toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13513 discussions

DFS on CDOT 8.3.1 and riverbed appliance
by Sayla, Mustafa 18 Dec '15

18 Dec '15

We just started migrating our CIFS data from 7-mode to CDOT system. For our remote office data we use riverbed for acceleration and what we are finding out that if "-is-advertise-dfs-enabled" is set to true then it will not accelerate the CIFS traffic. Per Netapp and Riverbed we have to turn this off on the CIFS Vserver for all the data and then enable it for shares we want the dfs advertise to work. Our issue is that we have over 200 shares which do not pass through riverbed appliance and are not affected but we still have to turn it off and there are only about 10 shares for which we want this to be disable. If I follow the solution by Netapp then I would disable on the vserver and then enable it for the 200 or so shares manually and also I have to remember it to do it for new shares. We use DFS for name space only and not for replication. What I am not clear is to what this setting would do if I turn it off for all the CIFS data? Does that mean I cannot map the drives using dfs path or something else. Anyone has run into similar issue and what did you do to resolve it. Any help is appreciated. Mustafa Sayla Visit us on the Web at mesirowfinancial.com This communication may contain privileged and/or confidential information. It is intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing or using any of this information. If you received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy. Confidential, proprietary or time-sensitive communications should not be transmitted via the Internet, as there can be no assurance of actual or timely delivery, receipt and/or confidentiality. This is not an offer, or solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any security, investment or other product.

4 8

VMware on CDOT 8.3.x
by Klise, Steve 17 Dec '15

17 Dec '15

Is there an update to tr-4068? Moreover looking for VMware 6x, NFS, jumbo frames info. If 4068 is best, I can use that. Steve

3 6

MHost Configuration Problem?
by Alexander Griesser 12 Dec '15

12 Dec '15

Hey, has anyone ever seen this? toaster*> version NetApp Release 8.0.1P2 7-Mode: Wed Feb 16 21:32:12 PST 2011 toaster*> options disk.auto disk.auto_assign off (value might be overwritten in takeover) toaster*> options autosupport.support.enable option autosupport.support.enable: can not be read, MHost configuration problem (code=0x1) autosupport.support.enable unknown (value might be overwritten in takeover) It seems as if only the autosupport options are affected... Best, Alexander Griesser Head of Systems Operations ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH E-Mail: AGriesser(a)anexia-it.com<mailto:AGriesser@anexia-it.com> Web: http://www.anexia-it.com Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601

2 2

Cmode: Custom stats XML configs..
by Jeffrey Mohler 12 Dec '15

12 Dec '15

Anyone using customer stats XML files in Cmode? I cant get any to work..always complains about _line 1_ even when using XML configurations provided by Netapp. _________________________________Jeff MohlerTech Yahoo, Storage Architect, Principal(831)454-6712 YPAC Gold Member Twitter: @PrincipalYahoo CorpIM: Hipchat & Iris

1 0

Chassis FRU PROM write operation failed. Replace the system chassis or controller!
by Andrew Hancock 11 Dec '15

11 Dec '15

Hi Toasters Brand new out of the box, NetApp FAS2520 HA, Dual Controller/DS4246 Shelf, Controller A after connecting a serial cable to it, gives.... Chassis FRU PROM write operation failed. Replace the system chassis or controller. If necessary contact support. It also then Halts, it takes about 1min 20s. I don't suppose there is much I can do other than report to Reseller, escalate to Support.... I'm not sure if this is the method of which it was handled, because it should have been delivered by Lupprians, but was delivered by TNT which ignored the packaging which stated MUST SHIP ON A PALLET DO NOT REMOVE, and removed the pallet everything was on, because the delivery man, said it was too heavy for him to handle, so it was stripped off the pallet. On delivery we are not allowed to carry deliveries off the lorries, due to health and safety, and he driver wanted a hand, I went off to make enquires what I should do, and found it all dumped outside in the rain! Anyway.... back to the issue, anything I can test, prove, provide additional info to support, or just ping it back to them! A case was already open with NetApp about the way it was delivered, and damage to boxes, by TNT, not sure if this is the cause of the hardware error! So this has now been tagged on by the reseller..... I've never seen this rror ebefore... Regards Andy

2 4

Grafana setup
by Basil 11 Dec '15

11 Dec '15

Hi folks, Can that OVA for the grafana setup be used to present information from sources other than Netapp? We have other storage vendors with metrics we want to present. Cheers, Basil

1 0

cdot missing disk space
by Mike Thompson 11 Dec '15

11 Dec '15

Hey all, I've got a cluster running cluster-mode 8.0.5 (don't laugh) that has an aggregate which is reporting much higher used size than I can account for based on the volumes contained on it. according to 'aggr show' and 'df -A' the aggregate has around 17T of space consumed. bc-gx-4b::> aggr show -aggregate gx4b_1 -fields size, usedsize, availsize aggregate size usedsize availsize --------- ------- -------- --------- gx4b_1 18.40TB 17.08TB 1.32TB though per my database, a tally of all the volumes contained on this aggregate, the total amount of space consumed by the volumes is only about 12.5T of space, so a significant amount is being soaked up by something. I get the same numbers from the command line as well: ssh admin@bc-gx-4b "set -units MB; vol show -aggregate gx4b_1 -fields used" | egrep "^bc" | awk '{print $3}' | sed 's/[^0-9]*//g' | paste -sd+ | bc 12528994 so the sum of the volumes is about 12.5T, but the aggregate thinks there is 17T used. it's been in this state for some time. There haven't been any volumes recently moved off or deleted, so there isn't any space being recovered in the background. 'vol show -state offline' and 'set diag; vol lost-found show' isn't reporting anything. Any ideas on how I might figure out what is sucking up the un-reported space?

9 16

list meta information
by Tom Yates 09 Dec '15

09 Dec '15

On Tue, 24 Nov 2015, Tom Yates wrote: > While I'm posting meta-stuff, I've had some difficulty in getting the > CAPTCHA to work in the list subscription page (as anyone who's tried to > subscribe recently will have noticed). If you're a python hacker who > doesn't mind helping me debug the problem, I'd appreciate an email > **off-list**, as I'm definitely not one. Vast thanks to John Constable <jc18(a)sanger.ac.uk>, who got this working. Web subscriptions are now re-enabled. I should also mention that it was pointed out to me that the "digest" function of the list was almost useless, because the volume threshold was set so low that a new digest was created nearly every time a message was sent. I have increased it considerably, so people subscribed to the digest should have been getting one a day, except when traffic is exceptionally high. We now return you to your regularly-scheduled programming. -- Tom Yates - http://www.teaparty.net

1 0

Netapp disk manufacture
by Klise, Steve 09 Dec '15

09 Dec '15

Does anyone know where I can find part numbers for disk size, manufacture? I looked on the NOW site but couldn’t find anything. I need to know if they are seagate, WD, etc.. I need them for all SAS, SATA, FC, SSD, etc. I have a customer that insists on a certain manufacturer. Steve

10 17

1gb sfp support in fas2500
by Mike Gossett 09 Dec '15

09 Dec '15

I was reading the tech specs on the fas2552/4 platforms and there is verbiage indicating that with 8.3.1 and onward, there is support for 1gb sfp modules in the uta2 ports. I have deployed many of these units in the past 18 months and have always forced 10gb switching to support it, even though 4x1g may have been adequate in some circumstances. My NetApp sales team seems to be unfamiliar with this and is researching. Can anyone shed some light on this for me? Are there 1g copper modules or only 1g fiber sfp? Has anyone quoted / sold / deployed these yet? Any caveats? Thanks Mike Sent from my mobile phone

2 2

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters