toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

3 participants
13514 discussions

RE: NetApp Simulator Limitations
by Rousseau, Deborah 14 Jun '06

14 Jun '06

Hi James, I've worked with simulators. A simulator is an excellent tool to see how the features of ONTAP work, however, there is no hardware substructure to provide performance and to secure data. The sims aren't really stripping across disks; the disks are really directories, so there isn't really RAID4 or RAID-DP or RAID Scrub protection... Performance is bound by the limitations of the sim's host RAM and CPU and the host's OS and other applications possibly running on the host. Sims also lack the real filer's NVRAM. But the sim can give you a really good idea of how the filer will work. Deborah Rousseau Network Appliance ________________________________ From: Johnson, James A [mailto:James_A_Johnson@homedepot.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 7:02 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: NetApp Simulator Limitations Does anyone know what limitations the NetApp simulator has? I know it looks and feels like a real filer, but there has to be some limitation, right? Thanks, James

1 0

NetApp Simulator Limitations
by Johnson, James A 14 Jun '06

14 Jun '06

Does anyone know what limitations the NetApp simulator has? I know it looks and feels like a real filer, but there has to be some limitation, right? Thanks, James

2 1

VIRUS (Win32/MyDoom.O!Worm): IN UNA E-MAIL DA LEI INVIATA
by Content-filter at bootes.trampi.mpi.it 14 Jun '06

14 Jun '06

VIRUS ALERT Il sistema di scansione ha rilevato un problema in una email presumibilmente inviate da Lei -> (<toasters(a)mathworks.com>), per il seguente destinatario: -> nicoletta.buttitta(a)istruzione.it La consegna del messaggio non e' potuta avvenire Di seguito i riferimenti della e-Mail inviata: ------------------------- BEGIN HEADERS ----------------------------- Return-Path: <toasters(a)mathworks.com> Received: from mathworks.com (host193-171-static.19-80-b.business.telecomitalia.it [80.19.171.193]) by mx3.istruzione.it (Mail Service) with ESMTP id 907A11E8BA2 for <nicoletta.buttitta(a)istruzione.it>; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 16:46:58 +0200 (CEST) From: toasters(a)mathworks.com To: nicoletta.buttitta(a)istruzione.it Subject: Delivery failed Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 16:46:58 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_49BE21DD.27DC6348" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-Id: <20060614144658.907A11E8BA2(a)mx3.istruzione.it> -------------------------- END HEADERS ------------------------------

1 0

I: L.D.L
by p_greenlotto＠virgilio.it 14 Jun '06

14 Jun '06

1 0

I: L.D.L
by p_greenlotto＠virgilio.it 14 Jun '06

14 Jun '06

1 0

Virus warning from BT Business
by BT.Business.Email.Virus.Filter＠btbroadbandoffice.com 14 Jun '06

14 Jun '06

** Please note: this is an automatically generated email. Please do not reply. ** The email, detailed below, that you recently sent contained a computer virus which has been made safe by the BT Business Email Virus Filter The treated email has been sent to the intended recipient without any risk of their computer being infected. Please use the following link for advice on how to disinfect your computer : http://www.btbroadbandoffice.com/help/email/outgoingviruswarning Message details: To: tekirdag(a)bhtemsilcilik.net Date: 06/14/06 08:38:14 Attachment: transcript.zip Virus: W32/MyDoom-O Action taken: deleted

1 0

Warning: could not send message for past 4 hours
by Mail Delivery Subsystem 13 Jun '06

13 Jun '06

********************************************** ** THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY ** ** YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE ** ********************************************** The original message was received at Tue, 13 Jun 2006 22:41:43 +0900 from bzmta7.plala.or.jp [210.150.239.199] ----- Transcript of session follows ----- <piug-l(a)derwent.tecc.co.uk>... Deferred: Connection timed out with derwent.tecc.co.uk. Warning: message still undelivered after 4 hours Will keep trying until message is 1 day old

1 0

RE: Is it possible to restore NTFS permissions only on FAS960?
by Warkentin, Grant 12 Jun '06

12 Jun '06

Thanks to all that replied. I have two options to pursue. 1. saveacl.exe and restacl.exe - these programs come in an archive called ntsec 2. Windows security explorer by smallwonders.com NOTICE - This communication is intended ONLY for the use of the person or entity named above and may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient named above or a person responsible for delivering messages or communications to the intended recipient, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that any use, distribution, or copying of this communication or any of the information contained in it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and then destroy or delete this communication, or return it to us by mail if requested by us. The City of Calgary thanks you for your attention and cooperation. ________________________________ From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Warkentin, Grant Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 3:08 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Is it possible to restore NTFS permissions only on FAS960? Someone had a little accident today and over wrote the NTFS permission settings on the folders in a tree. Lots of different permission were set on the folders in this tree. I'm wondering if it's possible to restore just the permission settings only from a snapshot. Thanks. Grant Warkentin System Administrator II City of Calgary - Information Technology Mail Drop == 8245 Ph: (403) 268-5629 Fax: (403) 268-2546 NOTICE - This communication is intended ONLY for the use of the person or entity named above and may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient named above or a person responsible for delivering messages or communications to the intended recipient, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that any use, distribution, or copying of this communication or any of the information contained in it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and then destroy or delete this communication, or return it to us by mail if requested by us. The City of Calgary thanks you for your attention and cooperation.

1 0

Is it possible to restore NTFS permissions only on FAS960?
by Warkentin, Grant 12 Jun '06

12 Jun '06

Someone had a little accident today and over wrote the NTFS permission settings on the folders in a tree. Lots of different permission were set on the folders in this tree. I'm wondering if it's possible to restore just the permission settings only from a snapshot. Thanks. Grant Warkentin System Administrator II City of Calgary - Information Technology Mail Drop == 8245 Ph: (403) 268-5629 Fax: (403) 268-2546 NOTICE - This communication is intended ONLY for the use of the person or entity named above and may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient named above or a person responsible for delivering messages or communications to the intended recipient, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that any use, distribution, or copying of this communication or any of the information contained in it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and then destroy or delete this communication, or return it to us by mail if requested by us. The City of Calgary thanks you for your attention and cooperation.

1 0

Boss wants to go Tagmastore - help
by Wollermann, Brian 12 Jun '06

12 Jun '06

Anyone have any experience with HDS Tagmastore vs. NetApp arguments? Mgmt wants to share disk across open systems and mainframe. NetApp doesn't play in the mainframe world. So that's a strike against it. However if I SAN attach all my NetApp disk and then hook it into the Tagmastore I have to walk away from all the NetApp software that works so great. It is then just generic SAN disk managed by the Tagmastore. I really love my NetApp software but I don't have enough ammo to lobby my case to keep buying the NetApp gear. Has anyone crossed this bridge before or do you know of any negatives with the Tagmastore solution (compared to NetApp)? I have no experience with the Tagmastore. I do understand that after you create a volume you extend it by creating another volume and "link" them together. I'd really like to keep my aggregates thank you very much. Thanks everyone. PS - If you have also fought this battle and lost that would be helpful information to me as well. B

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters