toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13515 discussions

RE: Storage space overheads!
by Glenn Walker 31 Jul '06

31 Jul '06

Marge... I'd much rather have RAID-DP than RAID5 - RAID-DP affords for faster read\write access and the ability to lose TWO drives without losing data (raid5 can only lose one). If you feel strongly about not wanting to use multiple disks for parity, use traditional RAID4 - still faster read\write access when compared to RAID5, but obviously you won't have as much resiliency to failure. That will surely boost your usable space as well. Glenn -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of margesimpson(a)hushmail.com Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2006 8:19 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Storage space overheads! Hi all, Thank you very much. It seems out of 100GB, what usable space I can have is 55GB (55%). I feel yauk! But it seems at this point of time, its the only solution. I wish NetApp had Raid5, this could have eliminated some issues like using 2 dual-parity drives. Thank you again for your responses about SATA and FC disks. Cheers, Marge. On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 19:19:08 +1000 "Holland, William L" <HollandWL(a)state.gov> wrote: >We have a R200 which has 168 ATA drives. I expected a high >failure rate >on these as ATA drives are not rated for continuous duty. I have >been >surprised, and pleased, that failure rate has been very low - >perhaps 3 >drives in a year. Not sure about the SATA. The way I am moving >is to >use (S)ATA for my NAS (user shares) and FC drives for hosting my >iSCSI >LUNs. Databases need the higher performance of FC, simple file >shares >do not. > >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner- >toasters(a)mathworks.com] >On Behalf Of margesimpson(a)hushmail.com >Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 10:00 PM >To: toasters(a)mathworks.com >Subject: RE: Storage space overheads! > >Hi Glenn D, Glenn W, Andrew, Michael, Holland and Holland, Thank >you >all for your feeback. > >To summarize, the following is true (i.e., about storage >sacrifice): >- Disk are right sized (realigning size in blocks from different >vendors...eg., for 72GB we get 68GB) before using by NetApp. >- dual parity (2 disks on RG of 16 => 14D+2P) >- spare disk/s >- WAFL & RAID overhead (~ 5%). >- aggr reserve 5% default >- vol snapshot reserve 20% default > - for LUNs: 50% for base snapshot + extra space 20% of remaining >data space >- user data should always be below 90% to avoid performance >bottleneck >and defrag issues. > >That's sounds bad to me, but if you all feel to be true then its >must be >a solution. > >How about putting SATA disks on the primary filers to save costs? >Whats are the problems in replacing FC disks with SATA? >Whats record about SATA disks, I heard they are terrible? (Failure >rates >is abnormal) > >Thanks again for feedback. >Marge. > > > > >Concerned about your privacy? Instantly send FREE secure email, no >account required http://www.hushmail.com/send?l=480 > >Get the best prices on SSL certificates from Hushmail >https://www.hushssl.com?l=485 Concerned about your privacy? Instantly send FREE secure email, no account required http://www.hushmail.com/send?l=480 Get the best prices on SSL certificates from Hushmail https://www.hushssl.com?l=485

1 0

Warning: E-mail viruses detected
by MailScanner 31 Jul '06

31 Jul '06

Our e-mail content detector has just been triggered by a message you sent: To: hlinda(a)ratree.psu.ac.th, linda.h(a)mail.psu.ac.th Subject: Mail System Error - Returned Mail Date: Mon Jul 31 08:20:27 2006 One or more of the attachments (document.com) are on the list of unacceptable attachments for this site and will not have been delivered. Consider renaming the files to avoid this constraint. The virus detector said this about the message: Report: MailScanner: Executable DOS/Windows programs are dangerous in email (document.com) -- MailScanner Email Virus Scanner Prince Of Songkhla University www.psu.ac.th MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support

1 0

RE: Storage space overheads!
by margesimpson＠hushmail.com 31 Jul '06

31 Jul '06

Hi all, Thank you very much. It seems out of 100GB, what usable space I can have is 55GB (55%). I feel yauk! But it seems at this point of time, its the only solution. I wish NetApp had Raid5, this could have eliminated some issues like using 2 dual-parity drives. Thank you again for your responses about SATA and FC disks. Cheers, Marge. On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 19:19:08 +1000 "Holland, William L" <HollandWL(a)state.gov> wrote: >We have a R200 which has 168 ATA drives. I expected a high >failure rate >on these as ATA drives are not rated for continuous duty. I have >been >surprised, and pleased, that failure rate has been very low - >perhaps 3 >drives in a year. Not sure about the SATA. The way I am moving >is to >use (S)ATA for my NAS (user shares) and FC drives for hosting my >iSCSI >LUNs. Databases need the higher performance of FC, simple file >shares >do not. > >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner- >toasters(a)mathworks.com] >On Behalf Of margesimpson(a)hushmail.com >Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 10:00 PM >To: toasters(a)mathworks.com >Subject: RE: Storage space overheads! > >Hi Glenn D, Glenn W, Andrew, Michael, Holland and Holland, Thank >you >all for your feeback. > >To summarize, the following is true (i.e., about storage >sacrifice): >- Disk are right sized (realigning size in blocks from different >vendors...eg., for 72GB we get 68GB) before using by NetApp. >- dual parity (2 disks on RG of 16 => 14D+2P) >- spare disk/s >- WAFL & RAID overhead (~ 5%). >- aggr reserve 5% default >- vol snapshot reserve 20% default > - for LUNs: 50% for base snapshot + extra space 20% of remaining >data space >- user data should always be below 90% to avoid performance >bottleneck >and defrag issues. > >That's sounds bad to me, but if you all feel to be true then its >must be >a solution. > >How about putting SATA disks on the primary filers to save costs? >Whats are the problems in replacing FC disks with SATA? >Whats record about SATA disks, I heard they are terrible? (Failure >rates >is abnormal) > >Thanks again for feedback. >Marge. > > > > >Concerned about your privacy? Instantly send FREE secure email, no >account required http://www.hushmail.com/send?l=480 > >Get the best prices on SSL certificates from Hushmail >https://www.hushssl.com?l=485 Concerned about your privacy? Instantly send FREE secure email, no account required http://www.hushmail.com/send?l=480 Get the best prices on SSL certificates from Hushmail https://www.hushssl.com?l=485

1 0

RE: Data Classification
by Glenn Walker 30 Jul '06

30 Jul '06

Eyal is speaking of the IS1200 solution - we're looking at it also as a potential solution for just this problem. Glenn ________________________________ From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Eyal Traitel Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2006 11:22 AM To: netster Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: Data Classification Hi ! 1. You can use "df -i" command to know how many inodes you have. This would be higher than the number of files (since it'll represent directories as well) but would be a good estimate for the ceiling. 2. Look at Kazeon - NetApp resells them. Eyal. On 7/30/06, netster <netster_cooper(a)yahoo.com> wrote: Hi! I have several NetApp filers with close to 25TBs of user data stored on them (Best guess is that there is some 50 million files, but we aren't sure as our backup software only backups the current data set, not the snapshots). We are looking to consolidate down the environment given the latest storage capacities and thought I would ask the community here what tools that they used to understand what data needed to be migrate, what data needed to be destroyed, and what the data costs in terms of per user and department? We have the costing for the storage down to a per $ fee per MB/GB. Any thoughts? We have tried some freeware and shareware programs, but they require weeks, if not months of personnel time to make sense out of the data that they collect. We are looking for a packaged solution. Thank you for your help. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Data-Classification-tf2023386.html#a5563372 Sent from the Network Appliance - Toasters forum at Nabble.com. -- Yours, Eyal.

2 1

Greetings!
by MR. JOHN FISHER 30 Jul '06

30 Jul '06

Dear Friend, I work as the Head of Fund Manager Executive with Fidelity Investment UK, the World Leading Investment & Fund Management Institution based in UK/Channel Island. I have an Investor under my portfolio with a closing balance of $42.870m as his first initial deposit. This Investor died three years ago leaving no WILL or AUTHORIZATION for re-transfer of his Investment and its proceeds to the INHERITOR.I have personally carried out an Investigation on the subject matter that took me 12 months to finalize and was made to understand that the Family or Relatives of the Investor knows nothing about his Investment with Fidelity and none have any records of all his deposits and investment with us leaving an avenue for claiming of the said funds with its accrued interest on presentation of a trustworthy person that can stand as the INHERITOR to the deceased . If you are interested, I can present you as the INHERITOR with proper documentation that will qualify you to have the funds claimed and on doing this, our establishment will not question the release of the funds to you as I will make sure that we comply with the laid down rules and laws of claiming the Investment of a deceased Investor in our Establishment. Our sharing ratio will be 50:50.Please contacted me for more detail breakdown if interested. Looking forward to hearing from you shortly. Sincerely. Mr.John Fisher. www.fidelity.co.uk

1 0

GREETINGS
by MR. JOHN FISHER 30 Jul '06

30 Jul '06

1 0

Greetings!
by john_fisher7＠virgilio.it 30 Jul '06

30 Jul '06

1 0

Dear Friend..............Important information please replay
by Tomas Traore 29 Jul '06

29 Jul '06

Dear Friend, I sourced your e-mail address from the internet directory as we have not previously known each other. However, every relationship begins one day I am Eng.Tomas Traore, the site inspection director with the ministry of works and construction and I work directly with the Minister in charge of the Ministry here in Republic of Sudan. I awarded a contract for IRRIGATION to a Portuguese firm worth several millions of dollars a few years ago. In the course of executing the project the firm discovered large gold deposit in one of the construction sites. Being the site director I collaborated with the firm in the mining of the gold on a mutual agreement to share the proceeds out of which I got a share of $16.4 million dollars. As an ordinary director and a mere civil servant in this small war torn country, I cannot introduce this funds into the banking system here considering my meager monthly income as well as the code of conduct guidelines regulating civil service here in my country, Sudan. Presently Sudan is engulfed in a civil crisis and as this crisis intensified by the day, I decided to leave with my family and succeeded in also moving this fund out of Sudan under diplomatic cover. I am presently out of Sudan I therefore solicit for your co-operation to take delivery of this fund into your custody for any profitable investment that will be mutually beneficial. I will be able to arrange all necessary procedures to ensure smooth movement of this funds until you are in control of it. Please let me know if you are interested by return mail and also include your full names and contact telephone number to enable me call you. I will provide you with my contact telephone and where I am presently as soon as you indicate appreciable interest to deal Please contact me on this email address (tomastraore2000(a)terra.com.ve). Thanks and God bless Regards, Eng. Tomas Traore

1 0

Auto: inactive-lists@w3.org autoreply
by W3C Postmaster 29 Jul '06

29 Jul '06

Sorry, this mailing list is no longer active. For an up to date list of web-related mailing lists, please see: http://www.w3.org/Mail/ Thanks, W3C Postmaster postmaster(a)w3.org ----- original message: ---------------------------------------------- From toasters(a)mathworks.com Sat Jul 29 20:40:10 2006 Received: from imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.68]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1G6vbQ-0005c4-Q8 for www-wca(a)w3.org; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 20:40:10 +0000 Received: from ibm70aec-qfe0 ([192.168.51.80]) by imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20060729204003.XQMC10418.imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm70aec-qfe0> for <www-wca(a)w3.org>; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 16:40:03 -0400 Received: from ibm69aec.bellsouth.net ([72.150.13.171]) by imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20060729203222.OAOB2467.imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net(a)ibm69aec.bellsouth.net> for <www-wca(a)w3.org>; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 16:32:22 -0400 Received: from mathworks.com ([72.150.13.171]) by ibm69aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20060729203204.WQVF14648.ibm69aec.bellsouth.net(a)mathworks.com> for <www-wca(a)w3.org>; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 16:32:04 -0400 From: toasters(a)mathworks.com To: www-wca(a)w3.org Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 15:30:15 -0500 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-Id: <20060729203204.WQVF14648.ibm69aec.bellsouth.net(a)mathworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Ytvwxy012356789BCDEFHIJKLNOPQRTUVWXZabce" X-BLTSYMAVREINSERT: qKOUx+vLSEQYsg6DItsDluFzr2UA Received-SPF: none (lisa.w3.org: domain of toasters(a)mathworks.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=3.9 X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1G6vbQ-0005c4-Q8 e1416d8a3530c7a98ab48eaedcd2bbb4 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Ytvwxy012356789BCDEFHIJKLNOPQRTUVWXZabce Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit This message has been processed by Symantec AntiVirus. Message.scr was infected with the malicious virus W32.Mydoom!gen and has been deleted because the file cannot be cleaned. --Ytvwxy012356789BCDEFHIJKLNOPQRTUVWXZabce Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Received: from ibm69aec.bellsouth.net ([72.150.13.171]) by imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20060729203222.OAOB2467.imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net(a)ibm69aec.bellsouth.net> for <www-wca(a)w3.org>; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 16:32:22 -0400 Received: from mathworks.com ([72.150.13.171]) by ibm69aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20060729203204.WQVF14648.ibm69aec.bellsouth.net(a)mathworks.com> for <www-wca(a)w3.org>; Sat, 29 Jul 2006 16:32:04 -0400 From: toasters(a)mathworks.com To: www-wca(a)w3.org Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 15:30:15 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0004_BE22DD71.70AA7FB1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-Id: <20060729203204.WQVF14648.ibm69aec.bellsouth.net(a)mathworks.com> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0004_BE22DD71.70AA7FB1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The message was not delivered due to the following reason(s): Your message could not be delivered because the destination computer was unreachable within the allowed queue period. The amount of time a message is queued before it is returned depends on local configura- tion parameters. Most likely there is a network problem that prevented delivery, but it is also possible that the computer is turned off, or does not have a mail system running right now. Your message could not be delivered within 1 days: Host 200.238.107.253 is not responding. The following recipients did not receive this message: <www-wca(a)w3.org> Please reply to postmaster(a)w3.org if you feel this message to be in error. ------=_NextPart_000_0004_BE22DD71.70AA7FB1 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="message.zip"

1 0

dont let me down
by Marie Roberts 29 Jul '06

29 Jul '06

Hello, You may be surprised to receive this mail, as you read this, don'tfeel so sorry for me because I know everyone will die someday. My name is Mrs. Marie Roberts, a business woman in London. I have been diagnosed with esophageal cancer which was discovered very late due to my laxity in caring for my health. It has defiled all forms of medication right now and I have only about few months' to live according to medical experts. I have never particularly lived my life so well as I never really cared for anyone not even me but my business. Though I am very rich, but I was never generous, I was always hostile to people and I only focus on my business as that was the only thing I cared for in my life. But now I regret all this as I now know that there is more to live. Though I am very rich, but I was never generous, I was always hostile to people and I only focus on my business as that was the only thing I cared for in my life. But now I regret all this as I now know that there is more to life than just wanting to have or make all the money in the world. I believed when God gives me a second chance to come to this world I would live my life in a different way from how I have lived now, but now that God has called me through this way I willed most of my properties and access to my immediate and extended family and as well as few close friends. I want God to be merciful to me and accept my soul and so with that reason I decided to give alms to CHARITY ORGANISATIONS, as I want this to be one of the last good deed I did on earth, so far I have distributed money to some Charity Organization in countries like India and Sudan. Now that my health has deteriorated so badly, I cannot do this myself anymore. I once asked my family members to close one of my accounts and distribute the funds which I have there to CHARITY ORGANSATION in Rwanda and Pakistan; they refused and kept the money to themselves.Hence, I do not trust them anymore, as they seem not to be contended with what I have left for them. The last of the funds which no one knows of, is the cash deposit in one of the banks here.I want to know if you can be of good help to dispatch these funds to CHARITY organizations. I have set aside 20% of the total amount $1,500,000.00 One million five hundred thousand dollars) for you and your time and patience for carrying out this duties.This means you will keep $300,000 (three hundred thousand dollars) for yourself and donate the rest to any charity organisation. May God be with you as you have decided to take a bold step to heal the world with me or even in my demise. If you can give me this assistance, you can send an email to my lawyer who has all the legal documents covering this transaction. He would give you more details. His name is Barr. Larry Smith and his email address is: ( larrysmith36(a)aim.com ) He would guide you through receiving the funds. Best Regards, Marie Roberts

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters