toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

1 participants
13523 discussions

Best Practices !!!
by Zeeshan 10 Sep '08

10 Sep '08

Hello all We are upgrading our storage from IBM N3600 to FAS6040... What are the best/recommended practices for powering it up... Does any one have some installation guides/check lists on this??? Thanx

2 1

Re: Best Practices !!!
by unix_thai＠yahoo.com 10 Sep '08

10 Sep '08

You should power up the shelves first then the head. If these are supported devices, you should be able to get netapp tech support to help. ------Original Message------ From: Zeeshan Sender: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com To: Toasters List Sent: Sep 10, 2008 12:46 AM Subject: Best Practices !!! Hello all We are upgrading our storage from IBM N3600 to FAS6040... What are the best/recommended practices for powering it up... Does any one have some installation guides/check lists on this??? Thanx Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T

2 1

Re: CIFS Guide
by unix_thai＠yahoo.com 09 Sep '08

09 Sep '08

The only thing I can think of is the manuals themselves. ------Original Message------ From: Cristian Rojas Sender: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Sent: Sep 7, 2008 11:06 AM Subject: CIFS Guide Hi list, which would be the most comprehensible CIFS Administration document you came across for OnTAP 7.2.3? THanks Cristian Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T

1 0

new online support communities for NetApp
by philippa 08 Sep '08

08 Sep '08

http://forums.netapp.com/community/support?view=overview The platform is Jive Clearspace (same as VMWare has). The communities are fairly new but already have nearly 2000 members and some good discussions going... -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/new-online-support-communities-for-NetApp-tp19276348p… Sent from the Network Appliance - Toasters mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

2 1

CIFS Guide
by Cristian Rojas 07 Sep '08

07 Sep '08

Hi list, which would be the most comprehensible CIFS Administration document you came across for OnTAP 7.2.3? THanks Cristian

1 0

Linkedin group
by Nicholas Bernstein 05 Sep '08

05 Sep '08

Hi all, I didn't happen to see a toasters group on linkedin (the professional networking site) so I made one. Thought it might be of interest to some folks on the list. http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=751357 If this is objectionable to the group, I will, of course, remove it. Linkedin, oddly, requires manual approval, so if you don't get approved right away, it's just because I haven't gotten to it... I'll approve all comers, unless list admin's care to take over the management of the linked in group, in which case, I'll happily hand it over to someone else. Cheers, Nick -- Nicholas Bernstein Technologist, Consultant, Instructor http://nicholasbernstein.com

3 2

Noob...
by David.Ashton＠rullion.co.uk 04 Sep '08

04 Sep '08

Hi, please excuse my noobness, I've recently inherited a Netapp system or 3, I'm fairly new to SANs in general and netapp in particular. This isnt my full time gig (storage), its one thing amongst the 2 thousand other things I'm working on today, but I allocate a fair amount of time to figuring this stuff out. I'm struggling with something I'm sure all netapp storage people go through, I've read the manuals, I've played around for about 6 months on the filers and I cant answer this. I have a FAS3020. I have a volume, lets call it vol_bond. Its 820GB, 20% snap reserve. It contains one lun, which is 320GB. The space guarantee is volume, and fractional reserve is 100. Currently, there are 5 snapshots, totalling 8GB. It is snap mirrored to another filer. Snapshots are created nightly, there are no problems with that. At weekends, after various backup activity, these grow to about 80GB, but we only keep 5 and they're deleted. Its all up and running, everythings fine. Except for the filer status which reports: /vol/vol_bond is full (using or reserving 98% of space and 0% of inodes, using 49% of reserve) and the df -r output is /vol/vol_bondv8/ 687865856 670681368 17184488 335194536 /vol/vol_bondv8/ /vol/vol_bondv8/.snapshot 171966464 14140040 157826424 0 /vol/vol_bondv8/.snapshot What am I missing? I thought I had this thing nailed but obviously not. Dave Ashton ********************************************************************** The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments are intended for the named recipient(s) only. It may also be privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you must take no action as a result of receiving it, including, but not limited to copying, distributing and amending it. If this communication has been sent to you in error, please contact us immediately and do not show the communication to any other party. Rullion shall have no liability whatsoever in respect of the content of the communication and makes no warranty as to accuracy. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author. Viruses:- Although we have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and attachments are free from viruses, we advise that in keeping with good computing practice, the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free. ********************************************************************** ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________

8 13

Visio Stencils for FAS3100 Series
by ifstat 02 Sep '08

02 Sep '08

Hi Does anyone have a Microsoft Visio stencil that includes images for the FAS3100 series, the stencils at www.visiocafe.com have not being updated. Please I need them urgently do complete a tender. Netapp Images/Stencils are freely available at www.visiocafe.com for those that use visio, enjoy. Thanks in advance. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Visio-Stencils-for-FAS3100-Series-tp19267152p19267152… Sent from the Network Appliance - Toasters mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

1 0

Re: Oddball SnapMirror issue - Fixed
by Raj Patel 31 Aug '08

31 Aug '08

Old issue I know, but in case anyone else was interested - * Upgrading from 7.06 to 7.2.5.1 fixed it. So I'm unsure if there was a bug in 7.06 SnapMirror or if 7.2.5.1 just has a more robust SnapMirror but upgrading destination and source certainly fixed it. Cheers, Raj. On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Raj Patel <phigmov(a)gmail.com> wrote: > We've got two FAS 270's in different cities. They're connected by a > 10mb pipe with routers (running ipsec) & firewalls (checkpoint splat) > seperating each datacenter. > > The primary san is fine and runs all our prod volumes (7.0.5) which > are mirrored to our secondary san (7.0.6). > > Recently I had to recreate the mirror relationship for some volumes as > they'd fallen far out of sync due to some firewall work. > > What I am seeing is one volume is syncing fine, one has a small lag > and two are stuck with a status of 'Pending with restart checkpoint' > after I re-initialised the transfer. > > snapmirror status -l shows this for one of the two that just don't get > properly initialised > > Source: 10.1.45.7:sqlprod01 > Destination: adcsan1:sqlprod01_mirror > Status: Pending with restart checkpoint > Progress: 38376 KB > State: Unknown > Lag: - > Mirror Timestamp: - > Base Snapshot: - > Current Transfer Type: Retry > Current Transfer Error: volume is not online; cannot execute operation > Contents: - > Last Transfer Type: - > Last Transfer Size: - > Last Transfer Duration: - > Last Transfer From: - > > Our firewalls rules have been relaxed to allow free-flow between these > devices (instead of just the SnapMirror ports) and the routers and > circuit haven't changed at all between it working fine and not working > now. The volume that is mirroring OK seems fine and still syncs fine - > granted the updates are small whereas the three non-working volumes > have to sync quite a lot of data. > > I've tried deleting the mirrored volumes, recreating them, setting up > the mirror relationship again (with a variety of scheduling and > bandwidth throttling options) and doing a destination SAN reboot. > > What are the best options to troubleshoot this or insuring a > successful mirror ? Has anyone had issues with dropped or stalled > SnapMirror baseline transfers via an IPSec tunnel or Firewall ? > > Thanks in advance, > Raj. > > PS As an addendum it looks like it starts a transfer, stalls and from > then on subsequent mirrors fail because its not online (ie the > initialisation fails ?) > > What I don't understand is why it just can't carry on with the > initialisation regardless of the interruption by resuming the mirror > operation ? >

1 0

RE: issues with 10G Ethernet.
by Page, Jeremy 28 Aug '08

28 Aug '08

Hi. Wow you're down the street. I have about 250 VMs on 5 servers (IBM x3850m2 with 4 quadcore processors and 64 gig of RAM. We are using Etherchannel to bind two gigE connections to a pair of stacked Cisco 3750 G switches. Then the switches are connected via a 10gig Etherchannel connection to each filer head. So about 50 VMs per server or 25 per gig port. Here's the results from esxtop's network information. It's got 8:26:08am up 97 days 19:20, 297 worlds; CPU load average: 0.29, 0.31, 0.37 PORT ID UPLINK USED BY DTYP DNAME PKTTX/s MbTX/s PKTRX/s MbRX/s %DRPTX %DRPRX 83886083 Y vmnic6 H vSwitch1 156.40 4.55 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 83886085 N 0:vmk-tcpip-172.1.2. H vSwitch1 156.40 4.55 117.49 0.40 0.00 0.00 50331651 Y vmnic5 H vSwitch3 819.40 0.78 854.49 1.45 0.00 0.00 50331746 N 1438:gsovmfmspoll05 H vSwitch3 596.24 0.58 606.16 1.14 0.00 0.00 50331649 Y vmnic1 H vSwitch3 302.31 0.37 388.53 0.29 0.00 0.00 50331690 N 1271:GSOVMFMSPOLL02 H vSwitch3 179.10 0.15 196.46 0.16 0.00 0.00 50331679 N 1249:GSOVMFMSPOLL01 H vSwitch3 129.51 0.14 166.70 0.11 0.00 0.00 50332486 N 1385:gsovmwebsense01 H vSwitch3 120.35 0.13 115.59 0.12 0.00 0.00 50331691 N 1276:GSOVMFMSPOLL03 H vSwitch3 44.06 0.04 57.03 0.05 0.00 0.00 50332424 N 1573:pcresource H vSwitch3 8.77 0.04 11.83 0.01 0.00 0.00 50331747 N 1446:GSOVMFMSPOLL04 H vSwitch3 21.55 0.03 25.56 0.04 0.00 0.00 50332308 N 1470:gsovmdproc1 H vSwitch3 21.17 0.02 24.22 0.09 0.00 0.00 16777217 Y vmnic0 H vSwitch0 10.68 0.02 59.32 0.05 0.00 0.00 16777220 N 0:vswif0 H vSwitch0 10.68 0.02 8.77 0.03 0.00 0.00 50332389 N 1295:gsovmgpprod01 H vSwitch3 3.62 0.01 6.48 0.03 0.00 0.00 33554433 Y vmnic2 H vSwitch2 7.25 0.00 13.73 0.01 0.00 0.00 50331738 N 1414:gsovmdhrdc01 H vSwitch3 2.29 0.00 6.10 0.03 0.00 0.00 33554487 N 1216:gsovmdns01 H vSwitch2 2.48 0.00 8.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 50332382 N 1687:gsovmsoftpdc H vSwitch3 1.53 0.00 2.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 50332455 N 1702:gsovmsmcctst H vSwitch3 2.67 0.00 6.29 0.02 0.00 0.00 50332301 N 1390:gsovmhyp01 H vSwitch3 0.95 0.00 4.20 0.02 0.00 0.00 33554489 N 1290:GSOVM-IK-DMZXP H vSwitch2 0.95 0.00 7.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 33554485 N 1694:gsovmwwwstg H vSwitch2 0.76 0.00 7.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 -----Original Message----- From: clane(a)co.durham.nc.us [mailto:clane@co.durham.nc.us] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 3:30 PM To: Page, Jeremy; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: issues with 10G Ethernet. What sort of ratio are you getting with VM on NFS on those 10gbE cards? (i.e. vm sessions per port and/or esx hosts per port) -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Page, Jeremy Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 9:26 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: issues with 10G Ethernet. We are doing the same for our NFS mounted VMs (a couple of hundred) with no real issues. It would be nice of the TOE functionality worked with VIFs though. 7.2.4 here. Are the bugs significant enough to warrant an upgrade if we've been stable for months? -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Glenn Walker Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 8:48 AM To: James Beal; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: issues with 10G Ethernet. We're using the dual-port 10GbE TOE cards with no issues - that said, TOE is not enabled because we're using VIF (Filer turns TOE off with VIF - not desired by us, but no choice right now as we cannot have SPOF). Perhaps disabling TOE would get you more reliability? -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of James Beal Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 8:02 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: issues with 10G Ethernet. I have a call open with netapp about this however I thought I would ask the list if anyone else has had similar issues. We have a cluster which is connected to our core via TOE-10G Ethernet (T320E-XFP). The problem we see is that the sometimes the netapp appears stop receiving any packets. I haven't done a packet trace while the problem is in effect as I have been a bit of a Muppet when I have noticed the problem as I had forgotten the rlm user name but I have made notes so next time it happens I will do a trace.. This has happened on both units in our cluster. We have replaced one of the 10gig cards and that has made no difference. Our networking people show no errors on the line cards. Power cycling the units brings the network card back. We have turned toe off on the cards and that appears not to make any difference to the reliability of the system. This has so far occurred 3 times which is really very poor. sysconfig -v 4 slot 4: Dual TOE-10G Ethernet Controller (T320E-XFP) Device Type: CT-31-1 Version Number: T3-SRAM1.1.0-BR1040-20-C0-FW4.6.0-DR03 Serial Number: PT3807035 e4a MAC Address: 00:07:43:05:13:ac (auto-10g_sr-fd-up) e4b MAC Address: 00:07:43:05:13:ad (auto-10g_sr-fd-cfg_down) ifconfig e4a e4a: flags=948043<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,TCPCKSUM> mtu 1500 inet 172.17.66.26 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 172.17.66.255 partner inet 172.17.66.27 (not in use) ether 00:07:43:05:13:ac (auto-10g_sr-fd-up) flowcontrol full This message (including any attachments) contains confidential and/or proprietary information intended only for the addressee. Any unauthorized disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may constitute a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by responding to this e-mail, and delete the message from your system. If you have any questions about this e-mail please notify the sender immediately. This message (including any attachments) contains confidential and/or proprietary information intended only for the addressee. Any unauthorized disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may constitute a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by responding to this e-mail, and delete the message from your system. If you have any questions about this e-mail please notify the sender immediately.

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters