toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13515 discussions

Start a nNew thread

Your Match
by Sang Gray 05 Feb '05

05 Feb '05

1 0

Cheating House Wife Services
by Cornelia Brady 05 Feb '05

05 Feb '05

1 0

Snapvault - deleted source snapshot by accident
by John Stoffel 04 Feb '05

04 Feb '05

Hi all, We've got some filers, SRC (6.5.1R1P12) and DEST (6.5.2R1) which are doing snapvaults across a WAN. Someone deleted an active (I think) snapvault snapshot on the source filer to make space. At least they did delete a snapshot on the SRC filer which was our base snapshot for snapvault to the filer DEST. Currently, I'm seeing the following on the secondary: # rsh dest snapvault status -l /vol/vol2/src_vol3_proj Snapvault secondary is ON. Source: src:/vol/vol3/proj Destination: dest:/vol/vol2/src_vol3_proj Status: Quiescing Progress: - State: Snapvaulted Lag: 11:59:33 Mirror Timestamp: Fri Feb 4 01:00:01 PST 2005 Base Snapshot: dest(0050404441)_vol2-base.0 Current Transfer Type: Update Current Transfer Error: base snapshot for transfer no longer exists on the source Contents: Replica Last Transfer Type: Update Last Transfer Size: 1137360 KB Last Transfer Duration: 00:43:47 Last Transfer From: src:/vol/vol3/proj It's been hung like this for a while now, say 8 hours. The src filer now has a couple of hourly snapvault snapshots online: # rsh src snap list vol3 Volume vol3 working... %/used %/total date name ---------- ---------- ------------ -------- 0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) Feb 04 16:00 sv_hourly.0 0% ( 0%) 0% ( 0%) Feb 04 15:00 sv_hourly.1 Do I just need to wait for the secondary (an R200) to finish quiescing it's side of things before I can restart the snapvault process? Or do I need to re-do the entire base snapvault all over again? Thanks, John John Stoffel - Senior Staff Systems Administrator - System LSI Group Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc. - http://www.toshiba.com/taec john.stoffel(a)taec.toshiba.com - 508-486-1087

2 2

fc woes continued : log digested
by Tavis Gustafson 04 Feb '05

04 Feb '05

######## scsi.cmd.checkCondition:error on .87,89 Fri Feb 4 11:29:54 GMT [scsi.cmd.checkCondition:error]: Device 8a.87: -- quiescing drive to allow outstanding I/O to complete. ######## FIRST MENTION OF FAILED DISK .87 ( DISK NOW LIVES IN SPARES POOL ) Fri Feb 4 11:30:20 GMT [raid.config.filesystem.disk.failed:error]: Disk -- [3HYY4K82000073408FS8] ####### scsi error continue on disk .89 Fri Feb 4 11:30:35 GMT [scsi.cmd.checkCondition:error]: Device 8a.89: Check Condition: CDB 0x2a:09cbc800:0080: Sense Data SCSI:aborted command - Fibre Channel frame CRC error (0xb - 0x47 0x0 0x3)(40387). ####### SUCCESSFUL RETRY ON DISK .87 Fri Feb 4 11:30:35 GMT [scsi.cmd.retrySuccess:info]: Device 8a.87: request successful after retry #3: cdb 0x2a:09cbc600:0080. ##### FIRST MENTION OF FC CRC FAME ERROR Fri Feb 4 11:30:36 GMT [ispfc_main:error]: Disk 8a.89: op 0x2a:09cbc800:0080 sector 164349952 SCSI:aborted command - Fibre Channel -- - Fibre Channel frame CRC error (0xb - 0x47 0x0 0x3)(41776) ###### FILER GIVES UP ON DISK .89. Fri Feb 4 11:30:36 GMT [scsi.cmd.noMorePaths:error]: Device 8a.89: No more paths to device: cdb 0x2a:09cbc800:0080. All retries have failed. ###### FIRST MENTION OF DISK 82 Fri Feb 4 11:30:55 GMT [scsi.cmd.checkCondition:error]: Device 8a.82: Check Condition: CDB 0x2a:09ac4b80:0080: Sense Data SCSI:aborted command -- - Fibre Channel frame CRC error (0xb - 0x47 0x0 0x3)(18075). ###### FIRST MENTION OF DISK 84 Fri Feb 4 11:30:58 GMT [scsi.cmd.checkCondition:error]: Device 8a.84: Check Condition: CDB 0x2a:09ac4c80:0080: Sense Data SCSI:aborted command -- - Fibre Channel frame CRC error (0xb - 0x47 0x0 0x3)(22992). ####### FIRST MENTION OF DISK 91 AND 90 (FC TIMEOUT) Fri Feb 4 11:31:00 GMT [ispfc_timeout_0:warning]: 8a.91 (0x0000005b) (0x034f4e10,0x2a:09cbcb80:0080,0/0,474/0/0,5192/0): command timeout, -- quiescing drive to allow outstanding I/O to complete. ######## GOING DOWN THE LIST NOW WITH 88 85 84 82 Fri Feb 4 11:31:00 GMT [ispfc_timeout_0:warning]: 8a.88 (0x00000058) (0x034f6f00,0x2a:09cbcb80:0080,0/0,387/0/0,5192/0): command timeout, -- request successful after retry #3: cdb 0x2a:09ac4c80:0080. ###### FIRST MENTION OF PASTTIMETOLIVE:ERROR Fri Feb 4 11:32:36 GMT [scsi.cmd.pastTimeToLive:error]: Device 8a.80: request failed after try #1: cdb 0x1c. -- request failed after try #1: cdb 0x2a:09cbcc00:0080. ###### FIRST MENTION OF WRITEERROR, DISKS 91 90 89 88 82 ( WILL STOP USING THEM!!??) Fri Feb 4 11:32:45 GMT [raid.label.io.writeError:error]: Label write on 8a.91 (S/N 3HYY4H2800007341NB79) failed with storage error 21. -- ######### THE DREADED MULTI-DISK ERROR PANIC: raid volfsm: vol boot: fatal multi-disk error. in process config_thread on release NetApp Release 6.4.5 on Fri Feb 4 11:32:46 GMT -- DUMPCORE: START #### GLOBAL TIMEOUT ( DISKS 92 86 85 84 83 81 80 ) .......................Fri Feb 4 11:32:46 GMT [config_thread:warning]: 8a.93 (0x0000005d) (0x03468f44,0x2a:109d43e8:0420,0/0,426/0/0,6197/0): -- ###############3 ##REBOOT #1 (SWAPPED MULTI-MODE CABLE BETWEEN LRC AND FC CARD) ###############3 ............................................................................................................................................ -- instance on primary side #### DISK 87, PREVIOUSLY FAILED, IS NOW ORPHANED Fri Feb 4 11:48:55 GMT [raid.assim.cls.notInCls:error]: Orphaning disk -- Loading volume boot ####### WAFL REPLAY FAILES AND PANICS THE FILER Replaying WAFL log wafl_verify_nvlog: replay failed twice in a row in log 0 request 8543 -- ............................................................................................................................................ ###### REBOOT - SWITCHED CABLE TO PORT B ON FC CARD ispfc: Fibre Channel adapter 8a appears to be unattached/disconnected. -- ore failure: ## MENTIONS DISK 80 ON A CHANNEL, MUST HAVE BEEN SOMETHING FROM LAST BOOT Error writing buffer to block 34873601 on disk 8a.80. Fri Feb 4 11:54:19 GMT [mgr.stack.saved:notice]: Reboot with saved panic information in log file #### MENTION 2 OF MULT-DISK ERROR ( PROBABLY FROM LAST BOOT ) Fri Feb 4 11:54:19 GMT [mgr.stack.string:notice]: Panic string: raid volfsm: vol boot: fatal multi-disk error. in process config_thread on -- config_thread ##### GOING TO REBUILD ON DISK 80 Fri Feb 4 11:54:20 GMT [raid.rg.recons.info:notice]: One disk is missing from RAID group /boot/plex0/rg0 -- prototype is 8b.93 ###### WEIRD STACK FRAME CRAP MENTIONS MULTIDISK ERROR Fri Feb 4 11:54:20 GMT [mgr.stack.framename:notice]: Stack frame 0: vol_multidisk_error(0xa2247c) + 0x5d -- is performed. ##### PASTTIMETOLIVE ERRORS RETURN ON DISK 80, 82,84, Fri Feb 4 12:13:59 GMT [scsi.cmd.pastTimeToLive:error]: Device 8b.80: request failed after try #1: cdb 0x1c. -- Check Condition: CDB 0x2a:09b24e98:0080: Sense Data SCSI:aborted command ##### MORE FC FRAME CRC ERRORS ( DISK 82 ) - Fibre Channel frame CRC error (0xb - 0x47 0x0 0x3)(57649). Fri Feb 4 12:14:23 GMT [scsi.cmd.checkCondition:error]: Device 8b.82: -- 10.3.38.28 was slow, op was v3 read, 63 > 60 (in seconds) ####### SCSI ERROR DISK 84 Fri Feb 4 12:14:48 GMT [scsi.cmd.checkCondition:error]: Device 8b.84: Check Condition: CDB 0x2a:09b25418:0080: Sense Data SCSI:aborted command -- - Fibre Channel frame CRC error (0xb - 0x47 0x0 0x3)(20148). ####### SCSI ERROR DISK 81 Fri Feb 4 12:14:53 GMT [ispfc_timeout_1:warning]: 8b.81 (0x01000051) (0x034f47b0,0x2a:09b25298:0080,0/0,20150/0/0,8028/0): command timeout, quiescing drive to allow outstanding I/O to complete. ###### SCSI DISK 80 Fri Feb 4 12:15:33 GMT [scsi.cmd.pastTimeToLive:error]: Device 8b.80: request failed after try #1: cdb 0x1c. -- Volume State Status Options #### PAST TOME TO LIVE ON DISKS 80 84 82 Fri Feb 4 12:16:19 GMT [scsi.cmd.pastTimeToLive:error]: Device 8b.80: request failed after try #1: cdb 0x1c. -- request failed after try #1: cdb 0x2a:09b25298:0080. #### FC TIMOUT ON DISKS 92 85 84 83 82 81 Fri Feb 4 12:16:49 GMT [ispfc_timeout_1:warning]: 8b.92 (0x0100005c) (0x034f4d00,0x2a:09b25698:0080,0/0,19912/0/0,8729/0): command timeout, -- #### FIRST MENTION OF SCSI ABORTED BY HOST DISK 92 Command aborted by host adapter: HA status 0x4: cdb 0x2a:09b25698:0080. Fri Feb 4 12:16:52 GMT [scsi.cmd.abortedByHost:error]: Device 8b.92: -- request failed after try #1: cdb 0x2a:09b25518:0080. ##### DEVICE RECOVERY DISK 84 Fri Feb 4 12:16:52 GMT [ispfc_timeout_1:error]: 8b.84 (0x01000054): global device timer timeout, initiating device recovery. ##### SCSI ABBORTED BY HOST DISK 85 Fri Feb 4 12:16:52 GMT [scsi.cmd.abortedByHost:error]: Device 8b.85: Command aborted by host adapter: HA status 0x4: cdb 0x2f:0025a800:0400. -- F #### MULTI-DISK ERROR #3 PANIC: raid volfsm: vol boot: fatal multi-disk error. in process config_thread on release NetApp Release 6.4.5 on Fri Feb 4 12:17:25 GMT -- 2032 to 2048MB ##### BOOT IN READONLY Intel Open Firmware by FirmWorks -- EMS NVRAM cache ### DISK FAILED ERROR DISK 89 (SECOND FAILED DISK) Fri Feb 4 12:17:25 GMT [raid.config.filesystem.disk.failed:error]: Disk /boot/plex0/rg0/8b.89 Shelf 5 Bay 9 [NETAPP X236_SCHT6146F10 NA05] S/N -- Autosupport, please see: http://now.netapp.com/autosupport/Fri #### DISK RECONSTRUCTION FAILED (DUH, READONLY FILESYSTEM) Feb 4 12:37:23 GMT [asup.throttle.msgHistoryErr:error]: Problems tracking message for throttling: DISK RECONSTRUCTION FAILED

1 0

question about copying an Oracle instance
by Steve Losen 04 Feb '05

04 Feb '05

We currently have our Oracle stuff running on Solaris boxes with (essentially) locally attached raid. We also have a clustered pair of Netapp filers that we use for home directories and other NAS storage. And our email system is running on Solaris with locally attached raid. We are looking into replacing our aging filers and locally attached raid disks with some kind of SAN/NAS solution. I'm the filer admin, so naturally I would like to see us buy Netapp. But I think the Oracle folks are going to push for EMC. Our Oracle folks have this situation where they need to make a copy of a 500G production Oracle instance every night and ship it to a data warehouse server. Then they do some automatic updates on the warehouse instance and make it available for querying. I know that both Netapp and EMC have efficient ways of handling this where you only need to copy part of the data. For example, on a Netapp we could use snapmirror and EMC claims to have similar functionality. However, the Oracle folks want to know what a worst case scenario would be, where you simply must copy all the data rather than just snapmirror the changes. It looks like EMC would probably be able to handle this sort of bulk copy faster than a comparable filer. But I was thinking that Netapp might have a better way to accomplish this. I don't know if this is supported or not, but theoretically WAFL should be able to handle it. Instead of actually copying the Oracle instance data (which would be either a 500G LUN or a 500G NFS file) you create a virtual copy. To do this, you would allocate a new inode for the copy, but link in the same data blocks as the original inode. This would be MUCH faster than copying the data, practically instantaneous. Of course the two copies would be in the same volume. Because WAFL always makes updates on fresh blocks, never changing existing data blocks, it would be possible to run the production instance on the original file and the warehouse instance on the virtual copy. Updates to one file would have no effect on the other. Once a day you could remove the warehouse instance and start over with a new "virtual copy". Maybe Netapp already supports something like this. But if not, they should think about it. I think it would be very handy in the database world where people need to run tests on production data, but are loathe to test on their production instance. I can see one problem right off the bat. Linking the same data block into more than one file is usually considered a filesystem no-no. So WAFL would need to be modified to support this, which might require some tricky bookkeeping. Perhaps each data block would need a file reference count, to indicate how many files it belongs to. If Netapp already supports something like this, I need to tell our folks who like EMC. If the powers that be choose EMC, how difficult will the EMC NAS product make my life? I realize this is a Netapp-centric list, so opinions will be biased. Steve Losen scl(a)virginia.edu phone: 434-924-0640 University of Virginia ITC Unix Support

2 1

RE: OnTap 7 Aggregates
by Hill, Aaron 04 Feb '05

04 Feb '05

I have not read anything yet on a transition method from standalone volumes so they can be placed into an aggregate as flexvols? i.e. Without adding more disk and doing some snapmirror (volume or qtree). I guees I am talking about a conversion(transmutation?) into the aggregate rather than a migration. Please interrupt me right now if there is a way to do this. Say I have 10-12 volumes, all the same size, all 80% full, same raid sizes (not DP), same disk geometry and speed. I want to put them into one big aggregate. Can this be done without actually creating a new aggregate from new disks beforehand? I can see a stepwise approach, but I am not sure if this will be optimal. 1) Partially populate your new aggregate with enough disks to allow one traditional volume worth of data to be migrated to a new flexvol. 2) Snapmirror and free up the old volumes disks, add these to the aggregate. 3) Repeat until all traditional volumes have become flexvols in the new aggregate. The main problem I see here is that the data will not be evenly spread over the whole aggregate as intended. It will be localised in raid groups, which is obviously marginally better than the traditional volumes. Normal aging and WAFL re-allocation will probably very slowly spread the flexvol blocks throughout the raid groups, but my guess is that this will take a very long time. Perhaps this is unavoidable? Another question is how to deal with the complexity introduced when all your traditional volumes were snapmirrored to one or more other sites. Are we effectively talking a new snapmirror baseline initialization here for the flexvols? This is a nightmare because in a Disaster Recovery scenario we will essentially be exposed during the initialization period and the rate limiting step of a WAN link or snapmirror retrieve from tape. Has anyone thought this type of thing through or can point me to reference documents? Thanks, Aaron -----Original Message----- From: Skottie Miller [mailto:skottie@anim.dreamworks.com] Sent: Friday, 4 February 2005 8:45 AM To: Holland, William L Cc: John Stoffel; 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: Re: OnTap 7 Aggregates William, you might want to read this whitepaper: http://www.netapp.com/tech_library/ftp/3356.pdf which describes OnTap 7G (the marketing name for 7.x) and has several best practices listed for aggregates and flexVolumes. as John suggests, you want to make aggregates as big as (reasonably) possible, within the configuration rules and best practices. things like: - there are max (raw) limits on aggregate size, just like there are on traditional volumes. the on-line system configuration guide doesn't list them yet, so I don't know where the limits are. - don't mix different drive sizes in the same aggregate - don't mix different drive speeds (10K, 15K) in the same aggregate - don't mix different shelf speeds (1G, 2G) in the same aggregate - make full raid groups, each one max size. - use Raid_DP - let OnTap pick the drives to assign to raid groups, rather than doing it "by hand". use to be, on nearstore especially, you had to hand-craft raid groups to get performance and protection; Ontap is smarter about hardware topology now, and seems to go a good job at this. we're testing 7.0 RC on an old f87, which is fine for learning the software, tough for experimenting with large aggregates... for your example, 6 shelves of the same type, with drives of the same type and speed, you can make one big aggregate using raid_dp, raid-group size 16, and get 5 raid groups and 4 spares. -skottie John Stoffel wrote: > William> Starting to look ahead to the upcoming OnTap 7. I'm very > William> excited about the new aggregates and flexvols. What criteria > William> should one use in determining the number of aggregates to > William> create? For example, FAS960 with 6ea DS14Mk2 shelves filled > William> with 144GB FC drives. Would it be better to create one huge > William> aggregate or several smaller aggregates? From my > William> perspective, I see no practical use for Tradional volumes > William> after upgrading to OnTap 7 and would like to convert to > William> flexvols, but was wondering if anyone with any experience > William> with any of the OnTap 7 RC's could provide feedback on this. ************** IMPORTANT MESSAGE ************** This e-mail message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains information which may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please advise the sender by return email, do not use or disclose the contents, and delete the message and any attachments from your system. Unless specifically indicated, this email does not constitute formal advice or commitment by the sender or the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ABN 48 123 123 124) or its subsidiaries. We can be contacted through our web site: commbank.com.au. If you no longer wish to receive commercial electronic messages from us, please reply to this e-mail by typing Unsubscribe in the subject line. ***************************************************************

6 6

AW: Fibre Channel Woes
by Rene Koehnen-Wiesemes 04 Feb '05

04 Feb '05

Hi Tavis, this looks like a huge physical problem. After cdb 0x1c (receive diagnostics results) you've got lots of write errors (cdb 0x2a with check condition (aborted command - Fibre Channel frame CRC error (0xb - 0x47 0x0 0x3)) on different drives. Unfortunately, these are pure SCSI-error messages from the embedded scsi protocol in the fc payload. You've got no information on any failed fc-component (e.g. LRC or disk shelf) by that. Rene > I am trying to determine if the problem is the the fibre > channel card or > with the LRC in the disk shelf. Anybody know if this is indicatd in > these error messages ? > > Thanks for any help > -Tavis

1 0

Re: Fibre Channel Woes
by Tavis Gustafson 04 Feb '05

04 Feb '05

There doesn't appear to be a any invalid CRC's at this point. The unit is booted in readonly mode. The only numbers showing up are for drive .93 with link failure counts. Does that indicate a bad drive? -thanks so much. Loop Link Underrun Loss of Invalid Frame In Frame Out ID Failure count sync CRC count count count count count 8b.93 4 0 9 0 34700 264468 8b.92 0 0 0 0 62193 618089 8b.91 0 0 1 0 99539 925291 8b.90 0 0 0 0 93475 868841 8b.89 0 0 0 0 93726 868906 8b.88 0 0 3 0 92456 863458 8b.87 0 0 0 0 2162 1020 8b.86 0 0 2 0 93614 867250 8b.85 0 0 0 0 131 167 8b.84 0 0 0 0 62299 616393 8b.83 0 0 0 0 61890 617720 8b.82 0 0 0 0 61987 616789 8b.81 0 0 6 0 61901 617655 8b.80 0 0 3 0 25407 338325 8b.ha 0 0 1 0 8084399 845489 On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 05:55:25AM -0800, McCarthy, Tim wrote: > While the system is up and running, try a "fcadmin link_stats 8b" > Look at the CRC column. > > It could be a bad controller on a disk or a ESH/LRC. > Look for the first device to show frame errors. > If it is the beginning of the shelf, it may be the ESH/LRC. > Swap it out. > > If it is all of them, it could be a bad FC card, in which case, you need > to swap it out. > > As always, please open a case > --tmac > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tavis Gustafson [mailto:tavis@hq.newdream.net] > Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 8:30 AM > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: Fibre Channel Woes > > I'm running an 840 with a DS14 ( 144GB disks ) connected to each other > with a dual port optical fibre channel card. Early this morning the > filer went down and apon reboot i started seeing lots of fibre channel > frame errors. I swapped optical cables and tried the second port on the > card but the errors came back when rebuilding. > > I am trying to determine if the problem is the the fibre channel card or > with the LRC in the disk shelf. Anybody know if this is indicatd in > these error messages ? > > Thanks for any help > -Tavis > > > Volume State Status Options > boot online reconstruct root, raidsize=7 > amplifier> Fri Feb 4 11:55:07 GMT [FastEnet-10/100/e3c:notice]: uid > 30358 tid 1: disk quota exceeded on volume boot. > onal warnings will be suppressed for approximately 60 minutes or until > either a 'quota resize' is performed. > Fri Feb 4 11:55:34 GMT [download.updateDone:info]: Bootblock update > completed > Fri Feb 4 11:56:35 GMT [FastEnet-10/100/e3c:notice]: uid 51154 tid 1: > disk quota exceeded on volume boot. Additiona > gs will be suppressed for approximately 60 minutes or until either a > 'quota resize' is performed. > > amplifier> Fri Feb 4 12:00:00 GMT [kern.uptime.filer:info]: 12:00pm up > 7 mins, 935006 NFS ops, 0 CIFS ops, 0 HTTP o > FS ops, 0 FCP ops, 0 iSCSI ops > > amplifier> Fri Feb 4 12:08:09 GMT [wafl_hipri:notice]: uid 24271 tid 1: > disk quota exceeded on volume boot. Additio > ings will be suppressed for approximately 60 minutes or until either a > 'quota resize' is performed. > Fri Feb 4 12:13:59 GMT [scsi.cmd.pastTimeToLive:error]: Device 8b.80: > request failed after try #1: cdb 0x1c. > Fri Feb 4 12:14:23 GMT [scsi.cmd.checkCondition:error]: Device 8b.82: > Check Condition: CDB 0x2a:09b24e98:0080: Sense > SI:aborted command - Fibre Channel frame CRC error (0xb - 0x47 0x0 > 0x3)(57649). > Fri Feb 4 12:14:23 GMT [scsi.cmd.checkCondition:error]: Device 8b.82: > Check Condition: CDB 0x2a:09b24e18:0080: Sense > SI:aborted command - Fibre Channel frame CRC error (0xb - 0x47 0x0 > 0x3)(57657). > Fri Feb 4 12:14:31 GMT [scsi.cmd.retrySuccess:info]: Device 8b.82: > request successful after retry #1: cdb 0x2a:09b24 > . > Fri Feb 4 12:14:31 GMT [scsi.cmd.retrySuccess:info]: Device 8b.82: > request successful after retry #1: cdb 0x2a:09b24 > . > Fri Feb 4 12:14:31 GMT [wafl_lopri:warning]: NFS response to client > 10.3.38.28 was slow, op was v3 read, 63 > 60 (in > ) > Fri Feb 4 12:14:48 GMT [scsi.cmd.checkCondition:error]: Device 8b.84: > Check Condition: CDB 0x2a:09b25418:0080: Sense > SI:aborted command - Fibre Channel frame CRC error (0xb - 0x47 0x0 > 0x3)(16996). > Fri Feb 4 12:14:51 GMT [scsi.cmd.checkCondition:error]: Device 8b.84: > Check Condition: CDB 0x2a:09b25418:0080: Sense > SI:aborted command - Fibre Channel frame CRC error (0xb - 0x47 0x0 > 0x3)(20148). > Fri Feb 4 12:14:53 GMT [ispfc_timeout_1:warning]: 8b.81 (0x01000051) > (0x034f47b0,0x2a:09b25298:0080,0/0,20150/0/0,80 > ommand timeout, quiescing drive to allow outstanding I/O to complete. > Fri Feb 4 12:15:33 GMT [scsi.cmd.pastTimeToLive:error]: Device 8b.80: > request failed after try #1: cdb 0x1c. > Fri Feb 4 12:15:40 GMT [telnet_0:info]: root logged in from host: > 10.3.67.21 > vol status > Volume State Status Options > Fri Feb 4 12:16:19 GMT [scsi.cmd.pastTimeToLive:error]: Device 8b.80: > request failed after try #1: cdb 0x1c. > Fri Feb 4 12:16:37 GMT [scsi.cmd.pastTimeToLive:error]: Device 8b.84: > request failed after try #3: cdb 0x2a:09b25418 > Fri Feb 4 12:16:37 GMT [scsi.cmd.pastTimeToLive:error]: Device 8b.81: > request failed after try #1: cdb 0x2a:09b25298 > Fri Feb 4 12:16:49 GMT [ispfc_timeout_1:warning]: 8b.92 (0x0100005c) > (0x034f4d00,0x2a:09b25698:0080,0/0,19912/0/0,87 > ommand timeout, quiescing drive to allow outstanding I/O to complete. > Fri Feb 4 12:16:49 GMT [ispfc_timeout_1:warning]: 8b.85 (0x01000055) > (0x034f5690,0x2a:09b25218:0080,0/0,11587/0/0,87 > ommand timeout, quiescing drive to allow outstanding I/O to complete. > Fri Feb 4 12:16:49 GMT [ispfc_timeout_1:warning]: 8b.84 (0x01000054) > (0x034f6020,0x2f:0025a800:0400,0/0,20143/0/0,87 > ommand timeout, quiescing drive to allow outstanding I/O to complete. > Fri Feb 4 12:16:49 GMT [ispfc_timeout_1:warning]: 8b.83 (0x01000053) > (0x034f5be0,0x2a:09b25298:0080,0/0,20153/0/0,87 > ommand timeout, quiescing drive to allow outstanding I/O to complete. > Fri Feb 4 12:16:49 GMT [ispfc_timeout_1:warning]: 8b.82 (0x01000052) > (0x034f6350,0x2a:09b25418:0080,0/0,20104/0/0,87 > ommand timeout, quiescing drive to allow outstanding I/O to complete. > Fri Feb 4 12:16:49 GMT [ispfc_timeout_1:warning]: 8b.81 (0x01000051) > (0x034f6ac0,0x2f:0025ac00:0400,0/0,20153/0/0,87 > ommand timeout, quiescing drive to allow outstanding I/O to complete. > Fri Feb 4 12:16:52 GMT [ispfc_timeout_1:error]: 8b.85 (0x01000055): > global device timer timeout, initiating device r > Fri Feb 4 12:16:52 GMT [scsi.cmd.abortedByHost:error]: Device 8b.92: > Command aborted by host adapter: HA status 0x4: > a:09b25698:0080. > Fri Feb 4 12:16:52 GMT [scsi.cmd.abortedByHost:error]: Device 8b.92: > Command aborted by host adapter: HA status 0x4: > f:0025ac00:0400. > Fri Feb 4 12:16:52 GMT [scsi.cmd.pastTimeToLive:error]: Device 8b.92: > request failed after try #1: cdb 0x2a:09b25618 > Fri Feb 4 12:16:52 GMT [scsi.cmd.pastTimeToLive:error]: Device 8b.92: > request failed after try #1: cdb 0x2a:09b25518 > Fri Feb 4 12:16:52 GMT [ispfc_timeout_1:error]: 8b.84 (0x01000054): > global device timer timeout, initiating device r > Fri Feb 4 12:16:52 GMT [scsi.cmd.abortedByHost:error]: Device 8b.85: > Command aborted by host adapter: HA status 0x4: > f:0025a800:0400. > Fri Feb 4 12:16:52 GMT [scsi.cmd.pastTimeToLive:error]: Device 8b.85: > request failed after try #1: cdb 0x2a:09b25098 > Fri Feb 4 12:16:52 GMT [scsi.cmd.abortedByHost:error]: Device 8b.85: > Command aborted by host adapter: HA status 0x4: > 8:109ed500:0040. > Fri Feb 4 12:16:52 GMT [scsi.cmd.abortedByHost:error]: Device 8b.85: > Command aborted by host adapter: HA status 0x4: > a:09b25218:0080. > Fri Feb 4 12:16:52 GMT [ispfc_timeout_1:error]: 8b.83 (0x01000053): > global device timer timeout, initiating device r > Fri Feb 4 12:16:52 GMT [scsi.cmd.pastTimeToLive:error]: Device 8b.84: > request failed after try #1: cdb 0x2f:0025a800 > Fri Feb 4 12:16:52 GMT [ispfc_timeout_1:error]: 8b.82 (0x01000052): > global device timer timeout, initiating device r > Fri Feb 4 12:16:52 GMT [scsi.cmd.abortedByHost:error]: Device 8b.83: > Command aborted by host adapter: HA status 0x4: > a:09b25298:0080. > Fri Feb 4 12:16:52 GMT [scsi.cmd.pastTimeToLive:error]: Device 8b.83: > request failed after try #1: cdb 0x2a:09b25198 > Fri Feb 4 12:16:52 GMT [scsi.cmd.abortedByHost:error]: Device 8b.83: > Command aborted by host adapter: HA status 0x4: > f:0025ac00:0400. > Fri Feb 4 12:16:52 GMT [ispfc_timeout_1:error]: 8b.81 (0x01000051): > global device timer timeout, initiating device r > Fri Feb 4 12:16:52 GMT [scsi.cmd.abortedByHost:error]: Device 8b.82: > Command aborted by host adapter: HA status 0x4: > f:0025ac00:0400. > Fri Feb 4 12:16:52 GMT [scsi.cmd.abortedByHost:error]: Device 8b.82: > Command aborted by host adapter: HA status 0x4: > a:09b25398:0080. > Fri Feb 4 12:16:52 GMT [scsi.cmd.abortedByHost:error]: Device 8b.82: > Command aborted by host adapter: HA status 0x4: > a:09b25418:0080. > Fri Feb 4 12:16:52 GMT [scsi.cmd.abortedByHost:error]: Device 8b.81: > Command aborted by host adapter: HA status 0x4: > f:0025ac00:0400. > Fri Feb 4 12:16:54 GMT [ispfc_timeout_1:warning]: 8b.80 (0x01000050) > (0x034f58b0,0x1c,0/0,56193/0/0,8745/0): command > , quiescing drive to allow outstanding I/O to complete. > Fri Feb 4 12:17:00 GMT [scsi.cmd.pastTimeToLive:error]: Device 8b.80: > request failed after try #1: cdb 0x1c. > Fri Feb 4 12:17:08 GMT [scsi.cmd.retrySuccess:info]: Device 8b.85: > request successful after retry #1: cdb 0x28:109ed > . > Fri Feb 4 12:17:25 GMT [scsi.cmd.retrySuccess:info]: Device 8b.82: > request successful after retry #1: cdb 0x2a:09b25 > . > Fri Feb 4 12:17:25 GMT [scsi.cmd.pastTimeToLive:error]: Device 8b.89: > request failed after try #1: cdb 0x28:10bc5c38 > Fri Feb 4 12:17:25 GMT [scsi.cmd.checkCondition:error]: Device 8b.83: > Check Condition: CDB 0x2a:09b25298:0080: Sense > SI:aborted command - Fibre Channel frame CRC error (0xb - 0x47 0x0 > 0x3)(42100). > F > PANIC: raid volfsm: vol boot: fatal multi-disk error. in process > config_thread on release NetApp Release 6.4.5 on Fri > 12:17:25 GMT 2005 >

1 0

RE: OnTap 7 Aggregates
by Kennedy, Jeffrey 04 Feb '05

04 Feb '05

One reason to stay with smaller aggregates is in anticipation of the Spinnaker integration. Data-less moves can only be done at the aggregate so if it's one ginormous aggregate it would defeat the purpose. ~JK -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Holland, William L Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 7:06 AM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: OnTap 7 Aggregates Starting to look ahead to the upcoming OnTap 7. I'm very excited about the new aggregates and flexvols. What criteria should one use in determining the number of aggregates to create? For example, FAS960 with 6ea DS14Mk2 shelves filled with 144GB FC drives. Would it be better to create one huge aggregate or several smaller aggregates? From my perspective, I see no practical use for Tradional volumes after upgrading to OnTap 7 and would like to convert to flexvols, but was wondering if anyone with any experience with any of the OnTap 7 RC's could provide feedback on this. Thanks in advance.

1 0

RE: Encrypted data on NetApp
by Hill, Aaron 04 Feb '05

04 Feb '05

Great, I am looking into it now. Looks like in interfaces with the Cryptainer product we have evaluated. Need to find out more ..... -----Original Message----- From: Sto Rage(c) [mailto:netbacker@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, 4 February 2005 11:38 AM To: Hill, Aaron Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: Encrypted data on NetApp have you looked at Decru (www.decru.com) ? They have a hardware appliance that can sit between the client network and the filer and encrypt selected shares/exports. We haven't used them, but may plan to evaluate them pretty soon. -G On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 11:07:49 +1100, Hill, Aaron <aaron.hill(a)cba.com.au> wrote: > > > > As part of our security layering, we are investigating the encryption of > certain portions of sensitive data on our NetApp (and I guess non-Netapp) > storage. > > > > Is anybody doing this on an enterprise scale and can recommend products? > > > > We have found a few products like "Cryptainer" that take a set folder > structure and encrypt it to look like a file or "hard shell" to anyone that > just views it via a standard CIFS/NFS connection. The CIFS client runs an > application that essentially maps to this file as a drive letter via UNC. > The user jumps through an authentication hoop (various methods of shared and > third-party authentication available) and then views the file as a complete > directory/file structure. > > > > Any recommendations regarding this, or any other product? On or off NetApp? > > > > > > Thanks, > > Aaron > > ************** IMPORTANT MESSAGE ************** > This e-mail message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains > information which may be confidential. > If you are not the intended recipient please advise the sender by return > email, do not use or disclose the contents, and delete the message and any > attachments from your system. Unless specifically indicated, this email does > not constitute formal advice or commitment by the sender or the Commonwealth > Bank of Australia (ABN 48 123 123 124) or its subsidiaries. > We can be contacted through our web site: commbank.com.au. > If you no longer wish to receive commercial electronic messages from us, > please reply to this e-mail by typing Unsubscribe in the subject line. > *************************************************************** >

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters