toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

4 participants
13526 discussions

Regarding Alerts configuration in C-Mode - Netapp
by Yuvaraja Shivaram 01 Oct '18

01 Oct '18

Hi All, Do you have list of alerts which are eligible for P1, P2, P3, P4 If we talk in alerts - > Critical, Fatal, Error, Warning.types of alerts, is any one has got any Excel sheet ? please let me on the same.. Regards Yuvaraja

1 0

small clarification on adding NTP servers to netapp 7 mode and c-mode
by Yuvaraja Shivaram 27 Sep '18

27 Sep '18

Hi all, Can we add new NTP servers to 7 mode and C-mode on Fly without disrupting any protocols... infact NTP servers are being decommissioned in future, so wanted to add the new NTP servers before decommissioned...so what is the best practise to add the same.... is there any disconnects happens to cifs protocols...? Regards Yuvaraja

2 1

Copying NTFS Data with Orphaned SIDs
by Stephen Stocke 12 Sep '18

12 Sep '18

Hi We’re migrating some data from Windows file servers to CIFS shares on a 9.1p13 cluster (NTFS security style on the vols). We’re getting errors on some files and folders using Robocopy and the common thread seems to be objects with orphaned SIDs for the owner or DACL entries. We’ve tried other tools with the same results. Robocopy to another Windows file share works fine. Has anyone else seen this behaviour? We’re assuming that the CIFS server is stopping the copy because it can’t resolve the SID. Is there any way to control that behaviour and just wrtie the DACL with the unresolved SID? Thanks Steve

3 3

CIFS Access Based Enumeration for Volume in Namespace
by Vanderyt, Jeff 10 Sep '18

10 Sep '18

Replying to an old post; I am just now hitting the same issue. Steve - did you ever find a solution to this issue? (ABE not working on junction paths). 9.1P14 here. -jeff ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 12:50:05 +0000 From: Stephen Stocke <scstocke(a)gmail.com> To: "<Toasters(a)teaparty.net>" <toasters(a)teaparty.net> Subject: CIFS Access Based Enumeration for Volume in Namespace Message-ID: <CAEGA2qbHgFzNEvKpLa688Syt-197quPEJNz941eYvar3PHKgZg(a)mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hello I have a need to use access-based enumeration within a CIFS share that contains volumes mounted as junction paths within the share volume. ABE is working for normal files and folders but volumes mounted as junction paths are visible even if the user does not have permissions to see the folder representing the junction. Has anyone done this? Or can anyone point to any documentation on whether this is possible? ONTAP 9.1p5, ntfs security style on all volumes. Many thanks Steve

2 1

9.4 oddness
by Peter D. Gray 10 Sep '18

10 Sep '18

Hi toasters We recently upgraded all our netapps to 9.4, from 9.3 Now we see something. The volumes we previously flagged as unprotected under SVM-DR are now displaying as "protected". The only volumes which show as "unprotected" are the root volumes. In reality, the volumes we had previously flagged as "unprotected" still seem to be unprotected, that is they are not being snapmirrored to the destination SVM. This is causing a few issues with our monitoring of our protection status. Has anybody seen this or know something about it? Also, the "volume show" man page does not mention the protection flag, but does display it when asked. I do not know if the man page on 9.3 documented the flag or not. I assume it did else I would not know about it. Regards, pdg Peter Gray Ph (direct): +61 2 4221 3770 Information Management & Technology Services Ph (switch): +61 2 4221 3555 University of Wollongong Fax: +61 2 4229 1958 Wollongong NSW 2522 Email: pdg(a)uow.edu.au Australia URL: http://pdg.uow.edu.au

1 0

Ocum alerts showing as Localhost instead of Ocum Name
by Yuvaraja Shivaram 05 Sep '18

05 Sep '18

Hi All, i have configured new alert setup through OCUM 7.2p1, we are receiving alerts but it is not showing OCUM host name , instead it shows as Local host whenever we receive alerts to our email id's, is anyone aware how to resolve this issue.. here in below statement itstead of localhost , it should reflect OCUM name(oncommand unified manager) "An incident was generated by localhost that requires your attention" Regards Yuvaraj

4 4

Related to New Cmode filer Setup
by Yuvaraja Shivaram 28 Aug '18

28 Aug '18

Hi Everyone, Any one has got all the commands to setup new cluster in Dataontap C-mode environment...9.xx version... if it is in Best Standard would be fine.... Example steps: Cluster mode setup Joining cluster Creating Vlan Creating Interface Groups Creating Lifs Creating all the roles of cluster , data , node-mgmt ,intercluster cluster-mgmt Creating aggregates (both DP and Raidtec) Creating Vservers (NFS, CIFS, ISCSI) Creating failovergroups Creating volumes Creating Export-policy and rule set... Regards Yuvaraj

3 2

Be careful about snaplock
by Basil 22 Aug '18

22 Aug '18

Just going through an experience I figured I would share with the list: we ordered a small Snaplock cluster, sized so that all disks would be used for the Snaplock aggregate. Well, as it turns out, you must always size enough disk for one regular aggregate: SVM root volumes are not supported on root aggregates nor on Snaplock aggregates.

2 2

revert status
by Alexander Griesser 21 Aug '18

21 Aug '18

Hey toasters, is there any way to see the status of a node-shell revert_to command? I just had to revert one of our systems and unfortunately the SSH connection broke and I'm not seeing any progress here anymore :-/ ::> run local revert_to 9.1 You are about to revert the system to work with Data ONTAP 9.1 The system will be rebooted immediately after the conversion process completes. Make sure that you have installed Data ONTAP 9.1 onto the boot device, or you will have to run "revert_to" again. Are you sure you want to proceed? [yes/no]? yes debug.nodewatchdog.level: 2 -> 2 FlexScale PCS is not active and cannot be configured. The management gateway server restarted. Waiting to see if the connection can be reestablished I can connect to the system fine again now and I can not run the revert_to again (it says that 9.1 is not supported, only 8.3) - so I guess it's either done already or still in progress. I couldn't find any command that would show me if this task is still running - any ideas? Thanks, Alexander Griesser Head of Systems Operations ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH E-Mail: AGriesser(a)anexia-it.com<mailto:AGriesser@anexia-it.com> Web: http://www.anexia-it.com<http://www.anexia-it.com/> Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601

2 3

Netapp C-Mode:- how to covert Global export policy into individual users access
by Yuvaraja Shivaram 20 Aug '18

20 Aug '18

Hi Team, Is there any way to convert global access users to convert into individual access. Say for example if any of the policy is having global access of client...like 0.0.0.0/0 and we would like to convert this into individual host access by removing this global entry "0.0.0.0\0". then how can we achieve this without disruptive activity... can we add all the individual hosts one by one which are accessing through this global access and then disable the global access parameter from export-policy rule or do we need to shutdown the application/databases and then modify the global parameter.... Please let us know if any of them worked on these kind of activity, my goal is to modify this parameter without bringing down the hosts.... Regards Yuvaraja

2 5

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters