create this filer's domain account, you must supply the name and password of an administrator account with sufficient privilege to add the filer to the OFFICE domain. Please enter the Windows 2000 user [OFFICE\Administrator]: Password for OFFICE\Administrator: CIFS - Logged in as OFFICE\Administrator. By default, setup creates the filer account in the Active Directory container named 'Computers'. Alternatively, you can install the filer in an organizational unit (OU) by specifying the domain relative distinguished name of the OU, as in 'ou=innerOU,ou=outerOU'. Active Directory container for filer account? [cn=computers]: CIFS - Connecting to domain controller. Mon Nov 25 23:03:46 EST [nbns_timer:info]: All CIFS name registrations complete fo r local server Welcome to the OFFICE Windows 2000(tm) domain. CIFS local server is running. thor> One of the thing's I am very curious about is the fact that the machine "joins" the OFFICE domain. All of my workstations "join" the SNOWSHORE or atleast the office.snowshore.com domain. Could this be the problem? Thanks, Ed Ed Sanborn (978) 367-8478 Principal Network Administrator SnowShore Networks 285 Billerica Rd. Chelmsford, MA. 01824

3 2

Third Party Hardware Support for Filers???
by Darragh, Stephen J 26 Nov '02

26 Nov '02

Just to do due diligance, does anyone know of third party hardware support for NetApp Filers? Thanks Steve Darragh

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters