toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

1 participants
13515 discussions

DEC TZ887 tape drive
by Nigel Metheringham 27 Jan '99

27 Jan '99

Anyone got one of these going on a NetApp (a 630 running 5.2.1)?? Its supposed to be just the same as a Quantum 4700, but initial tests are failing to write on it. The same drive was previously in use successfully on some other system (not NetApp). Do I need to hack the drive type ID - I thought all that was not needed with the latest releases. However 5.2.1 does not appear to be looking at the cloned_tapes in the same way as 5.1 (it didn't work right then either). Using the diag stuff on the mt command, a dump gives the following output:- DUMP: creating "/vol/web/.snapshot/snapshot_for_backup.2" snapshot. DUMP: Using Full Volume Dump DUMP: Date of this level 0 dump: Wed Jan 27 17:54:18 1999. DUMP: Date of last level 0 dump: the epoch. DUMP: Dumping /vol/web/ to rst0a DUMP: mapping (Pass I)[regular files] DUMP: mapping (Pass II)[directories] Wed Jan 27 17:55:30 GMT [netapp2: isp_main]: Tape (4.5):cmdblk 0xfffffc0000ae2ef0 op 0xa block 0 illegal request (5 30, 0) DUMP: Tape write failed. Wed Jan 27 17:55:30 GMT [netapp2: isp_main]: Tape (4.5) unrecognized error 0x5. DUMP: DUMP IS ABORTED DUMP: Deleting "/vol/web/.snapshot/snapshot_for_backup.2" snapshot. All clues gratefully received :-) Nigel. -- [ Nigel.Metheringham(a)theplanet.net - Systems Software Engineer ] [ Tel : +44 113 207 6112 Fax : +44 113 234 6065 ] [ Real life is but a pale imitation of a Dilbert strip ] [ We're recruiting http://www.theplanet.net/profile/recruit.htm ]

1 0

DRP documents...
by eyal traitel 27 Jan '99

27 Jan '99

Has anyone wrote a Disaster Recovery Plan documents for a filer? Can someone share his documents (or at least the technical parts...) ? Yours, Eyal Traitel

1 0

DATA OnTap and WINS...
by eyal traitel 27 Jan '99

27 Jan '99

Hi! Does anyone has experience with NetApp's WINS support and Samba's WINS? I get all the time "No WINS servers are responding; still trying"... Yours, Eyal Traitel

1 0

list tweak
by fubar＠mathworks.com 26 Jan '99

26 Jan '99

I've just tweaked the toasters list, making it a bona fide majordomo list. Hopefully (if I've got it right ;-), we'll stop seeing those darned "sub-scribe" messages to the list... The change may effect any filtering you have. From now on, list mail should appear to be from "owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com", rather than me. If it breaks your setup, sorry. If there are any real problems, feel free to shout at me. ;-) K.

1 0

Fwd: Re: duplicate inode numbers - correct URL
by Andrew Bond 25 Jan '99

25 Jan '99

1 0

duplicate inode numbers
by Tom Reingold 25 Jan '99

25 Jan '99

Hey! My user could not copy a snapshot to the original place because "cp" claimed the files are identical. I think cp thinks so because the inode numbers are the same. The files do not have identical contents, so it seems like a serious bug that the filer issued duplicate inode numbers. Am I wrong? The output belog is wide. Please view it with a wide window. # ls -il myfile .snapshot/*/myfile 2436244 -rw-rw---- 1 pete pete 85933 Jan 24 17:50 .snapshot/hourly.0/myfile 2436244 -rw-rw---- 1 pete pete 85211 Jan 24 15:50 .snapshot/hourly.1/myfile 2436244 -rw-rw---- 1 pete pete 84223 Jan 24 11:56 .snapshot/hourly.2/myfile 971294 -rw-rw---- 1 pete pete 83436 Jan 24 00:47 .snapshot/hourly.3/myfile 971294 -rw-rw---- 1 pete pete 79270 Jan 23 12:57 .snapshot/hourly.4/myfile 971294 -rw-rw---- 1 pete pete 79270 Jan 23 12:57 .snapshot/hourly.5/myfile 971294 -rw-rw---- 1 pete pete 75104 Jan 23 02:42 .snapshot/hourly.6/myfile 971294 -rw-rw---- 1 pete pete 75104 Jan 23 02:42 .snapshot/hourly.7/myfile 971294 -rw-rw---- 1 pete pete 79270 Jan 23 12:57 .snapshot/nightly.0/myfile 971294 -rw-rw---- 1 pete pete 70938 Jan 22 19:41 .snapshot/nightly.1/myfile 971294 -rw-rw---- 1 pete pete 62606 Jan 21 22:20 .snapshot/nightly.2/myfile 2436244 -rw-rw---- 1 pete pete 86541 Jan 24 22:24 myfile Tom Reingold tommy(a)bell-labs.com http://www.bell-labs.com/~tommy Bell Labs, the Research and Development unit of Lucent Technologies Murray Hill, NJ, 07974-0636 US

2 1

Microsoft exchange
by Jason Middlebrooks 24 Jan '99

24 Jan '99

Is Microsoft exchange supported on the netapp filers? Jason Middlebrooks Systems Engineer Datalink Phone: 770-933-9327x260 2264 Northwest Parkway, Suite I Pager: 888-502-1625 Marietta, GA 30067 Fax: 770-933-9272

10 11

Recoverable error rates
by Aiello, Tony 24 Jan '99

24 Jan '99

Hello, There's been some questions of late regarding the meaning of soft or recovered errors. A recovered error is defined as the disk needing to take some action other than the initial access to the media in order to satisfy an i/o request. The methods used may be to retry the request, reseeking to the sector, recreating the data from error correction information or all of the above. Recovered errors do not indicate pending disk failure. Drive manufacturer's specify a bit error rate of so many recoverable errors per bits of access. Note that bits of access includes sector overhead. A 512 byte sector is bracketed by header and trailer information used to keep track of the location as well as error recovery information. While recovered errors do not in themselves indicate pending drive failure, an excessive rate of more than 10 a day on a filer under average load would indicate problems in media management. This condition must be examined more closely to really quantify the error rate. A single sector written with a bit flip will always return a recovered event when read. Naturally. The ECC does not match the stored data so the error correction is invoked to reproduce the proper image. So when examining the recovered error log look at the block address. If each entry references the same block, that is ONE recovered error, regardless of how many entries are made against it. If each one indicates a different address then the amount of traffic must be considered. Using sysstat to look at the megabyte per second rating of the system. Using that determine the megabyte per hour rating. Multiply by 8 to get bits. A reasonable number of for the recovered error rate is 10 per 10^12 bits of access. So consider a disk giving an average response of 20 ms per 4K i/o. It's serving 50 transactions per second or .2 MB/sec. In a 24 hour period then it serves about 1.4 * 10^11 bits. Not far from the recovered bit error rate. So a recovered error every day would not even be excessive. Naturally a filer serving more transactions per second would have a higher rate of expected recovered errors. Realistically, disks don't perform that poorly and may go for long periods of time without reporting a single recovery event. Our primary motivation in logging these events is more for performance. Since error recovery takes time, a disk having a large number of recovered errors could adversely effect performance. So we log these as a means to aid in diagnosing performance problems. The short story is: drives are expected to have these recovered errors. Recovered errors don't indicate a pending failure. Removing a disk because of soft errors wastes time and materials. Futher it exposes you to real damage should some other device experience an unrecoverable error. Tony -------------------------- mailto: taiello(a)netapp.com Ph:(408) 367-3251 Fax: (408) 367-3151

3 2

Re: NFS mail spool [ Was Re: Microsoft exchange ]
by Keith Brown 22 Jan '99

22 Jan '99

Use of NetApp filer technology to act as the storage portion of large scale e-mail installations is a relatively common application of our products. Almost "routine" in fact! :-) A very good technical paper has been written by one of our customers on this subject, which can be perused at: http://www.earthlink.com/about/papers/mailarch.html A similar paper describing the net news application of filers is also available from: http://www.earthlink.com/about/papers/scalenews.html A recently published article on the subject of "Hosting E-Mail for Heavyweights", involving our storage solutions can be viewed at: http://www.internetworld.com/print/1998/10/12/infrastructure/19981012-hosti… tml And finally, one of our own papers on the subject of e-mail performance benchmarking is available from: http://www.netapp.com/technology/level3/3022.html All just FYI... Keith

1 0

RE: Microsoft exchange
by Mohler, Jeff 22 Jan '99

22 Jan '99

While we're on the subject of mail, I was thinking of moving our sendmail spool area from a drive local to the Sun mail server to one of our NetApp boxes. Anyone have any pros/cons regarding NFS mounting the mail spool to the mail server? -- Two words. Dot locking. (procmail)

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters