toasters June 2006

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

159 participants
197 discussions

BANNED message from you (multipart/mixed | application/octet-stream,.zip,readme.zip | .exe,.exe-ms,readme.htm ... .exe)
by Content-filter at sascan1.umary.edu 15 Jun '06

15 Jun '06

BANNED CONTENTS ALERT Our content checker found banned name: multipart/mixed | application/octet-stream,.zip,readme.zip | .exe,.exe-ms,readme.htm ... .exe in email presumably from you <toasters(a)mathworks.com> to the following recipient: -> areich(a)umary.edu Our internal reference code for your message is 10990-08/n+c6E6HcjSQY First upstream SMTP client IP address: [59.177.20.173] According to a 'Received:' trace, the message originated at: [59.177.20.173], mathworks.com (unknown [59.177.20.173]) Return-Path: <toasters(a)mathworks.com> Subject: Hi Delivery of the email was stopped! The message has been blocked because it contains a component (as a MIME part or nested within) with declared name or MIME type or contents type violating our access policy. To transfer contents that may be considered risky or unwanted by site policies, or simply too large for mailing, please consider publishing your content on the web, and only sending an URL of the document to the recipient. Depending on the recipient and sender site policies, with a little effort it might still be possible to send any contents (including viruses) using one of the following methods: - encrypted using pgp, gpg or other encryption methods; - wrapped in a password-protected or scrambled container or archive (e.g.: zip -e, arj -g, arc g, rar -p, or other methods) Note that if the contents is not intended to be secret, the encryption key or password may be included in the same message for recipient's convenience. We are sorry for inconvenience if the contents was not malicious. The purpose of these restrictions is to cut the most common propagation methods used by viruses and other malware. These often exploit automatic mechanisms and security holes in more popular mail readers (Microsoft mail readers and browsers are a common target). By requiring an explicit and decisive action from the recipient to decode mail, the danger of automatic malware propagation is largely reduced.

1 0

RE: NetApp Simulator Limitations
by Rousseau, Deborah 15 Jun '06

15 Jun '06

Yes, real NetApp supports Fibre Channel; the simulator can be downloaded from http://now.netapp.com and installed on a Linux server. Deborah Rousseau Network Appliance -----Original Message----- From: Charles Sprickman [mailto:spork@bway.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 2:18 PM To: Adrian Ulrich Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: NetApp Simulator Limitations On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Adrian Ulrich wrote: >> Most importantly from a testing perspective, the simulator does not >> yet support Fibre Channel. > ^^^^^^^ > Does NetApp work on this feature? :-) Where does one get this simulator you speak of?

2 1

moving a flex vol to a new aggr ?
by Greg Wilson 15 Jun '06

15 Jun '06

hey all i need to move a flex vol from one aggregate to another aggregate on the same filer is there a really simple command like vol move <volname> aggr1 aggr2 if not what would be the easiest way to move the flex vol to a new aggregate? vol copy ? thanks gw -- Greg Wilson Senior System Administrator greg.wilson(a)aapt.com.au

1 0

RE: NetApp Simulator Limitations
by Yoder, Alan 14 Jun '06

14 Jun '06

Most importantly from a testing perspective, the simulator does not yet support Fibre Channel. Alan =============================================================== Alan G. Yoder agy#netapp.com Senior Technical Staff =============================================================== > -----Original Message----- > From: Jennifer Davis [mailto:sigje@sigje.org] > Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 9:12 AM > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: RE: NetApp Simulator Limitations > > > One of the limitations is the file size which is 1000M, and > you can make > only a certain number of those disks which limits the size of > your volume. > > > Does anyone know what limitations the NetApp simulator has? > I know it > > looks and feels like a real filer, but there has to be some > limitation, > > right? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > James > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > !DSPAM:449027d9114351114720969! > > >

3 2

RE: NetApp Simulator Limitations
by Archbold, Richard 14 Jun '06

14 Jun '06

AFAIK, there is a limitation of about 100 Megs on the volume size that can be created ... Rich. ________________________________ From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Johnson, James A Sent: 14 June 2006 15:02 To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: NetApp Simulator Limitations Does anyone know what limitations the NetApp simulator has? I know it looks and feels like a real filer, but there has to be some limitation, right? Thanks, James

2 1

RE: NetApp Simulator Limitations
by Sels Roger 14 Jun '06

14 Jun '06

I though the only limitation for the simulator is the storage size, which is limited to 20GB. Regards, Roger ________________________________ From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Johnson, James A Sent: wo 14 jun 06 16:02 To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: NetApp Simulator Limitations Does anyone know what limitations the NetApp simulator has? I know it looks and feels like a real filer, but there has to be some limitation, right? Thanks, James

1 0

RE: NetApp Simulator Limitations
by Rousseau, Deborah 14 Jun '06

14 Jun '06

Hi James, I've worked with simulators. A simulator is an excellent tool to see how the features of ONTAP work, however, there is no hardware substructure to provide performance and to secure data. The sims aren't really stripping across disks; the disks are really directories, so there isn't really RAID4 or RAID-DP or RAID Scrub protection... Performance is bound by the limitations of the sim's host RAM and CPU and the host's OS and other applications possibly running on the host. Sims also lack the real filer's NVRAM. But the sim can give you a really good idea of how the filer will work. Deborah Rousseau Network Appliance ________________________________ From: Johnson, James A [mailto:James_A_Johnson@homedepot.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 7:02 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: NetApp Simulator Limitations Does anyone know what limitations the NetApp simulator has? I know it looks and feels like a real filer, but there has to be some limitation, right? Thanks, James

1 0

NetApp Simulator Limitations
by Johnson, James A 14 Jun '06

14 Jun '06

Does anyone know what limitations the NetApp simulator has? I know it looks and feels like a real filer, but there has to be some limitation, right? Thanks, James

2 1

VIRUS (Win32/MyDoom.O!Worm): IN UNA E-MAIL DA LEI INVIATA
by Content-filter at bootes.trampi.mpi.it 14 Jun '06

14 Jun '06

VIRUS ALERT Il sistema di scansione ha rilevato un problema in una email presumibilmente inviate da Lei -> (<toasters(a)mathworks.com>), per il seguente destinatario: -> nicoletta.buttitta(a)istruzione.it La consegna del messaggio non e' potuta avvenire Di seguito i riferimenti della e-Mail inviata: ------------------------- BEGIN HEADERS ----------------------------- Return-Path: <toasters(a)mathworks.com> Received: from mathworks.com (host193-171-static.19-80-b.business.telecomitalia.it [80.19.171.193]) by mx3.istruzione.it (Mail Service) with ESMTP id 907A11E8BA2 for <nicoletta.buttitta(a)istruzione.it>; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 16:46:58 +0200 (CEST) From: toasters(a)mathworks.com To: nicoletta.buttitta(a)istruzione.it Subject: Delivery failed Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 16:46:58 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_49BE21DD.27DC6348" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-Id: <20060614144658.907A11E8BA2(a)mx3.istruzione.it> -------------------------- END HEADERS ------------------------------

1 0

I: L.D.L
by p_greenlotto＠virgilio.it 14 Jun '06

14 Jun '06

1 0

← Newer
1
...
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
...
20
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters June 2006