toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

2 participants
13520 discussions

Support Bulletin 7010246
by Philbert Rupkins 27 May '16

27 May '16

Toasters, Does anybody have more information on support bulletin 7010246? I just received an email urging us to upgrade to ONTAP 8.1.4 P9 as earlier versions of 8.1.4 are "more susceptible to potential system disruptions and/or data loss due to drive failures exceeding the two drive failure protection offered by RAID-DP." We've been planning to upgrade to P9 so this isn't that big of a deal. However, I'm just curious if this is a new development or has this always been a problem with pre-P9 releases of 8.1.4? The support bulletin is light on background information. If this hasn't always been an issue, the only logical conclusion I can come to is NetApp is shipping new replacement drives that don't play well with pre-P9 releases of 8.1.4. Thank you all very much. Phil

1 0

(no subject)
by Yuvaraja Shivaram 20 May '16

20 May '16

hi, Anyone has any idea of resolving the below things for snapvault issue.. would like to fix this issue, stopping and restarting might work, but is that going start once again from beginning, is there any way to start with update command rather than starting from beginning.. Transfer aborted: destination qtree is not coalesced regards raj

1 0

Showmount -e?
by Basil 19 May '16

19 May '16

Does anyone know why showmount -e doesn't work in CDOT? Will it ever work?

3 3

incorrect language for volume
by Darry Cooley 16 May '16

16 May '16

We are in the process of migrating data from our 7mode filers (8.1.2P4 7-Mode) to our new CDOT filers (8.3.1P1), and we noticed that a few of our 7mode volumes (NFS volumes) do not have the correct language set. 7mode documentation says I can change the language of a volume, however: Note: If you are changing the NFS character set, you are asked to confirm > your choice, and also whether you want to halt the system so that > WAFL_check can be run to check for any files that will no longer be > accessible using NFS. The default answer for this question is yes. If you > do not want to halt the system, you must enter n. > I'd really prefer to not halt the filer. What are the ramifications of not halting the filer? Can I safely change the language and snapmirror over to the new filers without issue? Thanks. ...Darry -- Darry Cooley Factory Systems Engineer Broadcom Limited - WSD FS/FAST 4380 Ziegler Road, Fort Collins, CO 80525 darry.cooley(a)broadcom.com

3 3

Listing NTFS style ACLs from unix client via NFS (Take 2...)
by John Adams 12 May '16

12 May '16

Hi all.. I asked this a few weeks ago: If a qtree is using NTFS style permissions, and that same qtree is exported via NFS to a unix client...Is there a way to see the NTFS acl's from that unix client? The usual "ls -l" just shows what looks like mode 777. I got some good responses, but I'm not seeing what I want to see. Qtree on filer is security style NTFS. Qtree is exported to linux box via export file on filer: /vol/secgroup_group -sec=sys,rw=mfanfs,root=x.x.x.x,nosuid Qtree is mounted on linux box: > mount -o vers=4,acl secgroup:/vol/secgroup_group /secgroup > grep secgroup /proc/mounts secgroup:/vol/secgroup_group/ /secgroup nfs4 rw,relatime,vers=4,rsize=65536,wsize=65536,namlen=255,hard,proto=tcp,port=0,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,clientaddr=x.x.x.x,minorversion=0,local_lock=none,addr=x.x.x.x 0 0 NFS option on filer: > options nfs.ntacl nfs.ntacl_display_permissive_perms on >From a windows box, using the CIFS share to that qtree, I can right click on a file, select security, and then see/set the usual NTFS style ACLs. When use getfacl from the unix box, I still only see the unix style (User,Group,Other) permissions. What I'm hoping to see is the Windows style ACLs that are on the files. I can see them from the filer: secgroup@testfs1> fsecurity show /vol/secgroup_group/ccc/pit [/vol/secgroup_group/ccc/pit - File (inum 28476)] Security style: NTFS Effective style: NTFS DOS attributes: 0x0020 (---A----) Unix security: uid: xxxx(username) gid: 101 (groupname) mode: 0777 (rwxrwxrwx) NTFS security descriptor: Owner: DOMAIN\username Group: DOMAIN\Domain Users DACL: Allow - DOMAIN\budget - 0x001f01ff (Full Control) Allow - Everyone - 0x001200a9 (Read and Execute) - (Inherited) Allow - DOMAIN\username - 0x001f01ff (Full Control) - (Inherited) Allow - DOMAIN\group - 0x001f01ff (Full Control) - (Inherited) I am hoping to be able to see the above output, from the linux client. I'm looking for a way for users on linux clients to see the windows ACLs that are on this NTFS qtree. Any suggestions? Thanks.

3 2

automatic SP firmware upgrade after system node image get
by Iluhes 11 May '16

11 May '16

Folks,I have situation that SP firmware was upgraded after just "Get" of softwaresystem node image get -node * -package http:// and nothing else. It caused the SP to upgrade and watchdog reset some nodes as well.Is there a reason for that?Anyone ever come across this issue.

2 8

nfsstat in cmode 8.3
by Douglas Siggins 05 May '16

05 May '16

Greetings, Dipping my toes into cluster mode. It seems the ability to monitor specific nfs clients in 8.3 is no longer there? ::> statistics settings modify -display-rates true -client-stats enabled Warning: System performance may be significantly impacted. Are you sure? Do you want to continue? {y|n}: y ::> statistics show -object client I dont believe I am seeing the hostname field, has anyone used this prior? I know about nperf and pcpconfig in the sytemshell, but I'd prefer not to use "unsupported" tools.

3 5

FAS 3170 aggr issue
by Mark Flint 05 May '16

05 May '16

Hi all. I have 2 x FAS3170’s, both now running 8.0.5P1. On one unit, I can build an aggregate of over 70TB, yet on the other, it won’t allow this to happen. Both aggr’s were built using the CLI :- aggr create aggrgate1 –B 64 –r 16 –t raid_dp 112 ( 96 ) the 96 is the aggr built on the unit that is restricting aggr size. Anybody seen this before, or have any ideas? Thanks, `Mark

2 2

RE: 8.3.2 Upgrade Question
by Aaron Lewis 05 May '16

05 May '16

Thanks. So, I ran the command and got the following error: Error: command failed: Upgrade attempt failed. When I run the “system node upgrade-revert show” command, the node that had problems doesn’t even display. At this point, I’m thinking I may need to go through the process of installing the wonky node again. Any suggestions? From: Aaron Dunlap [mailto:Aaron.Dunlap@pivotts.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2016 1:58 PM To: Parisi, Justin <Justin.Parisi(a)netapp.com>; Aaron Lewis <aaron(a)ivoxy.com>; <toasters(a)teaparty.net> Lists <toasters(a)teaparty.net> Subject: RE: 8.3.2 Upgrade Question Me too… From: toasters-bounces(a)teaparty.net<mailto:toasters-bounces@teaparty.net> [mailto:toasters-bounces@teaparty.net] On Behalf Of Parisi, Justin Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2016 3:51 PM To: NGC-aaron-ivoxy.com <aaron(a)ivoxy.com<mailto:aaron@ivoxy.com>>; <toasters(a)teaparty.net<mailto:toasters@teaparty.net>> Lists <toasters(a)teaparty.net<mailto:toasters@teaparty.net>> Subject: RE: 8.3.2 Upgrade Question Non disruptive every time I’ve run it… From: toasters-bounces(a)teaparty.net<mailto:toasters-bounces@teaparty.net> [mailto:toasters-bounces@teaparty.net] On Behalf Of Aaron Lewis Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 4:48 PM To: <toasters(a)teaparty.net<mailto:toasters@teaparty.net>> Lists Subject: 8.3.2 Upgrade Question Hi all, Last night, I assisted a customer in upgrading a 4-node cluster from 8.2.1 to 8.3.2. We had an issue where the last node didn’t reboot correctly, due to the default image not changing, and had to boot into the backup image. From there, I was able to set the 8.3.2 image as default. Now everything is running 8.3.2 but “version” displays 8.2.1. A KB (#2021570) references running “system node upgrade-revert -node <nodename>” to fix this. Can anyone confirm that the command is non-disruptive? I feel like it should be, as the node is already running 8.3.2 code, but I wanted to make sure. Thanks! Regards, Aaron The information contained in this message and any attachments (collectively, the "Transmission") contains proprietary and/or confidential information of the sender’s employer which is protected from disclosure and intended solely for the named recipient(s). If you are not a named recipient, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or using this Transmission. Please contact the sender immediately by returning the e-mail and deleting the original Transmission.

2 1

disk firmware for IBM N series
by Mark Saunders 04 May '16

04 May '16

Hi all We have a mix of Netapp FAS and IBM N series filers. I used to be able to download new firmware for the N series through the IBM support site but this is now saying I don't have a valid support contract. Do IBM do anything to the firmware updates or could we get them from Netapp and apply them to the N series. I have looked at a couple and they appear to be identical but I know with the base OT there is something in the firmware to stop a Netapp version being installed to an N series. Regards Mark Data Centre Sysadmin Team Managed Services Phone:- 02476 694455 Ext 2567 The Sysadmin Team promoting PCMS Values ~Integrity~Respect~Commitment~ ~Continuous Improvement~ The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, the use of this information or any disclosure, copying or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. The views expressed in this e-mail may not necessarily be the views of the PCMS Group plc and should not be taken as authority to carry out any instruction contained. The PCMS Group reserves the right to monitor and examine the content of all e-mails. The PCMS Group plc is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1459419 whose registered office is at PCMS House, Torwood Close, Westwood Business Park, Coventry CV4 8HX, United Kingdom. VAT No: GB 705338743

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters