toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13515 discussions

automatic SP firmware upgrade after system node image get
by Iluhes 11 May '16

11 May '16

Folks,I have situation that SP firmware was upgraded after just "Get" of softwaresystem node image get -node * -package http:// and nothing else. It caused the SP to upgrade and watchdog reset some nodes as well.Is there a reason for that?Anyone ever come across this issue.

2 8

nfsstat in cmode 8.3
by Douglas Siggins 05 May '16

05 May '16

Greetings, Dipping my toes into cluster mode. It seems the ability to monitor specific nfs clients in 8.3 is no longer there? ::> statistics settings modify -display-rates true -client-stats enabled Warning: System performance may be significantly impacted. Are you sure? Do you want to continue? {y|n}: y ::> statistics show -object client I dont believe I am seeing the hostname field, has anyone used this prior? I know about nperf and pcpconfig in the sytemshell, but I'd prefer not to use "unsupported" tools.

3 5

FAS 3170 aggr issue
by Mark Flint 05 May '16

05 May '16

Hi all. I have 2 x FAS3170’s, both now running 8.0.5P1. On one unit, I can build an aggregate of over 70TB, yet on the other, it won’t allow this to happen. Both aggr’s were built using the CLI :- aggr create aggrgate1 –B 64 –r 16 –t raid_dp 112 ( 96 ) the 96 is the aggr built on the unit that is restricting aggr size. Anybody seen this before, or have any ideas? Thanks, `Mark

2 2

RE: 8.3.2 Upgrade Question
by Aaron Lewis 05 May '16

05 May '16

Thanks. So, I ran the command and got the following error: Error: command failed: Upgrade attempt failed. When I run the “system node upgrade-revert show” command, the node that had problems doesn’t even display. At this point, I’m thinking I may need to go through the process of installing the wonky node again. Any suggestions? From: Aaron Dunlap [mailto:Aaron.Dunlap@pivotts.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2016 1:58 PM To: Parisi, Justin <Justin.Parisi(a)netapp.com>; Aaron Lewis <aaron(a)ivoxy.com>; <toasters(a)teaparty.net> Lists <toasters(a)teaparty.net> Subject: RE: 8.3.2 Upgrade Question Me too… From: toasters-bounces(a)teaparty.net<mailto:toasters-bounces@teaparty.net> [mailto:toasters-bounces@teaparty.net] On Behalf Of Parisi, Justin Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2016 3:51 PM To: NGC-aaron-ivoxy.com <aaron(a)ivoxy.com<mailto:aaron@ivoxy.com>>; <toasters(a)teaparty.net<mailto:toasters@teaparty.net>> Lists <toasters(a)teaparty.net<mailto:toasters@teaparty.net>> Subject: RE: 8.3.2 Upgrade Question Non disruptive every time I’ve run it… From: toasters-bounces(a)teaparty.net<mailto:toasters-bounces@teaparty.net> [mailto:toasters-bounces@teaparty.net] On Behalf Of Aaron Lewis Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 4:48 PM To: <toasters(a)teaparty.net<mailto:toasters@teaparty.net>> Lists Subject: 8.3.2 Upgrade Question Hi all, Last night, I assisted a customer in upgrading a 4-node cluster from 8.2.1 to 8.3.2. We had an issue where the last node didn’t reboot correctly, due to the default image not changing, and had to boot into the backup image. From there, I was able to set the 8.3.2 image as default. Now everything is running 8.3.2 but “version” displays 8.2.1. A KB (#2021570) references running “system node upgrade-revert -node <nodename>” to fix this. Can anyone confirm that the command is non-disruptive? I feel like it should be, as the node is already running 8.3.2 code, but I wanted to make sure. Thanks! Regards, Aaron The information contained in this message and any attachments (collectively, the "Transmission") contains proprietary and/or confidential information of the sender’s employer which is protected from disclosure and intended solely for the named recipient(s). If you are not a named recipient, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or using this Transmission. Please contact the sender immediately by returning the e-mail and deleting the original Transmission.

2 1

disk firmware for IBM N series
by Mark Saunders 04 May '16

04 May '16

Hi all We have a mix of Netapp FAS and IBM N series filers. I used to be able to download new firmware for the N series through the IBM support site but this is now saying I don't have a valid support contract. Do IBM do anything to the firmware updates or could we get them from Netapp and apply them to the N series. I have looked at a couple and they appear to be identical but I know with the base OT there is something in the firmware to stop a Netapp version being installed to an N series. Regards Mark Data Centre Sysadmin Team Managed Services Phone:- 02476 694455 Ext 2567 The Sysadmin Team promoting PCMS Values ~Integrity~Respect~Commitment~ ~Continuous Improvement~ The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, the use of this information or any disclosure, copying or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. The views expressed in this e-mail may not necessarily be the views of the PCMS Group plc and should not be taken as authority to carry out any instruction contained. The PCMS Group reserves the right to monitor and examine the content of all e-mails. The PCMS Group plc is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1459419 whose registered office is at PCMS House, Torwood Close, Westwood Business Park, Coventry CV4 8HX, United Kingdom. VAT No: GB 705338743

1 0

8.3.2 Upgrade Question
by Aaron Lewis 04 May '16

04 May '16

Hi all, Last night, I assisted a customer in upgrading a 4-node cluster from 8.2.1 to 8.3.2. We had an issue where the last node didn't reboot correctly, due to the default image not changing, and had to boot into the backup image. From there, I was able to set the 8.3.2 image as default. Now everything is running 8.3.2 but "version" displays 8.2.1. A KB (#2021570) references running "system node upgrade-revert -node <nodename>" to fix this. Can anyone confirm that the command is non-disruptive? I feel like it should be, as the node is already running 8.3.2 code, but I wanted to make sure. Thanks! Regards, Aaron

2 1

NetApp CN1610 Cluster Switches??
by Chris hansen 04 May '16

04 May '16

I may have access to some of these switches, are they just plain 10gb fiber NETWORK switches? The person that is getting rid of them says they have a box of 4gb SPFs to go with them and it doesn’t appear this is a converged switch but just a 10gb switch geared toward Netapp. I’ve read some documentation on configuration but doesn’t give a clear use case. Thanks -Chris

3 2

accessing service processor
by Rhodes, Richard L. 27 Apr '16

27 Apr '16

Hello, This is probably really dumb, but I'm stumped. I've been working on a support case with IBM (nSeries). They asked me to get some info from the service processor. So I ssh to the SP, get a prompt, try and login as naroot (using root's pwd), which fails. The last time I tried to ssh and log onto a SP was when these systems were setup +2 years ago. Back then it worked. Since then we've regularly rolled the root password every X months. It's my understanding that naroot at the service processor uses the OnTap root password. I've tried to access the SP on several nSeries system and they all fail the same way. IBM nSeries N3220 (NetApp FAS2240) OnTap 8.1.2P1 7-mode Any thoughts are appreciated. Rick What I've done: - I know the root password - I used it to log onto the filer on the main interface Using username "root". root@filerxxxx's password: filerxxxx> - It's status is online filerxxxx> sp status Service Processor Status: Online Firmware Version: 2.1.1 Mgmt MAC Address: xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx Ethernet Link: up, 100Mb, full duplex, auto-neg complete Using DHCP: no IPv4 configuration: IP Address: xxx.xx.xx.xxx Netmask: 255.255.255.0 Gateway: xxx.xx.xx.x IPv6 configuration: Disabled - all hosts are allowed to access the sp filerxxxx> options sp sp.autologout.enable on sp.autologout.timeout 60 sp.setup on sp.ssh.access * - it pings - it gives a login prompt, but it doesn't take the root password ssh naroot@filerxxxxs naroot@filerxxxxs's password: Permission denied, please try again. naroot@filerxxxxs's password: - I've tried ssh to the SP via the DNS name (filerxxxxs) and the IP (xxx.xx.xx.xxx) - I am aware of the 15min timeout period on 6 unsuccessful login attempts. - I've tried ssh via putty from a Win laptop, and, ssh from an AIX system. Both give the same result - it naroot/root password doesn't work. - I rebooted the SP filerxxxx> sp reboot NOTE : If your console connection is through the SP,it will be disconnected Do you want to reboot the SP now? (y/n) :? y Console connection through the SP will now be dropped - Reboot didn't help - still can't login as naroot with root's password ssh naroot@filerxxxxs naroot@filerxxxxs's password: Permission denied, please try again. ----------------------------------------- The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.

5 6

quota control query in CDOT
by Brian Parent 23 Apr '16

23 Apr '16

I'm writing a perl script to call the NetApp APIs for modifying quotas. I'd like to allow a vserver admin the ability to change the association of quota policy for their own vserver, but that doesn't appear to be allowed. As far as I can tell, only cluster admins can do that. This is a request to see if I'm misunderstanding things, as I'm fairly new to CDOT. Vserver admins can create, delete, modify, copy, and rename quota policies for their vserver, but not change the active policy. So, if they were to make a backup copy of their active policy, then make changes to the active policy, but make a mistake and have the need to revert to their backup copy, they would *not* be able to without the intervention of a cluster admin. CDOT (8.3.1) prevents deletion of the active quota policy, and prevents copying to a policy name that already exists (even as a cluster admin, even if quotas are turned off). Excerpted from "Clustered Data ONTAP 8.3 Logical Storage": • When you need to create a quota rule or change quota rules for a quota policy, you can choose either of the following approaches: ◦ If you are working in a quota policy that is assigned to an SVM, then you need not assign the quota policy to the SVM. ◦ If you are working in an unassigned quota policy and then assigning the quota policy to the SVM, then you must have a backup of the quota policy that you can revert to if required. For example, you can make a copy of the assigned quota policy, change the copy, assign the copy to the SVM, and rename the original quota policy. I guess what is unsaid in the doc is that such an approach is available only to cluster, and not vserver admins. Have I got this right? I thought the idea was to allow vserver admins the privileges to work on their own vserver without requiring cluster admin privileges. -- Brian Parent Information Technology Services Department IT Infrastructure Operations Group Workplace, Internal, Research, and Educational Platforms (WIRE) team UC San Diego (858) 534-6090

1 0

OnCommand CPU report question for 2.x OPM
by Klise, Steve 21 Apr '16

21 Apr '16

>In former versions of DFM or whatever it was called now, I was able to chart individual CPU’s in Performance Manager. Now, I only see an average across all processors w/ 2.x OnCommand Performance Manager. I know I can drop down to the console, and run a sysstat -whatever... but was wondering if I was missing something for OnCommand Performance Manager to see, or graph individual CPUs. Is this an option, or how would I enable, setup? I am running the LOD, and can't see how this can be done... If its not available, that was of value to some of my customers. Steve

5 10

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters