toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

1 participants
13515 discussions

Thanks for Joining Tech OnTap!
by NetApp 02 Oct '09

02 Oct '09

================================================================================= NetApp Tech OnTap ================================================================================= Dear Toasters, Thank you for joining the NetApp Tech OnTap program. You will begin to receive Tech OnTap communications in the next few weeks. In the meantime, I invite you to browse the articles, tips, and tools available in the Tech OnTap archive. http://www.netapp.com/us/communities/tech-ontap/archive/tot-… [View More]

1 0

Thanks for Joining Tech OnTap!
by NetApp 02 Oct '09

02 Oct '09

1 0

Thanks for Joining Tech OnTap!
by NetApp 02 Oct '09

02 Oct '09

1 0

Thanks for Joining Tech OnTap!
by NetApp 02 Oct '09

02 Oct '09

1 0

Special Offer: NetApp Hardware Universe Poster
by NetApp 02 Oct '09

02 Oct '09

================================================ Tech OnTap Special Offer: NetApp Hardware Universe Poster ================================================ Dear Toasters, Rhett Bigler, your NetApp Systems Engineer, would like to offer you a complimentary membership to Tech OnTap, a resource for technical people who work with, evaluate, or rely on storage. Members receive a monthly newsletter packed with best practices, tips, and tricks plus opportunities to chat with NetApp product … [View More]

1 0

CommVault Archiver module (HSM) and OnTap 7.3?
by John Stoffel 02 Oct '09

02 Oct '09

Hi all, Does anyone know what the bug number that is fixed in OnTap 7.3.x so that CommVault 7.x will work properly with stubs to restore files which have been moved off to secondary storage? We're currently running 7.2.6.1 and 7.2.6.1P8 on our filers, and I just want to see if I can figure out which fpolicy (my assumption) bug was fixed. As I understand it, the bug was that on the first access, the file wasn't restored, but on the second it was. This could lead to problems if users found … [View More]

1 0

Re: missing ops? messages file and `qtree stats` data inconsistency
by Todd C. Merrill 02 Oct '09

02 Oct '09

On Fri, 2 Oct 2009, Jeff Mohler wrote: > Qtree stats are ONLY reads and writes. > > No metadata ops (readdir, etc, etc, etc...wafl IO..etc..etc.etc..even > CIFS has gobs of metadata ops, just like NFS) Jeff, we were thinking similarly as well... I compared the output of the three following stats, 60 seconds apart, and clearly the qtree stats is the smallest of the three: qtree stats 972297 cifs stat 2396439 uptime 2395260 However, given our workload,… [View More]

1 0

Re: Other OPS?
by Mike 02 Oct '09

02 Oct '09

Metadata work, mostly - directory crawls, access checks, things like that (in CIFS). In NFS, ACCESS, READDIR, READDIR+ , stuff like that. I think you can use 'cifs top -s ops' to see the busiest clients hitting the system. If the ones at the top have very high ops, but not many reads/writes, those could be your guys. That said, it's all about latency. If it isn't driving latency higher, shouldn't be a concern. Those are different stats commands, though, can't remember right now...... … [View More]--- On Fri, 6/5/09, Page, Jeremy <jeremy.page(a)gilbarco.com> wrote: > From: Page, Jeremy <jeremy.page(a)gilbarco.com> > Subject: Other OPS? > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Date: Friday, June 5, 2009, 3:10 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What > causes other ops? > I understand that pretty much everything that hits the > filer requires something > but I am seeing what looks like a very high number of other > ops when I do a > stats show. Does this indicate a problem or is it just a > busy box? It’s > a mixed mode volume. Just trying to figure out what’s > causing it to work > so hard. > > > > > > Instance > total_ops read_ops write_ops other_ops nfs_read_ops > nfs_write_op nfs_other_op > cifs_read_op cifs_write_o cifs_other_o > > > /s > /s > /s > /s > /s > /s > /s > /s > /s > /s > > > shares > 1633 > 984 > 139 > 509 > 0 > 1 > 34 > 984 > 137 > 473 > > > shares > 2085 > 1173 > 257 > 654 > 0 > 2 > 18 > 1173 > 255 > 634 > > > shares > 2593 > 1483 > 253 > 856 > 0 > 2 > 221 > 1483 > 251 > 634 > > > shares > 3268 > 2306 > 170 > 791 > 0 > 1 > 222 > 2305 > 168 > 569 > > > > > > > > > > > > Please be advised that this email may contain confidential > information. > > If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, > copy or > > re-transmit this email. If you have received this email in > error, > > please notify us by email by replying to the sender and by > telephone > > (call us collect at +1 202-828-0850) and delete this > message and any > > attachments. Thank you in advance for your cooperation and > assistance. > > > > In addition, Danaher and its subsidiaries disclaim that the > content of > > this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the > acceptance of, > > any > > contract or agreement or any amendment thereto; provided > that the > > foregoing disclaimer does not invalidate the binding effect > of any > > digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual > signature that is > > included in any attachment to this email. > > [View Less]

2 1

CIFS Standard Pool
by Zeeshan 02 Oct '09

02 Oct '09

Hi All Does anyone know about CIFS Standard Pool, recently we got a message on the filer that CIFS Standard pool was full and new requests could not be handled etc??? Thanx Xishan

1 0

Snapmanager - eMail issue
by Buerger, Andreas 02 Oct '09

02 Oct '09

Hey Toasters, We're experiencing problems in our Snapmanager environment: Since our eMail team changed the mailrelay hosts, we are not able to send emails with Snapmanager applications anymore. We tracked the problem down to the root cause and found that Snapmanger doesn't use the FQDN in the SMTP Helo cmd to connect to the email relay. According to RFC 821 (SMTP Protocol) the FQDN has to be submitted otherwise the mail relay "normally" does not accept the message (some mail relays do, some … [View More]

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters