toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

1 participants
13532 discussions

Risk of assigning disks in a loop to two controllers
by BERNTSEN Basil 10 Jun '16

10 Jun '16

Hi folks, I have a CDOT 8.2 system (in prod) where new shelves were installed on a SAS stack on the wrong node. I want to create an aggregate on node1, but the disks are on node2. Based on the guidelines<https://library.netapp.com/ecmdocs/ECMP1196912/html/GUID-99C1AA7C-79D9-4E4F…>, I'm thinking of delaying the aggregate creation and changing the shelves. My question is whether it's worth the delay. What are the risks of just assigning the disks to the partner of the node they're currently assigned to? The documentation says to "Always assign all disks on the same loop or stack to the same system." Why? Thanks! Basil ************************************************************************* This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential, intended solely for the addressee(s), and may contain legally privileged information. Any unauthorized use or dissemination is prohibited. E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Neither SOCIETE GENERALE nor any of its subsidiaries or affiliates shall be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. Please visit http://sgasdisclosure.com for important information regarding SG Americas Securities, LLC (“SGAS”). Please visit http://swapdisclosure.sgcib.com for important information regarding swap transactions with SOCIETE GENERALE. *************************************************************************

6 5

Closing cifs sessions by id in 8.2
by Basil 31 May '16

31 May '16

Hi, I'm running 8.2.3 and need to close a specific cifs session by ID for troubleshooting and taking a trace. The command cifs session close appears to have been introduced in 8.3... Is there another way, maybe from node or system shell, to kill a specific session?

1 1

Support Bulletin 7010246
by Philbert Rupkins 27 May '16

27 May '16

Toasters, Does anybody have more information on support bulletin 7010246? I just received an email urging us to upgrade to ONTAP 8.1.4 P9 as earlier versions of 8.1.4 are "more susceptible to potential system disruptions and/or data loss due to drive failures exceeding the two drive failure protection offered by RAID-DP." We've been planning to upgrade to P9 so this isn't that big of a deal. However, I'm just curious if this is a new development or has this always been a problem with pre-P9 releases of 8.1.4? The support bulletin is light on background information. If this hasn't always been an issue, the only logical conclusion I can come to is NetApp is shipping new replacement drives that don't play well with pre-P9 releases of 8.1.4. Thank you all very much. Phil

1 0

(no subject)
by Yuvaraja Shivaram 20 May '16

20 May '16

hi, Anyone has any idea of resolving the below things for snapvault issue.. would like to fix this issue, stopping and restarting might work, but is that going start once again from beginning, is there any way to start with update command rather than starting from beginning.. Transfer aborted: destination qtree is not coalesced regards raj

1 0

Showmount -e?
by Basil 19 May '16

19 May '16

Does anyone know why showmount -e doesn't work in CDOT? Will it ever work?

3 3

incorrect language for volume
by Darry Cooley 16 May '16

16 May '16

We are in the process of migrating data from our 7mode filers (8.1.2P4 7-Mode) to our new CDOT filers (8.3.1P1), and we noticed that a few of our 7mode volumes (NFS volumes) do not have the correct language set. 7mode documentation says I can change the language of a volume, however: Note: If you are changing the NFS character set, you are asked to confirm > your choice, and also whether you want to halt the system so that > WAFL_check can be run to check for any files that will no longer be > accessible using NFS. The default answer for this question is yes. If you > do not want to halt the system, you must enter n. > I'd really prefer to not halt the filer. What are the ramifications of not halting the filer? Can I safely change the language and snapmirror over to the new filers without issue? Thanks. ...Darry -- Darry Cooley Factory Systems Engineer Broadcom Limited - WSD FS/FAST 4380 Ziegler Road, Fort Collins, CO 80525 darry.cooley(a)broadcom.com

3 3

Listing NTFS style ACLs from unix client via NFS (Take 2...)
by John Adams 12 May '16

12 May '16

Hi all.. I asked this a few weeks ago: If a qtree is using NTFS style permissions, and that same qtree is exported via NFS to a unix client...Is there a way to see the NTFS acl's from that unix client? The usual "ls -l" just shows what looks like mode 777. I got some good responses, but I'm not seeing what I want to see. Qtree on filer is security style NTFS. Qtree is exported to linux box via export file on filer: /vol/secgroup_group -sec=sys,rw=mfanfs,root=x.x.x.x,nosuid Qtree is mounted on linux box: > mount -o vers=4,acl secgroup:/vol/secgroup_group /secgroup > grep secgroup /proc/mounts secgroup:/vol/secgroup_group/ /secgroup nfs4 rw,relatime,vers=4,rsize=65536,wsize=65536,namlen=255,hard,proto=tcp,port=0,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,clientaddr=x.x.x.x,minorversion=0,local_lock=none,addr=x.x.x.x 0 0 NFS option on filer: > options nfs.ntacl nfs.ntacl_display_permissive_perms on >From a windows box, using the CIFS share to that qtree, I can right click on a file, select security, and then see/set the usual NTFS style ACLs. When use getfacl from the unix box, I still only see the unix style (User,Group,Other) permissions. What I'm hoping to see is the Windows style ACLs that are on the files. I can see them from the filer: secgroup@testfs1> fsecurity show /vol/secgroup_group/ccc/pit [/vol/secgroup_group/ccc/pit - File (inum 28476)] Security style: NTFS Effective style: NTFS DOS attributes: 0x0020 (---A----) Unix security: uid: xxxx(username) gid: 101 (groupname) mode: 0777 (rwxrwxrwx) NTFS security descriptor: Owner: DOMAIN\username Group: DOMAIN\Domain Users DACL: Allow - DOMAIN\budget - 0x001f01ff (Full Control) Allow - Everyone - 0x001200a9 (Read and Execute) - (Inherited) Allow - DOMAIN\username - 0x001f01ff (Full Control) - (Inherited) Allow - DOMAIN\group - 0x001f01ff (Full Control) - (Inherited) I am hoping to be able to see the above output, from the linux client. I'm looking for a way for users on linux clients to see the windows ACLs that are on this NTFS qtree. Any suggestions? Thanks.

3 2

automatic SP firmware upgrade after system node image get
by Iluhes 11 May '16

11 May '16

Folks,I have situation that SP firmware was upgraded after just "Get" of softwaresystem node image get -node * -package http:// and nothing else. It caused the SP to upgrade and watchdog reset some nodes as well.Is there a reason for that?Anyone ever come across this issue.

2 8

nfsstat in cmode 8.3
by Douglas Siggins 05 May '16

05 May '16

Greetings, Dipping my toes into cluster mode. It seems the ability to monitor specific nfs clients in 8.3 is no longer there? ::> statistics settings modify -display-rates true -client-stats enabled Warning: System performance may be significantly impacted. Are you sure? Do you want to continue? {y|n}: y ::> statistics show -object client I dont believe I am seeing the hostname field, has anyone used this prior? I know about nperf and pcpconfig in the sytemshell, but I'd prefer not to use "unsupported" tools.

3 5

FAS 3170 aggr issue
by Mark Flint 05 May '16

05 May '16

Hi all. I have 2 x FAS3170’s, both now running 8.0.5P1. On one unit, I can build an aggregate of over 70TB, yet on the other, it won’t allow this to happen. Both aggr’s were built using the CLI :- aggr create aggrgate1 –B 64 –r 16 –t raid_dp 112 ( 96 ) the 96 is the aggr built on the unit that is restricting aggr size. Anybody seen this before, or have any ideas? Thanks, `Mark

2 2

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters