toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13515 discussions

Re: RE: Avamar VS SMVI
by hollandwl＠gmail.com 10 Feb '09

10 Feb '09

Snapvault is not EOL. The next version of SMVI will be including snapvault support. In the interim, Matt Robinson of NetApp has written SV SMVI (Snapvault for Snapmanager for Virtual Infrastructure). I've tried it in our development lab and it seems to work really well. Take a look at it at http://communities.netapp.com/docs/DOC-1868;jsessionid=A4775C7EF68BD0E628BE… The S550 is being discontinued and therefore snapvault primary for it is EOL. However, snapvault for the FAS series is … [View More]not EOL. On Feb 9, 2009 11:40am, "Klise, Steve" <klises(a)pamf.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think snapvault is EOL but is supported > > through 7.3. For some reason, the backup guys don’t want to do it, not > > sure about the specifics, but our VAR (who is great btw), has been trying to > > push us in that direction. > > > > > > > > > > IF it is EOL, that is a nail in that > > coffin. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: > > owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Bill Holland > > > Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 > > 4:00 AM > > > To: Klise, > > Steve; toasters(a)mathworks.com > > > Subject: Re: Avamar VS SMVI > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Have you looked at Snapvault from NetApp? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: steve > > klise > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Saturday, February > > 07, 2009 2:16 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Avamar VS SMVI > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We are starting an eval of SMVI and Avamar for backup/recovery of VM's. > > We are planning on having snapmirrors to another filer for backup (NDMP) and or > > DR purposes, but are doing the sm to a local filer for now. Avamar has some > > good selling point, but it seems to be a waste to buy yet another storage > > platform. We are heavily invested in netapp now with a VTL (1400), and > > NetBackup. Does anyone have any feed back? It seems to make sense to to SMVI > > but with Avamar I get longer retention. I was only going to keep a weeks worth > > of SMVI snapshots. With Avamar, it seem indefinite. The downside of the avamar > > is you seem to need two for going to tape. Avamar can do the single file > > restores, which SMVI 2.0 is supposed to do. Anyhow, any feedback is > > appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > View this message in context: Avamar VS > > SMVI > > > Sent from the Network Appliance > > - Toasters mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [View Less]

2 1

How to balance volume priority (some NFS vs. CIFS)
by Adam McDougall 09 Feb '09

09 Feb '09

I have not opened a case with Netapp yet but probably will if no one has any good ideas; I just like to pick people's brains before going official. Thanks for any input. A few months ago we moved a file share off a Windows server onto our FAS3040 Netapp running 7.2.4 and shared it out via CIFS. It contains software install files and scripts and depending on scheduled jobs, it can get hit pretty hard and pushes out approximately 1 Gbit/sec, which has been drastically affecting the … [View More]service times for our other shares on that filer, and its namely response-sensitive NFS shares we care about that are affected the most such as mail and web files. It doesn't really seem to be a disk bottleneck because the disk read/sec in sysstat is usually only half of what the filer is pushing out to the network, so I assume its reading some data from cache. The CIFS software install share can either get hit by 1-60+ CIFS clients where each client reads files on and off for hours at a time, or sometimes we have hundreds of clients hitting the share at once for a smaller set of files (such as to update one software package across a large set of PCs). I've been able to reproduce the slowdown with just 4 CIFS clients on gigabit downloading a large file from the share. Sometimes it only causes a modest slowdown in the NFS response time but sometimes email messages being moved between folders will stall for 8 seconds or much more, which is pretty much unacceptable. I don't think its a bottleneck in my core network because I've done tests where the slow nfs client is on the same switch as the filer, which is connected via two gig links using LACP. Also, in the normal situation where the slowdown is encountered, mail (NFS) traffic is flowing through a different gig uplink than the hungry CIFS clients. Goal: reduce the impact of greedy clients (primarily known ones, but hopefully unexpected ones too) on the response time of the rest of the filer's clients. I don't care if the CIFS software share must accept slower data rates, and I'd rather not run away from the problem by avoiding it but rather learn what I can do to prevent my filer from being held hostage by greedy clients. I do have another 3040 I could move the share to, but that filer also has volumes that would be affected negatively in the same way, and I'd rather not concede defeat and go back to hosting the share on a dedicated windows server. I can try different code versions in a test environment if I need to, but I'd like to think this kind of situation would have come up already and have a solution at hand. I've played around with na_priority trying to set the mail and website volumes to high or veryhigh priority and the software share to low or verylow but that isn't making a measurable impact. I'm not really sure what to tweak or check next. Here is an example from sysstat when I am simulating the slowdown condition with 4 CIFS clients on gigabit fetching the same file. CPU NFS CIFS HTTP Net kB/s Disk kB/s Tape kB/s Cache in out read write read write age 6% 2058 167 0 751 1543 2196 0 0 0 11 6% 2590 164 0 699 2238 2904 32 0 0 11 10% 2183 223 0 1241 4471 5072 17872 0 0 11 11% 3299 799 0 1577 22194 4935 1183 0 0 11 22% 3298 3072 0 3005 107869 9128 24 0 0 11 18% 2532 1986 0 2270 87651 2078 0 0 0 11 18% 2198 2200 0 1696 105941 8032 8 0 0 11 16% 3597 1650 0 1890 84691 3528 24 0 0 11 23% 4946 2216 0 2604 112741 14664 0 0 0 11 22% 4075 2041 0 2324 100380 21568 0 0 0 11 CPU NFS CIFS HTTP Net kB/s Disk kB/s Tape kB/s Cache in out read write read write age 21% 3272 2246 0 2862 115380 4688 24 0 0 11 21% 4117 2092 0 2686 109165 3864 8 0 0 11 26% 4188 2136 0 3436 115081 21900 0 0 0 11 ......(skip) 30% 7487 1773 0 4261 93385 10156 3328 0 0 6 25% 4566 1900 0 3339 96655 13764 9808 0 0 7 24% 2965 2202 0 2477 111493 11772 5475 0 0 8 23% 5256 1986 0 3093 102409 10508 24 0 0 8 19% 2979 2068 0 1810 102282 9926 0 0 0 8 20% 3164 2323 0 2301 111209 1560 8 0 0 8 23% 7082 2165 0 2322 103816 2292 24 0 0 8 22% 11780 1158 0 2763 55501 1760 0 0 0 8 20% 12032 675 0 3820 36504 2452 0 0 0 8 CPU NFS CIFS HTTP Net kB/s Disk kB/s Tape kB/s Cache in out read write read write age 23% 16269 1122 0 3914 54034 4460 24 0 0 6 18% 8991 1030 0 2739 48400 4568 8 0 0 6 10% 3903 237 0 1346 4494 3828 0 0 0 6 11% 3912 219 0 1623 4301 3808 6508 0 0 6 8% 2402 224 0 868 2027 2744 8712 0 0 6 [View Less]

5 5

VTL and SyncSort
by ifstat 09 Feb '09

09 Feb '09

Hi Thanks to everyone for the support in 2008 and best wishes to all for 2009! Not sure if this is the correct place to post this maybe some knows of a better forum for Netapp VTL's We have a client that is looking into a VTL solution, however they are also looking into SyncSort and I was wondering if anyone out there has work with this combination and what your expierence has being like, pro's and con's are welcome. I know the combination is supported,would like some feedback and to avoid a … [View More]

1 0

Avamar VS SMVI
by steve klise 08 Feb '09

08 Feb '09

We are starting an eval of SMVI and Avamar for backup/recovery of VM's. We are planning on having snapmirrors to another filer for backup (NDMP) and or DR purposes, but are doing the sm to a local filer for now. Avamar has some good selling point, but it seems to be a waste to buy yet another storage platform. We are heavily invested in netapp now with a VTL (1400), and NetBackup. Does anyone have any feed back? It seems to make sense to to SMVI but with Avamar I get longer retention. I … [View More]

3 2

NVRAM Battery Failure
by Zeeshan 07 Feb '09

07 Feb '09

Hello all... recently i ran into a strange problem...i have a fas 3040 in active-active configuration...everything running fine untill one fine morning the NVRAM charging stopped...the filer gave warning messages and then out of a sudden halted...and then the failover tookover the filer... now the problem is that i dont want the cluster to takeover...since netapp has promised replacements within 5 days...when i disable failover after some time, the filer automatically halts/shut down... how can … [View More]

3 3

Re: netgroups not being applied 7.3
by Nicholas Bernstein 06 Feb '09

06 Feb '09

Ed Wilts wrote: > On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Nicholas Bernstein > <nick(a)nicholasbernstein.com <mailto:nick@nicholasbernstein.com>> wrote: > :: snip:: > > There are some pretty serious bugs with netgroups in 7.3. It's a lot > better with 7.3.1 but still not 100% right yet. We had a high > priority case open with NetApp on this because we couldn't even start > to get a new filer into production on 7.3 because of the multiple issues. > > It … [View More]

1 0

read_align_histo.XX/write_align_histo.XX output from stats command
by Filip Sneppe 06 Feb '09

06 Feb '09

Hi, This article: https://now.netapp.com/Knowledgebase/solutionarea.asp?id=kb24492 talks about troublshooting LUN alignment issues. It mentions some statistics one can get from the stats command. Does anyone know how to interpret these, eg.: lun:/vol/esx_lun_data1/luns/esx_lun1.lun-P3NsiJNHOSbN:read_align_histo.0:5% lun:/vol/esx_lun_data1/luns/esx_lun1.lun-P3NsiJNHOSbN:read_align_histo.1:0% lun:/vol/esx_lun_data1/luns/esx_lun1.lun-P3NsiJNHOSbN:read_align_histo.2:0% lun:/vol/esx_lun_data1/… [View More]

3 5

netgroups not being applied 7.3
by Nicholas Bernstein 06 Feb '09

06 Feb '09

Hi all, I'm doing a very basic local /etc/netgroups to give out access via the /etc/exports file. (eg rw=trustedhosts (also @trustedhosts was tried)). If I give out access via the hostname/ip everything works fine. Add netgroups and it stops working. This is the fist time I've seen issues with a local netgroups file, and it's on 7.3 ontap. Has anyone else tried using netgroups on 7.3? Is anyone aware of any issues? netgroups: ---------------------------- trustedhosts (… [View More]

1 0

MEC (Multichassis EtherChannel)
by David Lee 05 Feb '09

05 Feb '09

(I'm a little out of my depth here, so there may be some bits needing lateral interpretation...) We already use bonded/trunked ethernet from the NetApp to a switch. That's fine. We are planning a network upgrade, which gives us a chance to do this bonding/trunking to a logically linked pair of switches (Cisco 3750E) that operate as a single virtual switch, using "MEC". (The theory is that if a switch in the MEC-pair fails, the bond/trunk link continues working through the other switch, … [View More]

6 6

Trouble with wrong quota report numbers
by Paul Letta 04 Feb '09

04 Feb '09

Hi Everyone. I am having a quota issue on qtrees that are in flexvols. I've been noticing one particular qtree growing over the past several weeks. It grows until it hits the quota, users scream, I increase the quota and so on... It got to the point where I just didn't believe that much space was being consumed. I started doing du commands all over the place, but could not find where that qtree was growing. A du at the root of that qtree did not show it growing either. Here's some … [View More]

2 2

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters