toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13514 discussions

URGENT: YOUR CONTRACT EXECUTION PAYMENT RELEASE
by shola_martins＠katamail.com 13 Oct '03

13 Oct '03

C/o Contract Reviewers Committee/Panel Desk, Dear Friend, How are you? I am Mr. Shola Martins the newly transited Contract Authority, as mentioned above, it is my pleasure to inform you that your longed awaited contract payment of $27.5 Million has been released the newly transited authorities headed by me. However, because of the failure and refusal of the formal authorities to release your contract payment of the file #002 with the FEDERAL MINISTRY OF JUSTICE, but be informed that immediately the fund gets to you, you will have to pay me 25% of the total fund. If you agree you can reply me and send your fax + phone number for easy communication and verifications of Deposit and Contract Certificates, so that you can receive your payment via the CENTRAL BANK OF NIGERIA, hope to hear from you soon, Regards, Mr. Shola Martins Contract Panel Pls, also reply to: mr_shola_marttins(a)yahoo.com

1 0

Procmail not delivering mail to users /var/spool/mail files on NFS mounted directory on (Netapp F825)
by work-usenet＠nouce.net 12 Oct '03

12 Oct '03

I have a Linux server which has a NFS mounted home directory on which mail is delivered to a /var/spool/mail directory. The NFS server is a Netappp F825. I have posted this to the procmai mailing list also. Cross posting to see if any netapp administrators have fought similar mail issues with NFS mounted spool directories; and could help resolve these issues. procmail is the LDA. (version 3.22) Sendmail (8.12.10) No /etc/procmail/rc Sendmail and Procmail are being run in a chroot environment. When mail is received from the network, it is deposited into /var/spool/mqueue and owned by root:<userid> but stays there until a manual sendmail -q is done to push the mail, into the userid mail spool. Is there away I can get procmail, to accept the root:<userid> permissions and process the mail into the /var/spool/mail/<userid> mailboxes? sendmail and procmail are setuid. The user and root are both trusted users in the sendmail.cf, and the userid is the default userid in the sendmail.cf (sendmail is running in a chrooted environment). If mail is send to a user in the chroot environment via sendmail the mail is delivered to the spool with no problems. So I expect the problem is with permissions on the file system and/or procmail accessing the files. /user/test/var/spool/mqueue: total 48 -rw-r--r-- 1 root test 1585 Oct 10 16:55 dfh9AKtP6K022309 -rw-r--r-- 1 root test 8907 Oct 10 16:55 dfh9AKtPfY022310 -rw-r--r-- 1 root test 8919 Oct 10 16:55 dfh9AKtPfZ022310 -rw-r--r-- 1 root test 1102 Oct 10 16:56 dfh9AKuqpv022328 -rw-r--r-- 1 root test 818 Oct 10 16:55 qfh9AKtP6K022309 -rw-r--r-- 1 root test 998 Oct 10 16:55 qfh9AKtPfY022310 -rw-r--r-- 1 root test 1014 Oct 10 16:55 qfh9AKtPfZ022310 -rw-r--r-- 1 root test 888 Oct 10 16:56 qfh9AKuqpv022328 drwxr-xr-x 2 test test 180224 Oct 10 16:56 /user/test/var/spool/mqueue

1 0

RE: F85 boot after total re-install ?
by Summers, John 10 Oct '03

10 Oct '03

Be sure you have an OS on the drives. Booting from floppies and running setup does some basic configuration but does not install a full version of the OS. John Summers Network Appliance -----Original Message----- From: Borders, Rich Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 9:47 AM To: Frank Bonnet; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: F85 boot after total re-install ? At the ok prompt do a printenv Set floppy-boot true You have to unset it to get it to boot disk later Good luck Richard D Borders > -----Original Message----- > From: Frank Bonnet [mailto:bonnetf@bart.esiee.fr] > Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 9:14 AM > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: F85 boot after total re-install ? > > Hi > > I've re-install a F85 from 6.4.2 floppies everything ran well > but when I've rebooted the machine it tried to DHCP boot ... > > How could I force it to boot from disks > thanks >

1 0

Middle East NetApp Dealers?
by ScottUCE＠aol.com 10 Oct '03

10 Oct '03

Can anybody recommend a reputable North American-based NetApp dealer that has the ability to sell (or can figure out a way to sell) into Middle Eastern countries such as Kuwait, UAE, Bahrain and Saudi Arabia? -- we can't seem to get an answer from Network Appliance or their distributors. Scott Scott Fischmann Union Computer Exchange, Inc. 6233 Idylwood Lane Minneapolis, MN 55436 email: scott(a)unioncomputer.com phone: 952 935 7282 | fax: 952 935 5056 "Helping our customers make each dollar go further -- since 1991!" www.unioncomputer.com

1 0

Re: F85 boot after total re-install ?
by tsnow＠hq.nasa.gov 10 Oct '03

10 Oct '03

Try: Power off the filer. Power on the filer. enter "CTRL C" during the initilzation to get to the boot menu. On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 15:51:33 +0200 Frank Bonnet wrote: > On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 08:41:13AM -0500, tsnow(a)hq.nasa.gov wrote: > > I ran into something similar. During the boot sequence I typed in a ctrl > > + c to get to the OK prompt. Once at the OK prompt type "boot floppy" > > Similar to SUN systems. > > > > When your are at the OK prompt you can set some enviroment > variables also. > > > > setenv floppy-boot? true > > > > Check the docs. Not sure what all the variables are. > > > Well ... I explain badly due to my terrible english ... > > I have installed from floppies THEN reboot as requested > by the setup utility , but at this time the filer wants > to get a DHCP/BOOTP request... I have filled Ip addresses > fields during setup and it does not seems to be accepted > by the filer as it always try to get its IP address thru DHCP >

1 0

Re: F85 boot after total re-install ?
by tsnow＠hq.nasa.gov 10 Oct '03

10 Oct '03

I ran into something similar. During the boot sequence I typed in a ctrl + c to get to the OK prompt. Once at the OK prompt type "boot floppy" Similar to SUN systems. When your are at the OK prompt you can set some enviroment variables also. setenv floppy-boot? true Check the docs. Not sure what all the variables are. On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 15:14:27 +0200 Frank Bonnet wrote: > Hi > > I've re-install a F85 from 6.4.2 floppies > everything ran well but when I've rebooted > the machine it tried to DHCP boot ... > > How could I force it to boot from disks > thanks >

2 1

RE: F85 boot after total re-install ?
by Borders, Rich 10 Oct '03

10 Oct '03

At the ok prompt do a printenv Set floppy-boot true You have to unset it to get it to boot disk later Good luck Richard D Borders > -----Original Message----- > From: Frank Bonnet [mailto:bonnetf@bart.esiee.fr] > Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 9:14 AM > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: F85 boot after total re-install ? > > Hi > > I've re-install a F85 from 6.4.2 floppies everything ran well > but when I've rebooted the machine it tried to DHCP boot ... > > How could I force it to boot from disks > thanks >

1 0

F85 boot after total re-install ?
by Frank Bonnet 10 Oct '03

10 Oct '03

Hi I've re-install a F85 from 6.4.2 floppies everything ran well but when I've rebooted the machine it tried to DHCP boot ... How could I force it to boot from disks thanks

1 0

Re: VERY URGENT FROM HEINZ
by VON HEINZ 08 Oct '03

08 Oct '03

MR. VON HEINZ FIRST MERIT BANK 101 W. HIGH STREET LONDON. EMAIL: heinz63v(a)yahoo.com Sir; PRIVATE AND URGENT. I am contacting you on business transfer of a hugh sum of money from a deceased account. Though I know that a transaction of this magnitude will make any one apprehensive and worried, but I am assuring you that all will be well at the end of the day. We decided to contact you due to the urgency of thistransaction. PROPOSITION; We discovered an abandoned sum of US$5,500,000.00 (five million five hundred thousand united states dollars) in an account that belongs to one of our foreign customers who died along with his entire family. Since his death, none of his next-of-kin or relations has come forward to lay claims for this money as the heir. We cannot release the fund from his account unless someone applies for claim as the next-of-kin to the deceased as indicated in our banking guidelines. Upon this discovery, we now seek your permission to have you stand as a next of kin to the deceased as all documentations will be carefully worked out by us for the funds (US$5,500,000.00) to be released in your favour as the beneficiary's next of kin. It may interest you to know that we have secured from the probate an order of madamus to locate any of deceased beneficiaries. Please acknowledge receipt of this message in acceptance of our mutual business endeavour by furnishing me with the following; 1. Beneficiary name and address 2. Direct Telephone and fax numbers These requirements will enable us file letter of claim to the appropriate departments for necessary approvals in your favour before the transfer can be made. We shall be compensating you with a million dollars on final conclusion of this project, while the rest shall be for us.Your share stays while the rest shall be for us for investment purposes. If this proposal is acceptable by you, do not take undue advantage of the trust we have bestowed in you, I await your urgent mail. Please reply to EMAIL: hvon1956(a)netzero.com Regards, Mr. Von Heinz.

1 0

Veritas BackupExec 9
by Steve Evans 08 Oct '03

08 Oct '03

I've been able to backup my filer using BackupExec 8.5, but since upgrading to BackupExec 9 I get an error that BackupExec is unable to attach to one of the drives. All the permissions are correct (the BackupExec service account is in the Backup Operators group, and the Admin group while troubleshooting), and I'm using user-defined shares in BackupExec. Has anyone else been through this? Veritas support is drawing blanks on this. Steve Evans SDSU Foundation

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters