toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

2 participants
13529 discussions

Start a nNew thread

Subscribe
by Jonas Jonsson 22 Jan '99

22 Jan '99

1 0

SUMMARY: can't control access over CIFS
by Tom Reingold 22 Jan '99

22 Jan '99

Thanks to Keith Brown of Netapp! His answer was right. After connecting a drive (or being told the user is not allowed), changing the permissions is not adequate. The user has to log out of NT. Keith suggested also doing "cifs terminate workstation-name" on the toaster, which I'll try next time. Thanks to Mark Muhlestein of Netapp for following up to make sure I'm a satisfied customer. I think we get more than our money's worth on this mailing list. :-) What other vendor follows up so thoroughly? Thanks to all others who tried. -- Tom Reingold tommy(a)bell-labs.com http://www.bell-labs.com/~tommy Bell Labs, the Research and Development unit of Lucent Technologies Murray Hill, NJ, 07974-0636 US

1 0

Subnet/Gateway Problem
by Patrick.Day.B＠bayer.com 22 Jan '99

22 Jan '99

I have a 740 with a 4-Port nic card. We are running both WINS and DNS (and the respective addresses are static-mapped). I have attached each port to a different subnet (they are all connecte via routers). When i run setup, it asks for each nic address and subnet mask, howerver it only asks for one gateway address for all. Only the nic that corresponds to the gateway will respond. How can i configure a default gateway for each port? -Patrick Day Bayer Corporation

2 1

Re: Subnet/Gateway Problem
by Keith Brown 22 Jan '99

22 Jan '99

> http://now-internal.netapp.com/knowledge/contents/TIP/TIP_55.shtml > >and: > > http://now-internal.netapp.com/knowledge/contents/TIP/TIP_56.shtml Doh! My apologies to everyone. I cut and pasted the above links from my browser and promptly forgot to modify them for *external* access to NOW. Unless you work here, you won't be able to get to these. The correct links are: http://now.netapp.com/knowledge/contents/TIP/TIP_55.shtml http://now.netapp.com/knowledge/contents/TIP/TIP_56.shtml Keith

2 1

Re: Subnet/Gateway Problem
by Keith Brown 21 Jan '99

21 Jan '99

>How can i configure a default gateway for each port? There are some "Tip and Technique" documents in the Knowledge Base of the NOW website that discusses this (at least they discuss the issue of multiple default gateways). They are: http://now-internal.netapp.com/knowledge/contents/TIP/TIP_55.shtml and: http://now-internal.netapp.com/knowledge/contents/TIP/TIP_56.shtml Hopefully they will answer your question. Take a look at the doc for /etc/dgateways also, which you will probably find at: http://yourfiler.bayer.com/na_admin/man/na_dgateways.5.html Keith

1 0

RE: Clustered failover product roadmap
by Norman, Paul 21 Jan '99

21 Jan '99

> I did see a pair of 740s clusetered at LISA. I've also been talking > to my reseller about clustering a pair of them, with nary a word of it > not being possible. I've also heard of clustering between a 630 and a > 7xx, but it "wasn't supported." True, the only supported configurations are between identical model filers. > > K. >

2 1

RE: Snapshots/no snapshots on the same volume
by Norman, Paul 21 Jan '99

21 Jan '99

> -----Original Message----- > From: Bob Collie [mailto:bob.collie@telalink.net] > Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 1999 1:01 PM > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: Snapshots/no snapshots on the same volume > > > Can you designate a certain area of the same volume to not snapshot > where you designate the rest of it to do so? > > It is my current understanding that I have to create an entirely > new volume in order to try and do this, but I'm hoping that is > not the case. I hate to be the one to dash your hopes, but your understanding is correct. You need to create additional volume. Snapshots are indeed done on a per volume basis. > > NetApp Release 5.1.2: Sat Sep 26 05:05:59 PDT 1998 > > Thanks, > -Bob > > -- > Bob Collie, VP/Chief Technical Officer, Telalink Corporation > mailto:bob.collie@telalink.net >

1 0

RE: Clustered failover product roadmap
by Norman, Paul 21 Jan '99

21 Jan '99

> -----Original Message----- > From: Brian Tao [mailto:taob@risc.org] > Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 1999 12:26 PM > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: Clustered failover product roadmap > > > I've got two conflicting pieces of information that I'd like > to have sorted out. I initially thought that clustered failover was > available on the F760 late last year, and that it was coming to the > F740 sometime this quarter. I was then told by a Netapp vendor that > last year saw the rollout of clustering on the F630's, and that I > should only expect clustering on the F760's this quarter. Clustering > on the F740's was not in the plans. F630 Clusters starting shipping October 10th of last year. F760 and F740 Clusters started shipping January 11th of this year. > > I'm pretty sure I heard right the first time, and I'm told Netapp > demonstrated an F740 cluster at LISA'98. I bought a pair of F740's on > the assumption that I could get clustering on them for 1999Q1, and I'm > about to buy another pair on the same assumption. We did demonstrate an F740 cluster at LISA'98 last December. > -- > Brian Tao (BT300, taob(a)risc.org) > "Though this be madness, yet there is method in't" >

1 0

Re: Snapshots/no snapshots on the same volume
by Keith Brown 21 Jan '99

21 Jan '99

>Can you designate a certain area of the same volume to not snapshot >where you designate the rest of it to do so? No. Sorry. Keith

3 2

Clustered failover product roadmap
by Brian Tao 20 Jan '99

20 Jan '99

I've got two conflicting pieces of information that I'd like to have sorted out. I initially thought that clustered failover was available on the F760 late last year, and that it was coming to the F740 sometime this quarter. I was then told by a Netapp vendor that last year saw the rollout of clustering on the F630's, and that I should only expect clustering on the F760's this quarter. Clustering on the F740's was not in the plans. I'm pretty sure I heard right the first time, and I'm told Netapp demonstrated an F740 cluster at LISA'98. I bought a pair of F740's on the assumption that I could get clustering on them for 1999Q1, and I'm about to buy another pair on the same assumption. -- Brian Tao (BT300, taob(a)risc.org) "Though this be madness, yet there is method in't"

4 3

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters