toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13514 discussions

Dump issue
by Kumar, Rahul 10 Dec '02

10 Dec '02

Hi Any Ideas why the dump is running so slow. We are running the filer to dump onto a SDLT tape drive DUMP: creating "/vol/vol0/../snapshot_for_backup.0" snapshot. DUMP: Using Full Volume Dump DUMP: Dumping tape file 1 on /tmp/filer1tape DUMP: Date of this level 0 dump: Mon Dec 9 23:02:06 2002. DUMP: Date of last level 0 dump: the epoch. DUMP: Dumping /vol/vol0/ to root DUMP: mapping (Pass I)[regular files] DUMP: mapping (Pass II)[directories] DUMP: estimated 44482138 KB. DUMP: dumping (Pass III) [directories] DUMP: dumping (Pass IV) [regular files] DUMP: Mon Dec 9 23:08:37 2002 : We have written 328738 KB. DUMP: Mon Dec 9 23:13:37 2002 : We have written 813336 KB. DUMP: Mon Dec 9 23:18:37 2002 : We have written 1248349 KB. DUMP: Mon Dec 9 23:23:37 2002 : We have written 1780575 KB. DUMP: Mon Dec 9 23:28:37 2002 : We have written 2307507 KB. DUMP: Mon Dec 9 23:33:37 2002 : We have written 2782586 KB. DUMP: Mon Dec 9 23:38:37 2002 : We have written 3220125 KB. DUMP: Mon Dec 9 23:43:37 2002 : We have written 3751844 KB. DUMP: Mon Dec 9 23:48:37 2002 : We have written 4190113 KB. DUMP: Mon Dec 9 23:53:37 2002 : We have written 4641781 KB. DUMP: Mon Dec 9 23:58:37 2002 : We have written 5080513 KB. DUMP: Tue Dec 10 00:03:37 2002 : We have written 5606338 KB. DUMP: Tue Dec 10 00:08:37 2002 : We have written 6088137 KB. DUMP: Tue Dec 10 00:13:37 2002 : We have written 6572608 KB. DUMP: Tue Dec 10 00:18:37 2002 : We have written 7016947 KB. DUMP: Tue Dec 10 00:23:37 2002 : We have written 7542679 KB. DUMP: Tue Dec 10 00:28:37 2002 : We have written 7984060 KB. DUMP: Tue Dec 10 00:33:37 2002 : We have written 8503801 KB. DUMP: Tue Dec 10 00:38:37 2002 : We have written 8958353 KB. DUMP: Tue Dec 10 00:43:37 2002 : We have written 9390217 KB. DUMP: Tue Dec 10 00:48:37 2002 : We have written 9828824 KB. DUMP: Tue Dec 10 00:53:37 2002 : We have written 10260501 KB. Rahul

3 2

Raid Group question
by Art Hebert 10 Dec '02

10 Dec '02

I have a current volume (vol0) that has a raidgroup size of 8. I had 3 spares that weren't being used and I wanted to add them to the volume, but like an idiot didn't check the raidgroup size. Thus when I added the 3 disks to the volume (vol0) 1 went to raidgroup 0 and the other 2 went to raidgroup 1 as a parity drive and a data drive. This will create a performance problem from what I can tell not mention another parity drive being used. I'd like to get these two disks back under raid group 0 if I can. Suggestions on the best way to do this would be appreciated. I'm thinking the safest way is to back it up and recreate the volumes and restore. Thanks art hebert

1 0

RE: Placing Oracle onto a cluster
by Art Hebert 09 Dec '02

09 Dec '02

We have the following: Head One: redo logs dbf files dbs files ctl files system temp Head Two: redo logs archive logs ctl files Sun Server: oracle binaries ctl files Since its dedicated to our production database I am thinking of moving some of the data files over to Head Two to improve performance. We have seperate mount points for each database component so we can move as needed without too much effort. art hebert -----Original Message----- From: George Kahler [mailto:george@YorkU.CA] Sent: Saturday, December 07, 2002 7:30 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Placing Oracle onto a cluster I would appreciate if someone could share how they break the various Oracle parts (pls excuse, I'm not a DBA), ie. data, logs, archives, & etc. amongst the various volumes in a NetApp cluster. I have an Oracle instance running on a singe F840 that very shortly is going to be clustered. The Oracle binaries are in a separate qtree and the rest the DBAs put in another qtree that I created for them. The qtrees and mount are by the SID. (HR) On the toaster /vol/db/<sid>/archs archive logs /ctl control files /data dbf files /rbs dbs files /redo redo logs /system /temp this gets mounted on a Sun DB server as filer:/vol/db/HR /rmounts/HR /oradata/HR --> /rmounts/DB/HR The DBAs refer to the database by a slink /oradata/HR in this case. A new mandate is to utilize the clustered F840s and to separate the database (.dbf), the redo and archive logs. In the cluster env there are now 4 volumes, 2 on each head. One for database, the other for logs (one has snapshots the other does not). Production DB is on one head, QA on the other. filer: A filer: B ------------------------ vol DB vol DB vol log vol log Do you folks that spread your logs end up with multiple nfs mounts per database? Do I suggest to my DBAs that I will have something like: A:/vol/db/HR/u01/data /rmounts/HR/u01 /rbs /system /temp A:/vol/log/HR/u02/redo1 /rmounts/HR/u02 /arch1 /ctl1 B:/vol/log/HR/u03/redo2 /rmounts/HR/u03 /arch2 /ctl2 /oradata/HR --> /rmounts/HR So I end up with 3 nfs mounts for each instance of the database? How do you people do this? There are about 10 other DBs waiting. What about a DSS; a reporting database? At the present time with all of the DB components on one volume all the DBAs have to snap the one volume and they can start up a DSS instance. In this new scenario, I guess they will still have to snap the DB volume and also snap one of the LOG volumes. What do you do? Sorry for being so winded but I was looking for specifics, unfortunately I couldn't find anything on either the NOW site or the archive list. Just the White Papers that describe the concept. Thanks, George ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- George Kahler e-mail: george(a)yorku.ca Sr. Systems Administrator humans: (416) 736-2100 x.22699 Computing and Network Services machines: (416) 736-5830 Ontario, Canada, M3J-1P3

1 0

RE: Suse & NetApp break oracle: flock problem
by Alex Harkema 09 Dec '02

09 Dec '02

Mike, thank you for your reply. I really suspect this is a linux-(kernel)problem. However I was curious if anyone had encountered the same issue. Besides that, we had not rebooted the machine when the error occurred. At the moment installations are running on the linux box (now still running the 2.4.18.-134 kernel, this one *not* containing the polyserver-flock patch) and I don't have the opportunity to reboot that one. However, I'll gladly send you the dumps afterward if we're still experiencing same problems. Can you tell me were I can find certifications for the oracle-on-linux/netapp products? Like, is 9iRac certified on Netapp? tia, Alex -----Original Message----- From: Kiernan, Michael [mailto:mkiernan@netapp.com] Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 2:09 PM To: 'Alex Harkema' Cc: Rolf Fokkens Subject: RE: Suse & NetApp break oracle: flock problem Hi Alex, What did 'priv set advanced; lock_dump -h' show on the filer at the time you get the error ? Was Oracle shutdown cleanly prior to reboot ? One problem we're aware of with Linux rpc.statd is that it sometimes can fail to remove the locks on the filer on reboot, due to it locking with an unqualified nodename, and sending lock recovery packets with a fully-qualified domain name. If Oracle shutdown cleanly, however, the locks should have been released by that action. A pktt trace from the filer to the linux box (pktt start all -i <ip of oracle linux box>) while you reboot the upgraded box and restart oracle would be useful, as would the lock_dump output. I'll be happy to look at the data. Mike -----Original Message----- From: Alex Harkema [mailto:HarkemaA@vertis.nl] Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 1:24 PM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Cc: Rolf Fokkens Subject: Suse & NetApp break oracle: flock problem Hi all! After upgrading the Linux kernel on our SuSE Linux Enterprise Server (SLES) to k_smp-2.4.18-224 we were unable to start our Oracle Database which was located on a NetApp Filer. All the feedback we got was "no locks available" Further investigation showed that k_smp-2.4.18-224 introduced a polyserve-flock patch which probably causes the problems. Has anyone ran into this? We'll do tests with k_smp-2.4.18-224 and/or 2.4.18-237 whithout the polyserve-flock patch and share this with those who express their interest. I address this report to both SuSE and NetApp for it's this combination that breaks Oracle. Because it's both in SuSE's and NetApp's interest I hope this report is appreciated though it may not have been sent through the proper channels. Alex Harkema Vertis

1 0

Suse & NetApp break oracle: flock problem
by Alex Harkema 09 Dec '02

09 Dec '02

Hi all! After upgrading the Linux kernel on our SuSE Linux Enterprise Server (SLES) to k_smp-2.4.18-224 we were unable to start our Oracle Database which was located on a NetApp Filer. All the feedback we got was "no locks available" Further investigation showed that k_smp-2.4.18-224 introduced a polyserve-flock patch which probably causes the problems. Has anyone ran into this? We'll do tests with k_smp-2.4.18-224 and/or 2.4.18-237 whithout the polyserve-flock patch and share this with those who express their interest. I address this report to both SuSE and NetApp for it's this combination that breaks Oracle. Because it's both in SuSE's and NetApp's interest I hope this report is appreciated though it may not have been sent through the proper channels. Alex Harkema Vertis

1 0

RE: Access the filer via passwordless ssh
by Potakamuri, Sreenivasa 08 Dec '02

08 Dec '02

This feature is not possible with ONTAP 6.3. But, this will be available in the future release. Thanks, Sreenivasa Potakamuri Network Appliance. -----Original Message----- From: Leslie Wang To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Sent: 12/8/02 3:49 AM Subject: Access the filer via passwordless ssh Does anyone know if his is possible with ONTAP 6.3?

1 0

RE: Accessing Filer from DOS
by Hall, Tom 08 Dec '02

08 Dec '02

I ran into a similar issue with a network boot disk that Norton Ghost made. I solved the problem by using Bart's network boot disk to connect to our filer. They seem to keep up with new dos drivers/utils for tcp/ip, ms network client, and nic drivers. You can download the disk from http://students.lco-college.edu/bootcd/network_boot_disk.htm <http://students.lco-college.edu/bootcd/network_boot_disk.htm> -----Original Message----- From: steven boyer [mailto:sboyer1@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 12:11 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Accessing Filer from DOS If a NT server goes down, we want to be able to re-image the windows server from the filer. We must do this from a DOS prompt. So the question is how do I access the filer using DOS. The following is the information from our NT Admin: I am trying to connect to the filer at \\crsqfiler\image to create and store images of our WIN2K servers. I used Powerquest to create the boot disks (Powerquest Boot Disk Builder Version 5.01 Build Bdb501.012). I receive the following error when attempting to connect to the filer from DOS - Error 58 The network has responded incorrectly. Attempts to connect to other sharepoints on the filer are also unsuccessful. I can connect to any WIN2K Share with no problem. I have reviewed the issues in the NETAPP Knowledge base, as well as, Powerquest's knowledge base and can find no remedy Has anyone been able to get this to work? Steven

2 1

Placing Oracle onto a cluster
by George Kahler 07 Dec '02

07 Dec '02

I would appreciate if someone could share how they break the various Oracle parts (pls excuse, I'm not a DBA), ie. data, logs, archives, & etc. amongst the various volumes in a NetApp cluster. I have an Oracle instance running on a singe F840 that very shortly is going to be clustered. The Oracle binaries are in a separate qtree and the rest the DBAs put in another qtree that I created for them. The qtrees and mount are by the SID. (HR) On the toaster /vol/db/<sid>/archs archive logs /ctl control files /data dbf files /rbs dbs files /redo redo logs /system /temp this gets mounted on a Sun DB server as filer:/vol/db/HR /rmounts/HR /oradata/HR --> /rmounts/DB/HR The DBAs refer to the database by a slink /oradata/HR in this case. A new mandate is to utilize the clustered F840s and to separate the database (.dbf), the redo and archive logs. In the cluster env there are now 4 volumes, 2 on each head. One for database, the other for logs (one has snapshots the other does not). Production DB is on one head, QA on the other. filer: A filer: B ------------------------ vol DB vol DB vol log vol log Do you folks that spread your logs end up with multiple nfs mounts per database? Do I suggest to my DBAs that I will have something like: A:/vol/db/HR/u01/data /rmounts/HR/u01 /rbs /system /temp A:/vol/log/HR/u02/redo1 /rmounts/HR/u02 /arch1 /ctl1 B:/vol/log/HR/u03/redo2 /rmounts/HR/u03 /arch2 /ctl2 /oradata/HR --> /rmounts/HR So I end up with 3 nfs mounts for each instance of the database? How do you people do this? There are about 10 other DBs waiting. What about a DSS; a reporting database? At the present time with all of the DB components on one volume all the DBAs have to snap the one volume and they can start up a DSS instance. In this new scenario, I guess they will still have to snap the DB volume and also snap one of the LOG volumes. What do you do? Sorry for being so winded but I was looking for specifics, unfortunately I couldn't find anything on either the NOW site or the archive list. Just the White Papers that describe the concept. Thanks, George ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- George Kahler e-mail: george(a)yorku.ca Sr. Systems Administrator humans: (416) 736-2100 x.22699 Computing and Network Services machines: (416) 736-5830 Ontario, Canada, M3J-1P3

2 2

new gigabit card
by Piotr KUCHARSKI 06 Dec '02

06 Dec '02

Are there more than one model of gigabit card for filer 740? Which is the best, then? p. -- Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master. -- Commissioner Pravin Lal http://nerdquiz.sgh.waw.pl/ -- polska wersja quizu dla nerdów ;)

2 1

AW: Accessing Filer from DOS
by Friedrich, Bernhard 06 Dec '02

06 Dec '02

There's yet another entry you may need to set: preferredredir=full This needs to be set in system.ini, typically in the directory where you keep the "net" command on your bootdisk. That way, you won't have to issue "net start /full" but a "net start" will suffice. If that still doesn't help, also set autostart=full in system.ini - this has always worked for us. See http://now.netapp.com/Knowledgebase/solutionarea.asp?id=ntapcs3583 for details and also see http://now.netapp.com/Knowledgebase/solutionarea.asp?id=ntapcs2762 - there's a typo in that article, though - it needs to be preferredredir instead of prefrredredir. Greetings, Bernhard Friedrich Uniklinikum Heidelberg ZIM - Server und Basissysteme -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Steven Boyer GD-Mail [mailto:steven.boyer@gd-centcom.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. Dezember 2002 17:40 An: Kumar, Rahul; Hall, Tom; toasters(a)mathworks.com Betreff: Re: Accessing Filer from DOS We made all those changes and still no glory ----- Original Message ----- From: Kumar, Rahul To: Hall, Tom ; steven boyer ; toasters(a)mathworks.com Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 10:52 PM Subject: RE: Accessing Filer from DOS Hi, You just need to modify the following line in the floppy to gain access to filers from DOS prompt. By default, the boot disk builder uses basic redirection. The Filers require Full redirection to make connections. Edit the A:\autoexec.bat on the floppy you just created and look for the line net start basic Change this line to read net start full That will take care of the problem. Rahul Kumar, Tele: + 91 20 2930812 (D), Cell: + 91 982230 9177. EDS PLM Solutions, Pune, India. -----Original Message----- From: Hall, Tom [mailto:Tom.Hall@exchange.webmd.net] Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 2:46 AM To: 'steven boyer'; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Accessing Filer from DOS I ran into a similar issue with a network boot disk that Norton Ghost made. I solved the problem by using Bart's network boot disk to connect to our filer. They seem to keep up with new dos drivers/utils for tcp/ip, ms network client, and nic drivers. You can download the disk from http://students.lco-college.edu/bootcd/network_boot_disk.htm -----Original Message----- From: steven boyer [mailto:sboyer1@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 12:11 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Accessing Filer from DOS If a NT server goes down, we want to be able to re-image the windows server from the filer. We must do this from a DOS prompt. So the question is how do I access the filer using DOS. The following is the information from our NT Admin: I am trying to connect to the filer at \\crsqfiler\image to create and store images of our WIN2K servers. I used Powerquest to create the boot disks (Powerquest Boot Disk Builder Version 5.01 Build Bdb501.012). I receive the following error when attempting to connect to the filer from DOS - Error 58 The network has responded incorrectly. Attempts to connect to other sharepoints on the filer are also unsuccessful. I can connect to any WIN2K Share with no problem. I have reviewed the issues in the NETAPP Knowledge base, as well as, Powerquest's knowledge base and can find no remedy Has anyone been able to get this to work? Steven

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters