toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13531 discussions

Delivery Notification: Delivery has failed
by Internet Mail Delivery 29 Jun '06

29 Jun '06

This report relates to a message you sent with the following header fields: Return-path: <toasters(a)mathworks.com> Received: from ims-ms-daemon.dxbdu2.emirates.net.ae by dxbdu2.emirates.net.ae (I&ES Mail Server 4.2) id <0J1N007C12OFIM(a)dxbdu2.emirates.net.ae> (original mail from toasters(a)mathworks.com); Fri, 30 Jun 2006 00:38:39 +0400 (GST) Received: from DR1-ES.emirates.net.ae ([213.42.0.245]) by dxbdu2.emirates.net.ae (I&ES Mail Server 4.2) with SMTP id <0J1N000B62OEI3(a)dxbdu2.emirates.net.ae> for kitchen(a)emirates.net.ae; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 00:38:39 +0400 (GST) Received: from dimail3.emirates.net.ae(213.42.1.74) by DR1-ES.emirates.net.ae via smtp id 0198_93d6938e_07b2_11db_8d47_0002b3c81b4c; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 01:02:29 +0400 Received: from emirates.net.ae ([64.32.89.204]) by dimail3.emirates.net.ae (I&ES Mail Server 4.2) with ESMTP id <0J1N000UG2O4WDI1(a)dimail3.emirates.net.ae> for kitchen(a)emirates.net.ae (ORCPT kitchen(a)emirates.net.ae); Fri, 30 Jun 2006 00:38:35 +0400 (GST) Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 16:32:29 -0400 From: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: EIM removed a virus(es) from this message, it is safe to check the message/attachment(s): Mail Delivery (failure kitchen(a)emirates.net.ae) To: kitchen(a)emirates.net.ae Message-id: <0J1N000UI2O5WDI1(a)dimail3.emirates.net.ae> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/related; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001B_01C0CA80.6B015D10"; type="multipart/alternative" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal Your message cannot be delivered to the following recipients: Recipient address: kitchen+Spam@ims-ms-daemon Original address: kitchen(a)emirates.net.ae Reason: Over quota

1 0

RE: Anyone ever hook up a EVA or Tagama to a VFILER?
by Christopher Mende 29 Jun '06

29 Jun '06

Have a GF940 & 3020v cluster hooked up to Hitachi 9585V's and works a treat. Just make SURE you stay within that compatibility matrix: ONTAP version FC Switch Firmware (different requirements for back-end than host connectivity!) Hitachi/EVA Firmware What's nice is how quickly disks zero, what's not nice is when the back-end tech accidently blows away the LUNs you're operating on. C ________________________________ From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Grey Friday Sent: Friday, 30 June 2006 5:16 a.m. To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Anyone ever hook up a EVA or Tagama to a VFILER? And if so what was the outcome? -Grey The information contained in this email is privileged and confidential and intended for the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are asked to respect that confidentiality and not disclose, copy or make use of its contents. If received in error you are asked to destroy this email and contact the sender immediately. Your assistance is appreciated.

1 0

Anyone ever hook up a EVA or Tagama to a VFILER?
by Grey Friday 29 Jun '06

29 Jun '06

And if so what was the outcome? -Grey

1 0

Warning: message 1FtlzA-0001W8-HW delayed 144 hours
by Mail Delivery System 29 Jun '06

29 Jun '06

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent has not yet been delivered to one or more of its recipients after more than 144 hours on the queue on lon-gs2dmrelay.mistral.net. The message identifier is: 1FtlzA-0001W8-HW The subject of the message is: Returned mail: see transcript for details The date of the message is: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:45:57 +0100 The address to which the message has not yet been delivered is: karin.harring(a)hunneman.com No action is required on your part. Delivery attempts will continue for some time, and this warning may be repeated at intervals if the message remains undelivered. Eventually the mail delivery software will give up, and when that happens, the message will be returned to you.

1 0

Problem renewing maintenance
by Chris Thompson 29 Jun '06

29 Jun '06

We're having a problem renewing maintenance cover on our F810. I wonder whether anyone else has had a similar experience. It's being done through a secondary supplier who had better remain nameless for the moment (just in case it's their fault rather than NetApp's...). We originally brought 3 years of cover: "Next Business Day Parts Delivery" for failed disks (which has worked fine, incidentally); "4 hours onsite service" for the base unit and disk shelf. Now we are being told that we can't have such a combination: it has to be all NBD Parts or all 4hrs Onsite. This doesn't make any sense to us. Disk failures are non-critical, and only the ... (ahem) very differently abled ... need someone to come and swap a disk for them! OTOH, base unit & shelf failures would be critical for us. Please tell me that NetApp haven't _really_ made it this difficult to buy the obviously appropriate combination of cover! -- Chris Thompson Email: cet1(a)cam.ac.uk

4 4

RE: netgroups
by Willeke, Jochen 29 Jun '06

29 Jun '06

Hi everybody, the @ was the error. After editing the /etc/exports everything is working as expected. Regards and thanks Jochen -----Original Message----- From: Myles Uyema [mailto:netapp@uyema.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 6:34 PM To: Willeke, Jochen Cc: Stephen C. Losen; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: netgroups The '@' notation for netgroups was introduced in 7.0.x, and doesn't exist in 6.5.x as far as I can tell. On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Willeke, Jochen wrote: Hi Stephen, thanks a lot...i created the netgroup as i did with other filers but sadly i won't work. In my /etc/exports i have an entry like the following: /vol/root -sec=sys,rw=@adm,root=@adm,nosuid I will do some deeper digging... So far, far well Jochen -----Original Message----- From: Stephen C. Losen [mailto:scl@sasha.acc.Virginia.EDU] Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 3:33 PM To: Willeke, Jochen Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: netgroups > Hi toasters, > > does anybody know since when (Ontap Version) you have the possibility to > manage access to nfs-exports with netgroups. I was not able to find > something on NOW but my test make me believe that it does not work with > 6.5.4. Or perhaps it does not work with 6.5.4 and me :-) > I think ONTAP supported NFS exports to netgroups even before ONTAP 5.0 when CIFS was introduced. The /etc/exports syntax changed between 6.4 and 6.5 so you might want to read up on that. Steve Losen scl(a)virginia.edu phone: 434-924-0640 University of Virginia ITC Unix Support

1 0

Your email requires verification verify#JYWgg183pm4EJaoXNDByib4d5Gi2kbRe
by dhornsby＠dhornsby.com 29 Jun '06

29 Jun '06

The message you sent requires that you verify that you are a real live human being and not a spam source. To complete this verification, simply reply to this message and leave the subject line intact. The headers of the message sent from your address are show below: From toasters(a)mathworks.com Thu Jun 29 01:14:14 2006 Received: from host107-142.pool8714.interbusiness.it ([87.14.142.107]:1097 helo=mathworks.com) by eclipse.websitewelcome.com with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Fvpn1-0000Co-Nc for dhornsby(a)dhornsby.com; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 01:14:14 -0500 From: toasters(a)mathworks.com To: dhornsby(a)dhornsby.com Subject: Returned mail: Data format error Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 08:12:37 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0010_CFD76DF2.E72815A6" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

1 0

Undeliverable Mail
by MAILER-DAEMON＠mathworks.com 29 Jun '06

29 Jun '06

このメールは、以下のＳＭＴＰエラーが発生したため、送信できませんでした。（　以下、サーバから出力されたエラーメッセージ　） Your mail attempted to be delivered on Thu, 29 Jun 2006 11:15:36 +0900 Could not be delivered to <ttr-raid(a)tctv.ne.jp> Due to the following SMTP relay error >>> RCPT TO:<ttr-raid(a)tctv.ne.jp> <<< 550 <ttr-raid(a)tctv.ne.jp>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table

1 0

RE: Any CIFS Audit scripts?
by Glenn Walker 28 Jun '06

28 Jun '06

The impact statement I made was in reference to performance, not log sizes... though this is good information to have. Glenn ________________________________ From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Warkentin, Grant Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 6:13 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Any CIFS Audit scripts? Auditing impact. We have full auditing turned on for Domain admins and some limited user auditing turned on. This generates 20 to 40 meg of logs per day. I have ours set to keep 30 logs rotating to a new log at the 20 meg mark (currently 635 meg total). They rotate about once per day at these settings (sometime twice). If I have a data migration to do I can, and have, caused all thirty logs to rotate in one evening. NOTICE - This communication is intended ONLY for the use of the person or entity named above and may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient named above or a person responsible for delivering messages or communications to the intended recipient, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that any use, distribution, or copying of this communication or any of the information contained in it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and then destroy or delete this communication, or return it to us by mail if requested by us. The City of Calgary thanks you for your attention and co-operation. ________________________________ From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Glenn Walker Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 6:37 PM To: Hadrian Baron; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Any CIFS Audit scripts? You'd have to find the mechanism to programmatically convert to CSV - the data files are in MS evt format (but I'm sure it can be done). 1.) No - NFS doesn't have auditing that I recall 2.) DFM doesn't do this 3.) File Auditing does have some impact, but it's difficult to predict just how much - impact will depend on the amount of headroom you have left in your filer (current load). 7.2 will probably help a bit as the rumors of multi-threaded WAFL should be present (or maybe that's 7.3??) Glenn ________________________________ From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Hadrian Baron Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 12:00 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Any CIFS Audit scripts? Hello everyone, I've been running into issues with growing CIFS access and I need more visibility. I've searching google, toaster archive, NOW, and CPAN for something that will generate a report from the cifs audit logs and can't find anything. I find allusions to scripts, but no one posting them. I will probably have to write a script myself but was wondering if there is anything already out there that someone would like to share. Here is how I see the script going: Pull down cifs audit.evt files from the filer Convert to CSV Parse the csv and generate a report to show which users are hitting which shares & files Submit records to mysql or another db so we have a historical security audit log DB for cifs. Three Qs: 1 - Would this work with NFS - it seems we lack NFS auditing with DOT. 2 - Is this something DFM could do? 3. What if any performance impact is seen by enabling NTFS file auditing (all options) for say 10 TB of data. Any help or feedback would be appreciated. I'm running DOT 7.1 on a pair of 940cs. -- Hadrian

1 0

RE: Any CIFS Audit scripts?
by Glenn Walker 28 Jun '06

28 Jun '06

You'd have to find the mechanism to programmatically convert to CSV - the data files are in MS evt format (but I'm sure it can be done). 1.) No - NFS doesn't have auditing that I recall 2.) DFM doesn't do this 3.) File Auditing does have some impact, but it's difficult to predict just how much - impact will depend on the amount of headroom you have left in your filer (current load). 7.2 will probably help a bit as the rumors of multi-threaded WAFL should be present (or maybe that's 7.3??) Glenn ________________________________ From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Hadrian Baron Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 12:00 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Any CIFS Audit scripts? Hello everyone, I've been running into issues with growing CIFS access and I need more visibility. I've searching google, toaster archive, NOW, and CPAN for something that will generate a report from the cifs audit logs and can't find anything. I find allusions to scripts, but no one posting them. I will probably have to write a script myself but was wondering if there is anything already out there that someone would like to share. Here is how I see the script going: Pull down cifs audit.evt files from the filer Convert to CSV Parse the csv and generate a report to show which users are hitting which shares & files Submit records to mysql or another db so we have a historical security audit log DB for cifs. Three Qs: 1 - Would this work with NFS - it seems we lack NFS auditing with DOT. 2 - Is this something DFM could do? 3. What if any performance impact is seen by enabling NTFS file auditing (all options) for say 10 TB of data. Any help or feedback would be appreciated. I'm running DOT 7.1 on a pair of 940cs. -- Hadrian

2 1

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters