toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13531 discussions

RE: Dump command issues?
by Melvin, Grant 15 Apr '99

15 Apr '99

Hi Mike, Officially NetApp doesn't support the ATL L200 or L500, but we do have a bunch of L200s in-house and we see different issues with them which normally results in a firmware upgrade from ATL. The latest upgrade is version 28 you may want to try this. FYI, the only "stackers" we officially support are the Quantum 4700 and Breece Hill Q2.15. We have had issues with timing on other tape stackers and have made recent changes to Data ONTAP that should cope with these variations, but we have no roadmap to "certify" a bunch more stackers. I know that 3rd party vendors have also been having some difficulty getting the L200/L500 units to work via NDMP without software changes. So if you are using a 3rd party tool which is NDMP-compliant or NOT then you may want to ask about their support (think patches) for these units. If you still have an issue after getting your unit upgraded/ checked out then feel free to send me an e-mail with your dump output and we'll see if we can get to the bottom of it. Cheers, Grant -----Original Message----- From: Mike Ball [mailto:mball@rtp.opensystems.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 1999 10:54 AM To: toasters@mathworks. com Subject: Dump command issues? Currently we have a F720 filer and a ATL Powerstor L500 tape library attached locally. We are running into a issue when we try to dump to multiple tapes. If we use the command below, it is supposed to dump our entire vol0 (90GB of data) to multiple tapes in our tape library. rsh -l dump 0uf urst0a,urst0a /vol/vol0 Unfortunately, the dump command above backs up to the first tape, then rewinds the tape when it is full but never unloads it. The first tape is then overwritten as the dump continues. The dump command above does not unload the tape and continue the dump onto the second tape in the library. Has anyone else experienced this before, or does anyone have any recommendations to correct the problem? Thank you, Mike Ball

2 1

RE: Migration problems
by Benn, Paul 15 Apr '99

15 Apr '99

Just for clarification.... The problem with Microsoft's Migration Tool for NetWare is that you can only migrate data to a domain controller (the problem exists for NT member servers as well as filers), right? I'm not sure how helpful this link is to you at this point (I just discovered it myself) but here it is anyway: http://support.microsoft.com/support/ntserver/migration/ Regards, Paul Oh, and to answer your question: Personally, I've never heard of any other tools to do this. I have, however, performed a NW=>NT migration. We chose to do everything manually because the end result was much cleaner. We did use the Microsoft tool, but only to migrate user accounts. The company was large so we performed the migration in steps (say 100 users per weekend and ~20 each week day). -----Original Message----- We tried to do this at the first time with a tool called Migration Tool for Netware. With this tool it is impossible to transfer the data from the Novell servers to the Netapp.

1 0

Migration problems
by JD Ambagtsheer 15 Apr '99

15 Apr '99

We are working on a migration project (Novell => NT) and want to transfer data from 3 Novell servers to a Netapp (F720) fileserver. Because of the different file systems, the right structure must also be transfered and translate. We tried to do this at the first time with a tool called Migration Tool for Netware. With this tool it is impossible to transfer the data from the Novell servers to the Netapp. Now we have the following question: - Does anyone already had a migration from Novell to a Netapp (or an other migration to a Netapp)? - Are there some tools to realise this? I hope someone has answer to those questions. Greetings, Jan-Dirk

1 0

Legato with NT
by Robert Palermo 15 Apr '99

15 Apr '99

Is anyone using Legato to back up a filer in an NT only environment ? Thanks for any input. Bob Palermo bob(a)opensystems.com Systems Engineer tel: 508-359-4248 Open System Solutions, Inc. fax: 508-359-5215 www.opensystems.com www.4privatei.com

2 1

Macs & NFS
by Clark Shishido 14 Apr '99

14 Apr '99

I just found that there is still one MacNFS client that is shipping. In an earlier post I had stated that there were no MacOS NFS clients available. Ascend bought Intercon which had published NFS/Share. It is now a part of IntragyAccess. I haven't seen it, but it might be an option for those of you who don't want to dedicate a UNIX server to reexport NFS shares via KA-Share, EtherShare, or netatalk. I looked around a little bit and PCZone/MacZone seems to have copies available. http://www.ascend.com/2405.html --clark http://macunix.com

2 2

Re: NDMP support, Arkeia and others
by Jason D. Kelleher 14 Apr '99

14 Apr '99

In message <19990413141027.A21139(a)sonic.net>, Dane Jasper writes: >I'm interested in seeing NetApp work closely with backup software vendors >such as Arkeia to further NDMP support. Arkeia now supports backup of the >Cobalt product line, including their (non exandable, small scale) RAID-1 NA >S >product. > >It would be great if NetApp would contact Arkeia and extend any assistance >they can in the extension of the Arkeia backup tool. This type of support >can only be beneficial for both companies, and end users too! > >Arkeia is at http://www.knox-software.com/. Arkeia is similar to Legato's >Networker product, but supports other server platforms and costs less. > >BRU is another backup product where I'd love to see NDMP support included. >BRU is at http://www.estinc.com/. > >NetApp customers, please voice your support to NetApp if you see value in >more support for NDMP. I thought NDMP was great until I saw it break in every other ONTAP release. I'm still using it. I'm waiting for fixes to internal bugs (in 5.3). I'm feeling jaded. And the NetApp voice mail call system just hung up on me twice while writing this email... Time to break out the secret stash of enginner numbers... Just so I don't sound like I'm beating NetApp up too bad... Hurray for SNTP!!!! Second level trunks are awesome!!! (But the 5.3 docs concerning them suck... Have a call open to find out if I'm doing it right. Generates errors during failover, but it works.) jason

1 0

RE: Not a server
by Benn, Paul 14 Apr '99

14 Apr '99

It's been some time since I've used this tool so curiosity got the best of me. I looked in one of the Microsoft NT4 training manuals and found the following tidbit: "The Windows NT Server Migration Tool for NetWare is used to migrate NetWare servers to computers running Windows NT Server. This tool transfers user and group accounts, login scripts, and files and directories form NetWare servers to Windows NT server domain controllers." It makes sense that the transfer of user accounts/groups and login scripts would fail but not the transfer of data only (even though it says otherwise). Were the attempted migrations of data only? If so, then you're initial assumption that the tool only works with domain controllers was correct. -----Original Message----- From: JD Ambagtsheer [mailto:J.D.Ambagtsheer@fel.tno.nl] Sent: Monday, April 12, 1999 1:04 AM To: Benn, Paul Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: Not a server It doesn't matter for those questions, but, I also checked those before, and were positive. I'm not for sure, but with this tool, I can see the NetApp, can select it, but when press the OK button, the NT PDC comes with the message I told before. I think it is a problem with this tool that it can only apply this migration on a NT PDC, and not an external filer (although it sounds stupid..).

2 2

RE: Cifs permissions ???
by Muhlestein, Mark 13 Apr '99

13 Apr '99

What is the output of 'cifs sessions -s' after someone tries to access the share? Are the group assignments as expected? I know having local groups in share-level acls works, so I'm not sure what the problem is in your setup. One thing to check is that the local group is for the filer, not for the domain. Did you do "User->Select Domain" then enter "\\filername" in usrmgr before creating the local group? btw, if you are planning on sharing data in a multiprotocol way (i.e. with NFS users accessing the same data as NT users), you don't want to rely on share level acls to control access, since they are not used for NFS clients. Normally, in an NT environment the share level acls are left wide open and the access control is done via file-level acls. Let me know if you can't figure this out. Mark Muhlestein -- mmm(a)netapp.com -----Original Message----- From: Jason Middlebrooks [mailto:Jason_Middlebrooks@datalink.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 1999 4:00 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Cifs permissions ??? The following is happening. Any ideas of what to do? 1. I have created a folder called test. 2. Within server manager I create a share for test. 3. Withing user manager I create a user called dude, a global group called dudes_global with several users, and a local group called dudes_local with several users. First I give one person (dude) permission to access test and everything works fine. (Dude can access test and nobody else can) Second I remove dude from the permissions list, add a global group (dudes_global) to have permission to access test and everything works fine. (Only the people in dudes_global can access test nobody else can) Third I remove dudes_global from the permissions list, add a local group (dudes_local) to have permission to access test and then it happens. (Nobody can access test and I mean nobody. I keep on getting not accessible / access is denied) Anything wrong with using local groups?? Is there any setting that needs to be changed in NT or on the Filer??? F720 DataOnTap 5.3 and all the other stuff... Jason Middlebrooks Systems Engineer Datalink Corp. jason_middlebrooks(a)datalink.com

1 0

RE: nightly.1 busy: snapshot rollovers not happening
by Benn, Paul 13 Apr '99

13 Apr '99

Yes, there's a sample script (batch file) that can be scheduled with the AT service. Here's a snippet from section 5.2 of the doc: Once the filer and Windows NT have been setup, schedule a batch process using the Windows NT "at" command. The following batch file, which uses NT Backup, is included as a reference: REM In this example, 'filer5' will be used as the name of the filer REM The qtree is called 'qtmixed,' which resides on a single REM volume filer. The default volume name is vol0. REM REM Delete the snapshot created by the previous run of this process rsh filer5 -l root snap delete vol0 openfiles REM REM Turn off oplocks, telling clients to release the file rsh filer5 -l root qtree oplocks qtmixed disable REM REM Create a snapshot directory called openfiles rsh filer5 -l root snap create vol0 openfiles REM REM Re-enable oplocks rsh filer5 -l root qtree oplocks qtmixed enable REM REM Map a drive letter to the filer's root share net use f: \\filer5\c$ REM REM Run the backup command - in this example NTBackup. REM Notice that '~snapshot' is used instead of '.snapshot' start /normal /b ntbackup backup f:\dir\~snapshot\ /hc:on /t normal REM End of file The above batch file (less the last few lines, launching a backup command) could also be used as a pre-job process with almost any Windows NT backup package. -----Original Message----- From: Mark Muhlestein [mailto:mmm@netapp.com] Sent: Monday, March 01, 1999 10:56 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: nightly.1 busy: snapshot rollovers not happening The best way to do this is to create a special snapshot specifically for the backup, then delete it when the backup completes. This avoids the problem of the snapshot being changed out from under you. And this can all be automated with scripts. See Paul Benn's message for a pointer to a description of how to do this. Mark Muhlestein -- mmm(a)netapp.com -----Original Message----- From: Patrick.Day.B(a)bayer.com <Patrick.Day.B(a)bayer.com> To: - (052)toasters(a)mathworks.com <toasters(a)mathworks.com>; - (052)tmerrill(a)mathworks.com <tmerrill(a)mathworks.com> Date: Monday, March 01, 1999 10:48 AM Subject: Re: nightly.1 busy: snapshot rollovers not happening >I ran across this same problem when i shared the Nightly.0 for backup >purposes. When the nightly.0 rolls over to the Nightly.1, the CIFS share keeps >track and actually keeps the share mapped to nightly.1. (same thing next night >when it rolls over to nightly.3). I posted the problem a few weeks ago and the >only "solution" anyone could come up with was running an rsh command to stop >and recreate the share every time the backup runs. I opted to forget the >snapshot directory backup and go with a live backup of the C$\ share.

3 3

Cifs permissions ???
by Jason Middlebrooks 13 Apr '99

13 Apr '99

The following is happening. Any ideas of what to do? 1. I have created a folder called test. 2. Within server manager I create a share for test. 3. Withing user manager I create a user called dude, a global group called dudes_global with several users, and a local group called dudes_local with several users. First I give one person (dude) permission to access test and everything works fine. (Dude can access test and nobody else can) Second I remove dude from the permissions list, add a global group (dudes_global) to have permission to access test and everything works fine. (Only the people in dudes_global can access test nobody else can) Third I remove dudes_global from the permissions list, add a local group (dudes_local) to have permission to access test and then it happens. (Nobody can access test and I mean nobody. I keep on getting not accessible / access is denied) Anything wrong with using local groups?? Is there any setting that needs to be changed in NT or on the Filer??? F720 DataOnTap 5.3 and all the other stuff... Jason Middlebrooks Systems Engineer Datalink Corp. jason_middlebrooks(a)datalink.com

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters