toasters June 2004

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

76 participants
86 discussions

Undeliverable mail
by Postmaster＠ns4.syntegra.com 23 Jun '04

23 Jun '04

Your message was not delivered to the following recipients: andy.bradbury(a)syntegra.bt.co.uk: This server does not accept this attachment: 'Manufacture.com'.

1 0

Undeliverable Mail
by Postmaster 21 Jun '04

21 Jun '04

User mailbox exceeds allowed message count: Montag2(a)immotoday.de Original message follows. Received: from yjnhxuv.com [217.228.70.182] by mx.kpsnet.net (SMTPD32-8.12) id A59E70BC0148; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 13:25:18 +0200 From: toasters(a)mathworks.com To: t.richter(a)vermietung-online.de Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:15:47 GMT MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: MULTI-KULTI-BANDE TYRANNISIERTE MITSCHUELER :Id:1364: Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <b7d8f06d26ce84.c353c.qmail(a)mathworks.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" 23.10.2002 B�ckeburg: Schlaegereien unter Schuelern moegen alltaeglich sein, doch was sich an einer Haupt- und Realschule in Stadthagen ereignete, kann grenzt schon an Terror. Eine auslaendische Jugendbande haben ueber Monate hinweg Mitschueler schikaniert und brutal verpruegelt. Weil viele Schueler und deren Familien aus Angst vor Vergeltung keine Angaben ueber die Taeter machten, wurden die Ermittlungen erschwert. Mittlerweile hat die Staatsanwaltschaft Bueckeburg gegen 36 Jugendliche Anklage wegen Noetigung und schwerer Koerperverletzung erhoben. Ob die Anklage auf Lehrer ausgedehnt werden muss, wird von der Staatsanwaltschaft noch geprueft. Eine Verhoehnung der jungen Opfer dieser kriminellen Auslaenderbande ist die Einstellung des niedersaechsischen Justizministers Christian Pfeiffer von der SPD, der nicht die Jungkriminellen sondern die Kommune fuer die Situation Stadthagen verantwortlich macht. Die Ursache ist seiner Ansicht nach nicht generell auf eine kriminelle Neigung sondern hauptsaechlich darauf zurueck zu fuehren, dass zu wenig fuer eine Eingliederung tuerkischer Kinder in Kindergaerten und hoehere Schulen getan wuerde. Die daraus resultierende Frustration foerdere die Gewaltbereitschaft.

1 0

CONGRATULATIONS
by globalmarketingbv 19 Jun '04

19 Jun '04

GLOBAL MARKETING COMPANY B.V H Cleyndertweg 45 1025 DG Amsterdam Nederland Tel: +31618925092 FAX +31204219106 Globa_mark(a)yahoo.co.uk 19TH June 2004 The desk of managing director prize award department Ref.№:EG/ 1562849736542/00 Bach:430/1402/DRS. ATTENTION. RE-AWARD NOTIFICATION FINAL NOTICE This is to inform you on the release of the long awaited of the GLOBAL international award program held on the 31st of January 2004. In the first letter we had already informed you about your re-award but still we have not had any respons of you. Yet, it would be a terrible waste to let this re-award of $1´287´901´33c ( One Milion two hundred and, eighty-seven thousand nine hundred and one Dollars thirty-three cents) slip throw your fingers. There isn`t a lot of time left, because we have a deadline! CONGRATULATIONS!!!!!!!! Due to the mixed up of numbers and addresses, I would ask that you keep this award top secret from public notice until your claim has been confirmed and, prize remitted as is part of our security protocol to avoid double claiming or unwarranted taking advantage of the situation by participants. Please be adviced that your funds have been deposited with a security company insured to your name due to failed efforts to communicate with you. The deadline for this final notice is the 29th of July 2004, by which funds will be returned to the Lottery Coporation as unclaimed!! To begin your claim, please contact Mr BENJAMIN HUMPHREYS, MANAGER OF BEVELLING SECURITY COMPANY on TEL: +31630847117,on this email address,bevellingsec(a)netscape.net for processing and remittance of funds to a designated account of your choice. Congratulations again from all members of staff and we look forward to seeing your name in an even greater profit in the future. SINCERELY, FRANK VAN DER VLIET Managing dir

1 0

Aviation
by freeman_7 17 Jun '04

17 Jun '04

1 0

RE: offline folder support?
by Michael Schipp 17 Jun '04

17 Jun '04

Yep! As far as your Windows 2000 Prof/XP machines think it is just another Windows box - we use it here with users syncing there home folders. Thank you, Michael A Schipp M.I.S Network Administrator ASI SOLUTIONS 8 Lord Street Botany NSW 2019 Phone: 02 9384 8000 Direct: 02 9384 8095 Email: mschipp(a)asi.com.au Web: http://www.asi.com.au <http://www.asi.com.au/> ________________________________ From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Brubaker, Paul Sent: Wednesday, 16 June 2004 1:12 AM To: list toasters Subject: offline folder support? Does anyone know if the Netapp / Ontap support offline folders (caching)... this is a microsoft windows 2000 and above feature (CIFS). We are running a FAS960 with Ontap 6.4.2 (soon to be Ontap 6.5.1). It appears not to be a supported feature; any plans Netapp will support it in the future? thanks! Paul Brubaker, Jr. RIDS - Intel System Support AT&T Wireless Services * office phone: 717-526-5011 * cell phone: 717-578-2254 * e-mail: paul.brubaker(a)attws.com

1 0

Turning off Logging output
by Robert Borowicz 16 Jun '04

16 Jun '04

Is there a way to temporarily turn off the logging output in a Telnet session? Too often I'm typing tedious commands and "BLAM" someone connects to a CIFS session and.... TIA -Rob {looking through the docs...}

2 1

PLEASE ADD ME TO YOUR MAILING LIST!!
by harbhajan julka 16 Jun '04

16 Jun '04

__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

1 0

SOLUTION: RE: Enlarge a volume owned by a vfiler
by toaster＠chopel.de 16 Jun '04

16 Jun '04

Hi, here is the solution for my problem: Normally it is like Adam Fox and his colleague wrote. Just adding the disks to both sites and make a 'snapmirror update' on the destination. Finish! But, first look on the "primary" Volume if the option fs_size_fixed is set to "on" before adding the disks. I don't know why this options was set to "on", maybe once we tested to rotate the mirror. But turning the option off resolve our problem. Thanks to all, Michael Thorsten.Lemke(a)computacenter.com wrote : > As I understand you have two volumes called "Volume1" that are both in > snapmirrored state? One is a normal snapmirror and the other one is a DR > backup of the vfiler? > In this case you have to do the enlargement also on the original (third) > source volume which is not in snapmirrored state and therefore does not > have the fs_size_fixed set to "on". The size of the filesystem of > snapmirrored volumes will adapt to the source volume after the next > scheduled update as Adam pointed out earlier (of course you have to add the > same amount of space to each of them first). > > Regards, > Thorsten > > > > > > toaster(a)chopel.de>@mathworks.com > on 16.06.2004 11:22:11 > > Please respond to toaster(a)chopel.de> > > Sent by: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com > > > To: "Fox, Adam" Adam.Fox(a)netapp.com>, > "Uehara; Tsuneyuki (Gen)" > tsuneyuki.uehara(a)gs.com>, > toasters(a)mathworks.com> > cc: > Subject: RE: Enlarge a volume owned by a vfiler > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Hallo, > > maybe my initial situation was not clear: > > On the "main site" I spent VfilerA a new disk. > Volume1 before "vol add" : 201 GB > Volume1 after "vol add" : also 201 GB > > vol status -b Volume1: > Vol Size (blocks) FS Size (blocks) > ----------------- ---------------- > 76996480 61597184 > > The filer notified that "..the disk was successfully added to volume > Volume1" > IMHO this results because Volume1 is in "snapmirrored-state" > an the option "fs_size_fixed" is set "on". > > On the "desaster site" I spent VfilerA' (vfiler dr) also > a new disk for volume Volume1. Same results. > > I think I must break the mirror but is this possible > without side effects on VfilerA because he is in "vfiler dr" > > Thanks a lot > > Michael > > Fox, Adam Adam.Fox(a)netapp.com> > schrieb : > > > You don't need to do this. It looks like you are doing Volume > > SnapMirror. All you have to do is add the disks to both volumes. > > You won't see the change on the destination until the next update, > > then the destination will become the size of the source. > > > > -- Adam Fox > > GS Tools Developer > > adamfox(a)netapp.com > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Uehara, Tsuneyuki (Gen) [mailto:tsuneyuki.uehara@gs.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 7:23 AM > > To: 'toaster(a)chopel.de'; > > toasters(a)mathworks.com > > Subject: RE: Enlarge a volume owned by a vfiler > > > > > > We perform "snapmirror quiesce" then "snapmirror break" then turn off > > "fs_size_fixed". > > > > # Gen Uehara > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com > > [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] > > On > > Behalf Of toaster(a)chopel.de > > Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 10:12 PM > > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > > Subject: Enlarge a volume owned by a vfiler > > > > Hi, > > > > I have a problem to enlarge a volume owned by a "dr"-vfiler. > > > > Vfiler1 Vfiler1 (dr backup) > > |--> vol1 |-->vol1 > > > > It was possible to add a disk to vol1 on both sites. But I can't disable > the > > volume option "fixed fs_size", because vol1 is in "snapmirrored-state". > > > > How can I enlarge the volume without deleting the dr-filer? > > > > Thanks for help, > > > > Michael > > > > > > > > > > > > COMPUTACENTER (UK) LTD > > The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. > It contains information which may be confidential and which may also be > privileged. > Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive > for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone > else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and then > destroy it. > > Computacenter information is available from http://www.computacenter.com > > This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the > presence of computer viruses. > > ***************************************************************************************************************************

1 0

NOTICE
by fromrodosky 16 Jun '04

16 Jun '04

J. RODOSKY AMKA. GREETINGS I AM CONTACTING YOU UNBEHALF OF MR.KHODORKOVSKY, FORMER BOSS OF YUKOS OIL, WHO IS PRESENTLY IN DETENTION FOR TAX EVASION AND FRAUD WHICH HAVE BEEN POLITICALLY MOTIVATED BY PRESIDENT PUTIN OF RUSSIA. JUST RECENTLY, THE TAX MINISTRY HAS WON A KEY COURT DECISION, REQUIRING YUKOS TO PAY AN EQUIVALENT OF $3.5 BN. IN BACK TAXES AND FINE TO THE GOVERNMENT. THIS IS A BATTLE MANY, BELIEVED TO BE BETWEEN THE WEALTHIEST VERSUS THE MOST POWERFUL IN RUSSIA.ALTHOUGH MR. KHODORKOVSKY HAS PERSONAL FORTUNE ESTIMATED AT $1.5BN,BUT CANNOT NOT AFFORD TO PRODUCE THAT SUM WITHOUT FILELING FOR BANKRUPCY OF YUKOS OIL AND OTHER PRIVATE INVESTMENT. HOWEVER, I AM CONTACTING YOU FOR A FAVOUR BASE ON ABSOLUTE CONFIDENCE AND SECRECY TO ASSIST US, BY ACTING AS A PARTNER TO RECEIVE AND ASSIST IN THE INVESTMENT OF A CERTAIN AMOUNT RUNNING INTO MILLIONS OF AMERICAN DOLLARS ON OUR BEHALF. THIS SUM ARISES AS THE ONLY PRIVATE UNOFFICIAL ACCOUNT OWNED BY HIM ,WHICH WAS NOT FROZEN, BECAUSE IT WAS NOT TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE AUTHORITY, AND SECONDLY THE TRANSACTION WAS NOT MADE WITH HIS NAME .IT IS THE ONLY HOPE OF SUSTAINING THE FAMILY, AFTER HE MUST HAVE BEEN RELEASED FROM PRISON. SINCE FILELING FOR BANKRUPCY REMAINS THE ONLY OPTION FOR HIM TO AVOID TEN YEARS JAIL TERMS, ACCORDING TO THE LAWYER. ON RECEIPT OF THIS MAIL,KINDLY SEND YOUR INTREST, TO THIS EMAIL ADDRESS, SO THAT WE CAN START NEGOTIATION, IT WILL ALSO BE BETTER IF YOU CAN FORWARD YOUR PHONE AND FAX NUMBER FOR BETTER AND QUICK COMMUNICATION. I WILL BRIEF YOU WITH MORE DETAILS IN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF YOUR RESPONSE. YOURS SINCERELY, MR. J. RODOSKY AMKA.

1 0

Usable space on a R200/SAN
by Eric sarraf 16 Jun '04

16 Jun '04

Hi, I am considering a R200 - 16TB for a SAN environment. We would like to get 12TB usable without going to the next config which is 24TB. I calculated the usable space as follows: 2 disks for default volume 1 parity disk 3 volumes with 14 drives (12 data, 2 parity) 1 volume with 11 drives (9 data, 2 parity) This gives me a total of 45 data disks. Knowing that each 320GB disk is formatted to 274GB, and considering the 10% WAFL, I get 11.1TB usable 274 * 45 * .9 = 11.1 1. Can I create larger RAID sizes by changing the RAIDsize option on R200 from 14 to 18? 2. Is it possible to change the single parity raidsize from 7 to 13? 3. According to block admin guide, with NO snapshots, volume has to be 10% larger than the total LUN size. It this is a must? I am able to create LUNs that are the same size as the volume. 4. Is it possible to combine default def. volume with other data volumes? Thanks,

1 0

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Older →

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters June 2004