toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13520 discussions

unregister
by Wil Ng 13 Apr '04

13 Apr '04

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind ASL to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

WINING NOTIFICATION
by ELGORDO LOTERIA PRIMITIVA 12 Apr '04

12 Apr '04

ELGORDO LOTERIA PRIMITIVA PIS0 36, CALLE CARLOS OTERGA, 28002 MADRID, SPAIN. TEL/FAX: +34-645-630-404. FROM:THE DESK OF THE VIC-PRESIDENT. INTERNATIONAL PROMOTION/PRIZE AWARD DEPT. REF NO: EGS/2551256007/03 BATCH NO: 15/0018/IPthD ATTENTION: RE:AWARD FINAL NOTIFICATION. We are pleased to inform you of the release of the result of the EL GROUP SWEEPSTAKE LOOTERY/INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMME played on the 15th March 2004.Your name attached to ticket number 025-11464992-750 with serial number 2113-05 drew the lucky numbers 13-15-22-37-39-45, Which consequently won the lottery in the 3rd category. You have therefore been approved for the lump sum pay out of 315,810.00 (Three Hundred and Fifteen Thousand Eight Hundred and Ten Euro Only) in cash credited to file Ref No: EGS/ 25512600/03. This is from a total cash prize shared among the thirty=0ne International Winners in this category. CONGATULATIONS!!! Your fund is now deposited with a security companyinsured on your name. Due to mixed up of some numbers and the names we ask that you keep this award from public notice until your claim has been processed and the money remitted to your account as this is part of our security protocol to avoid double claiming or unwarranted taking advantage of this programme by participants. All participants were selected through a computer ballot system drew from 25,000 names fromAsia,Australia,New Zealand, Middle East,Europe,North America as part of our International promotions programme, Which we conduct once every year. We hope your lucky name will a bigger win in the next programme.To begin your lottery claim, Please complete the PAYMENT PROCESSING FORM which will be send o you with this notification letter and you will fax a copy to a claim agent assigned to you. Mrs. Eva Perez. Foreign Operation manager EURO GLOBAL SECURITY COMPANY Tel: +34-675-118-081 Fax: +34-656-471-863. For the processing and remittance of your winning prize to a designated account of your choice. Remember, All prize money must be claimed notlatter than 28TH April 2004.After this date all fund will be returned to the MINISTERIO DE ECONOMIA HACIENDA AS UNCLAIMED. Note. In order to avoid unnecessary delays and complications. Please remember to quote your Reference Number, Batch Number and prize claim track number in every correspondence with your agent or us. Furthermore, Should there be any change of your address, do inform your claims agent as soon as possible. Congratulation again from all members of our staff and thank you for being a part of our promotions programme. Yours Sincerely. PEDRO GARZON CEO President PRIZE CLAIM TICKET NO: 31736745.

1 0

Be the dealer, win other players money japanese
by Leonard Rocha 12 Apr '04

12 Apr '04

1 0

My Impotency FINALLY solved! ild WA
by Dionne Emery 12 Apr '04

12 Apr '04

Be a winner with Apoll0! Quality enlargement from as little as just $40 a month Make a BIG difference in your life today with the power and promise of Apollo male enhancement patch. Increase size and stamina by up to 3 inches in as little as just 12 weeks! We guarantee your satisfaction or you get your payment back! Over 95% of our buyers have been astonished with the results! Click below to Learn more ORDER TODAY! http://iamtoor.com/4/1/index.php?ai=7038

1 0

Re[8]: Отдых в Сочи на майские праздники
by Tillable I. Report 09 Apr '04

09 Apr '04

РПаЎ±б l H

1 0

DFS Replication
by Alan Biren 07 Apr '04

07 Apr '04

I have a DFS environment with one Filer. I am able to set the shares for DFS, but the Filer does not support DFS Replication. Does anyone have a solution that they have working to resolve this. I'd like not to have to replace the existing DFS with VFM/StorageX. ***************************************************************************************************** If you have received this email in error please notify the the system manager or the sender immediately and do not disclosed the to anyone or make copies. ** eSafe scanned this email for viruses, vandals or malicious content ** ** To find out eSafe(TM) and other Aladdin Security Products, contact AMC Corporation at (212) 620-0700 *****************************************************************************************************

1 0

RE: SnapMirror and Qtrees
by Gole, Abhijeet 07 Apr '04

07 Apr '04

-----Original Message----- From: Odhner, Christian Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 11:00 AM To: Gole, Abhijeet; c-dl-snapmirror Subject: RE: SnapMirror and Qtrees > renamed /vol/vol1/MySpace (or My_Space) for snapmirror to work. Before I > change the names of 86 qtrees and their corresponding DFS share > pointers, I'm hoping that someone can tell me that NetApp was incorrect While Colin or someone else can comment on the current state of the bug and any workarounds, I should point out that even if there is no current workaround, the customer does NOT need to change his DFS pointers. Just change the qtree names, and change the CIFS share mappings on the filer side so that the same (old) share names point to the new (no-space) qtree names. Share names and Qtree names don't have to match, so client reconfiguration of any sort can be avoided pretty easily. -Chris -----Original Message----- From: Haber, David J. [mailto:david.haber@fahc.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 10:34 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: SnapMirror and Qtrees I have been told by NetApp support that you cannot, at this time, snapmirror qtrees that have spaces in their name. That is, a qtree with the path /vol/vol1/My Space cannot be snapmirrored. It would have to be renamed /vol/vol1/MySpace (or My_Space) for snapmirror to work. Before I change the names of 86 qtrees and their corresponding DFS share pointers, I'm hoping that someone can tell me that NetApp was incorrect and there is a way to snapmirror qtrees with spaces in their names. Or, can someone at NetApp who might be readin this give me an idea when the bug (86447) will be fixed.

1 0

SnapMirror and Qtrees
by Haber, David J. 07 Apr '04

07 Apr '04

I have been told by NetApp support that you cannot, at this time, snapmirror qtrees that have spaces in their name. That is, a qtree with the path /vol/vol1/My Space cannot be snapmirrored. It would have to be renamed /vol/vol1/MySpace (or My_Space) for snapmirror to work. Before I change the names of 86 qtrees and their corresponding DFS share pointers, I'm hoping that someone can tell me that NetApp was incorrect and there is a way to snapmirror qtrees with spaces in their names. Or, can someone at NetApp who might be readin this give me an idea when the bug (86447) will be fixed.

1 0

RE: CIFS performance Issue
by Tim Driggers 07 Apr '04

07 Apr '04

Hi Jack, I am using the same win2k server to copy to/from the NetApp and to/from another Win2k server. The only difference is which interface is used (the Win2k server has 100mbit and GigE to different vlans). I am actually transferring a 30 gigabyte file, not 30 megabyte. Your suggestion to defragment the Win2k box was valid, as the test server was slightly fragmented. I did a quick analysis after the defrag and this is what I found: Win2k server writing 30GB file over a 100mbit link to a Win2k Server: 12.2MB/sec (link saturated) Win2k server reading 30GB file over a 100mbit link from a Win2k Server: 12.13MB/sec (link saturated) Win2k server writing 30GB file over a GigE link to a NetApp 760: 7MB/sec Win2k server reading 30GB file over a GigE link from a NetApp 760: 25MB/sec note: these are the best readings after playing with several Win2k gigE settings (including your suggestion of TCP offload). I guess my question is, should I expect better performance from the NetApp? -----Original Message----- From: Jack Lyons [mailto:jack.lyons@martinagency.com] Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 9:43 AM To: 'Tim Driggers'; 'NetApp List (E-mail)' Subject: RE: CIFS performance Issue There are a lot of variables involved. What client are you using for copying the file to and from the NetApp. Are you using the Win2k server you are comparing it to? I think some of what is going is that the Win2k maybe caching the writes to the file, but when writing to the Filer it is not caching the reads (or if it is - it isn't doing it efficiently). I bet if you looked at the defrag map of the Win2k box it would be moderately fragmented. Also, for a Gig link, a 30 MB file is not that big. Try using a 300 MB file. We looked at several different solutions using different protocols and CIFS clients. Here is a snapshot of my results. Single Client WinXP client writing 300MB file over a GigE link to a Win2k Server: 40MB/s WinXP client reading 300MB file over a GigE link from a Win2k Server: 26MB/s MacOSX running the Dave Client writing a 300MB file over a GigE link to a FAS960: 22MB/s MacOSX running the Dave Client reading a 300MB file over a GigE link from a FAS960: 38MB/s However with 5 clients connected to a gig switch to a single GigE connected server WinXP client writing 300MB file over a GigE link to a Win2k Server: 6MB/s WinXP client reading 300MB file over a GigE link from a Win2k Server: 14MB/s MacOSX running the Dave Client writing a 300MB file over a GigE link to a FAS960: 18MB/s MacOSX running the Dave Client reading a 300MB file over a GigE link from a FAS960: 23MB/s My analysis is the Wintel box cannot handle the load at GigE speeds. I haven't had a chance to try using a TCP Offload Engine NIC which would probably help. -----Original Message----- From: Tim Driggers [mailto:timd@birthdayexpress.com] Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 11:59 AM To: NetApp List (E-mail) Subject: CIFS performance Issue Hi All, I have been playing with an F760 with ONTAP 6.4.1 for about thirty days. I am having a problem understanding a CIFS transfer rate difference I am seeing between writing to and from the NetApp. First, a little background: The F760 has a X1025B gigabit card (SX fiber) in it, connected to an Extreme BlackDiamond 6808. The BlackDiamond does -not- have jumbo frames enabled at this time. The NetApp has full flow control configured. I am able to copy a single (30GB) file (generated by mkfile in FreeBSD) to and from the NetApp over NFSv3 at between 92-96mbit consistently, with the FreeBSD using an NFS mount having a 100mbit link. I am able to copy the same 30GB file from the NetApp to a Windows 2000 server using CIFS at 130-160mbit consistently. The Win2k server has a gigabit SX card. When copying the file to the NetApp from the Win2k server, I am seeing a maximum throughput of 69mbit, and usually it settles around 33-40mbit. I am monitoring this transfer rate using 'sh port utillization' on the BlackDiamond. I have tested this on three different Win2k boxes, with nearly identical results. I have also followed instructions on NetApp's website on how to 'improve' performance through registry edits, with no apparent result (positive or negative). I have tried three different flowcontrol settings on the Win2k cards (send, recieve and full) - again with no change in performance. I'm thrilled with the NFS performance, but we are a windows shop. I need to get performance increased on the CIFS writes to the NetApp if it's possible. I have tried every tweak I could find, and nothing seems to change the rate at which I can write to the NetApp via CIFS. I have included some NetApp information: slot 8: Gigabit Ethernet Controller II e8 MAC Address: 00:03:47:25:36:6a (auto-1000sx-fd-up) slot 9: NVRAM Memory Size: 32 MB netapp1> options cifs cifs.audit.autosave.file.extension cifs.audit.autosave.file.limit 0 cifs.audit.autosave.onsize.enable off cifs.audit.autosave.onsize.threshold 500k cifs.audit.autosave.ontime.enable off cifs.audit.autosave.ontime.interval cifs.audit.enable off cifs.audit.file_access_events.enable on cifs.audit.logon_events.enable on cifs.audit.logsize 524288 cifs.audit.saveas /etc/log/adtlog.evt cifs.bypass_traverse_checking on cifs.comment cifs.guest_account cifs.home_dir cifs.home_dir_namestyle ntname cifs.home_dirs_public_for_admin on cifs.idle_timeout 1800 cifs.max_mpx 50 cifs.netbios_aliases cifs.netbios_over_tcp.enable on cifs.nfs_root_ignore_acl on cifs.oplocks.enable off cifs.oplocks.opendelta 8 cifs.per_client_stats.enable off cifs.perm_check_ro_del_ok on cifs.perm_check_use_gid on cifs.restrict_anonymous.enable off cifs.save_case on cifs.scopeid cifs.search_domains cifs.show_snapshot off cifs.shutdown_msg_level 2 cifs.sidcache.enable on cifs.sidcache.lifetime 1440 cifs.snapshot_file_folding.enable off cifs.symlinks.cycleguard on cifs.symlinks.enable on cifs.tcp_window_size 64240 cifs.trace_dc_connection off cifs.trace_login off cifs.wins_servers <edited> netapp1> options ip ip.fastpath.enable on ip.ipsec.enable off ip.match_any_ifaddr on ip.path_mtu_discovery.enable on ip.ping_throttle.alarm_interval 0 ip.ping_throttle.drop_level 10 ip.tcp.newreno.enable on ip.tcp.sack.enable off If anyone can help, I would really appreciate it. If I need to supply more information, please just ask. Thanks, Tim This email and its contents may be confidential. If it is and you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you.

3 2

mcafee virus scanner license
by Jeff Burton 07 Apr '04

07 Apr '04

I am looking at moving many Windows home directories and department shares over to the NetApp from Windows file clusters and everything is going smooth except the cost for virus scanning. McAfee wanted to charge us per user account at our company, since they could all technically access the server. Since we have about 70K people and probably >80K accounts, that is quite expensive even with the 2 digit cost per client. They have now agreed to charge us per user account that is actually accessing the NetApp, which is still outrageously expensive even with 10K users. Is this how all virus scanning software is licensed (per user) for the NetApp? It's going to be hard to sell a >100K cost to scan a NetApp when the Windows file servers cost, what, $5/per no matter how many users. Thanks, Jeff _________________________________________________________________ Frustrated with dial-up? Lightning-fast Internet access for as low as $29.95/month. http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200360ave/direct/01/

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters